Power closure from system level to implementation is mandatory to get reliable power values. This paper introduces a design environment utilizing metamodeling.
Nov 14, 2013 · This paper introduces a design environment utilizing metamodeling techniques and supporting consistent power modeling over various design levels ...
This paper introduces a design environment utilizing metamodeling techniques and supporting consistent power modeling over various design levels. The UPF ...
The semantic of the power intent format UPF: Consistent power modeling from system level to implementation. Juergen Karmann, Wolfgang Ecker. Infineon ...
The semantic of the power intent format UPF: Consistent power modeling from system level to implementation. J. Karmann, and W. Ecker. PATMOS, page 45-50.
UPF provides capability to model the power intent for System-Level IP components to be used in System-Level design. These are abstract models that contain ...
[8] J. Karmann and W. Ecker, “The semantic of the power intent format. UPF: Consistent power modeling from system level to implementation,”.
[PDF] UPF 2.0 Methodology for Hierarchical Power Intent Specification
dvcon-proceedings.org › uploads
• Parallel development of system and IP. • Consistent modeling for Hard and Soft IPs. • Documents power intent of IP for reuse. • Works within UPF 2.0 ...
System level power states. 32. SoC Integration. Page 33. • Partition design UPF ... – Check consistency between power intent and implemented design. Page 45 ...
May 8, 2023 · The VC LP solution enables the power intent owner to clean up design-independent issues in the UPF file before the RTL is ready.