Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record. C. J. Date: Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record. SIGMOD Record 19(1): 41-42(1990)
Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record. 41-42. Electronic Edition BibTeX · Toby J. Teorey: Correction. 43. Electronic Edition BibTeX ...
[Snodgrass 2006] R. T. Snodgrass, “Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing: An Analysis of the Literature,” ACM. SIGMOD Record, 35(3):8–21, September 2006.
Bibliographic details on Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record.
Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record. 41-42. no documents ... Joint Issue of ACM SIGMOD Record and IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 13(4), December ...
The peer review process is generally acknowledged as central to the advancement of scholarly knowledge. It is also vital to the advancement of individual ...
Jun 21, 2006 · An independent analysis of this data, using medians rather than means, reached the opposite conclusion: “that double blind review in SIGMOD do ...
Apr 25, 2024 · https://dblp.org/rec/journals/sigmod/Date90. C. J. Date: Response to R. T. Snodgrass's Letter in SIGMOD Record. SIGMOD Rec. 19(1): 41-42 ...
Richard Snodgrass has written or edited six books, as well as over 100 journal and conferences articles, all listed below, almost all as links to their content.
Recognizing the need for providing temporal support in database management systems, and spurred by the rapid decrease of storage cost in recent years, ...