Abstract
In a world that changes very fast, it is necessary that educational models evolve at the same speed and that teachers are increasingly prepared and open to deal with current problems. Tecnológico de Monterrey has implemented the Tec21 Educational Model based on four fundamental pillars: (a) Challenge-Based Learning (CBL); (b) flexibility; (c) trained, inspiring teachers, and (d) memorable, integrated educational experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the implementation of CBL experiences in two engineering areas within the campus, namely, Mechatronics and Biotechnology. In this article, we first present how a group of teachers adopted CBL as a teaching technique, and second, we describe the implementation of flexible education with external training partners using CBL in “FIT” (Flexible Technology, Interactive) courses. We also analyze various ways to assess the impact of digital technology tools like CANVAS, REMIND, ZOOM, and eLUMEN on competencies. The results of this research indicated that students acquire more knowledge in CBL classes; however, the teachers require an adequate training program and must have previously designed proficiency assessment instruments. The testing of various evaluation instruments found that checklists and evaluation rubrics were the most suitable, objective, and transparent in CBL classes, according to the surveys of teachers and students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meyers, C., Jones, T.B.: Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco (1993)
Hernández, M., Vallejo, G.A., Tudón, M.J.C., et al.: Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 909–922 (2019)
Free document available at: https://observatory.itesm.mx/Tec21/. Accessed 22 April 2019
Nichols, M., Cator, K.: Challenge Based Learning. White Paper. Apple, Inc., Cupertino, CA (2008)
Nichols, M., Cator, K., Torres, M.: Challenge-Based Learners User Guide. Digital Promise, Redwood City, CA (2016)
Johnson, L.F., Smith, R.S., Smythe, J.T., Varon, R.K.: Challenge-Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time. The New Media Consortium, Austin, TX (2009)
Giorgio, T.D., Brophy, S.P.: Challenge-based learning in biomedical engineering: a legacy cycle for biotechnology. In: ASEE, pp. 2701–2711 (2001).
Gaskins, W.B., Johnson, J., Maltbie, C., Kukreti, A.R.: Changing the learning environment in the college of engineering and applied science using challenge based learning. Int. J. Eng. Ped. 1, 33–41 (2015)
Larmer, J. (Ed.): Gold standard PBL: project-based teaching practices. Buck Institute for Education. Retrieved from http://bie.org/about/what_pbl (2015)
Lovell, M.D., Brophy, S.P., Li, S.: Challenge-based instruction for a civil engineering dynamics course. In: Proceedings, 2013, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, 23–26 June (2013).
Membrillo-Hernández, J., Ramírez-Cadena, M.J., Martínez-Acosta, M., Cruz-Gómez, E., Muñoz-Díaz, E., Elizalde, H.: Challenge based learning: the importance of world-leading companies as training partners. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 1103–1113 (2019)
Moore, D.: For interns, experience isn’t always the best teacher. the chronicle of higher education. http://chronicle.com/article/For-Interns-ExperienceIsnt/143073/ (2013)
Akella, D.: Learning together: Kolb’s experiential theory and its application. J. Manag. Org. 16, 100–112 (2010)
Conde, M.Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., SeinEchaluce, M.L.: Can we apply learning analytics tools in challenge based learning contexts? LNCS 10296, 242–256 (2017)
Membrillo-Hernández, J., Ramírez-Cadena, M.J., Caballero-Valdés, C., Ganem-Corvera, R., Bustamante-Bello, R., Benjamín-Ordoñez, J.A., Elizalde-Siller, H.: Challenge based learning: the case of sustainable development engineering at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City Campus. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. ICL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 715, pp. 908–914. Springer, Cham (2018)
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, T.B., Wenderoth, M.P.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8410–8415 (2014)
Membrillo-Hernández, J., Muñoz-Soto, R.B., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A.C., Castillo-Reyna, J., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Díaz-Quiñonez, J.A., Ramírez-Medrano, A.: Student engagement outside the classroom: analysis of a challenge-based learning strategy in biotechnology engineering. Proc. IEEE EDUCON 8725246, 617–621 (2019)
Price, J.M., Brophy, S., Lafayette, W.: Transfer effects of challenge based lessons in an undergraduate dynamics course. In: 121st ASEE Annual Conference ID: 10536 (2014)
O’Mahony, T.K., Vye, N.J., Bransford, J.D., Sanders, E.A., Stevens, R., Stephens, R.D., Richey, M.C., Lin, K.Y., Soleiman, M.K.: A Comparison of lecture-based and challenge-based learning in a workplace setting: course designs, patterns of interactivity, and learning outcomes. J. Learning. Sci. 21, 182–206 (2012)
Apple Inc.: Challenge-based learning: take action and make a difference. http://cbl.digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/08/CBL_Paper_2008.pdf (2009)
Hake, R.R.: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64–74 (1998)
Castillo-Reyna, J., García-García, R.M., Ramírez-Medrano, A., Reyes-Millán, M., Benavente-Vázquez, B.R., Chamorro-Urroz, C.D., Membrillo-Hernández, J.: Teaching and learning microbiology for engineers in a digital world: the case of the FIT courses at the Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World ICL 2018 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 916, pp. 914–920. Springer, Berlin (2020)
Membrillo-Hernández, J., Molina-Solis, E.G., Lara-Prieto, V., García-García, R.M.: Designing the curriculum for the 4IR: working the case of biology and sustainable development in bioengineering courses. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Berlin (2020) . (in press)
Félix-Herrán, L.C., Rendon-Nava, A.E., Nieto-Jalil, J.M.: Challenge-based learning: an I-semester for experiential learning in Mechatronics Engineering. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 1367–1383 (2019)
Vicerrectoría Transformación Educativa: Modelo Educativo Tec21. Obs. Educ. Innov. 1–52. https://observatory.itesm.mx/Tec21/ (2018).
Eraña-Rojas, I.E., López-Cabrera, M.V., Barrientos, E.R., Membrillo-Hernández, J.: A challenge-based learning experience in forensic medicine. J. Forensic Legal Med. 68, 101873 (2019)
Eraña-Rojas, I.E., López-Cabrera, M.V., Barrientos, E.R., Membrillo-Hernández, J.: A context-rich educational experience through crime scene analysis. Med. Educ. 53, 1138–1139 (2019)
Tay, H.Y.: Setting formative assessments in real-world contexts to facilitate self-regulated learning. Educ. Res. Policy Pract. 14, 169–187 (2015)
Arter, J.: Rubrics, scoring guides, and performance criteria. In: Boston, C. (ed.) Understanding Scoring Rubrics: A Guide for Teachers. University of Maryland: Eric Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, College Park, MD (2002)
Arter, J., McTighe, J.: Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom: Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance. Corwin Publishers California, Irvin (2000)
Carey, L.: Measuring and Evaluating School Learning, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Needham Heights, MA (2001)
Castejón, J., Capllonch, M., González, N., López, V.: Técnicas E Instrumentos De Evaluación. In V. M. (Coord), Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación superior. Narcea, Madrid (2009)
Delors, J.C.: La Educación Encierra Un Tesoro. UNESCO, Paris (1996)
Díaz Barriga, F.: Enseñanza Situada. McGraw Hill, México (2006)
Eduteka: Ministerio de Educación de Colombia. Retrieved from Fundación Gabriel Priedrahita Uribe: http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomCuadro.php3. (2002)
Gallagher, J.D.: Classroom Assessment for Teachers. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)
Ioannou, A., Vasiliou, C., Zaphiris, P.: Creative multimodal learning environments and blended interaction for problem-based activity in HCI education. TechTtrends 59, 47–56 (2015)
Tenbrink, T.: Evaluación Guía Práctica para Profesores (8va edición). Narcea, Madrid (2006)
Linn, R.A.: Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2005)
Çimer, A.: What makes biology learning difficult and effective: students’ view. Educ. Res. Rev. 7, 61–71 (2012)
Membrillo-Hernández. J., García-García, R.: Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) in engineering: Which evaluation instruments are best suited to evaluate CBL experiences? In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, vol. 9125364, pp. 885–893 (2020)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial and technical support of Writing Lab, TecLabs, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work. The authors acknowledge the NOVUS Program grant with PEP no. PHHT032-192200006-05-001 in support of this work. We acknowledge the staff of the Basic Sciences, Mechatronics, and Bioengineering departments of the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City Campus, and all the Host Engineers of the external training partners.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Membrillo-Hernández, J., de Jesús Ramírez-Cadena, M., Ramírez-Medrano, A. et al. Implementation of the challenge-based learning approach in Academic Engineering Programs. Int J Interact Des Manuf 15, 287–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00755-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00755-3