Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of e-integration on ambidextrous innovation in supply chain: the mediation and suppression effect of supply chain strategy implementation

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IT capability has become increasingly important for business to maintain an innovation-based competitive advantage in today’s turbulent economic environment. In light of the dynamic capability theory and related literature, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between supply chain e-integration, supply chain strategy implementation (i.e., lean strategy and agile strategy), and supply chain ambidextrous innovation, and supply chain ambidextrous innovation (i.e., exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation). A questionnaire survey was conducted in China mainland and quantitative data were gathered from 274 respondents. Supply chain e-integration enhances exploitative innovation but does not impact exploratory innovation significantly. Both lean and agile strategy implementation are positively associated with exploratory innovation. Whilst only lean strategy positively influences exploitative innovation. Supply chain e-integration positively impacts lean supply chain strategy but harms agile supply chain strategy. Furthermore, lean strategy implementation partially mediates the relationship between supply chain e-integration and exploitative innovation, whilst agile strategy plays a suppression role between e-integration and exploratory innovation. A new theoretical perspective on IT-based capabilities and supply chain ambidextrous innovation is provided by these findings. Practitioners can also apply these findings to improve innovation-based competition by addressing related inertia issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jimenez-Jimenez D, Martínez-Costa M, Rodriguez CS (2018) The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation. J Knowl Manag 24:298–317

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pagani M, Pardo C (2017) The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network. Ind Mark Manag 67:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabrilo S, Dahms S, Burgos Mutuc E, Marlin J (2020) The role of IT practices in facilitating relational and trust capital for superior innovation performance: the case of taiwanese companies. J Intellect Cap 21:753–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anh NTM, Hui L, Khoa VD, Mehmood S (2019) Relational capital and supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: an empirical study in China. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 31:1076–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dingler A, Enkel E (2016) Socialization and innovation: insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 109:50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar V, Jabarzadeh Y, Jeihouni P, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Learning orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Manag Int J 25:457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frohlich MT (2002) E-integration in the supply chain: barriers and performance. Decis Sci 33:537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swafford P, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2008) Achieving Supply Chain Agility through IT Integration and Flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 116:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou W, Chong AYL, Zhen C, Bao H (2018) E-Supply Chain Integration Adoption: examination of buyer–supplier Relationships. J Comput Inf Syst 58:58–65

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu K, Ram Ramamurthy (2011) Understanding the Link between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: an empirical examination. MIS Q 35(4):931–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ko WW, Liu G (2019) How information technology assimilation promotes exploratory and exploitative innovation in the small-and medium-sized firm context: the role of contextual ambidexterity and knowledge base. J Prod Innov Manag 36:442–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Najar T (2022) Lean-agile supply chain innovation performance; the mediating role of dynamic capability, innovation capacity, and relational embeddednes. Supply Chain Forum: An Int J 23:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qamar A, Hall M (2018) Can lean and agile organisations within the UK automotive supply chain be distinguished based upon contextual factors? Supply Chain Manag Int J 23:239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galankashi MR, Helmi SA (2016) Assessment of hybrid lean-agile (Leagile) supply chain strategies. J Manuf Technol Manag 27:470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Primus DJ, Stavrulaki E (2017) A product centric examination of PD/SC alignment decisions at the nexus of product development and supply chains. Int J Logist Manag 28:634–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart I, Fenn P (2006) Strategy: the motivation for innovation. Constr Innov 6:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haddud A, DeSouza A, Khare A, Lee H (2017) Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the internet of things integration in supply chains. J Manuf Technol Manag 28:1055–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinho C, Mendes L (2017) IT in lean-based manufacturing industries: systematic literature review and research issues. Int J Prod Res 55:7524–7540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keung Kwok S, Wu KKW (2009) RFID-based intra‐supply chain in textile industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 109:1166–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayogo DS, Zhang J, Luna-Reyes L et al (2015) Challenges and requirements for developing data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains. Inf Technol Manag 16:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moyano-Fuentes J, Martínez-Jurado PJ, Maqueira-Marín JM, Bruque-Cámara S (2012) Impact of use of information technology on lean production adoption: evidence from the automotive industry. Int J Technol Manag 57:132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28:1319–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piccoli I (2005) Review: IT-Dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Q 29(4):747–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 487–505

  25. Fawcett SE, Wallin C, Allred C et al (2011) Information Technology as an enabler of supply chain collaboration: a dynamic-capabilities perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 47:38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huo B, Ye Y, Zhao X, Shou Y (2016) The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance. Int J Prod Econ 178:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bi R, Davidson R, Kam B, Smyrnios K (2013) Developing Organizational Agility through IT and Supply Chain Capability. J Glob Inf Manag 21:38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How Information Technology Strategy and Investments influence firm performance. Mis Q 40:223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan S, Sawhney M (2000) E-hubs: the new B2B marketplaces. Harv Bus Rev 78:97–97

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ward P, Zhou H (2006) Impact of information technology integration and lean/just-in-time practices on lead-time performance. Decis Sci 37:177–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Raji IO, Rossi T, Strozzi F (2021) A dynamic literature review on’lean and agile’supply chain integration using bibliometric tools. Int J Serv Oper Manag 40:253–285

    Google Scholar 

  34. Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E, Shankar R (2008) Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies and case studies. Tata McGraw-Hill Education

  35. Qrunfleh S, Tarafdar M (2013) Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: the role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Manag Int J 18:571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jajja MSS, Kannan VR, Brah SA, Hassan SZ (2016) Supply chain strategy and the role of suppliers: evidence from the indian sub-continent. Benchmarking Int J 23:1658–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tarafdar M, Qrunfleh S (2017) Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. Int J Prod Res 55:925–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fisher ML (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harv Bus Rev 75:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qi Y, Zhao X, Sheu C (2011) The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decis Sci 42:371–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roh J, Hong P, Min H (2014) Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: the case of manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 147:198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Towill D, Christopher M (2002) The supply chain strategy conundrum: to be lean or agile or to be lean and agile? Int J Logist 5:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qamar A, Hall MA, Chicksand D, Collinson S (2020) Quality and flexibility performance trade-offs between lean and agile manufacturing firms in the automotive industry. Prod Plan Control 31:723–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stratton R, Warburton RD (2003) The strategic integration of agile and lean supply. Int J Prod Econ 85:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Iyengar V, Bharathi SV (2018) Bibliometric analysis of lean, agile, and Leagile Supply Chains in Automobile Industry (1990–2017). Int J Inf Syst Supply Chain Manag IJISSCM 11:22–45

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bashir M, Verma R (2017) Why business model innovation is the new competitive advantage. IUP J Bus Strategy 14:7

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hazen BT, Overstreet RE, Cegielski CG (2012) Supply chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption. Int J Logist Manag 23:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Seo Y-J, Dinwoodie J, Kwak D-W (2014) The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link? Supply Chain Manag Int J 19:733–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2005) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 57:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sheng ML, Chien I (2016) Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms. J Bus Res 69:2302–2308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Siren CA, Kohtamäki M, Kuckertz A (2012) Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: escaping the exploitation trap. Strateg Entrep J 6:18–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Arias-Pérez J, Alegre J, Villar C (2021) Emotional capability: the missing link between information technology capabilities and innovation performanceCapacidad emocional: el vínculo perdido entre capacidades de tecnologías de la información y desempeño innovadorCapacidade emocional: O elo perdido entre as capacidades das tecnologias da informação e o desempenho inovador. Manag Res J Iberoam Acad Manag 19:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Hua Z (2013) The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: the mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decis Support Syst 54:1452–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tomlinson PR (2010) Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Res Policy 39:762–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Y, Sun H, Jia T, Chen J (2021) The impact of buyer–supplier interaction on ambidextrous innovation and business performance: the moderating role of competitive environment. Int J Logist Manag 32:673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Karaman Aksentijević N, Ježić Z, Zaninović PA (2021) The Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use on Human Development—A. Macroeconomic Approach Economies 9:128

    Google Scholar 

  56. Adebanjo D, Teh P-L, Ahmed PK (2018) The impact of supply chain relationships and integration on innovative capabilities and manufacturing performance: the perspective of rapidly developing countries. Int J Prod Res 56:1708–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Song M, Chen M, Wang S (2018) Global supply chain integration, financing restrictions, and green innovation: analysis based on 222,773 samples. Int J Logist Manag 29:539–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ayoub HF, Abdallah AB, Suifan TS (2017) The effect of supply chain integration on technical innovation in Jordan: the mediating role of knowledge management. Benchmarking Int J 24:594–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nieves J, Osorio J (2019) Using information technology to achieve management innovation. Acad Rev Latinoam Adm 32:20–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen M, Chen Y, Liu H, Xu H (2020) Influence of information technology capability on service innovation in manufacturing firms. Ind Manag Data Syst 121:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nevo S, Nevo D, Pinsonneault A (2020) Exploring the role of it in the front-end of innovation: an empirical study of IT-enabled creative behavior. Inf Organ 30:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stroeken JH (2001) Information technology, innovation and supply chain structure. Int J Serv Technol Manag 2:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang J, Han Q, Zhou J, Yuan C (2015) The influence of environmental management practices and supply chain integration on technological innovation performance—evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. Sustainability 7:15342–15361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Xu Q, Hu Q, Chin T et al (2019) How supply chain integration affects innovation in a digital age: moderating effects of sustainable policy. Sustainability 11:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sun Y, Sun H (2021) Green innovation strategy and ambidextrous green innovation: the mediating effects of green supply chain integration. Sustainability 13:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hall DM, Algiers A, Levitt RE (2018) Identifying the role of supply chain integration practices in the adoption of systemic innovations. J Manag Eng 34:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wong CW, Wong CY, Boon-Itt S (2013) The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation. Int J Prod Econ 146:566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. von Haartman R, Bengtsson L (2015) The impact of global purchasing and supplier integration on product innovation. Int J Oper Prod Manag 35:1296–1311

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tomas RN, Rosales FP, Batalha MO, Alcantara RLC (2014) Analyzing effects of external integration on innovations outcomes in large and non-large brazilian food companies. Br Food J 116:984–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu G-C (2013) The influence of green supply chain integration and environmental uncertainty on green innovation in Taiwan’s IT industry. Supply Chain Manag Int J 18:539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Soto-Acosta P, Popa S, Martinez-Conesa I (2018) Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. J Knowl Manag 22:824–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ji P, Yan X, Shi Y (2021) Information technology investment and innovation performance: does investment paradox exist? J Asia Bus Stud 16:230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res Policy 48:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: the impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inf Syst Res 23:42–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tajudeen FP, Nadarajah D, Jaafar NI, Sulaiman A (2021) The impact of digitalisation vision and information technology on organisations’ innovation. Eur J Innov Manag 25:607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2006) The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26:282–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. So S, Sun H (2011) An extension of IDT in examining the relationship between electronic-enabled supply chain integration and the adoption of lean production. Int J Prod Res 49:447–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Gallagher KP, Worrell JL (2008) Organizing IT to promote agility. Inf Technol Manag 9:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Vickery SK, Droge C, Setia P, Sambamurthy V (2010) Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. Int J Prod Res 48:7025–7042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wamba SF (2012) Achieving supply chain integration using RFID technology: the case of emerging intelligent B-to-B e-commerce processes in a living laboratory. Bus Process Manag J 18:58–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Aburub F (2015) Impact of ERP systems usage on organizational agility: an empirical investigation in the banking sector. Inf Technol People 28:570–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Bargshady G, Zahraee SM, Ahmadi M, Parto A (2016) The effect of information technology on the agility of the supply chain in the iranian power plant industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 27:427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Breu K, Hemingway CJ, Strathern M, Bridger D (2002) Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. J Inf Technol 17:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Nazir S, Pinsonneault A (2012) IT and firm agility: an electronic integration perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst 13:2

    Google Scholar 

  85. DeGroote SE, Marx TG (2013) The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manag 33:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Dehgani R, Navimipour NJ (2019) The impact of information technology and communication systems on the agility of supply chain management systems. Kybernetes 48:2217–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rosenberg N (1986) The impact of technological innovation: a historical view. Posit Sum Strategy Harnessing Technol Econ Growth 17–32

  88. Birhanu D, Lanka K, Rao AN (2014) A survey of classifications in supply chain strategies. Procedia Eng 97:2289–2297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Abdallah AB, Dahiyat SE, Matsui Y (2019) Lean management and innovation performance: evidence from international manufacturing companies. Manag Res Rev 42:239–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Aoun M, Hasnan N (2014) Lean production and TQM: complementary or contradictory driving forces of innovation performance? Int J Innov Sci 5:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Byrne G, Lubowe D, Blitz A (2007) Using a lean six Sigma approach to drive innovation. Strategy Leadersh 35:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Bieraugel M (2015) Managing library innovation using the lean startup method. Libr Manag 36:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lichtenthaler U (2020) A conceptual Framework for combining Agile and Structured Innovation processes. Res-Technol Manag 63:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kahan S (2018) The age of Agile: a guide to a revolution in innovation management. Strategy Leadersh 46:48–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Beaumont M, Thuriaux-Alemán B, Prasad P, Hatton C (2017) Using agile approaches for breakthrough product innovation. Strategy Leadersh 45:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Denning S (2017) Strategic agility: using agile teams to explore opportunities for market-creating innovation. Strategy Leadersh 45:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  97. Nguyen MAT, Lei H, Vu KD, Le PB (2019) The role of cognitive proximity on supply chain collaboration for radical and incremental innovation: a study of a transition economy. J Bus Ind Mark 34:591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Ruiz-Benitez R, López C, Real JC (2019) Achieving sustainability through the lean and resilient management of the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 49:122–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Dhone NC (2020) Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in indian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 58:1319–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Nabass EH, Abdallah AB (2018) Agile manufacturing and business performance: the indirect effects of operational performance dimensions. Bus Process Manag J 25:647–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Chen C-J (2018) Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Manag Decis 57:1511–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V (2016) LARG index A benchmarking tool for improving the leanness, agility, resilience and greenness of the automotive supply chain. Benchmarking- Int J 23:1472–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Huo B, Ye Y, Zhao X et al (2018) Environmental uncertainty, specific assets, and opportunism in 3PL relationships: a transaction cost economics perspective. Int J Prod Econ 203:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Schmitt N (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 8:350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Cho E (2016) Making reliability Reliable: a systematic Approach to Reliability coefficients. Organ Res Methods 19:651–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Nunnally JC (1994) Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education

  108. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Algebra and statistics

  109. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12:531–544

    Google Scholar 

  110. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication …

  111. MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci 1:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Mamonov S, Peterson R (2019) The role of IT in innovation at the individual and group level–a literature review. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 26:797–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Ghobakhloo M, Azar A (2018) Information Technology Resources, the Organizational capability of lean-agile Manufacturing, and business performance. Inf Resour Manag J 31:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Azam MS (2015) Diffusion of ICT and SME performance. In: Quaddus M, Woodside AG (eds) Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 7–290

  115. Thakurta R, Guha Deb S (2018) IS/IT investments and firm performance: indian evidence. J Glob Inf Technol Manag 21:188–207

    Google Scholar 

  116. Pohl H (2012) Japanese automakers’ approach to electric and hybrid electric vehicles: from incremental to radical innovation. Int J Technol Manag 57:266–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159:379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Cheng CC, Chen J-S (2013) Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities. J Bus Ind Mark 28:444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Weill P, Subramani M, Broadbent M (2002) IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Available SSRN 317307

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Philosophy and Social Science Research Project (21Q085) of the Hubei Provincial Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-yan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Survey items

Appendix: Survey items

CONSTRUCTS

ITEMS

Supporting literature

SC e-integration

Real-time communication through IT

So and Sun (2011)

Swafford et al.(2008)

Haddud et al.(2017)

Complete purchasing and supply management through IT

Digital accounting and finance

Manufacturing with process control softwares like MES

Using IT to integrate activities in logistics and distribution

Real-time material management and inventory tracking

Lean SC strategy implementation

Employee involvement

Dey et al.(2019)

Ruiz-Benitez et al.(2019)

Kamble et al.(2019)

Prasad et al.(2019)

Reduces wastes

TQM

Pull systems

JIT basis for material purchase

JIT basis for order

Agile SC strategy implementation

Quickly detect changes, opportunities, and threats

Nabass and Abdallah(2019)

Chen(2018)

Responds quickly to customer requirements

Quickly adapt products‎/service to changes

To increase the frequencies of new products

Reacts immediately to incorporate changes into manufacturing processes

Speed in product cycle time

Exploratory SC innovation

We accept demands that go beyond existing products and services

Nguyen et al.(2019)

Sheng and Chien(2016)

We invent new products and services

We commercialize products and services that are completely new

Exploitative SC innovation

We frequently refine the provision of existing products and services

We regularly implement small adaptations to existing products and services

We introduce improved but existing products and services for local markets

We improve our provision’s efficiency of products and services

We increase economies of scales in existing markets

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Liu, Xy. & Xu, Sr. Impact of e-integration on ambidextrous innovation in supply chain: the mediation and suppression effect of supply chain strategy implementation. Inf Technol Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00412-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00412-z

Keywords

Navigation