Multi-objective exploration of architectural designs by composition of model transformations

1. Aleti, A., Bjornander, S., Grunske, L., Meedeniya, I.: Archeopterix: An extendable tool for architecture optimization of AADL models. In: Workshop on Model-Based Methodologies for Pervasive and Embedded Software, MOMPES ’09, pp. 61–71. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2009)

2. Aleti, A., Buhnova, B., Grunske, L., Koziolek, A., Meedeniya, I.: Software architecture optimization methods: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(5), 658–683 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Aranega, V., Etien, A., Mosser, S.: Using Feature Model to Build Model Transformation Chains. Springer, Berlin (2012)

   Book  Google Scholar 

4. Basciani, F., Di Ruscio, D., Iovino, L., Pierantonio, A.: Automated Chaining of Model Transformations with Incompatible Metamodels. Springer, Cham (2014)

   Book  Google Scholar 

5. Borde, E., Rahmoun, S., Cadoret, F., Pautet, L., Singhoff, F., Dissaux, P.: Architecture models refinement for fine grain timing analysis of embedded systems. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP), pp. 44–50 (2014)

6. Castellanos, C., Borde, E., Pautet, L., Sbastien, G., Vergnaud, T.: Improving reusability of model transformations by automating their composition. In: 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 267–274 (2015)

7. Chenouard, R., Jouault, F.: Automatically Discovering Hidden Transformation Chaining Constraints. Springer, Berlin (2009)

   Book  Google Scholar 

8. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Drago, M.L., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R.: A quality driven extension to the qvt-relations transformation language. Comput. Sci. 30(1), 1–20 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

10. Etien, A., Aranega, V., Blanc, X., Paige, R.F.: Chaining model transformations. In: 1st Workshop on the Analysis of Model Transformations, New York, NY, USA, pp. 9–14 (2012)

11. Etien, A., Muller, A., Legrand, T., Blanc, X.: Combining independent model transformations. In: Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC’10, pp. 2237–2243. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010)

12. Feiler, P.H., Gluch, D.P.: Model-Based Engineering with AADL: An Introduction to the SAE Architecture Analysis & Design Language. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2012)

    Google Scholar 

13. Heckel, R., Kuster, J., Taentzer, G.: Confluence of typed attributed graph transformation systems. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Kreowski, H.J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Graph Transformation. LNCS, vol. 2505. Springer, Berlin (2002)

14. Insfran, E., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., Abrahão, S.: Design guidelines for the development of quality-driven model transformations. In: 13th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Part II, MODELS’10, pp. 288–302. Springer, Berlin (2010)

15. Jouault, F., Kurtev, I.: Transforming models with ATL. In: International Conference on Satellite Events at MoDELS’05, pp. 128–138. Springer, Berlin (2006)

16. Koziolek, A., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: Peropteryx: automated application of tactics in multi-objective software architecture optimization. In: the ACM SIGSOFT Conference Quality of Software Architectures. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011)

17. Li, R., Etemaadi, R., Emmerich, M.T.M., Chaudron, M.R.V.: An evolutionary multiobjective optimization approach to component-based software architecture design. In: 2011 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 432–439 (2011)

18. Loniewski, G., Borde, E., Blouin, D., Insfran, E.: An automated approach for architectural model transformations. In: 22nd International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2013), Sevilla, Spain (2013)

19. Martens, A., Koziolek, H., Becker, S., Reussner, R.: Automatically improve software architecture models for performance, reliability, and cost using evolutionary algorithms. In: First Joint WOSP/SIPEW International Conference on Performance Engineering, pp. 105–116. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010)

20. Merilinna, J.: A tool for quality-driven architecture model transformation. Ph.D. thesis, VVT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Vuorimiehentie, Finland (2005)

21. OMG, O.M.G.: Flow latency analysis with the AADL (2012)

22. Rahmoun, S., Borde, E., Pautet, L.: Automatic selection and composition of model transformations alternatives using evolutionary algorithms. In: 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops, pp. 25:1–25:7. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015)

23. Sha, L., Rajkumar, R., Lehoczky, J.P.: Priority inheritance protocols: an approach to real-time synchronization. IEEE Trans. Comput. 39(9), 1175–1185 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

24. Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol. Comput. 2, 221–248 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Tisi, M., Jouault, F., Fraternali, P., Ceri, S., Bézivin, J.: On the use of higher-order model transformations. In: 5th European Conference on Model Driven Architecture—Foundations and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2009)

26. Wagelaar, D.: Composition Techniques for Rule-Based Model Transformation Languages. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

27. Zheng, W., Zhu, Q., Natale, M.D., Vincentelli, A.S.: Definition of task allocation and priority assignment in hard real-time distributed systems. In: 28th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2007 (RTSS 2007), pp. 161–170. IEEE (2007)

28. Zhu, Q., Yang, Y., Scholte, E., Natale, M.D., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: Optimizing extensibility in hard real-time distributed systems. In: Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), 2009, pp. 275–284. IEEE (2009)

Download references