Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Awareness Aspects and Effects on Coordination and Information Sharing in the Domain of Software Engineering as CSCW: An Ethnographic Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Augmented Human Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sets out to understand and explore awareness in software engineering as a form of collaborative work in terms of its entailment and implication. In doing so, it intends to answer the following two questions: What are the aspects of awareness that are most relevant to the domain of software engineering? In what ways does awareness affect coordination and information sharing among collaborating actors in the domain of software engineering? An ethnographic methodology was espoused in order to test existing theoretical perspectives and generalizations pertaining to cooperative awareness. The study shows that what constitutes awareness beyond what and where of work context is, to a great extent, contingent upon the requirements and objectives of each professional domain with respect to the nature and complexity of joint activities and the manner in which the collaborating actors interact with each other accordingly. This also depends on the role they play in cooperative endeavors. The aspects that are most relevant to the domain of software engineering include work-oriented information on each others’ activities, tasks as moment-by-moment work processes, general information of all collaborating actors, detailed information about each others’ attention and responsibility as to ongoing projects, changes to shared document repositories and workspaces, and the delicate interplay between individual and cooperative activities. Moreover, the study corroborates the importance of awareness information for successful and effective collaboration in the domain of software engineering in terms of coordination and information sharing. Accordingly, awareness affects coordination and information sharing in ways that it ensures that the contributions of collaborating actors are relevant to the coordinated work and their actions are evaluated according to the coordinated goals, reduces the effort associated with coordination and information sharing in terms of using CSCW synchronous and asynchronous technologies as well as the frequency of this use, keeps the collaboration efforts to a minimum, enables to structure activities and avoid duplication of work and to fine-grain synergistic group and shared working behavior in relation to coordinated tasks, and acts as a foundation for (and predictor for) closer collaboration in terms of coordination and information sharing. In addition, in the domain of software engineering, the contextual conditions that determine the manner in which coordination and information sharing can be achieved are mostly personal, experiential, and/or professional. This study suggests that it is important to focus on awareness as a set of theoretical perspectives and to support technologies pertaining to work practice in relevance to the domain when designing and evaluating CSCW systems in order to achieve more effective and efficient outcomes in terms of coordination and information sharing as social processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abran A, Moore JW, Bourque P, Dupuis R (2004) Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE Computer Society

  2. Bardram JE, Hansen TR (2010) Context-based workplace awareness: concepts and technologies for supporting distributed awareness in a hospital environment. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 19(2):105–138

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bannon LJ, Schmidt K (1989) CSCW: four characters in search of a context. In: ECSCW’89, 13–15 Sept. Gatwick, London, pp 358–372

  4. Bentley R, Dourish P (1995) Medium versus mechanism: supporting collaboration through customization. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer-supported cooperative work ECSCW ‘95, Stockholm, Sweden, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentley R, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Sommerville I, Hughes J, Randall D, Shapiro D (1992) Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work—CSCW’92 (Oct. 31–Nov. 4, Toronto, Canada), New York, ACM, pp 123–129

  6. Bibri SE (2015) The human face of Ambient Intelligence, cognitive, emotional, affective, behavioral, and conversational aspects. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bibri SE (2015) The shaping of ambient intelligence and the internet of things: historico-epistemic, socio-cultural, politico-institutional and eco-environmental dimensions. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blomberg J, Burrell M (2012) An ethnographic approach to design. In: Jacko JA (ed) Human–computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1025–1052

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blomberg J, Karasti H (2012) Ethnography: positioning ethnography within participatory design. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, London, pp 86–116

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blomberg J, Karasti H (2013) ‘Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22(4–6):373–423

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blomberg J, Giagomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P (1993) Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borning A, Travers M (1991) Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’91 (Apr. 27–May 2, New Orleans, LO), ACM, New York, pp 13–20

  13. Cabitza F, Simone C (2013) Computational coordination mechanisms: a tale of a struggle for flexibility. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denscombe M (2007) The Good research guide. McGraw-Hill House, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dey AK (2000) Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications. PhD thesis, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology

  16. Dey AK (2001) Understanding and using context. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5(1):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dey AK, Abowd GD, Salber D (2001) A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum Comput Interact 16(2–4):97–166

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work—CSCW’92, Oct. 31–Nov. 4, ACM, Toronto, Canada, New York, USA, pp 107–114

  19. Dourish P, Bly S (1992) Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’92, May 3–7, ACM, Monterey, CA, pp 541–547

  20. Falzon MA (2009) Introduction. In: Falzon MA (ed) Multi-sited ethnography: theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research surrey, Ashgate, Burlington, pp 1–23

  21. Fine GA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr 22(3):267–294

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzpatrick G, Ellingsen G (2013) A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 22:609–665

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gaver WW (1992) The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW’92 (Toronto, 1–4 November, 1992). ACM, New York

  24. Goodwin C, Duranti A (1992) Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grasso MA, Convertino G (2012) Collective intelligence in organizations: tools and studies [Special theme of (CSCW)]. J Collab Comput Work Pract 21:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greif I (1988) Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gross T (2013) Supporting effortless coordination: 25 years of awareness research. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gross T, Prinz W (2004) Modelling shared contexts in cooperative environments: concept, implementation, and evaluation. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 13(3–4):283–303

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gross T, Stary C, Totter A (2005) User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: structured embedding of findings from social sciences. Int J Hum Comput Interact (IJHCI) 18(3):323–360

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grudin J (1994) Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus. IEEE Comput 27(5):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grudin J, Poltrock S (2012) CSCW: computer supported cooperative work. In: Soegaard M, Dam RF (eds.) Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction, Interaction-Design.org Foundation, viewed 10 November 2016. http://www.interactiondesign.org/encyclopedia/cscw_computer_supported_cooperative_work.html

  32. Gutwin C, Greenberg S (2002) A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 11(3–4):411–446

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harper RR, Hughes JA, Shapiro DZ (1989) Working in harmony: an examination of computer technology in air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported cooperative work—ECSCW’89 (Sept. 13–15, Gatwick, UK), Dordrecht, Elsevier, pp 73–86

  34. Heath C, Luff P (1992) Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 1:69–94

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heath C, Luff P (1996) Convergent activities: line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In: Engestroem Y, Middleton D (eds) Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 96–129

    Google Scholar 

  36. Herskovic V, Pino JA, Ochoa SF, Antunes P (2007) Evaluation methods for groupware systems. In: International conference on groupware: design implementation and use, Springer, Country, 16–20 September, pp 328–336

  37. Hammersley M (1990) ‘What’s wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description. Sociology 24:597–615

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ishii H, Kobayashi M, Grudin J (1992) Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. In proceedings of CSCW’92. ACM, New York, pp 33–42

  39. Johansen R (1988) Groupware: computer support for business teams. The Free Press, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  40. Johannesson P, Perjons E (2012) A design science primer. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson-Lentz P, Johnson-Lentz T (1982) Groupware: the process and impacts of design choices. In: Kerr EB, Hiltz SR (eds) Computer-mediated communication systems: status and evaluation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Khan M, Sulaiman S, Tahir M, Said AM (2011) Domain-based classification of CSCW systems. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(11):1315–1319

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kirsh D (2001) The context of work. Hum Comput Interact 16:305–322

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kozulin A (1986) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Am Psychol 41(3):264–274

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuuti K (1991) Activity theory and it application to information systems research and development. In: Missen HE (ed) Information systems research. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 529–549

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lanamäki A, Väyrynen K (2016) Six issues in which IS and CSCW research communities differ. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on the design of cooperative systems, 23–27 May, Trento, Italy

  47. Leinonen P, Jaervela S, Haekkinen P (2005) Conceptualising the awareness of collaboration: a qualitative study of a global virtual team. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 14(4):301–322

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nardi BA (1996) Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness. The MIT Press, London, pp 69–102

    Google Scholar 

  49. Olson G, Olson J (2003) Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. J Econ Innov New Technol 12(1):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  50. Penichet VMR, Marin I, Gallud JA, Lozano MD, Tesoriero RA (2007) Classification method for CSCW systems. In: Electronic notes in theoretical computer science, vol 168, Elsevier, 16–17 November, pp 237–247

  51. Porter S (1993) Critical realist ethnography: the case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. Sociology 27:591–601

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prinz W (2006) Industry perspective on Collaborative Environments. In: Ballesteros IL (ed) New collaborative working environments 2020, Report on industry–led FP7 consultations and 3rd report of the experts group on Collaboration@Work. European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Bruxelles, pp 5–22

  53. Rittenbruch M, McEwan G (2009) An historical reflection of awareness in collaboration. In: Markopoulos P, de Ruyter B, Mackay W (eds) Awareness systems: advances in theory, methodology, and design, Springer, London, pp 3–48

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schmidt K (2000) The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW. In: Luff P et al (eds) Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schmidt K (2002) The problem with awareness: introductory remarks on awareness in CSCW. J Collab Comput 11(3–4):285–298

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schmidt K (2009) Divided by a common acronym: on the fragmentation of CSCW. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 7–11 September, Springer, London, Vienna, Austria, pp 223–242

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schmidt K (2011) The concept of “work’’ in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 20(4–5):341–401

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen HW (1999) There is more to context than location. Comput Gr UK 23(6):893–901

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schmidt K, Bannon L (2013) Constructing CSCW: the first quarter century. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 22(4–6):345–372

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schmidt K, Heath C, Rodden T (2002) Preface of the special issue on awareness in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 11(3–4):iii–iv

    Google Scholar 

  61. Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  62. Suchman L (2005) Introduction to plans and situated actions II: human–machine reconfigurations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ulrich W (2008) Information, context, and critique: context awareness of the third kind. In: The 31st information systems research seminar in scandinavia, Keynote talk presented to IRIS 31

Download references

Funding

The study is an integral part of a Ph.D. research endeavor being undertaken at NTNU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Sem Saelands veie 9, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Simon Elias Bibri

Authors
  1. Simon Elias Bibri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Elias Bibri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bibri, S.E. Awareness Aspects and Effects on Coordination and Information Sharing in the Domain of Software Engineering as CSCW: An Ethnographic Study. Augment Hum Res 4, 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-019-0016-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-019-0016-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation