Abstract
Since protein interactions are at the basis of all cellular processes, knowing the interaction network around a protein of interest provides a lot of information on its functioning. It also allows inferring the function of hypothetical proteins, based on those of their interactors. On a larger scale, knowing the whole interactome of a given organism allows studying its biology from a systemic perspective, a tactic which is increasingly more used, for example, to approach diseases. Together with the time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone experimental methods for determining protein interactions, there are a number of computational approaches that are now often used as a complement for the first. They can, for example, target proteins difficult for the experimental techniques or simply provide additional evidences of interaction. These methodologies are mature enough, both in terms of accuracy and easiness of usage to be incorporated into the standard toolboxes of molecular biologists.
The protocols below describe in detail the practical usage of two web-based tools for predicting protein interactions from raw sequence information. These tools provide predictions based on different approaches, whose eventual agreement provides additional support for the predictions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR (2007) Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLoS Comput Biol 3(3), e42
Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41–42
Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5(2):101–113
Zanzoni A, Soler-Lopez M, Aloy P (2009) A network medicine approach to human disease. FEBS Lett 583(11):1759–1765
Cho DY, Kim YA, Przytycka TM (2012) Network biology approach to complex diseases. PLoS Comp Biol 8(12), e1002820
Harrington ED, Jensen LJ, Bork P (2008) Predicting biological networks from genomic data. FEBS Lett 582(8):1251–1258
Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR (2007) Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part II. Computational methods to predict protein and domain interaction partners. PLoS Comput Biol 3(4), e43
Petrey D, Honig B (2014) Structural Bioinformatics of the Interactome. Annu Rev Biophys 43:193–210
von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P (2002) Comparative assessment of large scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417:399–403
Lee I, Date SV, Adai AT, Marcotte EM (2004) A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science 306(5701):1555–1558
Havugimana PC, Hart GT, Nepusz T, Yang H, Turinsky AL, Li Z, Wang PI, Boutz DR, Fong V, Phanse S, Babu M, Craig SA, Hu P, Wan C, Vlasblom J, Dar VU, Bezginov A, Clark GW, Wu GC, Wodak SJ, Tillier ER, Paccanaro A, Marcotte EM, Emili A (2012) A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 150(5):1068–1081
Tabach Y, Golan T, Hernandez-Hernandez A, Messer AR, Fukuda T, Kouznetsova A, Liu JG, Lilienthal I, Levy C, Ruvkun G (2013) Human disease locus discovery and mapping to molecular pathways through phylogenetic profiling. Mol Syst Biol 9:692
Enright AJ, Iliopoulos I, Kyrpides NC, Ouzounis CA (1999) Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402:86–90
Dandekar T, Snel B, Huynen M, Bork P (1998) Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem Sci 23:324–328
Pazos F, Valencia A (2008) Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. EMBO J 27(20):2648–2655
Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A (2013) Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nat Rev Genet 14(4):249–261
Pellegrini M, Marcotte EM, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D, Yeates TO (1999) Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4285–4288
Date SV, Marcotte EM (2003) Discovery of uncharacterized cellular systems by genome-wide analysis of functional linkages. Nat Biotechnol 21(9):1055–1062
Pazos F, Valencia A (2001) Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng 14:609–614
Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A (2008) High-confidence prediction of global interactomes based on genome-wide coevolutionary networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(3):934–939
von Mering C, Huynen M, Jaeggi D, Schmidt S, Bork P, Snel B (2003) STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31:258–261
Ochoa D, Pazos F (2010) Studying the co-evolution of protein families with the Mirrortree web server. Bioinformatics 26(10):1370–1371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Pazos, F., de Juan, D. (2015). Predicting Protein Interactions. In: McGenity, T., Timmis, K., Nogales Fernández, B. (eds) Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Protocols. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/8623_2015_113
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/8623_2015_113
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49309-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49310-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols