Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical degradation of unstabilized rammed earth (URE) wall under salts and rising damp attack effect

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long-term chemo–thermo–hydro–mechanical behavior, the salt migration, and the salt attack on unstabilized rammed earth have been rarely investigated in the literature. The authors simulated the mechanical degradation of a typical unstabilized rammed earth (URE) wall under salts and rising damp attack effect by using the finite element method. The simulation results show that the water/salinity in a freshly built rammed earth wall decreases/increases significantly due to the water evaporation and capillary effects after construction, and these effects are stabilized in the following 3 years. Globally, the wall is wetter, cooler, and saltier in winter than in summer and has a lower strength. The strength in the upper part of the wall is higher than in the lower part. In the first 4 years after construction, the strength in the upper part increases and then reaches an equilibrium stage with time, while the strength in the lower part increases and then has the tendency to decrease in the latter 3 years due to the accumulation of salt. The strength inconsistency may exist in the wall due to the combined effects of salt accumulation and water evaporation, and the strength on the surface may be higher or lower than that of the inside due to the changes of surrounding conditions with time. The simulation results show that the wall has the best mechanical performance without damp and salt attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

τ w (–):

The tortuosity factor

σ B (–):

Stefan–Boltzmann constant

σ 1 (MPa):

First principal stress

σ (MPa):

Cauchy stress

ρ w (kg·m 3):

Density of liquid water

ρ v (kg·m 3):

Density of water vapor

ρ s (kg·m 3):

Particle density

ρ eff (kg·m 3):

Effective density

ρ a (kg·m 3):

Density of dry air

ν (–):

Poisson’s coefficient

μ w (Pa·s):

Dynamic viscosity of water

μ v (Pa·s):

Dynamic viscosity of water vapor

λ eff (W·m 1·K 1):

Effective thermal conductivity

κ rw (–):

Relative water permeability

θs (–):

Saturated volumetric water content

θr (–):

Residual volumetric water content

θL (–):

Lode angle

θ (–):

Volumetric water content

η s (%):

Salinity

η ini (%):

Initial salinity inside of the wall

ε v (–):

Volumetric strain

ε ij (–):

Engineering strain tensor

ε e (–):

Emissivity of the wall

γ d (kN·m−3):

Dry unit weight

β inc (–):

Wall inclination angle

α H (–):

Hellman exponent

α 1, α t (m):

Longitudinal and transverse dispersivities

x (m):

Position of soil particles

v x , y , z (m·s 1):

Components of the velocity field vw

v wind0 (m·s 1):

The velocity of wind at H0

v wind (m·s 1):

The velocity of wind

v w (m·s 1):

Water velocity vector

v w (m·s 1):

Water velocity

v v (m·s 1):

Water vapor velocity

v a (m·s 1):

Dir air velocity

u ref (MPa):

Constant for UCS0

UCS (MPa):

Unconfined compressive strength with salt effect

u 1 (–):

Constant parameter for UCS0

u (m):

The displacement vector

u (m):

Soil particle displacement

t T (day):

The phase of T

t RH (day):

The phase of RH

t ref (day):

Reference time period

T ini (°C):

Wall temperature at the beginning

T ext, Tint (°C):

External and internal temperature of the wall

T av (°C):

Average temperature

T am (°C):

Amplitude of temperature

t (s):

Time

T (K):

Temperature

S r (–):

Saturation

Sh (–):

Sherwood number

Sc (–):

Schmidt number

s (MPa):

Total suction

R s (W·m 2):

Shortwave radiation

R Lg (W·m 2):

Ground longwave radiation

R La (W·m 2):

Environmental longwave radiation

RHini (–):

Relative humidity of the wall at the beginning

RHi (–):

The RH on the internal boundary surface

RHext, RHint (–):

Wall external and internal RH

RHe (–):

The RH on the external boundary surface

RHav (–):

Average RH

RHam (–):

Amplitude of RH

RH (–):

Relative humidity

Re (–):

Reynolds number

R (J·K−1·mol−1):

Gas constant

Q r (W·m 3):

Heat source of radiation

Q p (MPa):

The plastic potential

Q (W·m 3):

Additional heat source

q (W·m 2):

Conductive heat flux

p sat (Pa):

Pressure of saturated water vapor

p at (Pa):

Total atmospheric pressure

n VG (–), mVG (–):

Material-dependent constant parameters

n (–):

The normal vector

n (–):

Porosity

m ws (kg·m 3·s 1):

Water source

M w (kg·mol 1):

Molar mass of water

m HB (–):

Constant parameter in Hoek and Brown criteria

m evap (kg·m 3·s 1):

Water source of evaporation

M a (kg·mol 1):

Molar mass of dry air

l VG (–):

Constant value of Mualem equation

L v (J·kg 1):

Latent heat of evaporation

L (m):

Length of the evaporative surface

K 1, K 3 (–):

Parameters for RLa

J 2 (MPa2):

J3 (MPa3), Second and third deviatoric stress invariants

h t (W·m 2·K 1):

Surface heat transfer coefficient

h m (m·s 1):

Surface moisture transfer coefficient

H 0 (m):

Wind height

H (m):

Wall height

g (m·s 2):

Gravity acceleration

F yield (MPa):

Yield surface

f v (kg·m 2·s 2):

Body force vector

e s (–):

Void ratio

E ref (MPa):

Reference Young modulus

e 1 (–):

Constant value for E

E (MPa):

Elastic modulus at failure

dσ ij (MPa):

Stress increment

dλ (–):

Harding parameter

D w (m2·s 1):

Diffusivity of liquid water

D v (m2·s 1):

Diffusivity of water vapor

D (m):

Water head

C wi0 (s2·m 2·K 1):

Constant value for hm

C w (J·kg 1·K 1):

Water specific heat capacity

C v (J·kg 1·K 1):

Water vapor specific heat

c s (mol·m3·s 1):

Source of the solute concentration

C s (J·kg 1·K 1):

Soil particle specific heat capacity

C m (m 1):

Specific water capacity

C KC (m2):

Constant value in Kozeny–Carman equation

c fi (–):

Fine content

C eff (J·kg 1·K 1):

Effective specific heat capacity

C e (m2·s 1):

Effective diffusion

C d (m2·s 1):

Dispersion tensor

C c (–):

Cloud cover factor

C a (J·kg 1·K 1):

Dry air specific heat capacity

c (mol·m 3):

Mass concentration of the solute

a l b (–):

Surface albedo

\({\varepsilon }_{ij}^{pl}\) (–):

Plastic strain tensor

\({\varepsilon }_{ij}^{el}\) (–):

Elastic strain tensor

\({d\varepsilon }_{kl}^{el}\) (–):

Elastic strain increment

\({D}_{ijkl}^{el}\) (MPa):

Elastic modulus tensor

References

  1. Adamson AW, Gast AP (1967) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Interscience publishers New York

  2. Allinson D, Hall M (2010) Hygrothermal analysis of a stabilised rammed earth test building in the UK. Energy Build 42:845–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alnefaie KA, Abu-Hamdeh NH (2013) Specific heat and volumetric heat capacity of some saudian soils as affected by moisture and density. In: International conference on mechanics, fluids, heat, elasticity and electromagnetic fields. pp 139–143

  4. An N, Hemmati S, Cui Y et al (2018) Numerical analysis of hydro-thermal behaviour of Rouen embankment under climate effect. Comput Geotech 99:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assadollahi H, Nowamooz H (2020) Long-term analysis of the shrinkage and swelling of clayey soils in a climate change context by numerical modelling and field monitoring. Comput Geotech 127:103763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Assadollahi Tejaragh H (2019) The impact of climatic events and drought on the shrinkage and swelling phenomenon of clayey soils interacting with constructions. Université de Strasbourg, Theses

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aubert JE, Fabbri A, Morel JC, Maillard P (2013) An earth block with a compressive strength higher than 45MPa! Constr Build Mater 47:366–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ávila F, Puertas E, Gallego R (2021) Characterization of the mechanical and physical properties of unstabilized rammed earth: a review. Constr Build Mater 270:121435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bansal RC, Bhatti TS, Kothari DP (2002) On some of the design aspects of wind energy conversion systems. Energy Convers Manag 43:2175–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bañuelos-Ruedas F, Angeles-Camacho C, Rios-Marcuello S (2011) Methodologies used in the extrapolation of wind speed data at different heights and its impact in the wind energy resource assessment in a region. Wind Farm Tech Regul Potential Estim Siting Assess. https://doi.org/10.5772/20669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barzegar AR, Oades JM, Rengasamy P (1996) Soil structure degradation and mellowing of compacted soils by saline-sodic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:583–588. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020035x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bear J (1988) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Courier Corporation

  13. Bear J (1979) HYDRAULICS OF GROUND WATER

  14. Beckett CTS, Augarde CE, Easton D, Easton T (2017) Strength characterisation of soil-based construction materials. Géotechnique 68:400–409. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bui Q-B, Morel J-C (2009) Assessing the anisotropy of rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 23:3005–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bui Q-B, Morel J-C, Hans S, Walker P (2014) Effect of moisture content on the mechanical characteristics of rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 54:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carman PC (1997) Fluid flow through granular beds. Chem Eng Res Des 75:S32–S48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Champiré F, Fabbri A, Morel J-C et al (2016) Impact of relative humidity on the mechanical behavior of compacted earth as a building material. Constr Build Mater 110:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Charola AE (2000) Salts in the deterioration of porous materials: an overview. J Am Inst Conserv 39:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1179/019713600806113176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chauhan P, El Hajjar A, Prime N, Plé O (2019) Unsaturated behavior of rammed earth: Experimentation towards numerical modelling. Constr Build Mater 227:116646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chauhan P, Prime N, Plé O (2022) Benefit of unsaturated soil mechanics approach on the modeling of early-age behavior of rammed earth building. Materials 15:362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chitimbo T, Abdul-Samad F, Prime N, Plé O (2022) Hydro-mechanics coupling on rammed earth material: drying experiment at structural scale. Constr Technol Archit 1:698–706. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chitimbo T, Prime N, Plé O, Abdulsamad F (2022) Drying experiment on rammed earth structure. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Code UB (1997) International building code. Int Code Counc USA

  25. Cole RJ (1979) The longwave radiation incident upon inclined surfaces. Sol Energy 22:459–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper JR, Dooley RB (2008) Release of the IAPWS formulation 2008 for the viscosity of ordinary water substance. Int Assoc Prop Water Steam

  27. Cui K, Du Y, Zhang Y et al (2019) An evaluation system for the development of scaling off at earthen sites in arid areas in NW China. Herit Sci 7:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0256-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daus AD, Frind EO (1985) An alternating direction Galerkin technique for simulation of contaminant transport in complex groundwater systems. Water Resour Res 21:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Doehne E (2002) Salt weathering: a selective review. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 205:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.205.01.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fabbri A, Al Haffar N, McGregor F (2019) Measurement of the relative air permeability of compacted earth in the hygroscopic regime of saturation. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 347:912–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Falchi L, Slanzi D, Balliana E et al (2018) Rising damp in historical buildings: a venetian perspective. Build Environ 131:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan X, Pedroli B, Liu G et al (2012) Soil salinity development in the yellow river delta in relation to groundwater dynamics. Land Degrad Dev 23:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. François B, Palazon L, Gerard P (2017) Structural behaviour of unstabilized rammed earth constructions submitted to hygroscopic conditions. Constr Build Mater 155:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Franzoni E (2014) Rising damp removal from historical masonries: a still open challenge. Constr Build Mater 54:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Franzoni E (2018) State-of-the-art on methods for reducing rising damp in masonry. J Cult Herit 31:S3–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fujimaki H, Shimano T, Inoue M, Nakane K (2006) Effect of a salt crust on evaporation from a bare saline soil. Vadose Zone J 5:1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gabrielli E, Colla C (2015) Investigation of damp and salt distribution in outdoors full-scale masonry wall via wireless monitoring and radar testing. Key Eng Mater 624:155–162. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Geng X, Boufadel MC (2017) The influence of evaporation and rainfall on supratidal groundwater dynamics and salinity structure in a sandy beach. Water Resour Res 53:6218–6238. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gerard P, Mahdad M, Robert McCormack A, François B (2015) A unified failure criterion for unstabilized rammed earth materials upon varying relative humidity conditions. Constr Build Mater 95:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hall M, Allinson D (2009) Assessing the effects of soil grading on the moisture content-dependent thermal conductivity of stabilised rammed earth materials. Appl Therm Eng 29:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hall M, Djerbib Y (2004) Rammed earth sample production: context, recommendations and consistency. Constr Build Mater 18:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heymes F, Aprin L, Bony A et al (2013) An experimental investigation of evaporation rates for different volatile organic compounds. Process Saf Prog 32:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoek E, Brown ET (1981) Underground excavations in rock: Hoek, E; Brown, E T London: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 1980, 527P. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18: 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90809-3

  45. Hoła A (2020) Methodology for the in situ testing of the moisture content of brick walls: an example of application. Arch Civ Mech Eng 20:114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00120-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang J (2018) A simple accurate formula for calculating saturation vapor pressure of water and ice. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 57:1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0334.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Indekeu M, Woloszyn M, Grillet A-C et al (2017) Towards hygrothermal characterization of rammed earth with small-scale dynamic methods. Energy Procedia 132:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Gallipoli D, Toll DG (2009) The strength of unstabilised rammed earth materials. Géotechnique 59:487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang B, Wu T, Xia W, Liang J (2020) Hygrothermal performance of rammed earth wall in Tibetan autonomous prefecture in Sichuan province of China. Build Environ 181:107128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar S, Mathur J, Mathur S et al (2016) An adaptive approach to define thermal comfort zones on psychrometric chart for naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India. Build Environ 109:135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee BY, Kurtis KE (2017) Effect of pore structure on salt crystallization damage of cement-based materials: consideration of w/b and nanoparticle use. Cem Concr Res 98:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lepakshi R, Venkatarama Reddy BV (2020) Shear strength parameters and Mohr-Coulomb failure envelopes for cement stabilised rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 249:118708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Li Y, Kong Z, Xie H et al (2021) Construction type influences features of rising damp of blue-brick masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 284:122791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu B, Zhao W, Wen Z et al (2019) Mechanisms and feedbacks for evapotranspiration-induced salt accumulation and precipitation in an arid wetland of China. J Hydrol 568:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liuzzi S, Hall MR, Stefanizzi P, Casey SP (2013) Hygrothermal behaviour and relative humidity buffering of unfired and hydrated lime-stabilised clay composites in a Mediterranean climate. Build Environ 61:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Long Z, Li H, Bu X et al (2013) Solar radiation on vertical surfaces for building application in different climate zones across China. J Renew Sustain Energy 5:021418. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4798492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo Y, Zhou P, Ni P et al (2021) Degradation of rammed earth under soluble salts attack and drying-wetting cycles: the case of Fujian Tulou. China. Appl Clay Sci 212:106202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mahdavi A, Martens B, Scherer R (2014) eWork and ebusiness in architecture, engineering and construction: ECPPM 2014. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Martín-del-Rio JJ, Canivell J, Torres-González M et al (2021) Analysis of the materials and state of conservation of the medieval rammed earth walls of Seville (Spain). J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Masters GM, M MG (2004) Renewable and efficient electric power systems. John Wiley & Sons

  61. Medjelekh D, Ulmet L, Gouny F et al (2016) Characterization of the coupled hygrothermal behavior of unfired clay masonries: numerical and experimental aspects. Build Environ 110:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Millington RJ, Quirk JP (1961) Permeability of porous solids. Trans Faraday Soc 57:1200–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Monteith J, Unsworth M (2013) Principles of environmental physics: plants, animals, and the atmosphere. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nguyen JL, Schwartz J, Dockery DW (2014) The relationship between indoor and outdoor temperature, apparent temperature, relative humidity, and absolute humidity. Indoor Air 24:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nikoosokhan S, Nowamooz H, Chazallon C (2016) Effect of dry density, soil texture and time-spatial variable water content on the soil thermal conductivity. Geomech Geoengin 11:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2015.1048313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nowak H (2001) Modelling of the longwave radiation incident upon a building. Arch Civ Eng 47:243–267

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nowamooz H, Chazallon C (2011) Finite element modelling of a rammed earth wall. Constr Build Mater 25:2112–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nowamooz H, Nikoosokhan S, Lin J, Chazallon C (2015) Finite difference modeling of heat distribution in multilayer soils with time-spatial hydrothermal properties. Renew Energy 76:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Pel L, Huinink H, Kopinga K (2002) Ion transport and crystallization in inorganic building materials as studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. Appl Phys Lett 81:2893–2895. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1512329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pel L, Huinink H, Kopinga K (2003) Salt transport and crystallization in porous building materials. Magn Reson Imaging 21:317–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00161-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Poós T, Varju E (2020) Mass transfer coefficient for water evaporation by theoretical and empirical correlations. Int J Heat Mass Transf 153:119500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Reed RF (2018) Observation and use of soil suction. Years of Experience 20:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481691.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rehman MMU, Cheema TA, Ahmad F et al (2019) Thermodynamic assessment of microchannel heat sinks with novel sidewall ribs. J Thermophys Heat Transf 34:243–254. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.T5770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Saito H, Šimůnek J, Mohanty BP (2006) Numerical analysis of coupled water, vapor, and heat transport in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone J 5:784–800. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. dos Santos RA, Esquivel ER (2018) Saturated anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of a compacted lateritic soil. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10:986–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Scherer GW (2004) Stress from crystallization of salt. Cem Concr Res 34:1613–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schnellmann R, Busslinger M, Schneider HR, Rahardjo H (2010) Effect of rising water table in an unsaturated slope. Eng Geol 114:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Shao M, Li L, Wang S et al (2013) Deterioration mechanisms of building materials of Jiaohe ruins in China. J Cult Herit 14:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Shen Y, Chen W, Kuang J, Du W (2017) Effect of salts on earthen materials deterioration after humidity cycling. J Cent South Univ 24:796–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3482-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Soudani L, Fabbri A, Morel J-C et al (2016) Assessment of the validity of some common assumptions in hygrothermal modeling of earth based materials. Energy Build 116:498–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Tang F, Nowamooz H (2018) Long-term performance of a shallow borehole heat exchanger installed in a geothermal field of Alsace region. Renew Energy 128:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tang F, Nowamooz H (2020) Outlet temperatures of a slinky-type horizontal ground heat exchanger with the atmosphere-soil interaction. Renew Energy 146:705–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Tang F, Nowamooz H, Wang D et al (2022) A simplified approach to predicting the heat extraction rate of borehole heat exchangers from parametric analysis. Geothermics 101:102358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Soil Sci 66:161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Taylor P, Fuller RJ, Luther MB (2008) Energy use and thermal comfort in a rammed earth office building. Energy Build 40:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Taylor P, Luther MB (2004) Evaluating rammed earth walls: a case study. Sol Energy 76:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Tong F, Jing L, Zimmerman RW (2010) A fully coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model for simulating multiphase flow, deformation and heat transfer in buffer material and rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Toride N, Inoue M, Leij FJ (2003) Hydrodynamic dispersion in an unsaturated dune sand. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:703–712. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.0703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Torres I (2018) New technique for treating rising damp in historical buildings: wall base ventilation. J Cult Herit 31:S60–S70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Toufigh V, Kianfar E (2019) The effects of stabilizers on the thermal and the mechanical properties of rammed earth at various humidities and their environmental impacts. Constr Build Mater 200:616–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Touré PM, Sambou V, Faye M et al (2017) Mechanical and hygrothermal properties of compressed stabilized earth bricks (CSEB). J Build Eng 13:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tsilingiris PT (2008) Thermophysical and transport properties of humid air at temperature range between 0 and 100°C. Energy Convers Manag 49:1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Tu H, Vanapalli SK (2016) Prediction of the variation of swelling pressure and one-dimensional heave of expansive soils with respect to suction using the soil-water retention curve as a tool. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Vann JD, Houston SL (2021) Field soil suction profiles for expansive soil. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 147:04021080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Wagner W, Kretzschmar H-J (2008) IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam. International steam tables: properties of water and steam based on the industrial formulation IAPWS-IF97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 7–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  97. Walker P, Keable R, Martin J, Maniatidis V (2005) Rammed earth: design and construction guidelines

  98. Xia J, Zhang S, Zhao X et al (2016) Effects of different groundwater depths on the distribution characteristics of soil-Tamarix water contents and salinity under saline mineralization conditions. CATENA 142:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Xu Y, Li J, Fan H et al (2017) Stability analysis of clastic rock slope with mudstone interlayer under rainfall infiltration. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1871–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0215-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Xu L, Wong KK, Fabbri A et al (2018) Loading-unloading shear behavior of rammed earth upon varying clay content and relative humidity conditions. Soils Found 58:1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Yeh H-F, Huang T-T, Lee J-W (2021) Effect of unimodal and bimodal soil hydraulic properties on slope stability analysis. Water 13:1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang X, Nowamooz H (2021) Effect of rising damp in unstabilized rammed earth (URE) walls. Constr Build Mater 307:124989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhang X, Nowamooz H (2021) Thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) behavior of Unstabilized Rammed Earth (URE) wall submitted to environmental and mechanical loadings. Mater Struct 54:198. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01798-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhang X, Nowamooz H (2022) Factors influencing the thermo–hydro–mechanical behavior of unstabilized rammed earth walls. Materials 15:8821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Zhang L, Yang L, Jelle BP et al (2018) Hygrothermal properties of compressed earthen bricks. Constr Build Mater 162:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Zhang L, Zhang N, Zhao F, Chen Y (2004) A genetic-algorithm-based experimental technique for determining heat transfer coefficient of exterior wall surface. Appl Therm Eng 24:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Consent to publication

We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.

We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with me about progress, submissions of revisions, and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Nowamooz, H. Mechanical degradation of unstabilized rammed earth (URE) wall under salts and rising damp attack effect. Acta Geotech. 18, 5029–5046 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01865-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01865-w

Keywords

Navigation