Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
The 1-in-EkSAT problem, while hard to approximate within a 2Ω(k) factor, be- comes substantially easier and admits an e-approximation in polynomial time with either one of two restrictions: (i) do not allow negations (which is the 1-in- EkHS problem), (ii) consider satisfiable instances.
Abstract. We study the approximability of 1-in-kSAT, the variant of Max kSAT where a clause is deemed satisfied when precisely one of its literals is satisfied.
Abstract. We study the approximability of 1-in-kSAT, the variant of Max kSAT where a clause is deemed satised when precisely one of its literals is satised.
The results show that the 1-in-kSAT problem exhibits some rather peculiar phenomena in the realm of constraint satisfaction problems, ...
We study the approximability of 1-in-kSAT, the variant of Max kSAT where a clause is deemed satisfied when precisely one of its literals is satisfied.
Abstract: We study the approximability of 1-in-kSAT, the variant of Max kSAT where a clause is deemed satisfied when precisely one of its literals is satisfied.
We study the approximability of 1-in-kSAT, the variant of Max kSAT where a clause is deemed satisfied when precisely one of its literals is satisfied.
Aug 22, 2014 · The Complexity of Making Unique Choices: Approximating 1-in-k SAT by Guruswami and Trevisan gives a method for approximating Max 1 in 2 Sat.
The Complexity of Making Unique Choices: Approximating 1-in-kSAT. In Proc. of APPROX-RANDOM, Springer-Verlag, 2005 [Conference Proceedings]; Luca Trevisan On ...
We provide some evidence that Unique k-SAT is as hard to solve as general k-SAT, where k-SAT denotes the satisfiability problem for k-CNFs with at most k ...
Missing: Making | Show results with:Making