User Involvement in Collaborative Decision-Making Dialog Systems

1. Wendemuth, A., Biundo, S.: A companion technology for cognitive technical systems. In: Anna Esposito, Alessandro Vinciarelli, R.H.V.C.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the EUCogII-SSPNET-COST2102 International Conference, pp. 89-103 (2011). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2012)

   Google Scholar 

2. Sohrabi, S., Baier, J., McIlraith, S.A.: HTN planning with preferences. In: Proceedings of the 21st Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009). pp. 1790-1797. AAAI Press (2009)

   Google Scholar 

3. Nothdurft, F., Behnke, G., Bercher, P., Biundo, S., Minker, W.: The interplay of user-centered dialog systems and ai planning. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL). pp. 344-353. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic (September 2015)

   Google Scholar 

4. Myers, K.L., Tyson, W.M., Wolverton, M.J., Jarvis, P.A., Lee, T.J., desJardins, M.: PASSAT: a user-centric planning framework. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International NASA Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space, pp. 1-10 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

5. Ai-Chang, M., Bresina, J., Charest, L., Chase, A., Hsu, J.J., Jonsson, A., Kanefsky, B., Morris, P., Rajan, K., Yglesias, J., et al.: Mapgen: mixed-initiative planning and scheduling for the mars exploration rover mission. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19(1), 8–12 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Fernández-Olivares, J., Castillo, L.A., García-Pérez, Ó., Palao, F.: Bringing users and planning technology together. Experiences in SIADEX. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2006). pp. 11-20. AAAI Press (2006)

   Google Scholar 

7. Tecuci, G., Boicu, M., Cox, M.T.: Seven aspects of mixed-initiative reasoning: an introduction to this special issue on mixed-initiative assistants. AI Mag. 28(2), 11 (2007)

   Google Scholar 

8. Behnke, G., Ponomaryov, D., Schiller, M., Bercher, P., Nothdurft, F., Glimm, B., Biundo, S.: Coherence across components in cognitive systems–one ontology to rule them all. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015). AAAI Press (2015)

   Google Scholar 

9. W3C OWL Working Group: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview (2009). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

10. Honold, F., Schüssel, F., Weber, M.: Adaptive probabilistic fission for multimodal systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, pp. 222-231. OzCHI’12, ACM, New York, NY, USA (November, 26-30 2012)

    Google Scholar 

11. Honold, F., Schussel, F., Weber, M., Nothdurft, F., Bertrand, G., Minker, W.: Context models for adaptive dialogs and multimodal interaction. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE 2013), pp. 57-64. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

12. Glodek, M., Honold, F., Geier, T., Krell, G., Nothdurft, F., Reuter, S., Schüssel, F., Hoernle, T., Dietmayer, K., Minker, W., Biundo, S., Weber, M., Palm, G., Schwenker, F.: Fusion paradigms in cognitive technical systems for Human-Computer interaction. Neurocomputing 161, 17–37 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Schüssel, F., Honold, F., Weber, M.: Using the transferable belief model for multimodal input fusion in companion systems. In: Multimodal Pattern Recognition of Social Signals in HCI, LNCS, vol. 7742, pp. 100-115. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

14. Allen, J.F., Schubert, L.K., Ferguson, G., Heeman, P., Hwang, C.H., Kato, T., Light, M., Martin, N., Miller, B., Poesio, M., et al.: The trains project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 7(1), 7–48 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Ferguson, G., Allen, J.F., et al.: Trips: An integrated intelligent problem-solving assistant. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/IAAI, pp. 567–572 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

16. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. KR 91, 473–484 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L.: Collagen: a collaboration manager for software interface agents. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 8(3–4), 315–350 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artif. Intell. 86(2), 269–357 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

19. Myers, K.L., Jarvis, P.A., Tyson, W.M., Wolverton, M.J.: A mixed-initiative framework for robust plan sketching. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2003). pp. 256-266. AAAI Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. de la Asunción, M., Castillo, L., Fdez-Olivares, J., García-Pérez, Ó., González, A., Palao, F.: Siadex: an interactive knowledge-based planner for decision support in forest fire fighting. AI Commun. 18(4), 257 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

21. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L.: Diamondhelp: a generic collaborative task guidance system. AI Mag. 28(2), 33 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

22. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: Attrakdiff: Ein fragebogen zur messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer qualitt. In: Szwillus, G., Ziegler, J. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, pp. 187–196. B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

23. Kirschner, P.A.: Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn. Instr. 12(1), 1–10 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J.: Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: a cognitive-load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 86(1), 122 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. M. Klepsch, F.W., Seufert, T.: Differentiated Measurement of Cognitive Load: Possible or Not? (2015), in preparation

    Google Scholar 

Download references