Abstract. In this paper we propose to draw a link from the quantitative notion of coherence, previously used to evaluate rival scientific theories, to legal ...

Aug 19, 2010 · We evaluate the stories of the plaintiff and the defendant in a legal case as rival theories by measuring how well they cohere when accounting ...

We evaluate the story of the plaintiff and the defen- dant in a legal case as rival theories by measuring how well they cohere when accounting for the evidence.

Nov 19, 2009 · We evaluate the stories of the plaintiff and the defendant in a legal case as rival theories by measuring how well they cohere when accounting ...

In this paper we propose to draw a link from the quantitative notion of coherence, previously used to evaluate rival scientific theories, to legal reasoning ...

In this paper we propose to draw a link from the quantitative notion of coherence, previously used to evaluate rival scientific theories, to legal reasoning ...

Evaluating Cases in Legal Disputes as Rival Theories. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_6 · Full text. Journal: New Frontiers in Artificial ...

Pontus Stenetorp, Jason Jingshi Li: Evaluating Cases in Legal Disputes as Rival Theories. JSAI-isAI Workshops 2009: 59-72. manage site settings.

Fingerprint. Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating cases in legal disputes as rival theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

In this paper we propose to draw a link from the quantitative notion of coherence, previously used to evaluate rival scientific theories, to legal reasoning. We ...