Author
AbstractThe reform of public pension systems has become a key policy issue in many countries. Because conventional approaches to reform largely unfunded retirement income schemes prove politically and economically difficult, attention has focused on the option of a partial shift towards funded provisions. Yet this too presents problems. This paper outlines the potential benefits of such a shift and highlights the main fiscal options and constraints. The liabilities to the current generation of retirees and workers under an unfunded pension scheme constitute a huge, hidden public debt. Most countries find that making this implicit debt fully explicit, repaying it and thus reversing the initial redistribution towards the start-up generation, lie beyond their political, economic and fiscal capacities. Thus, a shift requires simultaneous steps of the following sort: (i) a benefit reform of the unfunded scheme, reducing the implicit debt; (ii) a redesign of the basic tier remaining unfunded, to ... La réforme des systèmes publics d’assurance vieillesse est devenue un enjeu des politiques publiques dans un grand nombre de pays. Les approches classiques pour réformer en profondeur les régimes de retraite par répartition sont difficiles à mettre en œuvre aux niveaux politique et économique, aussi évoque-t-on de plus en plus la possibilité d’une réorientation partielle vers des systèmes de retraite par capitalisation. Toutefois, cette stratégie pose également problème. Ce document souligne les avantages potentiels d’une telle orientation et met en évidence les principales options et contraintes budgétaires. Les engagements pris envers la génération actuelle de retraités et d’actifs dans le cadre d’un système de répartition représentent un endettement public énorme et qui n’apparaît pas de manière officielle. La plupart des gouvernants considèrent que transformer cette dette implicite en un endettement totalement explicite, la rembourser et, ce faisant réaffecter la redistribution ...
Suggested Citation
Robert Holzmann, 1997.
"Fiscal Alternatives of Moving from Unfunded to Funded Pensions,"
OECD Development Centre Working Papers
126, OECD Publishing.
Handle:
RePEc:oec:devaaa:126-en
DOI: 10.1787/834846721016
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:devaaa:126-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dcoecfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.