Abstract
IT capability has become increasingly important for business to maintain an innovation-based competitive advantage in today’s turbulent economic environment. In light of the dynamic capability theory and related literature, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between supply chain e-integration, supply chain strategy implementation (i.e., lean strategy and agile strategy), and supply chain ambidextrous innovation, and supply chain ambidextrous innovation (i.e., exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation). A questionnaire survey was conducted in China mainland and quantitative data were gathered from 274 respondents. Supply chain e-integration enhances exploitative innovation but does not impact exploratory innovation significantly. Both lean and agile strategy implementation are positively associated with exploratory innovation. Whilst only lean strategy positively influences exploitative innovation. Supply chain e-integration positively impacts lean supply chain strategy but harms agile supply chain strategy. Furthermore, lean strategy implementation partially mediates the relationship between supply chain e-integration and exploitative innovation, whilst agile strategy plays a suppression role between e-integration and exploratory innovation. A new theoretical perspective on IT-based capabilities and supply chain ambidextrous innovation is provided by these findings. Practitioners can also apply these findings to improve innovation-based competition by addressing related inertia issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jimenez-Jimenez D, Martínez-Costa M, Rodriguez CS (2018) The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation. J Knowl Manag 24:298–317
Pagani M, Pardo C (2017) The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network. Ind Mark Manag 67:185–192
Cabrilo S, Dahms S, Burgos Mutuc E, Marlin J (2020) The role of IT practices in facilitating relational and trust capital for superior innovation performance: the case of taiwanese companies. J Intellect Cap 21:753–779
Anh NTM, Hui L, Khoa VD, Mehmood S (2019) Relational capital and supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: an empirical study in China. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 31:1076–1094
Dingler A, Enkel E (2016) Socialization and innovation: insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 109:50–60
Kumar V, Jabarzadeh Y, Jeihouni P, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Learning orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Manag Int J 25:457–474
Frohlich MT (2002) E-integration in the supply chain: barriers and performance. Decis Sci 33:537–556
Swafford P, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2008) Achieving Supply Chain Agility through IT Integration and Flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 116:288–297
Zhou W, Chong AYL, Zhen C, Bao H (2018) E-Supply Chain Integration Adoption: examination of buyer–supplier Relationships. J Comput Inf Syst 58:58–65
Lu K, Ram Ramamurthy (2011) Understanding the Link between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: an empirical examination. MIS Q 35(4):931–954
Ko WW, Liu G (2019) How information technology assimilation promotes exploratory and exploitative innovation in the small-and medium-sized firm context: the role of contextual ambidexterity and knowledge base. J Prod Innov Manag 36:442–466
Najar T (2022) Lean-agile supply chain innovation performance; the mediating role of dynamic capability, innovation capacity, and relational embeddednes. Supply Chain Forum: An Int J 23:285–300
Qamar A, Hall M (2018) Can lean and agile organisations within the UK automotive supply chain be distinguished based upon contextual factors? Supply Chain Manag Int J 23:239–254
Galankashi MR, Helmi SA (2016) Assessment of hybrid lean-agile (Leagile) supply chain strategies. J Manuf Technol Manag 27:470–482
Primus DJ, Stavrulaki E (2017) A product centric examination of PD/SC alignment decisions at the nexus of product development and supply chains. Int J Logist Manag 28:634–655
Stewart I, Fenn P (2006) Strategy: the motivation for innovation. Constr Innov 6:173–185
Haddud A, DeSouza A, Khare A, Lee H (2017) Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the internet of things integration in supply chains. J Manuf Technol Manag 28:1055–1085
Pinho C, Mendes L (2017) IT in lean-based manufacturing industries: systematic literature review and research issues. Int J Prod Res 55:7524–7540
Keung Kwok S, Wu KKW (2009) RFID-based intra‐supply chain in textile industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 109:1166–1178
Sayogo DS, Zhang J, Luna-Reyes L et al (2015) Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains. Inf Technol Manag 16:5–18
Moyano-Fuentes J, Martínez-Jurado PJ, Maqueira-Marín JM, Bruque-Cámara S (2012) Impact of use of information technology on lean production adoption: evidence from the automotive industry. Int J Technol Manag 57:132–148
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28:1319–1350
Piccoli I (2005) Review: IT-Dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Q 29(4):747–776
Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 487–505
Fawcett SE, Wallin C, Allred C et al (2011) Information Technology as an enabler of supply chain collaboration: a dynamic-capabilities perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 47:38–59
Huo B, Ye Y, Zhao X, Shou Y (2016) The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance. Int J Prod Econ 178:132–143
Bi R, Davidson R, Kam B, Smyrnios K (2013) Developing Organizational Agility through IT and Supply Chain Capability. J Glob Inf Manag 21:38–55
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533
Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How Information Technology Strategy and Investments influence firm performance. Mis Q 40:223–246
Kaplan S, Sawhney M (2000) E-hubs: the new B2B marketplaces. Harv Bus Rev 78:97–97
Ward P, Zhou H (2006) Impact of information technology integration and lean/just-in-time practices on lead-time performance. Decis Sci 37:177–203
Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28:58–71
Raji IO, Rossi T, Strozzi F (2021) A dynamic literature review on’lean and agile’supply chain integration using bibliometric tools. Int J Serv Oper Manag 40:253–285
Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E, Shankar R (2008) Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies and case studies. Tata McGraw-Hill Education
Qrunfleh S, Tarafdar M (2013) Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: the role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Manag Int J 18:571–582
Jajja MSS, Kannan VR, Brah SA, Hassan SZ (2016) Supply chain strategy and the role of suppliers: evidence from the indian sub-continent. Benchmarking Int J 23:1658–1676
Tarafdar M, Qrunfleh S (2017) Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. Int J Prod Res 55:925–938
Fisher ML (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harv Bus Rev 75:105–117
Qi Y, Zhao X, Sheu C (2011) The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decis Sci 42:371–389
Roh J, Hong P, Min H (2014) Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: the case of manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 147:198–210
Towill D, Christopher M (2002) The supply chain strategy conundrum: to be lean or agile or to be lean and agile? Int J Logist 5:299–309
Qamar A, Hall MA, Chicksand D, Collinson S (2020) Quality and flexibility performance trade-offs between lean and agile manufacturing firms in the automotive industry. Prod Plan Control 31:723–738
Stratton R, Warburton RD (2003) The strategic integration of agile and lean supply. Int J Prod Econ 85:183–198
Iyengar V, Bharathi SV (2018) Bibliometric analysis of lean, agile, and Leagile Supply Chains in Automobile Industry (1990–2017). Int J Inf Syst Supply Chain Manag IJISSCM 11:22–45
Bashir M, Verma R (2017) Why business model innovation is the new competitive advantage. IUP J Bus Strategy 14:7
Hazen BT, Overstreet RE, Cegielski CG (2012) Supply chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption. Int J Logist Manag 23:119–134
Seo Y-J, Dinwoodie J, Kwak D-W (2014) The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link? Supply Chain Manag Int J 19:733–746
Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2005) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 57:351–363
Sheng ML, Chien I (2016) Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms. J Bus Res 69:2302–2308
Siren CA, Kohtamäki M, Kuckertz A (2012) Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: escaping the exploitation trap. Strateg Entrep J 6:18–41
Arias-Pérez J, Alegre J, Villar C (2021) Emotional capability: the missing link between information technology capabilities and innovation performanceCapacidad emocional: el vínculo perdido entre capacidades de tecnologías de la información y desempeño innovadorCapacidade emocional: O elo perdido entre as capacidades das tecnologias da informação e o desempenho inovador. Manag Res J Iberoam Acad Manag 19:127–142
Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Hua Z (2013) The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: the mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decis Support Syst 54:1452–1462
Tomlinson PR (2010) Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Res Policy 39:762–775
Wang Y, Sun H, Jia T, Chen J (2021) The impact of buyer–supplier interaction on ambidextrous innovation and business performance: the moderating role of competitive environment. Int J Logist Manag 32:673–695
Karaman Aksentijević N, Ježić Z, Zaninović PA (2021) The Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use on Human Development—A. Macroeconomic Approach Economies 9:128
Adebanjo D, Teh P-L, Ahmed PK (2018) The impact of supply chain relationships and integration on innovative capabilities and manufacturing performance: the perspective of rapidly developing countries. Int J Prod Res 56:1708–1721
Song M, Chen M, Wang S (2018) Global supply chain integration, financing restrictions, and green innovation: analysis based on 222,773 samples. Int J Logist Manag 29:539–554
Ayoub HF, Abdallah AB, Suifan TS (2017) The effect of supply chain integration on technical innovation in Jordan: the mediating role of knowledge management. Benchmarking Int J 24:594–616
Nieves J, Osorio J (2019) Using information technology to achieve management innovation. Acad Rev Latinoam Adm 32:20–39
Chen M, Chen Y, Liu H, Xu H (2020) Influence of information technology capability on service innovation in manufacturing firms. Ind Manag Data Syst 121:173–191
Nevo S, Nevo D, Pinsonneault A (2020) Exploring the role of it in the front-end of innovation: an empirical study of IT-enabled creative behavior. Inf Organ 30:1–19
Stroeken JH (2001) Information technology, innovation and supply chain structure. Int J Serv Technol Manag 2:269–288
Yang J, Han Q, Zhou J, Yuan C (2015) The influence of environmental management practices and supply chain integration on technological innovation performance—evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. Sustainability 7:15342–15361
Xu Q, Hu Q, Chin T et al (2019) How supply chain integration affects innovation in a digital age: moderating effects of sustainable policy. Sustainability 11:1–17
Sun Y, Sun H (2021) Green innovation strategy and ambidextrous green innovation: the mediating effects of green supply chain integration. Sustainability 13:1–20
Hall DM, Algiers A, Levitt RE (2018) Identifying the role of supply chain integration practices in the adoption of systemic innovations. J Manag Eng 34:1–14
Wong CW, Wong CY, Boon-Itt S (2013) The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation. Int J Prod Econ 146:566–574
von Haartman R, Bengtsson L (2015) The impact of global purchasing and supplier integration on product innovation. Int J Oper Prod Manag 35:1296–1311
Tomas RN, Rosales FP, Batalha MO, Alcantara RLC (2014) Analyzing effects of external integration on innovations outcomes in large and non-large brazilian food companies. Br Food J 116:984–999
Wu G-C (2013) The influence of green supply chain integration and environmental uncertainty on green innovation in Taiwan’s IT industry. Supply Chain Manag Int J 18:539–552
Soto-Acosta P, Popa S, Martinez-Conesa I (2018) Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. J Knowl Manag 22:824–849
Ji P, Yan X, Shi Y (2021) Information technology investment and innovation performance: does investment paradox exist? J Asia Bus Stud 16:230–240
Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res Policy 48:1–9
Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: the impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inf Syst Res 23:42–59
Tajudeen FP, Nadarajah D, Jaafar NI, Sulaiman A (2021) The impact of digitalisation vision and information technology on organisations’ innovation. Eur J Innov Manag 25:607–629
Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2006) The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26:282–299
So S, Sun H (2011) An extension of IDT in examining the relationship between electronic-enabled supply chain integration and the adoption of lean production. Int J Prod Res 49:447–466
Gallagher KP, Worrell JL (2008) Organizing IT to promote agility. Inf Technol Manag 9:71–88
Vickery SK, Droge C, Setia P, Sambamurthy V (2010) Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. Int J Prod Res 48:7025–7042
Wamba SF (2012) Achieving supply chain integration using RFID technology: the case of emerging intelligent B-to-B e-commerce processes in a living laboratory. Bus Process Manag J 18:58–81
Aburub F (2015) Impact of ERP systems usage on organizational agility: an empirical investigation in the banking sector. Inf Technol People 28:570–588
Bargshady G, Zahraee SM, Ahmadi M, Parto A (2016) The effect of information technology on the agility of the supply chain in the iranian power plant industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 27:427–442
Breu K, Hemingway CJ, Strathern M, Bridger D (2002) Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. J Inf Technol 17:21–31
Nazir S, Pinsonneault A (2012) IT and firm agility: an electronic integration perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst 13:2
DeGroote SE, Marx TG (2013) The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manag 33:909–916
Dehgani R, Navimipour NJ (2019) The impact of information technology and communication systems on the agility of supply chain management systems. Kybernetes 48:2217–2236
Rosenberg N (1986) The impact of technological innovation: a historical view. Posit Sum Strategy Harnessing Technol Econ Growth 17–32
Birhanu D, Lanka K, Rao AN (2014) A survey of classifications in supply chain strategies. Procedia Eng 97:2289–2297
Abdallah AB, Dahiyat SE, Matsui Y (2019) Lean management and innovation performance: evidence from international manufacturing companies. Manag Res Rev 42:239–262
Aoun M, Hasnan N (2014) Lean production and TQM: complementary or contradictory driving forces of innovation performance? Int J Innov Sci 5:237–252
Byrne G, Lubowe D, Blitz A (2007) Using a lean six Sigma approach to drive innovation. Strategy Leadersh 35:5–10
Bieraugel M (2015) Managing library innovation using the lean startup method. Libr Manag 36:351–361
Lichtenthaler U (2020) A conceptual Framework for combining Agile and Structured Innovation processes. Res-Technol Manag 63:42–48
Kahan S (2018) The age of Agile: a guide to a revolution in innovation management. Strategy Leadersh 46:48–49
Beaumont M, Thuriaux-Alemán B, Prasad P, Hatton C (2017) Using agile approaches for breakthrough product innovation. Strategy Leadersh 45:19–25
Denning S (2017) Strategic agility: using agile teams to explore opportunities for market-creating innovation. Strategy Leadersh 45:3–9
Nguyen MAT, Lei H, Vu KD, Le PB (2019) The role of cognitive proximity on supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: a study of a transition economy. J Bus Ind Mark 34:591–604
Ruiz-Benitez R, López C, Real JC (2019) Achieving sustainability through the lean and resilient management of the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 49:122–155
Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Dhone NC (2020) Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in indian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 58:1319–1337
Nabass EH, Abdallah AB (2018) Agile manufacturing and business performance: the indirect effects of operational performance dimensions. Bus Process Manag J 25:647–666
Chen C-J (2018) Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Manag Decis 57:1511–1534
Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V (2016) LARG index A benchmarking tool for improving the leanness, agility, resilience and greenness of the automotive supply chain. Benchmarking- Int J 23:1472–1499
Huo B, Ye Y, Zhao X et al (2018) Environmental uncertainty, specific assets, and opportunism in 3PL relationships: a transaction cost economics perspective. Int J Prod Econ 203:154–163
Schmitt N (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 8:350
Cho E (2016) Making reliability Reliable: a systematic Approach to Reliability coefficients. Organ Res Methods 19:651–682
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94
Nunnally JC (1994) Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Algebra and statistics
Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12:531–544
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication …
MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci 1:173–181
Mamonov S, Peterson R (2019) The role of IT in innovation at the individual and group level–a literature review. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 26:797–810
Ghobakhloo M, Azar A (2018) Information Technology Resources, the Organizational capability of lean-agile Manufacturing, and business performance. Inf Resour Manag J 31:47–74
Azam MS (2015) Diffusion of ICT and SME performance. In: Quaddus M, Woodside AG (eds) Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 7–290
Thakurta R, Guha Deb S (2018) IS/IT investments and firm performance: indian evidence. J Glob Inf Technol Manag 21:188–207
Pohl H (2012) Japanese automakers’ approach to electric and hybrid electric vehicles: from incremental to radical innovation. Int J Technol Manag 57:266–288
Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159:379–392
Cheng CC, Chen J-S (2013) Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities. J Bus Ind Mark 28:444–454
Weill P, Subramani M, Broadbent M (2002) IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Available SSRN 317307
Funding
This study was funded by the Philosophy and Social Science Research Project (21Q085) of the Hubei Provincial Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Survey items
Appendix: Survey items
CONSTRUCTS | ITEMS | Supporting literature |
---|---|---|
SC e-integration | Real-time communication through IT | So and Sun (2011) Swafford et al.(2008) Haddud et al.(2017) |
Complete purchasing and supply management through IT | ||
Digital accounting and finance | ||
Manufacturing with process control softwares like MES | ||
Using IT to integrate activities in logistics and distribution | ||
Real-time material management and inventory tracking | ||
Lean SC strategy implementation | Employee involvement | Dey et al.(2019) Ruiz-Benitez et al.(2019) Kamble et al.(2019) Prasad et al.(2019) |
Reduces wastes | ||
TQM | ||
Pull systems | ||
JIT basis for material purchase | ||
JIT basis for order | ||
Agile SC strategy implementation | Quickly detect changes, opportunities, and threats | Nabass and Abdallah(2019) Chen(2018) |
Responds quickly to customer requirements | ||
Quickly adapt products/service to changes | ||
To increase the frequencies of new products | ||
Reacts immediately to incorporate changes into manufacturing processes | ||
Speed in product cycle time | ||
Exploratory SC innovation | We accept demands that go beyond existing products and services | Nguyen et al.(2019) Sheng and Chien(2016) |
We invent new products and services | ||
We commercialize products and services that are completely new | ||
Exploitative SC innovation | We frequently refine the provision of existing products and services | |
We regularly implement small adaptations to existing products and services | ||
We introduce improved but existing products and services for local markets | ||
We improve our provision’s efficiency of products and services | ||
We increase economies of scales in existing markets |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, J., Liu, Xy. & Xu, Sr. Impact of e-integration on ambidextrous innovation in supply chain: the mediation and suppression effect of supply chain strategy implementation. Inf Technol Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00412-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00412-z