Our experiments show that we can reduce Java bytecode to 4.6 percent of its original size, which is 5.3 times better than the 24.3 percent achieved by J-Reduce.

Our experiments show that we can reduce Java bytecode to 4.6% of its original size, which is 5.3 times better than the 24.3% achieved by J-Reduce. The much ...

Our experiments show that we can reduce Java bytecode to 4.6% of its original size, which is 5.3 times better than the 24.3% achieved by J-Reduce.

Our experiments show that we can reduce Java bytecode to 4.6% of its original size, which is 5.3 times better than the 24.3% achieved by J-Reduce.

Jun 20, 2021 · Our experiments show that we can reduce Java bytecode to 4.6 percent of its original size, which is 5.3 times better than the 24.3 percent ...

Reducing a failure-inducing input to a smaller one is challenging for input with internal dependencies because most sub-inputs are invalid.

Logical Bytecode Reduction. Christian Gram Kalhauge, Jens Palsberg. Keywords: input reduction, type-safe code transformation, Technical Talks 4B, Posters 4 ...

In this chapter, we relate the different formal logical systems characterized in this work to nominalist and realist approaches to sortals.

Logical bytecode reduction · List of references · Publications that cite this publication.

Apr 25, 2024 · Christian Gram Kalhauge , Jens Palsberg : Logical bytecode reduction.