In the following we decrease the degree to (2, 1) and further make the system simple but at the cost of increasing the insertion and deletion ...

We show that simple semi-conditional ins–del systems of degree (2, 1) and with ID sizes ( 1 + e , e ′ , e ″ ; 1 + d , d ′ , d ″ ) are computationally complete ...

Computational completeness of simple semi-conditional insertion–deletion systems of degree (2,1). Article. Full-text available. Sep 2019; Nat Comput.

Insertion–deletion systems are a computational model ... Computational completeness of simple semi-conditional insertion–deletion systems of degree (2,1).

We show that simple semi-conditional ins–del systems of degree (2, 1) and with ID sizes ( 1 + e , e ′ , e ″ ; 1 + d , d ′ , d ″ ) are computationally complete ...

In this paper, we study simple semi-conditional ins–del systems, where an ins–del rule can be applied only in the presence or absence of substrings of the ...

We show that simple semi-conditional ins–del systems of degree (2, 1) and with ID sizes $$(1+e,e',e'';1+d,d',d'')$$ are computationally complete for any $$e,e', ...

Aug 3, 2024 · Computational completeness of simple semi-conditional insertion-deletion systems of degree (2, 1). Nat. Comput. 18(3): 563-577 (2019). [c10].

Computational completeness of simple semi-conditional insertion–deletion systems of degree (2, 1). H Fernau, L Kuppusamy, I Raman. Natural Computing 18, 563 ...

Computational completeness of simple semi-conditional insertion–deletion systems of degree (2,1) · H. FernauLakshmanan KuppusamyIndhumathi Raman. Computer ...