Papers by Miguel F Andrade
Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2001
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Febs Letters, 2000
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bioinformatics/computer Applications in The Biosciences, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Nucleic Acids Research, 2003
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Structural Biology, 2001
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Molecular Biology, 2001
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
BMC Bioinformatics, 2005
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
BMC Bioinformatics, 2003
Background To date, many of the methods for information extraction of biological information from... more Background To date, many of the methods for information extraction of biological information from scientific articles are restricted to the abstract of the article. However, full text articles in electronic version, which offer larger sources of data, are currently available. Several questions arise as to whether the effort of scanning full text articles is worthy, or whether the information that can be extracted from the different sections of an article can be relevant. Results In this work we addressed those questions showing that the keyword content of the different sections of a standard scientific article (abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion) is very heterogeneous. Conclusions Although the abstract contains the best ratio of keywords per total of words, other sections of the article may be a better source of biologically relevant data.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Nature Genetics, 1995
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
BMC Genetics, 2005
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cancer Cell, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
PLOS Biology, 2005
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Febs Letters, 2005
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Miguel F Andrade