Abstract
The current IP mobility protocols are called centralized mobility management (CMM) solutions, in which all data traffic and management signaling messages must be forwarded to an anchor entity. In some vehicle scenarios, vehicles may move as a group from one roadside unit to another (i.e., after traffic lights or traffic jams). This causes data traffic and exchanged mobility messages to peak at the anchor entity and, consequently, affects the network performance. A new design paradigm aimed at addressing the anchor entity issue is called distributed mobility management (DMM); it is an IETF proposal that is still being actively discussed by the IETF DMM working group. Nevertheless, network-based DMM is designed based on the well-known network-based CMM protocol Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6). There is no significant difference between network-based DMM and PMIPv6 in terms of handover latency and packet loss. Because vehicles change their roadside unit frequently in this context, the IP addresses of mobile users (MUs) require fast IP handover management to configure a new IP address without disrupting ongoing sessions. Thus, this paper proposes the Fast handover for network-based DMM (FDMM) based on the Fast Handover for PMIPv6 (PFMIPv6). Several modifications to PFMIPv6 are required to adapt this protocol to DMM. This paper specifies the necessary extensions to support the scenario in which an MU has old IP flows and hence has multiple anchor entities. In addition, the analytic expressions required to evaluate and compare the handover performance of the proposed FDMM and the IETF network-based DMM have been derived. The numerical results show that FDMM outperforms the IETF network-based DMM in terms of handover latency, session recovery and packet loss at the cost of some extra signaling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Cisco White Paper. (2014). Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update (pp. 2013–2018).
IETF DMM WG. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmm/charter/.
Balfaqih, M., Ismail, M., Nordin, R., Balfaqih, Z., et al. (2015). Proxy mobile IPv6 Handover management in vehicular networks: State of the art, taxonomy and directions for future research. Wireless Personal Communications, 84(2), 1509–1534.
Seite, P., Liu, D., Yokota, H., Korhonen, J., Chan, H. A., et al. (2014). Requirements for distributed mobility management. In IETF RFC 7333.
Bernardos, C., Oliva, A., Giust, F., et al. (2015). An IPv6 distributed client mobility management approach using existing mechanisms. draft-bernardos-dmm-cmip-03 (work in progress).
Lee, J. (2015). PMIPv6-based distributed mobility management. Draft-jaehwoon-dmm-pmipv6-04 (work in progress).
Giust, F., Liebsch, M., et al. (2015). Deployment of control-/data-plane separation in DMM. draft-giust-dmm-cpdp-deployment-00 (work in progress).
Ali-Ahmad, H., Ouzzif, M., Bertin, P., Lagrange, X., et al. (2013). Distributed mobility management: Approaches and analysis. In 2013 IEEE international conference on Communications workshops (ICC), (pp. 1297–1302).
Yokota, H., Chowdhury, K., Koodly, R., Patil B., Xia, F., et al. (2010). Fast handovers for proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 5949.
Ki-Sik, K., Lee, W., Youn-Hee, H., Myung-Ki, S., HeungRyeol, Y., et al. (2008). Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: Mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(2), 36–45.
Lee, J., Bonnin, J.-M., Ilsun, Y., Tai-Myoung, C., et al. (2013). Comparative handover performance analysis of IPv6 mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(3), 1077–1088.
JaeSukand, L., Jongpil, J., et al. (2013). Performance analysis of cross-layer handoff scheme in IP-based next-generation wireless networks. The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society, 38B(6), 454–472. doi:10.7840/kics.2013.38B.6.454.
Wang, L., Qin, Y., Zhou, H., Guan, J., & Zhang, H. (2015). Design, implementation, and performance evaluation of efficient PMIPv6 based mobile multicast sender support schemes. Mobile Information Systems, 2015, 741460. doi:10.1155/2015/741460.
Seite, P., Bertin, P., Lee, J. H., et al. (2014). Distributed mobility anchoring. IETF draft-seite-dmm-dma-07 (work in progress).
Bernardos, C., Oliva A., Giust, F., et al. (2015). A PMIPv6-Based Solution for Distributed Mobility Management. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress), draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-04.
Yi, L., Zhou, H., Huang, D., Zhang, H., et al. (2013). D-PMIPv6: A distributed mobility management scheme supported by data and control plane separation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1415–1426.
Nguyen T.-T., Bonnet, C., et al. (2015). A hybrid centralized-distributed mobility management for supporting highly mobile users (to appear in IEEE ICC).
Lee, J.-H., Yan, Z., Bonnin, J.-M., Lagrange, X., et al. (2013). Dynamic tunnelling for network-based distributed mobility management coexisting with PMIPv6. In Proceedings of the PIMRC, London, UK.
Korhonen, J., Gundavelli, S., Yokota, H., & Cui, X. (2012). Runtime LMA assignment support for proxy Mobile IPv6. RFC 6463.
Korhonen J., Devarapalli, V., et al. (2011). Local mobility anchor (LMA) discovery for proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 6097.
Murtadha, M. K., Noordin, N. K., Ali, B. M., Hashim, T., et al. (2015). Design and evaluation of distributed and dynamic mobility management approach based on PMIPv6 and MIH protocols. Wireless Networks, 21, 1–17.
Giust, F., Oliva, A., Bernardos, C. J., Da Costa, R. P. F., et al. (2011). A network-based localized mobility solution for distributed mobility management. In 14th international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications (WPMC) (pp. 1–5).
Giust, F., Bernardos, C. J., Oliva, A., et al. (2014). Analytic evaluation and experimental validation of a network-based IPv6 distributed mobility management solution. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(11), 2484–2497.
Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., Patil, B., et al. (2008). Proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 5213.
Koodli, R. (2009). Mobile IPv6 fast handovers. IETF RFC 5568.
Baumann, F., Niemegeers, I., et al. (1994). An evaluation of location management procedures. In Proceedings of the third annual international conference on universal personal communication (pp. 359-364).
Akyildiz, I. F., Ho, J. S. M., Lin, Y.-B., et al. (1996). Movement-based location update and selective paging for PCS networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 4(4), 629–638. doi:10.1109/90.532871.
Lin, Y.-B. (1997). Reducing location update cost in a PCS network. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(1), 25–33.
Fang, Y. (2003). Movement-based mobility management and trade off analysis for wireless mobile networks. IEEE Trans. Computers, 52(6), 791–803.
Pack, S., Choi, Y., et al. (2004). A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks. IEICE Trans. Comm., 87(3), 462–469.
Makaya, C., Pierre, S., et al. (2008). An analytical framework for performance evaluation of IPv6-based mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(3), 972–983.
Mohanty, S., Akyildiz, I. F., et al. (2006). A cross-layer (Layer 2 + 3) Handoff Management Protocol for Next-Generation Wireless Systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(10), 1347–1360.
Rappaport, T. S. (2002). Wireless communications: Principles and practic (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ali-Ahmad, H., Lagrange, X., Ouzzif, M., Bertin, P. (2013). Cost analysis on global mobility management schemes in IPv6 mobile networks. IEEE VTC.
Zhang, X., Castellanos, J. G., Campbell, A. T., et al. (2002). P-MIP: Paging extensions for mobile IP. ACM Mobile Networks and Applications.
Lee, J. H., Chung, T. M., et al. (2009). How much do we gain by introducing route optimization in proxy mobile IPv6 networks? Annals of Telecommunications, 65, 233–246.
Camp, T., Boleng, J., & Davies, V. (2002). A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5), 483–502.
Davies, V. (2000). Evaluating mobility models within an ad hoc network. Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines, 2000.
Hossain, M. S., Atiquzzaman, M., et al. (2013). Cost analysis of mobility protocols. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2271–2285.
Hossain, M. S., Atiquzzaman, M. (2009). Stochastic Properties and application of city section mobility model. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2009).
Ali-Ahmad, H., Ouzzif, M., Bertin, P., Lagrange, X., et al. (2014). Performance analysis on network-based distributed mobility management. Wireless Personal Communications, 74(4), 1245–1263.
Mun-Suk, K., SuKyoung, L., Cypher D., Golmie, N., et al. (2010). Fast Handover Latency Analysis in Proxy Mobile IPv6. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010).
Mun-Suk, K., SuKyoung, L., David, C., Nada, G., et al. (2013). Performance analysis of fast handover for proxy Mobile IPv6. Information Sciences, 219, 208–224.
Jong-Hyouk, L., Ernst, T., Tai-Myoung, C., et al. (2010). Cost analysis of IP mobility management protocols for consumer mobile devices. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(2), 1010–1017.
Sangheon, P., Taekyoung, K., Yanghee, C., Eun, P. K., et al. (2009). An adaptive network mobility support protocol in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(7), 3627–3639.
Wang, L., Gao, S., Zhang, H., Schmidt, T. C., Guan, J., et al. (2013). Mobile multicast source support in PMIPv6 networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 1(152), 152.
Seonggeun, R., Kyung-Joon, P., Ji-Woong, C., et al. (2014). Enhanced fast handover for network mobility in intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(1), 357–371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balfaqih, M., Ismail, M., Nordin, R. et al. Fast handover solution for network-based distributed mobility management in intelligent transportation systems. Telecommun Syst 64, 325–346 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0178-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0178-y