Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A Variable Stiffness Soft Gripper Using Granular Jamming and Biologically Inspired Pneumatic Muscles

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the domains, in which robots operate change the objects a robot may be required to grasp and manipulate, are likely to vary significantly and often. Furthermore there is increasing likelihood that in the future robots will work collaboratively alongside people. There has therefore been interest in the development of biologically inspired robot designs which take inspiration from nature. This paper presents the design and testing of a variable stiffness, three fingered soft gripper, which uses pneumatic muscles to actuate the fingers and granular jamming to vary their stiffness. This gripper is able to adjust its stiffness depending upon how fragile/deformable the object being grasped is. It is also lightweight and low inertia, making it better suited to operation near people. Each finger is formed from a cylindrical rubber bladder filled with a granular material. It is shown how decreasing the pressure inside the finger increases the jamming effect and raises finger stiffness. The paper shows experimentally how the finger stiffness can be increased from 21 N·m−1 to 71 N·m−1. The paper also describes the kinematics of the fingers and demonstrates how they can be position-controlled at a range of different stiffness values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Jacobsen S C, Wood J E, Knutti D F, Biggers K B. The UTAH/MIT dextrous hand: Work in progress. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1984, 3, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali M S, Kyriakopoulos K J, Stephanou H E. The kinematics of the Anthrobot-2 dextrous hand. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, USA, 1993, 705–710.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Diftler M A, Mehling J S, Abdallah M E, Radford N A, Bridgwater L B, Sanders A M, Hargrave B. Robonaut 2-the first humanoid robot in space. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, 2178–2183.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grebenstein M, Albu-Schäffer A, Bahls T, Chalon M, Eiberger O, Friedl W, Höppner H. The DLR hand arm system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, 3175–3182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao Z, Wei G, Dai J S. Inverse kinematics and workspace analysis of the metamorphic hand. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2014, 5, 965–975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schulte H F. The characteristics of the McKibben artificial muscle. In the Application of External Power in Prosthetics and Orthotics, 1961, 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chou C P, Hannaford B. Measurement and modelling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1996, 12, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis S, Tsagarakis N, Canderle J, Caldwell D. Enhanced modelling and performance in braided pneumatic muscle actuators. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2003, 22, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis S. Caldwell D. A dexterous robot hand for museum exhibition. Design, installation and maintenance. An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 2010, 13, 1859–1867.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shadow Dexterous Hand [2015-05-29]. https://www.shadowrobot.com/products/dexterous-hand/.

  11. Bicchi A, Tonietti G. Fast and “soft-arm” tactics [robot arm design]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2004, 11, 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim S, Laschi C, Trimmer B. Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology, 2013, 31, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin H T, Leisk G G, Trimmer B. GoQBot: A caterpillarinspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 026007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laschi C, Cianchetti M, Mazzolai B, Margheri L, Follador M, Dario P. Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Advanced Robotics, 2012, 26, 709–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seok S, Onal C D, Wood R, Rus D, Kim S. Peristaltic locomotion with antagonistic actuators in soft robotics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2010, 1228–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hassan T, Manti M, Passetti G, d'Elia N, Cianchetti M, Laschi C. Design and development of a bio-inspired, underactuated soft gripper. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, 2015, 3619–3622.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rateni G, Cianchetti M, Ciuti G, Menciassi A, Laschi C. Design and development of a soft robotic gripper for manipulation in minimally invasive surgery: A proof of concept. Meccanica, 2015, 50, 2855–2863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maghooa F, Stilli A, Noh Y, Althoefer K, Wurdemann H A. Tendon and pressure actuation for a bio-inspired manipulator based on an antagonistic principle. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seattle, WA, USA, 2015, 2556–2561.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Katzschmann R K, Marchese A D, Rus D. Autonomous object manipulation using a soft planar grasping manipulator. Soft Robotics, 2015, 2, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mosadegh B, Polygerinos P, Keplinger C, Wennstedt S, Shepherd R F, Gupta U, Shim J, Bertoldi K, Walsh C J, Whitesides G M. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24, 2163–2170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Homberg B S, Katzschmann R K, Dogar M R, Rus D. Haptic identification of objects using a modular soft robotic gripper. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 1698–1705.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wakimoto S, Ogura K, Suzumori K, Nishioka Y. Miniature soft hand with curling rubber pneumatic actuators. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, 2009, 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Al Abeach L A, Nefti-Meziani S, Davis S. Design of a variable stiffness soft dexterous gripper. Soft Robotics, 2017, 4, 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shiva A, Stilli A, Noh Y, Faragasso A, De Falco I, Gerboni G, Wurdemann H A. Tendon-based stiffening for a pneumatically actuated soft manipulator. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2016, 1, 632–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang A, Ataollahi A, Althoefer K, Dasgupta P, Nanayakkara T. A variable stiffness joint by granular jamming. Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2012, 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng N G, Lobovsky M B, Keating S J, Setapen A M, Gero K I, Hosoi A E, Iagnemma K D. Design and analysis of a robust, low-cost, highly articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2012, 4328–4333.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown E, Rodenberg N, Amend J, Mozeika A, Steltz E, Zakin M R, Jaeger H M. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107, 18809–18814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim Y J, Cheng S, Kim S, Lagnemma K. A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, 29, 1031–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis S, Tsagarakis N, Canderle J, Caldwell D. Enhanced modelling and performance in braided pneumatic muscle actuators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2003, 22, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang A, Xynogalas G, Dasgupta P, Althoefer K, Nanayakkara T. Design of a variable stiffness flexible manipulator with composite granular jamming and membrane coupling. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2012, 2922–2927.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Godage I S, Branson D T, Guglielmino E, Medrano-Cerda G A, Caldwell D. Shape function-based kinematics and dynamics for variable length continuum robotic arms. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, 452–457.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ziegler J G, Nichols N B. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Transactions of the ASME, 1942, 64, 759–765.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Iraq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loai Al Abeach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Abeach, L., Nefti-Meziani, S., Theodoridis, T. et al. A Variable Stiffness Soft Gripper Using Granular Jamming and Biologically Inspired Pneumatic Muscles. J Bionic Eng 15, 236–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0018-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0018-8

Keywords

Navigation