Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

General addiction versus specific addiction: which is associated with a higher risk of negative consequences

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information technology addictions research has been limited in comparing the addictions with their predictive ability of negative consequences, a key criterion for many disorders, contributing to prevention and treatment efforts. Furthermore, there were overlaps among the addictions, proving the need to control for each addiction, which earlier studies had not done. Therefore, the current study examined whether general or specific addictions were associated with a higher risk of negative consequences whilst controlling for age and gender. General addictions, like Internet addiction (IA) and smartphone addiction (SA), indicated the addictive tendency towards technology and technological devices. Specific addictions, such as Internet gaming disorder (IGD) and social media addiction (SMA), indicated the addictive tendency towards gaming and social media content. Participants were a convenience sample of 191 (61.25% females) recruited from social media platforms and the university’s research participation system. Five hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted with IA, SA, IGD, and SMA as the predictors, and predicted for each common negative consequence identified among the addictions. The common negative consequences are depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, and sleep quality. The results showed that IA and SA were significant predictors of stress, and IA significantly predicted poor sleep quality while SA significantly predicted depression. Comparatively, IGD and SMA did not significantly predict any of the negative consequences. Limitations include sample’s generalizability and conceptualizations of IA, SA, and SMA. Future research directions include replication studies, recognition and interventions for general addictions, and exploring the interactions among the addictions, negative consequences, and other risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlize S. Y. Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, C.S.Y., Chew, P.K.H. General addiction versus specific addiction: which is associated with a higher risk of negative consequences. Curr Psychol 43, 35249–35260 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07015-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07015-z

Keywords

Navigation