May 14, 2008 · Abstract: We study the conditional sojourn time distributions of processor sharing (PS), foreground background processor sharing (FBPS) and ...
Sep 13, 2008 · Specifically, if the newly arriving job is smaller than k and larger than m−k of the previous m jobs, it is routed into class k. Then, the ...
Sep 13, 2008 · Abstract We study the conditional sojourn time distributions of processor sharing (PS), foreground background processor sharing (FBPS) and ...
(PDF) Heavy-Tailed Limits for Medium Size Jobs and Comparison ...
www.researchgate.net › ... › Static
PDF | We study the conditional sojourn time distributions of processor sharing (PS), foreground background processor sharing (FBPS) and shortest.
We study the conditional sojourn time distributions of processor sharing (PS), foreground background processor sharing (FBPS) and shortest remaining ...
We therefore ask: What scheduling policy minimizes mean response time in the heavy-traffic M/G/k with unknown job sizes and general job size distribution?
ABSTRACT. We consider scheduling to minimize mean response time of the M/G/k queue with unknown job sizes. In the single- server k = 1 case, the optimal ...
Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
If UNIX process lifetimes (sizes) are Exponentially distributed, then there is no benefit to active process migration: all jobs have the remaining lifetime.
scheduling policy is known to be optimal for the sojourn time tail across heavy-tailed and light-tailed job size distributions. Recently, Wierman & Zwart ...
We first focus on the case of heavy-tailed job sizes. We derive a necessary condition for a scheduling policy to be tail-competitive; see (12) below. This ...