Abstract
Free full text
Commensal Bacteria Control Cancer Response to Therapy by Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment
Associated Data
Abstract
The gut microbiota influences both local and systemic inflammation. Inflammation contributes to development, progression, and treatment of cancer, but it remains unclear whether commensal bacteria affect inflammation in the sterile tumor microenvironment. Here, we show that disruption of the microbiota impairs the response of subcutaneous tumors to CpG-oligonucleotide immunotherapy and platinum chemotherapy. In antibiotics-treated or germ-free mice, tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived cells responded poorly to therapy, resulting in lower cytokine production and tumor necrosis after CpG-oligonucleotide treatment and deficient production of reactive oxygen species and cytotoxicity after chemotherapy. Thus, optimal responses to cancer therapy require an intact commensal microbiota that mediates its effects by modulating myeloid-derived cell functions in the tumor microenvironment. These findings underscore the importance of the microbiota in the outcome of disease treatment.
The commensal microbiota influences metabolism, tissue development, inflammation, and immunity (1). The gut microbiota affects inflammation and immunity not only locally at the mucosal level but also systemically (2–5), raising the question of whether the microbiota affects inflammatory processes that contribute to cancer and its therapy. Tumor-associated inflammatory cells promote cancer cell proliferation and suppress antitumor immunity (6). Anticancer treatments alter this microenvironment and may evoke tumor-destructive immune responses (7–9), but whether commensal organisms affect this process is unexplored.
To investigate whether commensal bacteria alter inflammation in the tumor microenvironment, mice received an antibiotic cocktail (ABX) of vancomycin, imipenem, and neomycin in drinking water starting 3 weeks before tumor inoculation and continuing throughout the experiment. To analyze tumors of comparable stages of progression in both wild-type (WT) and genetically altered mice, three C57Bl/6 mouse transplantable tumors were selected based on susceptibility to therapy: EL4 lymphoma, MC38 colon carcinoma, and B16 melanoma. Tumor cells were injected subcutaneously, and mice were analyzed or treated when the tumors reached a diameter of ≥4 mm. Gene expression analysis of pretherapy MC38 and EL4 tumors revealed down-regulation of genes related to inflammation, phagocytosis, antigen presentation, and adaptive immune responses in ABX-treated mice but up-regulation of genes related to tissue development, cancer, and metabolism (fig. S1, A and B). ABX lowered the frequency of monocyte-derived Ly6C+ MHC class II+ cells in EL4 and MC38 tumors and the spleen of MC38 tumor-bearing mice. ABX also decreased Ly6Ghigh neutrophil frequency in MC38 tumors (fig. S2).
To determine whether ABX affect tumor immunotherapy, MC38 and B16 tumor-bearing mice were treated with a combination of intratumoral CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN), a ligand of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), and inhibitory interleukin-10 (IL-10) receptor antibodies (anti-IL-10R) (10). This immunotherapy retards tumor growth and prolongs survival by rapidly inducing hemorrhagic necrosis dependent on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production by tumor-associated myeloid cells followed by a CD8 T cell response required for tumor eradication (11). ABX impaired therapy efficacy to retard tumor growth and lengthen survival (Fig. 1, ,AA and andB,B, and fig. S3A). Anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN treatment induced MC38 tumor necrosis in control mice that was greatly reduced both macroscopically and histologically in ABX-treated animals (Fig. 1, ,CC and andD).D). Similar observations in immunodeficient Ragl−/− mice demonstrated that ABX regulate the response to anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN independently of adaptive immunity (Fig. 1D). However, in Tnf−/− mice, anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN induced minimal necrosis and had no effect on tumor growth in either control or ABX-treated mice (Fig. 1, ,CC and andD,D, and fig. S3B).
ABX significantly impaired CpG-ODN–induced Tnfexpression and frequencies of TNF-positive leukocytes in MC38 tumors at 3 hours (Fig. 2, ,AA and andB).B). ABX decreased the frequencies of TNF-producing cells and the amount of cytokine per cell in Ly6C+MHC-IT monocytes, Ly6C-F4/80hi macrophages, CD11chiMHC-IIhi dendritic cells (DC), and Ly6C+F4/80intMHC-II+ monocyte-derived cells (fig. S4, A to C). ABX also decreased CD86 expression and IL-12B production in tumor-associated DC (fig. S4, D and E). After anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN, tumors from ABX-treated mice also displayed diminished expression of pro-inflammatory Il1a, Il1b, Il12b, and Cxcl10, but not of anti-inflammatory Il10, Il1rn, and Socs3 or Nos2 genes (fig. S5). To determine whether the ABX effect was dependent on decreased bacteria load, germ-free (GF) or specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice bearing MC38 tumors received anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN treatment. Tumors of GF as compared to SPF control mice produced significantly lower amounts of TNF and IL-12B (Fig. 2, ,CC to toE).E). Thus, commensal microbiota primes tumor-associated innate myeloid cells for inflammatory cytokine production in response to anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN, and ABX or the GF status of the mice attenuates this response and the TNF-dependent early tumor necrosis.
Gavage administration thrice weekly of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) largely restored Tnf expression and frequency of TNF-producing leukocytes in tumors of ABX-treated WT mice but not Tlr4−/−mice [lacking the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) receptor for LPS] (Fig. 2F and fig. S6A). Conversely, Tlr4 deficiency led to lower induction of Tnf and reduced tumor regression after immunotherapy (Fig. 2, ,FF and andG),G), whereas Tlr2 deficiency had no effect (fig. S6B). Overall, these findings suggest that bacterial products, in part through TLR4 activation, directly or indirectly prime tumor-associated myeloid cells for TLR9-dependent response to CpG-ODN. The ability of oral ABX treatment to reduce gastrointestinal but not skin bacterial load, combined with an absence of bacterial DNA in tumors and the restorative effect of gastrointestinal LPS administration, suggest that intestinal bacteria regulate the inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment.
To determine how individual bacterial species affect the antitumor response, we correlated fecal microbiota composition with TNF production. Principal-component analysis of natural variation in microbiota composition versus TNF production suggested a codependence (fig. S7). Two experimental microbiota perturbations were used: (i) three-week ABX treatment followed by a 1-to 4-week recovery, and (ii) three-week singleantibiotic treatments. Bacterial abundance was restored to pretreatment levels 1 week after ABX cessation (Fig. 3A); bacterial diversity (fig. S8) and composition gradually increased, although neither reached the pre-ABX condition (Fig. 3, ,BB and andC,C, and figs. S9 and S10). Tnf expression did not recover until week 4 post-ABX (Fig. 3D). All the single antibiotics tested increased variability in Tnf expression, whereas only imipenem consistently reduced total bacterial abundance (fig. S11, A to D, and fig. S12). The different perturbations resulted in different bacteria being present. Thus, partially overlapping genera were identified that positively or negatively correlated with Tnf expression (figs. S13 and S14A). Among the positive correlates were Gram-negative genera [e.g., Alistipes (figs. S13 and S14A)], consistent with a role for TLR4 in priming TNF production. However, Gram-positive genera also showed positive correlation, suggesting that recognition pathways other than TLR4 were also involved. Identification of the same genera in different data sets increased the confidence in the validity of the correlation. Particularly, one genus (Lactobacillus) negatively and one (Ruminococcus) positively correlated with TNF expression in all three analyses (fig. S13). The Lactobacillus genus included L. murinum, L. intestinalis, and L. fermentum, the latter previously identified to have anti-inflammatory effects (12, 13). The Ruminococcus genus was represented by a single unclassified operational taxonomic unit (OTU) and the Alistipes genus by the single A. shahii species. Lactobacillus species recovered quickly after ABX withdrawal, whereas recovery of Ruminococcus and Alistipes species was delayed and coincided with restoration of the TNF response (fig. S14B). Administration of cultured A. shahii by gavage to mice preexposed to ABX reconstituted the ability of tumor-associated myeloid cells to produce TNF (Fig. 3E and fig. S15A). Conversely, administration of L. fermentum to intact mice attenuated the response (fig. S15B). These association experiments validate the results of the correlation analysis and confirm the ability of these species to influence the tumor response to CpG-ODN.
To determine whether the microbiota also affects cancer treatments not considered to be directly dependent on inflammation processes, we next examined the response to agents used in human cancer chemotherapy. The platinum compounds oxaliplatin and cisplatin cause tumor cytotoxicity by forming platinum DNA adducts and intrastrand cross-links (14). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important for DNA damage and apoptosis in response to platinum compounds (15). Oxaliplatin, unlike cisplatin, also induces immunogenic cell death that drives antitumor T cell immunity (9,16). Oxaliplatin eradicated most subcutaneous EL4 tumors and prolonged survival in control mice, but ABX-treated animals displayed significantly reduced tumor regression and survival (Fig. 4A and fig. S16A). GF animals similarly failed to respond to oxaliplatin treatment (fig. S16B). The therapeutic effects of oxaliplatin on a different tumor (MC38) and of cisplatin on EL4 tumors were also significantly reduced in ABX-treated mice (fig. S16, C and D).
The effect of ABX was observed as early as day 2 after treatment with oxaliplatin (Fig. 4A), suggesting suppression of early cytotoxicity rather than of inflammation/immunity after immunogenic cell death. Indeed, ABX attenuated most gene expression changes observed in EL4 tumors 18 hours after oxaliplatin treatment (Fig. 4B). The genes inhibited by ABX were related to monocyte differentiation, activation, and function, whereas the genes that were increased in ABX-treated mice were related to cellular functions such as metabolism, transcription, translation, and DNA replication (fig. S17). Gene expression analysis using the Nanostring nCounter technology confirmed the expression changes of selected genes fig. S18).
Gene expression analysis revealed that after oxaliplatin treatment the induction of pro-inflammatory genes was decreased in the absence of microbiota, suggesting that inflammation was important for the antitumor effect of the drug. However, unlike anti-IL-10R/CpG-ODN, oxaliplatin antitumor effects were independent of TNF (fig. S19A). The observation that ABX treatment attenuated the induction of Nox1 and Cybb encoding ROS-generating NADPH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) oxidase 2 (NOX2) and of the ROS-responsive Nos2, Sod1, and Sod2 after oxaliplatin led us to examine oxaliplatin-induced ROS production. Oxaliplatin induced ROS in tumors from control but not ABX-treated mice, as detected in vivo by bioluminescence (Fig. 4C). Induction of ROS was dependent on NOX2 encoded by the Cybb gene (Fig. 4C). Because NOX2 is expressed in phagocytic cells (17), we examined ROS production in tumor-infiltrating hematopoietic cells ex vivo. The fluorescence intensity of the ROS probe in tumor-infiltrating CD11b+Gr-1hi neutrophils and in F4/80+ Gr-1int macrophage-like cells increased after oxaliplatin treatment in control mice, but this response was impaired in ABX-treated or Cybb−/− animals (Fig. 4D). ROS inhibition by the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) was previously shown to block oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis of cancer cell lines in vitro and inhibit the effectiveness of oxaliplatin therapy of mouse tumor cell lines in vivo (18,19). We found that inhibition of ROS by either Cybb deficiency or NAC impaired oxaliplatin-induced EL4 tumor regression as early as day 2 and decreased overall survival at an extent comparable to that of ABX (Fig. 4E and fig. S19B). Depletion of myeloid cells by Gr-1 antibody impaired the ability of oxaliplatin to induce tumor regression and to increase survival (Fig. 4F and fig. S19C). These data suggest that the reduced effect of oxaliplatin in ABX-treated or GF mice is partially due to reduced myeloid-cell ROS production. To investigate whether gut commensals prime these cells by release of TLR agonists, we studied Tlr4−/− and Myd88−/− mice. (Myd88 is the adaptor protein that signals downstream of IL-1 family receptors and most TLRs.) Myd88, but not Tlr4, deficiency impaired the early antitumor effect of oxaliplatin, although Tlr4 deficiency had a partial effect on long-term tumor growth and survival (fig. S19D). Il1r or Il18r deficiency did not impair the response (fig. S19D), suggesting that the commensal effect was related to microbial product sensing.
The levels of tumor DNA-bound platinum were similar in control and ABX-treated mice, although tumors from ABX-treated mice showed reduced DNA damage (fig. S20). These data suggest that ABX prevent oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage and apoptosis after DNA adduct formation in part by decreasing ROS production (15,18,19). In ABX-treated mice, the decreased induction of the DNA damage response gene Atr and of the p53 downstream genes Bax, Fas, Cdkn1a, and Rb1 is compatible with reduced tumor DNA damage and p53-dependent activation of apoptosis. Although tumor-cell-produced ROS were previously reported to be required for the cytotoxic effect of platinum compounds in vitro, our data indicate that the ROS required for oxaliplatin genotoxicity in vivo are mostly derived from tumor-associated inflammatory cells. Because ABX treatment affected tumor cytotoxicity shortly after chemotherapy, and this effect was observed using both oxaliplatin and its relative cisplatin that is unable to trigger immunogenic cell death, the data suggest that commensal bacteria modulate the genotoxicity of platinum compounds independently of immunity elicited by immunogenic cell death. However, DC activation and adaptive antitumor immune responses after oxaliplatin may also require a commensal-dependent inflammatory response.
Besides platinum complexes, drugs such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, podophyllotoxins, and camptothecine induce ROS as part of their anticancer activity and may be similarly regulated (15, 20–22). Mechanisms by which the gut microbiota affects the systemic inflammatory tone are only now being uncovered (23, 24). In a different setting, total body irradiation was shown to increase the efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in part by inducing microbial translocation (25). Our study indicates that commensal bacteria differentially affect the type of inflammatory tone required for response to different therapeutic protocols and highlights the potential to improve cancer treatment by manipulating human gut microbiota.
Acknowledgments:
We greatly appreciate the support of D. Trageser-Cessler and A. Cesar in the NIAID germ-free facility; H. Zhou in the NIH Center for Human Immunology; T. Plona and K. Pike in the Laboratory of Molecular Technology, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.; and R. Winkler-Pickett, M. Karwan, and D. Zhao in the Cancer and Inflammation Program, CCR/NCI. We thank D. Klinman and A. Hurwitz for advice and R. Germain for critically reviewing the manuscript. The data presented in this manuscript are tabulated in the main paper and in the supplementary materials. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH (NCI, Center for Cancer Research, and NIAID) and the Japanese Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship for Japanese Biomedical and Behavioral Researchers at NIH. The 16S sequences were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession PRJNA221649. Array data were deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession no. GSE51414.
Footnotes
Supplementary Materials
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6161/967/suppl/DC1 Materials and Methods
References and Notes
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240527
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc6709532?pdf=render
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Article citations
Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Gastric Cancer: Potential Mechanisms and Clinical Applications-A Literature Review.
Cancers (Basel), 16(20):3547, 21 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39456641 | PMCID: PMC11506470
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Nomograms predicting benefit after immunotherapy in oral bifidobacteria supplementation ICC patients: a retrospective study.
BMC Cancer, 24(1):1274, 14 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39402531 | PMCID: PMC11476933
Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy.
Signal Transduct Target Ther, 9(1):266, 07 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39370455 | PMCID: PMC11456611
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Assessment of Prognostic Factors, Clinical Features Including the Microbiome, and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary Site.
Cancers (Basel), 16(19):3416, 08 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39410035 | PMCID: PMC11475148
Supramolecularly engineered bacteria mediated calcium overload and immunotherapy of tumors.
Theranostics, 14(17):6560-6570, 07 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39479452 | PMCID: PMC11519789
Go to all (1,165) article citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
BioProject
- (1 citation) BioProject - PRJNA221649
GEO - Gene Expression Omnibus
- (1 citation) GEO - GSE51414
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Intestinal microbiota: unexpected alliance with tumor therapy.
Immunotherapy, 6(3):231-233, 01 Jan 2014
Cited by: 10 articles | PMID: 24762069
[The intestinal microbiota: a boost for antitumor treatments].
Med Sci (Paris), 30(4):436-438, 01 Apr 2014
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 24801040
Review
Microbiota modulation of myeloid cells in cancer therapy.
Cancer Immunol Res, 3(2):103-109, 01 Feb 2015
Cited by: 30 articles | PMID: 25660553 | PMCID: PMC4324508
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Gut microbiota: Anti-cancer therapies affected by gut microbiota.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11(1):1, 10 Dec 2013
Cited by: 10 articles | PMID: 24322902
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
Intramural NIH HHS (2)
Grant ID: ZIA BC010793-12
Grant ID: ZIA BC011153-10