Apr 25, 2008 · Our study has three main findings: (1) CEOs' first deals exhibit zero announcement effects while their subsequent deals exhibit negative announcement effects.
We explore the history of mergers and acquisitions made by individual CEOs. Our study has three main findings: (1) CEOs7 first deals exhibit zero ...
People also ask
Are overconfident CEOs born or made?
What is a new method for measuring CEO overconfidence evidence from acquisitions?
What is an example of self-attribution bias in investment?
Are Overconfident CEOs Born or Made? Evidence of Self-Attribution ...
papers.ssrn.com › sol3 › papers
We explore the history of mergers and acquisitions made by individual CEOs. Our study has three main findings.
The evidence presented so far are consistent with self-attribution bias leading to overconfidence in that first deals (by both frequent and infrequent acquirers) ...
Our study has three main findings: (1) CEOs' first deals exhibit zero announcement effects while their subsequent deals exhibit negative announcement effects.
We examine the acquisitions of relatively active and inactive acquirers to test the predictions of the self-attribution hypothesis. We begin by examining ...
Oct 22, 2024 · We explore the history of mergers and acquisitions made by individual CEOs. Our study has three main findings: (1) CEOs' first deals exhibit ...
“Many CEOs overestimate their own negotiating skills and overlook the element of luck in successful mergers, acquisitions, and other deals.
The results show that overconfident managers tend to accept higher performance growth rate, and this tendency is more obvious in private enterprises. The ...
Jun 11, 2008 · Consistent with this, they find that CEOs appear to overly attribute their role in successful deals, leading to more deals even though these ...