Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: send outbound webmentions for silo posts #452

Closed
snarfed opened this issue Aug 27, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

feature: send outbound webmentions for silo posts #452

snarfed opened this issue Aug 27, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner
snarfed commented Aug 27, 2015

...in other words, extend the outbound part of the existing blog webmentions feature to silos as well.

here's a concrete example. i recently tweeted this:

My silly privacy antics landed me in a @vice @Motherboard article on prepaid credit cards. Fun, mildly embarrassing. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-simple-trick-ashley-madisons-users-could-have-used-to-protect-themselves

with this new feature, we'd attempt to send a webmention with this tweet as the source and the motherboard.vice.com link as the target. of course, the source wouldn't actually be the twitter.com permalink, it'd be the bridgy proxy URL that renders the tweet as mf2.

this is kind of cute. i like it. plus, it's doable for all silos! at least right now. 😏

one interesting question is whether to do consider this part of "listen" or "publish." ie should we start doing this when you sign up for backfeed? or only when you enable publish? it's not clear to me which one it belongs to. i'm leaning toward listen (backfeed), but not sure.

also, a catch: POSSE/PESOSed silo posts would end up sending multiple wms, one from the original post and one from each silo post, so the target would end up showing duplicates. bridgy already causes this for POSSEd comments/likes/reposts, though, so it's not a new problem, and we've pretty much agreed that it's the recipient's job to use syndication links, etc to de-dupe.

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner Author
snarfed commented Aug 27, 2015

cc @kylewm @kevinmarks @kylewm @tantek. i'd love feedback on the bigger picture here: what you think of the product feature, etiquette, etc. thanks in advance!

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner Author
snarfed commented Aug 27, 2015

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner Author
snarfed commented Aug 27, 2015

@kevinmarks raises a good point: we don't want to do this for POSSEd posts with backlinks. options:

ugh.

@snarfed
Copy link
Owner Author
snarfed commented Aug 28, 2015

i went back and re-read #51 more closely, and it's actually for this exact feature. closing this issue as a dupe and merging the discussion there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant