Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

×
Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task.
People also ask
Feb 17, 2016 · The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task.
Abstract: Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making ...
Recent research suggests that unconscious processing is superior to conscious processing in tasks involving many decision alternatives (Dijksterhuis et al., ...
Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment. Authors. Andreas Größler · Etiënne Rouwette · Jac Vennix. Publication date: 2016.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task. An experimental ...
Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment · Etiënne Rouwette. Systems, 2016. downloadDownload free PDF View PDFchevron_right.
May 31, 2023 · Therefore, the objective of this research is to conduct analyses of dynamic moral decision-making and differentiate between conscious and non- ...