Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Design for Remanufacturing and Circular Business Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

Remanufacturing has significant market potential, and the purported benefits of remanufacturing are compelling. Remanufacturing offers a means to retain control of products and materials throughout the product life cycle, and, therefore, through remanufacturing, businesses can insulate against material price shocks and future material scarcity issues. Remanufacturing has therefore been identified as a ‘sleeping giant’ whose potential, once tapped, can fast track companies to increased profits, while, in parallel, realising circular practices within industrial systems. However, it is widely accepted that the majority of products that are currently remanufactured have not been designed for remanufacturing and business models to support remanufacturing are complex. In light of these combined issues, this paper presents the story of a business in transition. The core aim of this paper is to build understanding of design for remanufacturing and remanufacturing-oriented business models. The paper reports on the linkages between design and business model strategies by presenting a case of a business-led pilot study conducted to explore the commercial viability of remanufacturing. The results show how life cycle considerations and a combination of design and business strategies can accelerate transition to resource-efficient business models. The paper illuminates the topic of remanufacturing by showcasing a dynamic real-world business case, from which other companies can learn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guitini R, Gaudette K (2003) Bus Horiz 46(960):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. All-Party Sustainable Resource Group (2014) Triple win: the economic, social and environmental case for remanufacturing. Policy Connect

    Google Scholar 

  3. UNEP (2013) Metal recycling: opportunities, limits, infrastructure. A Report of the Working Group on the Global Metal Flows to the International Resource Panel (Reuter MA, Hudson C, van Schaik A, Heiskanen K, Meskers C, Hagelüken C (eds)). UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hatcher G, Ijomah W, Windmill J (2011) Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2004–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’ Rafferty S, O’ Connor F (2010) Regional perspectives on capacity building for ecodesign. In: Facilitating sustainable innovation through collaboration. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 159–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Prendeville S et al (2013) Motivations and barriers to ecodesign in industry. (ENEC) Available at: http://www.ecodesign-centres.org/projects.htm

  7. Bocken N, Holgado M, Evans S (2015) Challenges and opportunities in circular business model innovation for clothing from a retailer perspective. ISIE conference, 7–10 July 2015, Surrey, UK

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nasr N, Thurston M (2006) Remanufacturing: a key enabler to sustainable product systems. Rochester Institute of Technology, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yang SS, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2015) Towards implementation of DfRem into the product development process. Procedia CIRP 26:565–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sundin E, Östlin J, Rönnbäck AÖ, Lindahl M, Sandström GÖ (2008) Remanufacturing of products used in product service system offerings. In: Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier. Springer, London, pp 537–542

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa F, Prendeville S, Beverley K, Teso G, Brooker C (2015) Sustainable product-service systems for an office furniture manufacturer: how insights from a pilot study can inform PSS design. Procedia CIRP 30:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakao T, Mizuyama H (2014) Understanding of a product/service system design: a holistic approach to support design for remanufacturing. J Remanufacturing 4(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pigosso DC, Zanette ET, Guelere Filho A, Ometto AR, Rozenfeld H (2010) Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 18(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray C, Charter M (2008) Remanufacturing and product design. Int J Prod Dev 6(3–4):375–392

    Google Scholar 

  15. Willems B, Dewulf W, Duflou JR (2008) A method to assess the lifetime prolongation capabilities of products. Int J Sustain Manuf 1(1–2):122–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hammond R, Amezquita T, Bras B (1998) Issues in the automotive parts remanufacturing industry: a discussion of results from surveys performed among remanufacturers. Eng Des Autom 4:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fiksel J (1996) Design for environment: creating eco-efficient products and processes. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JF (2013) Design for remanufacturing in China: a case study of electrical and electronic equipment. J Remanufacturing 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fakhredin F, Bakker CA, Geraedts JMP Designer focused quickscan recyclability assessment method. In: Proceedings of CARE innovation “Going Green” conference, Vienna, 17–20 November 2014. Austrian Society for Systems Engineering and Automation

    Google Scholar 

  20. Magretta J (2002) Why business models matter. Harv Bus Rev 80(5):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Short S, Bocken N, Barlow C, Chertow M (2014) From refining sugar to growing tomatoes. J Ind Ecol 18(5):p603–p618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bocken NMP, Bakker C, De Pauw I (2015) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, Sustainable design & manufacturing conference, Seville, 12–14 April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bocken N, Short S, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod 65:42–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bocken NMP, Rana P, Short SW (2015) Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. J Ind Prod Eng 32(1):p67–p81

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bakker C, van Hollander M, van Hinte E, Zijlstra Y (2014) Products that last: product design for circular business models. TU Delft Library, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bakker C, Ingenegeren R, Devoldere T, Tempelman E, Huisman J, Peck D (2012) Rethinking eco-design priorities; the case of the Econova television. In: Electronics goes green 2012+(EGG), 2012. IEEE 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gutowski T, Sahni S, Boustani A, Graves S (2011) Remanufacturing and energy savings. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4540–4547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prendeville S, O’Connor F, Palmer L (2014) Material selection for eco-innovation: SPICE model. J Cleaner Prod (Special Issue on Lean and Green Manufacturing) 85:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brennan G, Tennant M, Blomsma F (2015) Business and production solutions 10: sustainability, key issues. Earthscan Routledge, New York, p 219

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prendeville S, O’Connor F, Sherry J, Palmer L (2013) Ecodesign trade-offs in new product development. In: LCA Avnir conference. Lille

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mont O, Dalhammar C, Jacobsson N (2006) A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 14(17):1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Prendeville .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Acknowledgments This research is supported by the European Union’s H2020 programme through the European Remanufacturing Network (ERN).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prendeville, S., Bocken, N. (2017). Design for Remanufacturing and Circular Business Models. In: Matsumoto, M., Masui, K., Fukushige, S., Kondoh, S. (eds) Sustainability Through Innovation in Product Life Cycle Design. EcoProduction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0471-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics