Abstract
This paper explores the dynamic relationship between Bitcoin prices and the sentiments expressed by celebrities on X (formerly Twitter), employing a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of a diverse range of sentiments (positive, negative, valence, arousal, dominance) extracted from the posts of 30 influential celebrities in the Bitcoin community on future Bitcoin prices and volumes. The analysis reveals that negative sentiments have a statistically significant impact on Bitcoin price fluctuations. Furthermore, while the shocks to price caused by sentiments converge within approximately 2 weeks, it was found that in the short term, spanning just 2 days, positive sentiments and valence sentiments positively influence price fluctuations, whereas negative sentiments exert a stronger negative effect. This finding underscores the direct influence of celebrity sentiments on the short-term emotions and actions of Bitcoin market participants, supporting psychological researches that indicate a strong influence of negative information on individual cognition and behavior. The significance of this study lies in its broad analysis of Bitcoin price fluctuations using the sentiments of various influencers on social media, not limited to globally recognized figures, and shows one possible way to respond to an immature market. This study offers valuable insights for investors and market analysts in refining investment strategies and risk management by considering market sentiment fluctuations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
We are unable to publish the usersā post data due to the terms of use for the Academic Research product track of X (formerly Twitter).
Notes
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/. Accessed: 2023-11-27.
https://companiesmarketcap.com/. Accessed: 2023-11-27.
In July 2023, Twitter was renamed to āXā. This paper will use the name āXā for clarity and consistency.
https://www.coinbase.com. Accessed: 2023-11-27.
https://hive.one/c/Bitcoin. Accessed: 2022-5-31.
https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment. Accessed: 2023ā11-27.
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716ā723.
Akhtaruzzaman, M., Sensoy, A., & Corbet, S. (2020). The influence of Bitcoin on portfolio diversification and design. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101344.
Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Mensi, W., & Yoon, S. M. (2018). Efficiency, multifractality, and the long-memory property of the Bitcoin market: A comparative analysis with stock, currency, and gold markets. Finance Research Letters, 27, 228ā234.
Ante, L. (2023). How Elon Muskās twitter activity moves cryptocurrency markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122112.
Baig, A., Blau, B. M., & Sabah, N. (2019). Price clustering and sentiment in bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 29, 111ā116.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645ā1680.
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Galbraith, J. W., & Hendry, D. (1993). Co-integration, error correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford University Press.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323ā370.
Baur, D. G., & Dimpfl, T. (2021). The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value. Empirical Economics, 61(5), 2663ā2683.
Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177ā189.
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1ā8.
Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., & Awad, M. (2020). Augmented textual features-based stock market prediction. IEEE Access, 8, 40269ā40282.
Chaim, P., & Laurini, M. P. (2018). Volatility and return jumps in bitcoin. Economics Letters, 173, 158ā163.
Chen, Y., Bredin, D., PotƬ, V., & Matkovskyy, R. (2022). COVID risk narratives: A computational linguistic approach to the econometric identification of narrative risk during a pandemic. Digital Finance, 4(1), 17ā61.
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427ā431.
Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50, 987ā1007.
Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37, 424ā438.
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on web and social media (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 216ā225).
Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255ā259.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263ā292.
Kim, H. J., Hong, J. S., Hwang, H. C., Kim, S. M., & Han, D. H. (2020). Comparison of psychological status and investment style between bitcoin investors and share investors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 502295.
Kraaijeveld, O., & De Smedt, J. (2020). The predictive power of public Twitter sentiment for forecasting cryptocurrency prices. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 65, 101188.
Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297ā303.
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187ā1230.
Mai, F., Shan, Z., Bai, Q., Wang, X., & Chiang, R. H. (2018). How does social media impact Bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 19ā52.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.
Mohammad, S. (2018). Obtaining reliable human ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance for 20,000 English words. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational linguistics (volume 1: Long papers) (pp. 174ā184).
Mushtaq, R. (2011). Augmented dickey fuller test. Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1911068.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 2008, 21260.
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(3), 703ā708.
Platanakis, E., & Urquhart, A. (2020). Should investors include bitcoin in their portfolios? A portfolio theory approach. The British Accounting Review, 52(4), 100837.
Sensoy, A. (2019). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A high-frequency analysis with alternative currencies. Finance Research Letters, 28, 68ā73.
Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 1ā48.
Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139ā1168.
Valdez, D., Ten Thij, M., Bathina, K., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2020). Social media insights into US mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e21418.
Vidal-TomĆ”s, D., & IbaƱez, A. (2018). Semi-strong efficiency of Bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 27, 259ā265.
Zhang, X., Fuehres, H., & Gloor, P. A. (2011). Predicting stock market indicators through twitter āI hope it is not as bad as I fear.ā Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 26, 55ā62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.I. wrote the main body of the manuscript. A.Y. wrote part of the manuscript and he prepared all figures and tables. S.M., the supervising professor, was responsible for the supervision and leadership of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Additional tables for the analysis
See TablesĀ 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38.
Appendix 2. Additional tables for the results of the hypothesis tests
See TablesĀ 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Inuduka, T., Yokose, A. & Managi, S. Influencing cryptocurrency: analyzing celebrity sentiments on X (formerly Twitter) and their impact on bitcoin prices. Digit Finance 6, 379ā426 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00106-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00106-3