Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
Sep 23, 2016 · The objective is to minimize the overall costs associated with a crew schedule, which includes workforce costs and hotel costs. A cost minimal ...
Train drivers prefer schedules with fewer and more evenly distributed unpopular du- ties across crew depots. In this paper, we define and measure unpopularity.
The objective is to minimize the overall costs associated with a crew schedule, which includes workforce costs, hotel costs, etc. A cost minimal schedule often ...
Nov 13, 2023 · In this paper, we define and measure unpopularity and (un)fairness in a railway crew scheduling context. We integrate fairness conditions into a ...
Sep 23, 2016 · In this paper, we define and measure unpopularity and (un)fairness in a railway crew scheduling context. We integrate fairness conditions into a column ...
Oct 1, 2024 · The goal of the SS&S rules at NS is to obtain fair and attractive crew schedules, a topic that is gaining popularity in recent years (see ...
Sep 23, 2016 · In this paper, we define and measure unpopularity and (un)fairness in a railway crew scheduling context. We integrate fairness conditions into a ...
People also ask
Sep 17, 2024 · The results of the bi-objective model show a substantial improvement in fairness with only a minor reduction in efficiency compared to the ...
We propose an optimization approach for an instance of a train crew rostering problem arising from a practical application.
The Fairness-Oriented Crew Rostering Problem (FCRP) considers the joint optimization of attractiveness and fairness in cyclic crew rostering.