Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
Dec 12, 2011 · We compare the strengths and weaknesses of two fundamentally different approaches in increasing BGP's robustness which we termed ingress and ...
Comparing Ingress and Egress Detection to Secure Interdomain. Routing: An Experimental Analysis. CHRISTOPH GOEBEL, International Computer Science Institute.
The experiments confirm the intuition that the contribution ASes are able to make towards securing the correct working of the inter-domain routing ...
People also ask
Comparing ingress and egress detection to secure interdomain routing: An experimental analysis. Distributed application configuration, management, and ...
Comparing ingress and egress detection to secure interdomain routing : An experimental analysis. Goebel, Christoph;Neumann, Dirk;Krishnan ...
Comparing Ingress and Egress Detection to Secure Interdomain Routing: An Experimental Analysis. Article. Dec 2011. Christoph Goebel · Dirk Neumann ...
Comparing ingress and egress detection to secure interdomain routing: An experimental analysis · C. GoebelDirk NeumannR. Krishnan. Computer Science ...
We compare the strengths and weaknesses of two fundamentally different approaches in increasing BGP's robustness which we termed ingress and egress detection of ...
PCFS enforces the end- points' path selection, enables multipath communication, and protects packets from unanticipated re-routing and hijacking.
Jun 15, 2022 · To ensure end-to-end secure routing, (1) a customer must be able to select trusted ingress/egress points and securely exchange packets with hi- ...