Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
HAJNAL ANDRÉKA, JOHAN van BENTHEM, ISTVAN NÉMETI; Back and Forth Between Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Logic Journal of the IGPL, Volume 3, Issue 5, 1 A.
Back and Forth Between Modal Logic and Classical Logic dates sharing various desirable features with basic modal logic - in particular, its decidability ...
People also ask
This paper proves decidability for a largèbounded fragment' of predicate logic, and points out several applications, including a fresh look at the landscape ...
In this paper, we consider the well-known modal logics K, T, K4, and S4, and we study some of their sub-propositional fragments, namely the classical Horn ...
This chapter is about a more specialized contact: the flow of ideas between algebra and modal logic through 'guarded fragments' restricting the range of ... [ ...
Feb 4, 2023 · Many resources to learn logic call modal logic a non-classical logic. To me, this doesn't make sense and is like a category error.
Missing: Forth | Show results with:Forth
Oct 12, 2016 · ML-1995-04: Andréka, Hajnal and van Benthem, Johan and Németi, István (1995) Back and Forth between Modal Logic and Classical Logic.
Author. J.F.A.K. van Benthem ; Year: 1995 ; Title: Back and Forth Between Modal Logic and Classical Logic ; Journal: Logic journal of the IGPL ; Volume | Issue ...
Aug 21, 2019 · The key point here is that in contrast with propositional logic, modal logic has non-truth-functional operations. Any "propositional term" - ...
Missing: Back Forth
“Back and Forth Between Modal Logic and Classical Logic” is a paper by Hajnal Andréka Johan van Benthem István Németi published in 1995. It has an Open ...