Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influencing cryptocurrency: analyzing celebrity sentiments on X (formerly Twitter) and their impact on bitcoin prices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digital Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamic relationship between Bitcoin prices and the sentiments expressed by celebrities on X (formerly Twitter), employing a Vector Autoregression (VAR) model. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of a diverse range of sentiments (positive, negative, valence, arousal, dominance) extracted from the posts of 30 influential celebrities in the Bitcoin community on future Bitcoin prices and volumes. The analysis reveals that negative sentiments have a statistically significant impact on Bitcoin price fluctuations. Furthermore, while the shocks to price caused by sentiments converge within approximately 2 weeks, it was found that in the short term, spanning just 2 days, positive sentiments and valence sentiments positively influence price fluctuations, whereas negative sentiments exert a stronger negative effect. This finding underscores the direct influence of celebrity sentiments on the short-term emotions and actions of Bitcoin market participants, supporting psychological researches that indicate a strong influence of negative information on individual cognition and behavior. The significance of this study lies in its broad analysis of Bitcoin price fluctuations using the sentiments of various influencers on social media, not limited to globally recognized figures, and shows one possible way to respond to an immature market. This study offers valuable insights for investors and market analysts in refining investment strategies and risk management by considering market sentiment fluctuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.Ā 1
Fig.Ā 2
Fig.Ā 3
Fig.Ā 4
Fig.Ā 5
Fig.Ā 6
Fig.Ā 7
Fig.Ā 8
Fig.Ā 9
Fig.Ā 10
Fig.Ā 11
Fig.Ā 12
Fig.Ā 13
Fig.Ā 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We are unable to publish the usersā€™ post data due to the terms of use for the Academic Research product track of X (formerly Twitter).

Notes

  1. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/. Accessed: 2023-11-27.

  2. https://companiesmarketcap.com/. Accessed: 2023-11-27.

  3. In July 2023, Twitter was renamed to ā€œXā€. This paper will use the name ā€œXā€ for clarity and consistency.

  4. https://www.coinbase.com. Accessed: 2023-11-27.

  5. https://hive.one/c/Bitcoin. Accessed: 2022-5-31.

  6. https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment. Accessed: 2023ā€“11-27.

  7. https://github.com/Priya22/EmotionDynamics.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716ā€“723.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Akhtaruzzaman, M., Sensoy, A., & Corbet, S. (2020). The influence of Bitcoin on portfolio diversification and design. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101344.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Mensi, W., & Yoon, S. M. (2018). Efficiency, multifractality, and the long-memory property of the Bitcoin market: A comparative analysis with stock, currency, and gold markets. Finance Research Letters, 27, 228ā€“234.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ante, L. (2023). How Elon Muskā€™s twitter activity moves cryptocurrency markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122112.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baig, A., Blau, B. M., & Sabah, N. (2019). Price clustering and sentiment in bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 29, 111ā€“116.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645ā€“1680.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Galbraith, J. W., & Hendry, D. (1993). Co-integration, error correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323ā€“370.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baur, D. G., & Dimpfl, T. (2021). The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value. Empirical Economics, 61(5), 2663ā€“2683.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177ā€“189.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., & Awad, M. (2020). Augmented textual features-based stock market prediction. IEEE Access, 8, 40269ā€“40282.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chaim, P., & Laurini, M. P. (2018). Volatility and return jumps in bitcoin. Economics Letters, 173, 158ā€“163.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chen, Y., Bredin, D., PotƬ, V., & Matkovskyy, R. (2022). COVID risk narratives: A computational linguistic approach to the econometric identification of narrative risk during a pandemic. Digital Finance, 4(1), 17ā€“61.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427ā€“431.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50, 987ā€“1007.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37, 424ā€“438.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on web and social media (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 216ā€“225).

  • Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255ā€“259.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263ā€“292.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, H. J., Hong, J. S., Hwang, H. C., Kim, S. M., & Han, D. H. (2020). Comparison of psychological status and investment style between bitcoin investors and share investors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 502295.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kraaijeveld, O., & De Smedt, J. (2020). The predictive power of public Twitter sentiment for forecasting cryptocurrency prices. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 65, 101188.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297ā€“303.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187ā€“1230.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mai, F., Shan, Z., Bai, Q., Wang, X., & Chiang, R. H. (2018). How does social media impact Bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 19ā€“52.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mohammad, S. (2018). Obtaining reliable human ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance for 20,000 English words. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational linguistics (volume 1: Long papers) (pp. 174ā€“184).

  • Mushtaq, R. (2011). Augmented dickey fuller test. Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1911068.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 2008, 21260.

  • Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(3), 703ā€“708.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Platanakis, E., & Urquhart, A. (2020). Should investors include bitcoin in their portfolios? A portfolio theory approach. The British Accounting Review, 52(4), 100837.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sensoy, A. (2019). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A high-frequency analysis with alternative currencies. Finance Research Letters, 28, 68ā€“73.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 1ā€“48.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139ā€“1168.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Valdez, D., Ten Thij, M., Bathina, K., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2020). Social media insights into US mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e21418.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vidal-TomĆ”s, D., & IbaƱez, A. (2018). Semi-strong efficiency of Bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 27, 259ā€“265.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zhang, X., Fuehres, H., & Gloor, P. A. (2011). Predicting stock market indicators through twitter ā€œI hope it is not as bad as I fear.ā€ Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 26, 55ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.I. wrote the main body of the manuscript. A.Y. wrote part of the manuscript and he prepared all figures and tables. S.M., the supervising professor, was responsible for the supervision and leadership of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Inuduka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Additional tables for the analysis

See TablesĀ 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38.

TableĀ 14 Augmented Dickey-Fuller test results (Pt, Vt, and Spost)
TableĀ 15 AIC (Pt, Vt, and Spost)
TableĀ 16 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Pt equation of Pt, Vt, and Spost
TableĀ 17 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Vt equation of Pt, Vt, and Spost
TableĀ 18 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Spost equation of Pt, Vt, and Spost
TableĀ 19 Augmented Dickey-Fuller test results (Pt, Vt, and Snegt)
TableĀ 20 AIC (Pt, Vt, and Snegt)
TableĀ 21 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Pt equation of Pt, Vt, and Snegt
TableĀ 22 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Vt equation of Pt, Vt, and Snegt
TableĀ 23 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Snegt equation of Pt, Vt, and Snegt
TableĀ 24 Augmented Dickey-Fuller test results (Pt, Vt, and Svalt)
TableĀ 25 AIC (Pt, Vt, and Svalt)
TableĀ 26 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Pt equation of Pt, Vt, and Svalt
TableĀ 27 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Vt equation of Pt, Vt, and Svalt
TableĀ 28 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Svalt equation of Pt, Vt, and Svalt
TableĀ 29 Augmented Dickey-Fuller test results (Pt, Vt, and Sarot)
TableĀ 30 AIC (Pt, Vt, and Sarot)
TableĀ 31 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Pt equation of Pt, Vt, and Sarot
TableĀ 32 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Vt equation of Pt, Vt, and Sarot
TableĀ 33 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Sarot equation of Pt, Vt, and Sarot
TableĀ 34 Augmented Dickey-Fuller test results (Pt, Vt, and Sdomt)
TableĀ 35 AIC (Pt, Vt, and Sdomt)
TableĀ 36 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Pt equation of Pt, Vt, and Sdomt
TableĀ 37 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Vt equation of Pt, Vt, and Sdomt
TableĀ 38 Estimation results for Ī±, Ī², and Ī³ in the Sdomt equation of Pt, Vt, and Sdomt

Appendix 2. Additional tables for the results of the hypothesis tests

See TablesĀ 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53.

TableĀ 39 Ljung-Box test results (Pt, Vt, and Spost)
TableĀ 40 ARCH-LM test results (Pt, Vt, and Spost)
TableĀ 41 Jarqueā€“Bera test results (Pt, Vt, and Spost)
TableĀ 42 Ljung-Box test results (Pt, Vt, and Snegt)
TableĀ 43 ARCH-LM test results (Pt, Vt, and Snegt)
TableĀ 44 Jarqueā€“Bera test results (Pt, Vt, and Snegt)
TableĀ 45 Ljung-Box test results (Pt, Vt, and Svalt)
TableĀ 46 ARCH-LM test results (Pt, Vt, and Svalt)
TableĀ 47 Jarqueā€“Bera test results (Pt, Vt, and Svalt)
TableĀ 48 Ljung-Box test results (Pt, Vt, and Sarot)
TableĀ 49 ARCH-LM test results (Pt, Vt, and Sarot)
TableĀ 50 Jarqueā€“Bera test results (Pt, Vt, and Sarot)
TableĀ 51 Ljung-Box test results (Pt, Vt, and Sdomt)
TableĀ 52 ARCH-LM test results (Pt, Vt, and Sdomt)
TableĀ 53 Jarqueā€“Bera test results (Pt, Vt, and Sdomt)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inuduka, T., Yokose, A. & Managi, S. Influencing cryptocurrency: analyzing celebrity sentiments on X (formerly Twitter) and their impact on bitcoin prices. Digit Finance 6, 379ā€“426 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00106-3

Keywords

JEL Classification