Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/paa12.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Susan Ariel Aaronson

Personal Details

First Name:Susan
Middle Name:Ariel
Last Name:Aaronson
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:paa12
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://elliott.gwu.edu/susan-aaronson
Twitter: @aaronsonsusan
Mastodon: @saaronson@dizl.de
Terminal Degree:1993 Department of Economics; Johns Hopkins University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(94%) Institute for International Economic Policy (IIEP)
Elliott School of International Affairs
George Washington University

Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
http://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/
RePEc:edi:iigwuus (more details at EDIRC)

(6%) Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)

Waterloo, Canada
http://www.cigionline.org/
RePEc:edi:cigiica (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2023. "The Governance Challenge Posed by Large Learning Models," Working Papers 2023-07, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  2. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2022. "Wicked Problems Might Inspire Greater Data Sharing," Working Papers 2022-09, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  3. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2022. "A Missed Opportunity to Further Build Trust in AI: A Landscape Analysis of OECD.AI," Working Papers 2022-10, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  4. Susan Aaronson, 2021. "Can Trade Agreements Solve the Wicked Problem of Disinformation," Working Papers 2021-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  5. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2020. "Data Is Dangerous: Comparing the Risks That the United States, Canada and Germany See in Data Troves," Working Papers 2020-5, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  6. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2020. "Data Governance, AI, and Trade: Asia as a Case Study," Working Papers 2020-6, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  7. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2020. "A Plurilateral “Single Data Area†Is the Solution to Canada’s Data Trilemma," Working Papers 2020-8, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  8. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2020. "America's uneven approach to AI and its consequences," Working Papers 2020-7, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  9. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "Information Please: A Comprehensive Approach to Digital Trade Provisions in NAFTA 2.0," Working Papers 2018-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  10. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "Data is Different: Why the World Needs a New Approach to Governing Cross-border Data Flows," Working Papers 2018-10, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  11. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2018-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  12. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "Data Minefield: How AI is Prodding Governments to Rethink Trade in Data," Working Papers 2018-11, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  13. N. Susan Gaines & Susan Ariel Aaronson & M Rodwan Abouharb, 2017. "Taming the Tiger: Peaceful and Violent Protest and the Repressive Responses of Government," Working Papers 2017-15, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  14. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  15. N. Susan Gaines & Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Repression, Civil Conflict, And Leadership Tenure: A Case Study of Turkey," Working Papers 2017-14, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  16. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "What Are We Talking About When We Discuss Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2017-9, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  17. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Repression, Civil Conflict, And Leadership Tenure: A Case Study of Kazakhstan," Working Papers 2017-16, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  18. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Repression, Civil Conflict, and Leadership Tenure: A Case Study of Honduras," Working Papers 2017-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  19. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "The Digital Trade Imbalance and Its Implications for Internet Governance," Working Papers 2016-7, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  20. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Repression, Civil Conflict, and Leadership Tenure: The Sri Lanka Case Study," Working Papers 2016-9, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  21. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Repression, Civil Conflict, And Leadership Tenure: A Case Study Of Argentina," Working Papers 2016-21, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  22. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Human Rights: TPP as a Case Study," Working Papers 2016-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  23. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Repression, Civil Conflict, And Leadership Tenure: A Case Study Of Bahrain," Working Papers 2016-23, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  24. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Working by Design: New Ideas to Empower U.S. and European Workers in TTIP," Working Papers 2016-8, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  25. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Ethan Wham, 2016. "Can Transparency in Supply Chains Advance Labor Rights? Mapping of Existing Efforts," Working Papers 2016-6, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  26. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Redefining Protectionism: The new challenge in the digital age," Working Papers 2016-30, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  27. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2015. "Repression, civil conflict and leadership tenure; the Thai Case Study: 2006-2014," Working Papers 2015-9, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  28. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Ian Higham, 2014. "Putting the Blame on Governments: Why Firms and Governments have Failed to Advance the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights," Working Papers 2014-06, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  29. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Rob Maxim, 2014. "Trade Imbalance: Juggling the Needs of Investors and the Public Interest in TTIP," Working Papers 2014-08, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  30. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2013. "Internet Governance and Internet Control: How to Safeguard Internet Freedom," Working Papers 2013-10, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  31. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Ian Higham, 2013. "‘Re-righting business’: John Ruggie and the struggle to develop international human rights standards for transnational firms," Working Papers 2013-5, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  32. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2011. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Working Papers 2011-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  33. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2010. "How China's Employment Problems Became Trade Problems: China, Labour Law, and the Rule of Law," Working Papers 2010-11, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  34. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2010. "A Match Made in the Corporate and Public Interests: Marrying Voluntary CSR Initiatives and the WTO," Working Papers 2010-06, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  35. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2010. "Unexpected Bedfellows: The GATT, the WTO, and Some Democratic Rights," Working Papers 2010-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  36. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Jennifer Brinkerhoff, 2009. "Limited Partnership: Business, Government, Civil Society (NGOs) and the Public in the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Working Papers 2010-28, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  37. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2006. "Reality Bites: The Myth of Labor Rights as a Non-trade Issue," Working Papers 2010-29, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  38. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2002. "Minding Our Business: Corporate Social Responsibility Pressures and the Failure to Develop Universal Global Rules to Govern Investors and States," Working Papers 2010-26, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

Articles

  1. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2021. "Transatlantic Priorities: Data Governance," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(1), pages 59-60, January.
  2. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2019. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-577, October.
  3. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2018. "Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 245-272.
  4. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "What might have been and could still be: the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s potential to encourage an open internet and digital rights," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 232-254, May.
  5. Aaronson Susan Ariel & Abouharb M. Rodwan & Daniel Wang K., 2015. "The Liberal Illusion Is Not a Complete Delusion: The WTO Helps Member States Keep the Peace Only When It Increases Trade," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 455-484, December.
  6. Aaronson, Susan, 2015. "Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 671-700, October.
  7. Aaronson, Susan Ariel & Abouharb, M. Rodwan, 2014. "Does the WTO help member states improve governance?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 547-582, July.
  8. Alexander Dix & Gregor Thüsing & Johannes Traut & Laurits Christensen & Federico Etro & Susan Aaronson & Rob Maxim, 2013. "EU data protection reform: Opportunities and concerns," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(5), pages 268-285, September.
  9. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2011. "Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 50-63, February.
  10. Aaronson Susan, 2010. "How China's Employment Problems Became Trade Problems," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, October.
  11. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2007. "Seeping in slowly: how human rights concerns are penetrating the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 413-449, November.
  12. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2006. "Ronald Seavoy. Origins and Growth of the Global Economy: From the Fifteenth Century Onward. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2003. 275 pp. ISBN 0-275-97912-1, $70.95," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 164-166, March.
  13. Aaronson, Susan, 2000. "Thomas W. Zeiler. Free Trade, Free World: The Advent of GATT. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999. xiv + 280 pp. ISBN 0-8078-2458-5, $39.95," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 445-447, June.
  14. Susan Aaronson, 1994. "The Policy Battle Over Freer World Trade," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 48-54, November.
  15. Aaronson, Susan, 1993. "Hollywood's Overseas Campaign: The North Atlantic Movie Trade, 1920–1950. By Ian Jarvie. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Pp. xvii, 473. $65.00," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 713-714, September.
  16. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 1993. "The Manchester Experiment: A History of Manchester Business School, 1965–1990. ByJohn F. Wilson · London: Paul Chapmam Publishing, 1992. xi + 153 pp. Photographs, tables, charts, appendixes, notes, bi," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(2), pages 333-335, July.

Books

  1. Aaronson, Susan Ariel. & Aissi, Jonas. & Barbu, Mirela. & Campling, Liam. & Corley-Coulibaly, Marva. & Echeverria Manrique, Elizabeth. & Harrison, James, & Kizu, Takaaki. & Lazo Grandi, Pablo. & Tran,, 2017. "Handbook on assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment arrangements," Studies on Growth with Equity, International Labour Office, Research Department, number 994961693502676, April.
  2. Aaronson, Susan Ariel. & Aissi, Jonas. & Barbu, Mirela. & Campling, Liam. & Corley-Coulibaly, Marva. & Echeverria Manrique, Elizabeth. & Harrison, James, & Kizu, Takaaki. & Lazo Grandi, Pablo. & Tran,, 2017. "Manual de evaluación de las disposiciones laborales en acuerdos comerciales y de inversión," Studies on Growth with Equity, International Labour Office, Research Department, number 994976493202676, April.
  3. Aaronson,Susan Ariel & Zimmerman,Jamie M., 2007. "Trade Imbalance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521694209, October.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2020. "A Plurilateral “Single Data Area†Is the Solution to Canada’s Data Trilemma," Working Papers 2020-8, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Hoekman & Charles Sabel, 2021. "Plurilateral Cooperation as an Alternative to Trade Agreements: Innovating One Domain at a Time," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S3), pages 49-60, April.

  2. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "Data is Different: Why the World Needs a New Approach to Governing Cross-border Data Flows," Working Papers 2018-10, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Hou, Bohan, 2021. "A Novel Data Governance Scheme Based on the Behavioral Economics Theory," SocArXiv 2b9dc, Center for Open Science.
    2. Craig Allen McGee Jones, 2021. "Critical Success Factors for Data Governance of Cross-border e-Trade Data Among ASEAN Member States," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 3(1), pages 38-60, April.

  3. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2018-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan Aaronson, 2021. "Can Trade Agreements Solve the Wicked Problem of Disinformation," Working Papers 2021-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    2. Lijuan Yang, 2023. "Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Frederic Boissay & Torsten Ehlers & Leonardo Gambacorta & Hyun Song Shin, 2021. "Big techs in finance: on the new nexus between data privacy and competition," BIS Working Papers 970, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. G. M. Aubakirova & F. M. Isatayeva, 2021. "New Approaches to the Construction of a Diversified Economy: the Experience of Kazakhstan," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 712-718, November.

  4. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "The Digital Trade Imbalance and Its Implications for Internet Governance," Working Papers 2016-7, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Human Rights: TPP as a Case Study," Working Papers 2016-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    2. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "What Are We Talking About When We Discuss Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2017-9, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    3. Tao Jiang & Yizhu Hu & Fazli Haleem & Shaolong Zeng, 2023. "Do Digital Trade Rules Matter? Empirical Evidence from TAPED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Soberanía digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-1.
    5. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Digital sovereignty," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    6. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    7. Bagchi, Kaushambi & Kapilavai, Sashank, 2018. "Political Economy of Data Nationalism," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190347, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

  5. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "Working by Design: New Ideas to Empower U.S. and European Workers in TTIP," Working Papers 2016-8, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    2. Min Zhu & Thomas J. Prusa, 2023. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on the duration of antidumping protection," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 553-592, May.

  6. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Ian Higham, 2013. "‘Re-righting business’: John Ruggie and the struggle to develop international human rights standards for transnational firms," Working Papers 2013-5, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Patricia Pittman, 2016. "Alternative Approaches to the Governance of Transnational Labor Recruitment," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 269-314, June.
    2. Judith Schrempf-Stirling & Florian Wettstein, 2017. "Beyond Guilty Verdicts: Human Rights Litigation and its Impact on Corporations’ Human Rights Policies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 545-562, October.
    3. Gor Samvel, 2018. "Seemingly Connected, Obviously Separate: The Parallel Realities of the UN Global Compact and the Multilateral Regimes in Water Governance," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Judith Schrempf-Stirling, 2018. "State Power: Rethinking the Role of the State in Political Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Uwafiokun Idemudia & Cynthia Kwakyewah & Judy Muthuri, 2020. "Mining, the environment, and human rights in Ghana: An area of limited statehood perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 2919-2926, November.

  7. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2011. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Working Papers 2011-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "Duration of membership in the world trade organization and investment-oriented remittances inflows," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    2. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of the Duration of Membership in the GATT/WTO on Human Development in Developed and Developing Countries," EconStor Preprints 265061, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Choudhury, Sanchari, 2019. "WTO membership and corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "Effect of the duration of membership in the GATT/WTO on economic growth volatility," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 448-467.
    5. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2016. "Beyond trade: the impact of WTO transparency norms on socialist-oriented countries with an emphasis on Vietnam's legal reform," OSF Preprints bgzhv, Center for Open Science.
    6. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "WTO membership, the membership duration and the utilization of non-reciprocal trade preferences offered by the QUAD Countries," EconStor Preprints 247265, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Duration of the Membership in the World Trade Organization and Aid for Trade Flows," EconStor Preprints 260562, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of Aid for Trade flows on the Accession to the World Trade Organization," EconStor Preprints 261331, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Lucia Tajoli, 2022. "Too much of a good thing? Russia-EU international trade relations at times of war," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 807-834, December.
    10. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of the Duration of the Membership in GATT/WTO on Commercial Services Exports in Developing Countries," EconStor Preprints 262167, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

  8. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2010. "How China's Employment Problems Became Trade Problems: China, Labour Law, and the Rule of Law," Working Papers 2010-11, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Ceglowski Janet & Golub Stephen S., 2012. "Does China Still Have a Labor Cost Advantage?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, September.

  9. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2010. "A Match Made in the Corporate and Public Interests: Marrying Voluntary CSR Initiatives and the WTO," Working Papers 2010-06, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Lili & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2021. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility by a Multinational Firm and International Privatization Policies," MPRA Paper 105651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pallab Paul & Kausiki Mukhopadhyay, 2010. "Growth via Intellectual Property Rights Versus Gendered Inequity in Emerging Economies: An Ethical Dilemma for International Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 359-378, February.
    3. Cho, Sumi & Lee, Sang-Ho & Hoang, Xoan, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and strategic trade policy: an endogenous timing game and its policy implications," MPRA Paper 95404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Anna Zueva & Jenny Fairbrass, 2021. "Politicising Government Engagement with Corporate Social Responsibility: “CSR” as an Empty Signifier," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 635-655, May.
    5. Xu Lili & Lee Sang-Ho, 2022. "Corporate Profit Tax and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Under Foreign Acquisition," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 123-151, January.
    6. Gregory E. Goering, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility, durable-goods and firm profitability," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 489-496.
    7. Daniel Tschopp & Ronald Huefner, 2015. "Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 565-577, March.

  10. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2010. "Unexpected Bedfellows: The GATT, the WTO, and Some Democratic Rights," Working Papers 2010-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. International Organisation, 2017. "Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisons in Trade and Investment Arrangements," Working Papers id:11929, eSocialSciences.
    2. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb & K. Daniel Wang, 2015. "The Liberal Illusion Is Not a Complete Delusion: The WTO Helps Member States Keep the Peace Only When It Increases Trade," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 455-484, December.
    3. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    4. Stephen C. Nelson & Geoffrey P. R. Wallace, 2017. "Are IMF lending programs good or bad for democracy?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 523-558, December.
    5. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2014. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Working Papers 2014-07, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

  11. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Jennifer Brinkerhoff, 2009. "Limited Partnership: Business, Government, Civil Society (NGOs) and the Public in the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Working Papers 2010-28, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Cullen Hendrix & Marcus Noland, 2015. "Myanmar: Cross-Cutting Governance Challenges," Working Papers id:6676, eSocialSciences.
    2. World Bank Group, 2014. "Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement in World Bank Group Operations," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21113.
    3. Léonce Ndikumana, 2013. "The Private Sector as Culprit and Victim of Corruption in Africa," Working Papers wp330, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  12. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2006. "Reality Bites: The Myth of Labor Rights as a Non-trade Issue," Working Papers 2010-29, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Jette Steen Knudsen, 2018. "Government Regulation of International Corporate Social Responsibility in the US and the UK: How Domestic Institutions Shape Mandatory and Supportive Initiatives," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 164-188, March.

  13. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2002. "Minding Our Business: Corporate Social Responsibility Pressures and the Failure to Develop Universal Global Rules to Govern Investors and States," Working Papers 2010-26, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Cited by:

    1. Alan J. Kearns, 2017. "Rebuilding Trust: Ireland’s CSR Plan in the Light of Caritas in Veritate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(4), pages 845-857, December.

Articles

  1. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2019. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-577, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2018. "Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 245-272.

    Cited by:

    1. Yongmin Chen & Xinyu Hua & Keith E. Maskus, 2020. "International Protection of Consumer Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 8391, CESifo.
    2. Susan Aaronson, 2018. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," Working Papers 2018-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    3. Nick Bernards & Malcolm Campbell‐Verduyn & Daivi Rodima‐Taylor & Jerome Duberry & Quinn DuPont & Andreas Dimmelmeier & Moritz Huetten & Laura C. Mahrenbach & Tony Porter & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2020. "Interrogating Technology‐led Experiments in Sustainability Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 523-531, September.
    4. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Soberanía digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-1.
    5. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2021. "Digital Trade Rules in Preferential Trade Agreements: Is There a WTO Impact?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 25-36, May.
    6. Lijuan Yang, 2023. "Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Ferracane,Martina Francesca & Van Der Marel,Erik Leendert, 2021. "Regulating Personal Data : Data Models and Digital Services Trade," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9596, The World Bank.
    8. Robert Wolfe, 2018. "Learning about digital trade: Privacy and e-commerce in CETA and TPP," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/27, European University Institute.
    9. Luciano Ciravegna & Snejina Michailova, 2022. "Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 172-186, February.
    10. Lidan Jiang & Jingyan Chen & Yuhan Bao & Fang Zou, 2022. "Exploring the patterns of international technology diffusion in AI from the perspective of patent citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5307-5323, September.
    11. Xiaomeng Zhang & Wei Wang & Wenmeng Yu & Dajun Shen & Tingting Zhang, 2023. "River Chief Information-Sharing System as a River Information Governance Approach in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    13. Fleur Johns & Caroline Compton, 2022. "Data jurisdictions and rival regimes of algorithmic regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 63-84, January.

  3. Aaronson Susan Ariel & Abouharb M. Rodwan & Daniel Wang K., 2015. "The Liberal Illusion Is Not a Complete Delusion: The WTO Helps Member States Keep the Peace Only When It Increases Trade," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 455-484, December.

    Cited by:

    1. J Tyson Chatagnier & Haeyong Lim, 2021. "Does the WTO exacerbate international conflict?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1068-1082, September.
    2. Huang, Qiuyue & Li, Zhiyuan, 2024. "Trade and peace: The WTO case," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

  4. Aaronson, Susan, 2015. "Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 671-700, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan Aaronson, 2021. "Can Trade Agreements Solve the Wicked Problem of Disinformation," Working Papers 2021-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    2. Yik-Chan Chin & Jingwu Zhao, 2022. "Governing Cross-Border Data Flows: International Trade Agreements and Their Limits," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, August.

  5. Aaronson, Susan Ariel & Abouharb, M. Rodwan, 2014. "Does the WTO help member states improve governance?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 547-582, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "Duration of membership in the world trade organization and investment-oriented remittances inflows," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    2. Sena Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Duration of the Membership in the World Trade Organization and Aid for Trade Flows," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of the Duration of Membership in the GATT/WTO on Human Development in Developed and Developing Countries," EconStor Preprints 265061, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Sena Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Duration of the Membership in the GATT/WTO, Structural Economic Vulnerability and Trade Costs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-32, May.
    5. Choudhury, Sanchari, 2019. "WTO membership and corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "Effect of the duration of membership in the GATT/WTO on economic growth volatility," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 448-467.
    7. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Duration of WTO Membership and Investment-Oriented Remittances Flows," EconStor Preprints 251274, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2016. "Beyond trade: the impact of WTO transparency norms on socialist-oriented countries with an emphasis on Vietnam's legal reform," OSF Preprints bgzhv, Center for Open Science.
    9. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "WTO membership, the membership duration and the utilization of non-reciprocal trade preferences offered by the QUAD Countries," EconStor Preprints 247265, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Duration of the Membership in the World Trade Organization and Aid for Trade Flows," EconStor Preprints 260562, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of Aid for Trade flows on the Accession to the World Trade Organization," EconStor Preprints 261331, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Lucia Tajoli, 2022. "Too much of a good thing? Russia-EU international trade relations at times of war," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 807-834, December.
    13. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of the Duration of the Membership in GATT/WTO on Commercial Services Exports in Developing Countries," EconStor Preprints 262167, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Effect of the duration of membership in the GATT/WTO on human development in developed and developing countries," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 943-983, November.

  6. Alexander Dix & Gregor Thüsing & Johannes Traut & Laurits Christensen & Federico Etro & Susan Aaronson & Rob Maxim, 2013. "EU data protection reform: Opportunities and concerns," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(5), pages 268-285, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Frizzo-Barker, Julie & Chow-White, Peter A. & Mozafari, Maryam & Ha, Dung, 2016. "An empirical study of the rise of big data in business scholarship," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 403-413.
    2. Maciej Sobolewski & Michał Paliński, 2017. "How much consumers value on-line privacy? Welfare assessment of new data protection regulation (GDPR)," Working Papers 2017-17, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

  7. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2011. "Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 50-63, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Anica Zeyen & Markus Beckmann & Stella Wolters, 2016. "Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 341-360, May.
    2. Vijge, Marjanneke J. & Metcalfe, Robin & Wallbott, Linda & Oberlack, Christoph, 2019. "Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 200-209.
    3. Bürgi Bonanomi, Elisabeth & Elsig, Manfred & Espa, Ilaria, 2015. "The Commodity Sector and Related Governance Challenges from a Sustainable Development Perspective: The Example of Switzerland Current Research Gaps," Papers 865, World Trade Institute.
    4. Bertrand Venard & Kezang Tshering, 2021. "Barriers to transparency in Bhutan's public administration: A new typology of opacity," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 203-216, October.
    5. Furstenberg, Saipira & Moldalieva, Janyl, 2022. "Critical reflection on the extractive industries transparency initiative in Kyrgyzstan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Brunnschweiler, Christa & Edjekumhene, Ishmael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Daniel Berliner & Alex Ingrams & Suzanne J. Piotrowski, 2022. "Process effects of multistakeholder institutions: Theory and evidence from the Open Government Partnership," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1343-1361, October.
    8. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Walter, Götz & Van de Graaf, Thijs & Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-192.
    9. Schuler Douglas A., 2012. "A club theory approach to voluntary social programs: Multinational companies and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Fenton Villar, Paul, 2020. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and trust in politicians," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Lujala, Päivi, 2018. "An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 358-381.
    12. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Gianluca Iannucci, 2021. "(Dis)honest bureaucrats and (non)compliant firms in an evolutionary game," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 321-344, May.
    13. Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in domestic settings: An exploration of mining regulation vis-à-vis CSR in Ghana," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 9-17.
    14. Phillips, Jason & Whiting, Kai, 2016. "A geocybernetic analysis of the principles of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 248-265.
    15. Raimund Bleischwitz, 2014. "Transparency in the Extractive Industries: Time to Ask for More," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(4), pages 1-9, November.
    16. Gregory Poelzer & Stefan Linde & Sverker C. Jagers & Simon Matti, 2021. "Digging in the dark: reviewing international literature to address impending policy challenges for Swedish and Finnish mining," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 225-238, July.
    17. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hervé Dumez, 2015. "How firms (partially) organize their environment : Meta-organizations in the oil and gas industry," Working Papers hal-01483012, HAL.
    18. López-Cazar, Ibeth & Papyrakis, Elissaios & Pellegrini, Lorenzo, 2021. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and corruption in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    20. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    21. López Cazar, I.M., 2020. "Does the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) help reduce corruption in Latin America? Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," ISS Working Papers - General Series 123971, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    22. Corrigan, Caitlin C., 2014. "Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 17-30.
    23. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Andrews, Nathan, 2015. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 183-192.
    24. Berliner, Daniel & Ingrams, Alex & Piotrowski, Suzanne, 2022. "Process effects of multistakeholder institutions: theory and evidence from the Open Government Partnership," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    25. Wilson, Christopher & Claussen, Christoffer & Valverde, Pablo, 2021. "Does civil society matter for natural resource governance? A comparative analysis of multi-stakeholder participation and EITI validation outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    26. António Mateus & Luís Martins, 2021. "Building a mineral-based value chain in Europe: the balance between social acceptance and secure supply," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 239-261, July.

  8. Aaronson Susan, 2010. "How China's Employment Problems Became Trade Problems," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Ceglowski Janet & Golub Stephen S., 2012. "Does China Still Have a Labor Cost Advantage?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, September.

  9. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2007. "Seeping in slowly: how human rights concerns are penetrating the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 413-449, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2016. "Beyond trade: the impact of WTO transparency norms on socialist-oriented countries with an emphasis on Vietnam's legal reform," OSF Preprints bgzhv, Center for Open Science.
    2. Guillaume Gaulier & Aude Sztulman & Deniz Ünal, 2020. "Are global value chains receding? The jury is still out. Key findings from the analysis of deflated world trade in parts and components," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 161, pages 219-236.
    3. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2014. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Working Papers 2014-07, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    4. Duan, Fengyu, 2017. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern History of Human Rights," LawArXiv 9uftm, Center for Open Science.
    5. Davide Fiaschi & Elisa Giuliani, 2011. "The impact of business on society: exploring CRS adoption and alleged human rights abuses by large corporations," LEM Papers Series 2011/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

Books

  1. Aaronson,Susan Ariel & Zimmerman,Jamie M., 2007. "Trade Imbalance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521694209, October.

    Cited by:

    1. International Organisation, 2017. "Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisons in Trade and Investment Arrangements," Working Papers id:11929, eSocialSciences.
    2. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2016. "At the Intersection of Cross-Border Information Flows and Human Rights: TPP as a Case Study," Working Papers 2016-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    3. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2010. "Unexpected Bedfellows: The GATT, the WTO, and Some Democratic Rights," Working Papers 2010-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    4. Lisa Lechner, 2016. "The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 840-871, September.
    5. World Bank, 2012. "From Political to Economic Awakening : The Path of Economic Integration - Deauville Partnership Report on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Volume 2. Main Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 11887, The World Bank Group.
    6. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    7. World Bank, 2012. "From Political to Economic Awakening in the Arab World : The Path of Economic Integration - Deauville Partnership Report on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Volume 1. Overview Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 11886, The World Bank Group.
    8. Ida Bastiaens & Evgeny Postnikov, 2020. "Social standards in trade agreements and free trade preferences: An empirical investigation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 793-816, October.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Rankings

This author is among the top 5% authors according to these criteria:
  1. Number of Downloads through RePEc Services over the past 12 months, Weighted by Number of Authors

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 17 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-INT: International Trade (9) 2014-09-29 2014-09-29 2017-03-19 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 2019-01-28 2020-07-27 2021-05-10. Author is listed
  2. NEP-BIG: Big Data (5) 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 2020-07-27 2022-10-31 2022-10-31. Author is listed
  3. NEP-PAY: Payment Systems and Financial Technology (5) 2016-06-09 2017-03-19 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 2019-01-28. Author is listed
  4. NEP-ICT: Information and Communication Technologies (3) 2019-01-21 2019-01-21 2019-01-28
  5. NEP-GER: German Papers (2) 2014-09-29 2014-09-29
  6. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (2) 2014-09-25 2016-06-14
  7. NEP-PKE: Post Keynesian Economics (2) 2014-09-25 2016-06-14
  8. NEP-SEA: South East Asia (2) 2020-07-27 2020-07-27
  9. NEP-AGR: Agricultural Economics (1) 2020-07-27
  10. NEP-AIN: Artificial Intelligence (1) 2023-11-13
  11. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2014-09-25
  12. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2014-09-29
  13. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (1) 2014-09-29

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Susan Ariel Aaronson should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.