Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Justified Group Recommender Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering

Abstract

Justification improves the reliability of a recommender system because it helps user/s understand the reasoning behind the recommendation. Nearest neighbor style and influence style are the common justification styles in a recommender system. Since both styles are constructed exclusively in light of user preferences on the item rather than content of an item, the recommendation cannot be adequately justified. Moreover, these justification styles are applicable for personal recommender systems rather than group recommender systems. In this paper, we introduce a novel justification style for group recommender systems having the structure “item x is recommended because those who watch y , z,...that contain features {\(g_i,~ g_j\), ...} also watch x that contains {\(g_k,~ g_l\), ...}”. Our justification style is based on precedence mining model, wherein the precedence probability of using an item by an active user is determined based on pairwise precedence relations between the items. We broaden this idea of precedence probability to accommodate the social influence factor. No past investigation deals with justified group recommender systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An item is said to be a group item if at least one user in the group consumes that item.

  2. 2.

    https://www.amazon.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.flipkart.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/.

References

  1. Amer-Yahia, S., Roy, S.B., Chawla, A., Das, G., Yu, C.: Group recommendation: semantics and efficiency. PVLDB 2(1), 754–765 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baltrunas, L., Makcinskas, T., Ricci, F.: Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 119–126 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bilgic, M.: Explaining recommendations: satisfaction versus promotion. In: Proceedings of Beyond Personalization, the Workshop on the Next Stage of Recommender Systems Research, pp. 13–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., Rueda-Morales, M.A.: Managing uncertainty in group recommending processes. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19(3), 207–242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jameson, A., Smyth, B.: Recommendation to groups. In: The Adaptive Web, pp. 596–627 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kagita, V.R., Meka, K.C., Padmanabhan, V.: A novel social-choice strategy for group modeling in recommender systems. In: 2015 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), pp. 153–158. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kagita, V.R., Padmanabhan, V., Pujari, A.K.: Precedence mining in group recommender systems. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, pp. 701–707. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kagita, V.R., Pujari, A.K., Padmanabhan, V.: Group recommender systems: a virtual user approach based on precedence mining. In: Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 434–440. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kagita, V.R., Pujari, A.K., Padmanabhan, V.: Virtual user approach for group recommender systems using precedence relations. Inf. Sci. 294, 15–30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mobasher, B., Burke, R.D., Bhaumik, R., Sandvig, J.J.: Attacks and remedies in collaborative recommendation. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(3), 56–63 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parameswaran, A.G., Koutrika, G., Bercovitz, B., Molina, H.G.: Recsplorer: recommendation algorithms based on precedence mining. In: SIGMOD, pp. 87–98 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shin, C., Woo, W.: Socially aware tv program recommender for multiple viewers. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 55(2), 927–932 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Symeonidis, P., Nanopoulos, A., Manolopoulos, Y.: Providing justifications in recommender systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 38(6), 1–1272 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Hao, Y., Gu, J.: Tv program recommendation for multiple viewers based on user profile merging. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16(1), 6382 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkateswara Rao Kagita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kagita, V.R., Pujari, A.K., Padmanabhan, V. (2018). Justified Group Recommender Systems. In: Saeed, K., Chaki, N., Pati, B., Bakshi, S., Mohapatra, D. (eds) Progress in Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 564. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6875-1_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6875-1_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6874-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6875-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics