Abstract
Semantic information can be accessed unconsciously, yet it remains unclear to what extent unconscious semantic information spreads across association networks. We compared conscious and unconscious semantic priming among different levels of semantic associations: direct, cross-form, and metaphoric associations. Chinese words associated with thermal qualities (cold or warm) were adopted as the primes, followed by a discrimination task regarding the target being associated with coldness or warmth. The targets were (1) words with thermal qualities, (2) illustrations representing thermal qualities, or (3) words describing personality traits that are metaphorically associated with thermal qualities. We first demonstrated the typical semantic priming effect in the three types of semantic associations when the prime was visible (Experiment 1). We then rendered the primes invisible using the continuous flash suppression paradigm and found a reversed semantic priming effect for the direct association and yet no priming effects for the cross-form and metaphoric associations (Experiment 2). These results suggested that unconscious semantic priming only occurs between directly associated stimuli while consciousness is necessary for higher-level associations and facilitatory interactions, delineating the contrast between unconscious and conscious semantic processing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data and materials for all experiments can be found at https://osf.io/trf6g.
References
Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(39), 15214. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805867105
Almeida, J., Pajtas, P. E., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Affect of the unconscious: Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0133-7
Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36(4), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00110-3
Baars, B., Franklin, S., & Ramsøy, T. (2013). Global Workspace Dynamics: Cortical “Binding and Propagation” Enables Conscious Contents [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(200), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00200
Bahrami, B., Vetter, P., Spolaore, E., Pagano, S., Butterworth, B., & Rees, G. (2010). Unconscious Numerical Priming Despite Interocular Suppression. Psychological Science, 21(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360664
Bajo, M. T. (1988). Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 14(4), 579.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572–1595. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212157
Breitmeyer, B. G. (2015). Psychophysical “blinding” methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.012
Carr, T. H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R. D., & Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 8(6), 757.
Chen, Y. C., & Yeh, S. L. (2012). Look into my eyes and I will see you: Unconscious processing of human gaze. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1703–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.001
Costello, P., Jiang, Y., Baartman, B., McGlennen, K., & He, S. (2009). Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.003
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 1(1), 42–45.
Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J. P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8520. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1332574100
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79(1), 39–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00124-4
Eo, K., Cha, O., Chong, S. C., & Kang, M. S. (2016). Less Is More: Semantic Information Survives Interocular Suppression When Attention Is Diverted. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(20), 5489. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3018-15.2016
Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1537
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
Hesselmann, G., Darcy, N., Ludwig, K., & Sterzer, P. (2016). Priming in a shape task but not in a category task under continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision, 16(3), 17–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.3.17
Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the Top: Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System. Neuron, 36(5), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C. S., & Buchanan, E. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior research methods, 45(4), 1099–1114.
Kanai, R., Tsuchiya, N., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2006). The Scope and Limits of Top-Down Attention in Unconscious Visual Processing. Current Biology, 16(23), 2332–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.001
Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious’ automatic’processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3(1–2), 289.
Kircher, T., Sass, K., Sachs, O., & Krach, S. (2009). Priming words with pictures: Neural correlates of semantic associations in a cross-modal priming task using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30(12), 4116–4128.
Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2004). Partial Awareness Creates the “Illusion” of Subliminal Semantic Priming. Psychological Science, 15(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502001.x
Laby, D. M., Kirschen, D. G., Rosenbaum, A. L., & Mellman, M. F. (1998). The effect of ocular dominance on the performance of professional baseball players. Ophthalmology, 105(5), 864–866.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210951
Luo, Y., Zhang, S., Tao, R., & Geng, H. (2016). The power of subliminal and supraliminal eye contact on social decision making: An individual-difference perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.001
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Psychology Press.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of experimental psychology, 90(2), 227.
Moors, P., Hesselmann, G., Wagemans, J., & van Ee, R. (2017). Continuous Flash Suppression: Stimulus Fractionation rather than Integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 719–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.005
Mudrik, L., Breska, A., Lamy, D., & Deouell, L. Y. (2011). Integration Without Awareness: Expanding the Limits of Unconscious Processing. Psychological Science, 22(6), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611408736
Mudrik, L., Faivre, N., & Koch, C. (2014). Information integration without awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.009
Okita, T., & Jibu, T. (1998). Selective attention and N400 attenuation with spoken word repetition. Psychophysiology, 35(3), 260–271.
Pelli, D. G., & Vision, S. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Sass, K., Krach, S., Sachs, O., & Kircher, T. (2009). Lion – tiger – stripes: Neural correlates of indirect semantic priming across processing modalities. Neuroimage, 45(1), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.014
Sergent, C., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Neural processes underlying conscious perception: Experimental findings and a global neuronal workspace framework. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98(4), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.006
Shanks, D. R. (2017). Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 752–775.
Sklar, A. Y., Levy, N., Goldstein, A., Mandel, R., Maril, A., & Hassin, R. R. (2012). Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(48), 19614. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211645109
Sklar, A. Y., Goldstein, A., & Hassin, R. R. (2021). Regression to the Mean Does Not Explain Away Nonconscious Processing. Experimental Psychology.
Sperber, R. D., McCauley, C., Ragain, R. D., & Weil, C. M. (1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing. Memory & Cognition, 7(5), 339–345.
Tan, J. S., & Yeh, S. L. (2015). Audiovisual integration facilitates unconscious visual scene processing. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 41(5), 1325.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 37(4), 571–590.
Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1500
Van Vugt, B., Dagnino, B., Vartak, D., Safaai, H., Panzeri, S., Dehaene, S., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2018). The threshold for conscious report: Signal loss and response bias in visual and frontal cortex. Science, 360(6388), 537–542.
Yang, E., Zald, D. H., & Blake, R. (2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7(4), 882.
Yang, Y. H., & Yeh, S. L. (2011). Accessing the meaning of invisible words. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.005
Yang, E., Brascamp, J., Kang, M. S., & Blake, R. (2014). On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness [Review]. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(724), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00724
Yang, Y. H., Zhou, J., Li, K. A., Hung, T., Pegna, A. J., & Yeh, S. L. (2017). Opposite ERP effects for conscious and unconscious semantic processing under continuous flash suppression. Consciousness and Cognition, 54, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.05.008
Yang, Y. H., & Yeh, S. L. (2018a). Can emotional content be extracted under interocular suppression? Plos one, 13(11), e0206799.
Yang, Y. H., & Yeh, S. L. (2018b). Unconscious processing of facial expression as revealed by affective priming under continuous flash suppression. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(6), 2215–2223.
Zhou, Y., Ho, H. N., & Watanabe, J. (2017). Perceptual-Semantic Congruency Facilitates Semantic Discrimination of Thermal Qualities [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2113), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02113
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by Grants from National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) to SC (109-2811-H-002 -519) and SY (107-2410-H-002 -129 -MY3 and 110-2410-H-002-130-MY3). We thank Dr. Hsin-Ni Ho for providing illustrations used in the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclosure.
Ethics approval
This study was conducted following the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments and approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the National Taiwan University.
Consent to participate
Informed written consents were obtained from all participants in the present study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chien, SE., Chang, WC., Chen, YC. et al. The limits of unconscious semantic priming. Curr Psychol 42, 26824–26835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03590-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03590-1