Wetland information extraction based on UAV multispectral and oblique images

• Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K et al (2012) SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(11):2274–2282

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Adam E, Mutanga O, Rugege D (2010) Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing for identification and mapping of wetland vegetation: a review. Wetl Ecol Manag 18(3):281–296

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baker C, Lawrence R, Montagne C et al (2006) Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models. Wetlands J Soc Wetland Sci 26(2):465–474

  Google Scholar 

• Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G et al (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58(3):239–258

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boresjö LB, Näslund-Landenmark B (2002) Wetland classification for Swedish CORINE Land Cover adopting a semi-automatic interactive approach. Can J Remote Sens 28(2):139–155

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brinson M (2002) Temperate freshwater wetlands: types, status, and threats. Environ Conserv 29(2):115–133

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Candiago S, Remondino F, De G et al (2015) Evaluating multi-spectral images and vegetation indices for precision farming applications from UAV images. Remote Sens 7:4026–4047

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen DG, Zhou DM, Lv XG, Wang RH (2007) A study on classification of wetland communities in Honghe national nature reserve by remote sensing. Remote Sens Technol Appl 04:485–491

  Google Scholar 

• Coops N, Goodbody T, Cao L (2019) Four steps to extend drone use in research. Nature 572:433–435

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenbeiss H, Lambers K, Sauerbier M (2005) Photogrammetric recording of the archaeological site of Pinchango Alto (Palpa, Peru) using a mini helicopter (UAV). The World is in Your Eyes - Proceedings of the XXXIII Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference, Tomar, Portugal

• Goodbody T, Coops N, Marshall P et al (2017) Unmanned aerial systems for precision forest inventory purposes: a review and case study. For Chron 93:71–81

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hunt ERJ, Hively WD, Fujikawa SJ et al (2010) Acquisition of NIR-green-blue digital photographs from unmanned aircraft for crop monitoring. Remote Sens 2(1):290–305

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jyothi BN, Babu GR, Krishna IVM (2008) Object oriented and multi-scale image analysis: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats-a review. J Comput Sci 4(9):706–712

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ming DP, Luo JC, Zhou CH, Wang J (2006) Research on high resolution remote sensing image segmentation methods based on features and evaluation of algorithms. J Geo-Inform Sci 01:103–109

  Google Scholar 

• Mirijovsk J, Langhammer J (2015) Multitemporal monitoring of the morphody namics of a mid-mountain stream using UAS photogrammetry. Remote Sens 7:8586–8609

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ozesmi SL, Bauer ME (2002) Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag 10(5):381–402

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schultehostedde B, Walters D, Powell C et al (2007) Wetland management: an analysis of past practice and recent policy changes in Ontario. J Environ Manag 82(1):83–94

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tan HL, Gelfand SB, Delp EJ (1992) A cost minimization approach to edge detection using simulated annealing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(1):3–18

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zang SY, Zhang C, Zhang LJ, Zhang YH (2012) Wetland remote sensing classification using support vector machine optimized with genetic algorithm: a case study in Honghe nature national reserve. Sci Geogr Sin 32(04):434–441

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang SY, Li ZF, Xu F, Pan JJ, Jiang XS, Zhang WM (2020) Optimization of estuarine wetland landscape classification based on multi temporal UAV remote sensing images [J]. J Ecol 39(09):3174–3184

  Google Scholar 

Download references