Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE failure #13784

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

remicollet
Copy link
Member

AX_GCC_FUNC_ATTRIBUTE([target]) may fail breaking various optimization (ex: base64_encode/base64_decode)

In config.log

configure:17050: checking for __attribute__((target))
configure:17072: cc -o conftest -Wall -Werror=format-security -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=return-type -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -fvisibility=hidden  -D_GNU_SOURCE  conftest.c -lm  >&5
conftest.c:146:32: warning: 'bar' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
  146 |                     static int bar( void ) __attribute__((target("sse2")));
      |                                ^~~
configure:17072: $? = 0
configure:17087: result: no

Dropping the static keyword allow the test to work

Notice, this file is outdated, see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf-archive.git;a=blob_plain;f=m4/ax_gcc_func_attribute.m4 (serial 9 => 13) but "target" is not part of this upstream file, and only ifunc and target are used.

@petk
Copy link
Member
petk commented Mar 22, 2024

I was checking if this should be added in the upstream archive, but the issue is that this target addition is very specific and would require additional argument (that "sse2" string). #11712 and this is also in need of rechecking #9586

I think this macro can be forked and bundled but we update it with the upstream recent changes.

@remicollet
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the quick review

Merged in 8.2+ as 09a3681

@remicollet remicollet closed this Mar 22, 2024
@remicollet remicollet deleted the fix-target-detection branch March 22, 2024 10:31
@athos-ribeiro
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @remicollet, I just saw this one landed. Thanks for fixing that.

FWIW, we are still carrying #9586 in Debian/Ubuntu since any new warnings introduced would disable those optimizations in future builds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants