Informatica

In this paper, we focus on group decision making problems with uncertain preference ordinals, in which the weight information of decision makers is completely unknown or partly unknown. First of all, the consistency and deviation measures between two uncertain preference ordinals are defined. Based on the two measures, a multi-objective optimization model which aims to maximize the deviation of each decision maker’s judgements and the consistency among different decision makers’ judgements is established to obtain the weights of decision makers. The compromise solution method, i.e. the VIKOR method is then extended to derive the compromise solution of alternatives for group decision making problems with uncertain preference ordinals. Finally, three examples are utilized to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

The aim of the current research is to measure objective congruence (incongruence) of the results obtained in a process of multiple criteria analysis when applying different MCDM methods. The methodology for evaluation of ranking results is developed on the ground of a case study of the redevelopment of derelict buildings as well as on composed experimental tasks. Fuzzified COPRAS, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are applied for ranking the alternatives. Calculation results are evaluated by applying mathematical statistics methods. A methodology for measuring the congruence (incongruence) of the relative significances of alternatives is proposed.