Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Experimental and Modeling Studies of Orientational Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Experimental studies have shown that the orientation selectivity of visual stimuli is characteristic not only of cortical, but also of subcortical neurons in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral geniculate body in cats. Mathematical modeling reported here provided an analysis of the factors affecting measures of the orientational selectivity of neurons. Simulated responses to bar stimuli and brightness gradient stimuli were qualitatively consistent with experimental results. Non-null coefficients of selectivity may result either from an elongated receptive field shape in conditions in which the influences of saturation effects are nonlinear or where the center of the receptive field is displaced relative to the center of the stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. D. Glezer, Mechanisms of Recognition of Visual Images, Nauka, Leningrad (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. F. Podvigin, Dynamic Properties of Neural Structures of the Visual System, Nauka, Leningrad (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. F. Podvigin, T. V. Bagaeva, D. N. Podvigina, et al., “A new property of orientationally selective neurons in the lateral geniculate body in cats,” Zh. Evolyuts. Biokhim. Fiziol., 43, No. 6, 487–493 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. F. Podvigin, N. B. Kiseleva, T. A. Sheremet’eva, et al., “Quantitative assessment of the reflection of the space-brightness properties of stimuli by the neural structures of the lateral geniculate body in cats,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 81, No. 31, 21–28 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. F. Podvigin and I. V. Chueva, “Relationship between the responses of cat lateral geniculate body neurons and the contrast of the light stimulus,” Neirofiziologiya, 9, No. 3, 267–274 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. B. Barlow, R. Fitzhugh, and S. W. Kuffler, “Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat’s retina during dark adaptation,” J. Physiol., 137, No. 2, 338–354 (1957).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P. O. Bishop,W. Kozak,W. R. Levick, and G. J. Vakkur, “The determination of the projection of the visual field on to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat,” J. Physiol., 163, No. 3, 503–539 (1962).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O. D. Creutzfeld and H. C. Nothdurft, “Representation of complex visual stimuli in the brain,” Naturwissenschaften, 65, 307–318 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Cudeiro and A. M. Sillito, “Spatial frequency tuning of orientation-discontinuity-sensitive corticofugal feedback to the cat lateral geniculate nucleus,” J. Physiol., 490, No. 2, 481–492 (1996).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Dayan and L. F. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience. Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems, MIT Press (2000).

  11. G. Felsena and Y. Dan, “A natural approach to studying vision,” Nat. Neurosci., 8, 1643–1646 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Hammond, “Cat retinal cells: Size and shape of receptive field centres,” J. Physiol., 242, 99–118 (1974).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Hu, X. Li,Y. Zhou, and T. Shou, “Effects of bicuculline on direction-sensitive relay cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) of cats,” Brain Res., 885, 87–93 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Integrative action in the cat’s lateral geniculate body,” J. Physiol., 155, No. 2, 385–398 (1961).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol., 148, No. 3, 574–591 (1959).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Kozak, R. Rodieck, and P. Bishop, “Response of single units in lateral geniculate nucleus of cat to moving visual patterns,” J. Neurophysiol., 28, No. 1, 19–47 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Kuhlmann and T. R. Vidyasagar, “A computational study of how orientational bias in the lateral geniculate nucleus can give rise to orientational selectivity in primary visual cortex,” Front. Syst. Neurosci., 5, Art. 81 (2011).

  18. A. G. Leventhal and J. D. Schall, “Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Comp. Neurol., 220, 465–475 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Levick and L. Thibos, “Analysis of orientation bias in cat retina,” J. Physiol., 329, 243–261 (1982).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. C. L. Passaglia, J. B. Troy, L. Rutiger, and B. B. Lee, “Orientational sensitivity of ganglion cells in primate retina,” Vision Res., 42, No. 6, 683–694 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. J. D. Schall, V. H. Perry, and A. G. Leventhal, “Retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields in old-world monkeys are oriented radially,” Brain Res., 368, 18–23 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Shou and A. G. Leventhal, “Organized arrangement of orientationsensitive relay cells in the cat’s dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus,” J. Neurosci., 9, No. 12, 4287–4302 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. E. P. Simoncelli and B. A. Olshausen, “Natural image statistics and neural representation,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 24, 1193–1216 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. E. L. Smith 3rd, Y. M. Chino, W. H. Ridder 3rd, et al., “Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys,” Vis. Neurosci., 5, No. 6, 525–545 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. R. E. Soodak, R. M. Shapley, and E. Kaplan, “Linear mechanism of orientational tuning in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat,” J. Neurophysiol., 58, No. 2, 267–275 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G. B. Stanley, F. F. Li, and Y. Dan, “Reconstruction of natural scenes from ensemble responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus,” Neuroscience, 79, No. 18, 8036–8042 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Suematsu, T. Naito, and H. Sato, “Relationship between orientational sensitivity and spatiotemporal receptive field structures of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus,” Neural. Networks, 35, 10–20 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Sun, X. Chen, L. Huang, and T. Shou, “Orientation bias of the extraclassical receptive field of the relay cells in the cat’s dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus,” Neuroscience, 125, No. 2, 485–505 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. G. Thompson,Y. Zhou, and A. G. Leventhal, “Direction-sensitive X and Y cells within the A laminae of the cat’s LGBd,” Vis. Neurosci., 11, 927–938 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. K. G. Thompson, A. G. Leventhal, Y. Zhou, and D. Liu, “Stimulus dependence of orientation and direction sensitivity of cat LGNd relay cells without cortical inputs: a comparison with area 17 cells,” Vis. Neurosci., 11, No. 5, 939–951 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. T. R. Vidyasagar and J. V. Urbas, “Orientation sensitivity of cat LGN neurons with and without inputs form visual cortical area 17 and 18,” Exp. Brain Res., 46, No. 2, 156–169 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. X. Xu, J. Ichida, Y. Shostak, et al., “Are primate lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells really sensitive to orientation or direction?” Vis. Neurosci., 19, No. 1, 97–108 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. X. Ye, G. Li, Y. Yang, and Y. Zhou, “The effect of orientation adaptation on responses of lateral geniculate nucleus neurons with high orientation bias in cats,” Neuroscience, 164, No. 2, 760–769 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Zhou, A. G. Leventhal, and K. G. Thompson, “Visual deprivation does not affect the orientation and direction sensitivity of relay cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat,” J. Neurosci., 15, 689–698 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

    E. G. Yakimova

  2. Ioffe Physicotechnical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia

    A. V. Chizhov

Authors
  1. E. G. Yakimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Chizhov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. G. Yakimova.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 99, No. 7, pp. 841–858, July, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yakimova, E.G., Chizhov, A.V. Experimental and Modeling Studies of Orientational Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Neurosci Behav Physi 45, 465–475 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0097-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0097-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation