Abstract
Background
Aged asthmatic patients experience increased morbidity and mortality. Knowledge of the aging effect on airway inflammation and asthma control is limited.Objective
We sought to compare airway inflammation and its relationship to asthma control in aged versus younger patients and determine whether differences are asthma specific or caused by "inflamm-aging."Methods
We performed a prospective study of aged (>60 years) and younger (21-40 years) inner-city patients with asthma. After a run-in period to control for inhaled corticosteroid use, induced sputum was collected. Age-matched nonasthmatic control subjects were included to measure age-related inflammatory changes.Results
Aged (mean age, 67.9 ± 5.1 years; n = 35) compared with younger (mean age, 30.8 ± 5.9 years; n = 37) asthmatic patients had significantly worse asthma control and lower FEV1. Aged asthmatic patients had higher sputum neutrophil (30.5 × 104/mL and 23.1%) and eosinophil (7.0 × 104/mL and 3.8%) numbers and percentages compared with younger patients (neutrophils, 13.0 × 104/mL [P < .01] and 6.9% [P < .01]; eosinophils, 2.0 × 104/mL [P < .01] and 1.2% [P < .01]). Aged asthmatic patients had higher sputum IL-6 (P < .01) and IL-8 (P = .01) levels. No significant inflammatory differences between aged and younger control subjects were observed. In aged asthmatic patients increased sputum IL-6 and macrophage inflammatory protein 3α/CCL20 levels were significantly associated with decreased asthma control and increased sputum neutrophil numbers and IL-1β, IL-6, and macrophage inflammatory protein 3α/CCL20 levels were associated with hospitalization.Conclusions
The inflammatory patterns of aged versus younger asthmatic patients are associated with increased sputum neutrophil and eosinophil values and cytokine levels related to neutrophil recruitment. Differences in airway inflammation can contribute to diminished asthma control in the aged. Further understanding of asthma pathophysiology in aged patients is needed to improve management of this vulnerable population.Free full text
The effect of aging on sputum inflammation and asthma control
Associated Data
Abstract
Background
Aged asthma patients experience increased morbidity and mortality. Knowledge of the aging effect on airway inflammation and asthma control is limited.
Objective
To compare airway inflammation and its relationship with asthma control in aged vs. younger patients and determine if differences are asthma-specific or due to “inflamm-aging.”
Methods
Prospective study of aged (>60 years) and younger (21–40 years) inner-city asthma patients. After a run-in period to control for inhaled corticosteroid use, induced sputum was collected. Aged-matched, non-asthma controls were included to measure age-related inflammatory changes.
Results
Aged (mean age 67.9±5.1 years, n=35) compared to younger (mean age 30.8±5.9 years, n=37) asthma patients had significantly worse asthma control and lower forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1). Aged asthma patients had higher sputum neutrophil number and percent (30.5 ×104/mL and 23.1%) and eosinophils (7.0×104/mL and 3.8%) compared to younger patients (neutrophils, 13.0 ×104/mL [P<0.01] and 6.9% [P<0.01]; eosinophils, 2.0×104/mL [P <0.01] and 1.2% [P<0.01]). Aged asthma patients had higher sputum interleukin-6 (IL-6) (P <0.01) and IL-8 (P =0.01). No significant inflammatory differences between aged and younger controls were observed. In aged asthma patients, elevated sputum IL-6 and MIP3α/CCL20 were significantly associated with decreased asthma control; elevated sputum neutrophils, IL-1β, IL-6 and MIP3α/CCL20 with hospitalization.
Conclusions
The inflammatory patterns of aged vs. younger asthma patients are associated with increased sputum neutrophils and eosinophils and cytokines related to neutrophil recruitment. Differences in airway inflammation may contribute to diminished asthma control in the aged. Further understanding of asthma pathophysiology in aged patients is needed to improve management of this vulnerable population.
Capsule summary
Aged compared to younger asthma patients have increased sputum neutrophils and eosinophils and cytokines related to neutrophil recruitment. These differences in airway inflammation were associated with diminished asthma control in the aged.
INTRODUCTION
Asthma is reported in 4–13% of persons >60 years of age1–5. Asthma in the aged is not only more prevalent than previously considered, but morbidity and mortality in this group are high with 50–66% of all asthma deaths occurring in adults >65 years of age2, 6–9. Although co-existing lung disease10, co-morbidities11–12 and under-treatment2, 8 contribute to worse outcomes, the effect of aging on asthma-related airway inflammation and its regulation is also likely a major factor in heightened morbidity. Because of increases in aging of the worldwide population, the number of people >60 years is projected to grow to 72 million by the year 203013; and with this increase so will the unmet needs of aged patients with asthma.
The limited data available on airway inflammation in aged adults with asthma suggest that there are increased airway neutrophils14–15. However, these studies have not considered the potential impact of “inflamm-aging,” that is, the low-grade basal systemic inflammation (e.g., increased interleukin [IL]1-β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) often observed with aging16, nor have they been conducted in inner-city subjects, a population with a higher asthma morbidity17–18. Additionally, analyses have not correlated airway inflammation with clinical features of disease or appropriately controlled for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, a factor that may influence airway cellularity19. Establishing the characteristics of airway inflammation in aged asthma patients is an important step towards a greater understanding of the high morbidity and mortality rates in this population, and to begin to formulate more effective treatments.
To address these unanswered questions, we recruited aged and younger asthma patients from an inner-city population; defined their clinical characteristics; and obtained sputum samples to measure patterns of airway inflammation. Furthermore, to more fully assess the age independent effects of asthma, control populations of aged-matched subjects without asthma were included. Thus, our study design allowed us to evaluate three aspects of aging and airway inflammation: a) the effect of aging on asthma (i.e., aged vs. younger patients with asthma), b) the effect of asthma on aging (i.e., aged patients with asthma vs. aged controls), and c) the effect of aging itself (i.e., aged vs. younger controls).
METHODS
Patient Population
Potential study participants were adults receiving medical care at a tertiary-care center in New York City and were eligible if they were between the ages of 21–40 or ≥60 years, spoke English, and had mild, moderate or severe persistent asthma, defined according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute’s Expert Panel on Asthma20. Subjects were classified with asthma, based upon the presence of current episodic respiratory symptoms in the preceding 12 months, a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma and evidence of past or present reversible airflow obstruction. Individuals were excluded if they had: a physician diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease or emphysema, restrictive lung disease, or other chronic respiratory illness, had a smoking history of ≥10 pack-years, dementia, received immunosuppressive medications (excluding corticosteroids) in the past 12 months, or were pregnant or lactating. To limit confounding due to co-morbidities, we excluded subjects that did not meet eligibility criteria for immune-gerontological studies as defined in the SENIEUR protocol21. To adjust for potential age-related effects on airway inflammation, we recruited age-matched controls that met the same inclusion and exclusion criteria but did not have a history of past or current asthma.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to enrollment.
Additional information, including recruitment of subjects, is provided in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository.
Baseline Assessment
Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics, past asthma history, asthma morbidity over the 12 months prior to study enrollment, current asthma medications, co-morbidities, and smoking history. Baseline level of asthma control was assessed with the Asthma Control Test (ACT)22, and asthma-related quality of life with the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)23–24. Lung function was performed in asthma and control subjects according to the standards specified by consensus guidelines25. Additional information is provided in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository.
Run-in Period
To measure ICS-adherence, and to adjust for potential differences of sputum inflammatory cell counts secondary to corticosteroid use, asthma subjects entered a 2-week run in period. During this time, ICS-adherence was determined either by attaching a DOSER inhalations tracker (MediTrack, Hudson, MA) to the inhaler or by recording the counter numbers on the patients’ ICS at the run-in visit and again at sputum collection.
Sputum induction Visit
Sputum induction and processing is described in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository.
Multiplex for Detection of Inflammatory Cytokine Proteins
Sputum supernatants were assayed for a panel of Th17 cytokines, eotaxin-1, TGF-β and IL-8 as described in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository.
Measurement of Sputum T-regulatory (Treg) cells
To assess if aging alters regulation of airway inflammation, we measured Treg cells from the sputum by flow cytometry as described in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository. Treg cells were reported as the percentage of CD3+CD4+ cells expressing Foxp3 and CD127low26.
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between groups are presented using number (%), mean (SD) or median [interquartile range] for skewed distributions. Comparison of cell counts, cytokine levels, baseline clinical characteristics, atopic sensitization, and past and present clinical features of asthma among aged vs. younger asthma patients and aged vs. younger controls, was done using chi-squared tests, t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, as appropriate. We also conducted multiple regression analyses comparing sputum cell counts and cytokine levels among aged vs. younger asthma patients and controls after controlling for medication adherence, ICS dose, years with asthma, atopy, race, sex, body mass index (BMI) and pack-years smoking.
We used linear or logistic regression (as appropriate) analyses to assess the adjusted relationship between sputum inflammatory markers (categorized as “low” vs. “high” based upon whether the level was below or above the median) and asthma control and hospitalizations for asthma in the past 12 months among aged vs. younger asthma patients. The model included an interaction term between age group and each marker to test whether specific cell types or cytokines have a differential impact on asthma control and odds-ratio (OR) for asthma hospitalizations according to age. Additional information is provided in the Methods section of this article’s Online Repository.
RESULTS
Baseline Characteristics of Participants
The study sample consisted of 112 participants including 35 aged and 37 younger asthma patients, and 18 aged and 22 younger controls. Baseline characteristics of study participants according to age and asthma status are shown in Table I. Consistent with the epidemiology of an inner-city population, the cohort consisted predominantly of racial and ethnic minority groups. There were no significant differences in the distribution of sex, income, or education among aged vs. younger asthma patients (P >0.05 for all comparisons). Aged asthma patients were more likely to be non-Hispanic (P =0.05) and insured by Medicare and Medicaid/Medicare (P <0.01). Although the percentages of aged asthma patients who were allergen sensitized was high (74.3%), it was significantly lower than for younger patients (100%, P <0.01). The distribution of allergens to which the aged and younger asthma patients were sensitized, is shown in Table II. A higher co-morbidity index score was seen in aged asthma patients (P <0.01). There were no significant differences in the distribution of food allergies, eczema, rhinitis, or GERD among aged vs. younger asthma patients (P >0.05 for all comparisons). There were no significant differences in the percentages of never smokers in aged compared to younger asthma patients (60.0% vs. 78.4%, respectively, P =0.15). The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar among aged vs. younger controls except for a higher co-morbidity score (P <0.01) and higher prevalence of GERD (P =0.01) among the former.
TABLE I
Asthma | Control | P value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Aged | Younger | Aged | Younger | Younger Asthma vs. Aged Asthma | Aged Control vs. Aged Asthma | Younger Control vs. Aged Control | Younger Control vs. Younger Asthma | |
N | 112 | 35 | 37 | 18 | 22 | ||||
Demographics | |||||||||
Age (y), mean (SD) | 47.8 (20.0) | 67.9 (5.1) | 30.8 (5.9) | 68.2 (5.2) | 27.5 (5.4) | <0.01 | 0.85 | <0.01 | 0.03 |
Female | 82 (73.2%) | 29 (82.9%) | 25 (67.6%) | 13 (72.2%) | 15 (68.2%) | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.99 | 1.00 |
Race/Ethnicity | |||||||||
White, non-Hispanic | 24 (21.4%) | 8 (22.9%) | 6 (16.2%) | 3 (16.7%) | 7 (31.8%) | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.11 |
Black, non-Hispanic | 27 (24.1%) | 12 (34.3%) | 8 (21.6%) | 4 (22.2%) | 3 (13.6%) | ||||
Hispanic | 55 (49.1%) | 12 (34.3%) | 23 (62.2%) | 10 (55.6%) | 10 (45.5%) | ||||
Other | 6 (5.4%) | 3 (8.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5.7%) | 2 (9.1%) | ||||
Total Monthly Income | |||||||||
<$1500/month | 49 (44.1%) | 19 (54.3%) | 14 (38.9%) | 7 (38.9%) | 9 (40.9%) | 0.33 | 0.60 | 0.91 | 0.44 |
>$1500/month | 26 (23.4%) | 7 (20.0%) | 7 (19.4%) | 5 (27.8%) | 7 (31.8%) | ||||
Don’t know | 36 (32.4%) | 9 (25.7%) | 15 (41.7%) | 6 (33.3%) | 6 (27.3%) | ||||
Insurance Type | |||||||||
Medicaid | 26 (23.4%) | 3 (8.6%) | 15 (41.7%) | 2 (11.1%) | 6 (27.3%) | <0.01 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.40 |
Medicare | 14 (12.6%) | 6 (17.1%) | 1 (2.8%) | 5 (27.8%) | 2 (9.1%) | ||||
Medicaid and Medicare | 21 (18.9%) | 15 (42.9%) | 1 (2.8%) | 5 (27.8%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Private/HMO | 28 (25.2%) | 7 (20.0%) | 9 (25.0%) | 2 (11.1%) | 10 (45.5%) | ||||
Other Insurance | 21 (18.9%) | 4 (11.4%) | 9 (25.0%) | 4 (22.2%) | 4 (18.2%) | ||||
No Insurance | 1 (0.90%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Education | |||||||||
High School, GED | 46 (41.4%) | 20 (57.1%) | 13 (36.1%) | 8 (44.4%) | 5 (22.7%) | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.26 | 0.44 |
College (or higher) | 65 (58.6%) | 15 (42.9%) | 23 (63.9%) | 10 (55.6%) | 17 (77.3%) | ||||
Clinical | |||||||||
Atopy* | 82 (73.2%) | 26 (74.3%) | 37 (100%) | 7 (38.9%) | 12 (54.5%) | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.50 | <0.01 |
Co-morbidity Index score, median [IQR] | 0.50 [0–3] | 3 [3–4] | 0 [0–0] | 3 [2–3] | 0 [0–0] | <0.01 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.89 |
Food Allergy | 27 (24.1%) | 10 (28.6%) | 9 (24.3%) | 5 (27.8%) | 3 (13.6%) | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.51 |
Drug Allergy | 32 (28.6%) | 13 (37.1%) | 7 (18.9%) | 8 (44.4%) | 4 (18.2%) | 0.14 | 0.83 | 0.15 | 1.00 |
Eczema | 16 (14.3%) | 6 (17.1%) | 6 (16.2%) | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (9.1%) | 0.99 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 0.70 |
Rhinitis | 71 (63.4%) | 21 (60.0%) | 28 (75.7%) | 9 (50.0%) | 13 (59.1%) | 0.24 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.30 |
Sinus Infections | 24 (21.4%) | 10 (28.6%) | 8 (21.6%) | 2 (11.1%) | 4 (18.2%) | 0.68 | 0.19 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
GERD | 38 (33.9%) | 17 (48.6%) | 10 (27.0%) | 9 (50.0%) | 2 (9.1%) | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.18 |
BMI, median [IQR] | 29.9 [24.8–36.5] | 31.3 [28.1–36.3] | 29.7 [24.3–39.4] | 29.2 [23.8–33.6] | 26.9 [21.7–34.1] | 0.56 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.18 |
Smoking status | |||||||||
Never Smoked | 83 (74.1%) | 21 (60.0%) | 29 (78.4%) | 14 (77.8%) | 19 (86.4%) | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.51 |
Past Smoker | 29 (25.9%) | 14 (40.0%) | 8 (21.6%) | 4 (22.2%) | 3 (13.6%) | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.51 |
Pack Years | 1.5 [0.3–4.4] | 3.9 [1.5–8.7] | 0.24 [0.05–1.1] | 2.9 [2.2–3.5] | 0.02 [0.02–0.16] | <0.01 | 0.60 | 0.03 | 0.22 |
Data are presented as means (standard deviation=SD), median [interquartile range=IQR] or absolute number of subjects (percentages). BMI=Body Mass Index; GED= General Educational Development; GERD=Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease; HMO=Health Maintenance Organization; y=Years.
TABLE II
Asthma | |||
---|---|---|---|
Aged | Younger | P value | |
Number of Subjects | 35 | 37 | |
Antigen: | |||
German cockroach | 16 (45.7%) | 23 (62.2%) | 0.24 |
Dust mite (D. pteronyssinus) | 14 (40.0%) | 23 (62.2%) | 0.10 |
Dust mite (D. farinae) | 12 (34.3%) | 25 (67.6%) | 0.01 |
Cat | 15 (42.9%) | 28 (75.7%) | 0.01 |
Dog | 7 (20.0%) | 17 (45.9%) | 0.04 |
Mold mix | 3 (8.6%) | 9 (24.3%) | 0.14 |
Ragweed | 9 (25.7%) | 15 (40.5%) | 0.28 |
Tree mix | 4 (11.4%) | 17 (45.9%) | <0.01 |
Grass mix | 6 (17.1%) | 14 (37.8%) | 0.09 |
Weed mix | 3 (8.6%) | 3 (8.1%) | 0.99 |
Data are presented as absolute numbers of subjects (percentages). Detectable IgE to antigen determined either by skin prick testing or serum IgE (described in Methods).
Past and present asthma history
Aged vs. younger asthma patients had a significantly lower FEV1 (69.1% vs. 81.0%, respectively, P <0.01; Table III). Although all patients with asthma had prior evidence of reversibility of obstruction as documented in their medical records, the mean change in mL of FEV1 after bronchodilator therapy was significantly greater in the younger asthma patients (P =0.03). Aged patients, on average, received their diagnosis at an older age than younger patients (P <0.01), and had asthma for a greater duration (P <0.01). In the past 12 months, no significant differences in the percentage of patients with a history of past intubation, or the number of hospitalizations, urgent care visits and exacerbations requiring oral or intravenous corticosteroids were observed among aged vs. younger patients (P >0.05 for all comparisons).
TABLE III
Asthma | |||
---|---|---|---|
Aged | Younger | P value | |
Pulmonary Function | |||
Pre-BD FEV1, % predicted, mean (SD) | 69.1 (17.7) | 81.0 (13.1) | <0.01 |
FEV1/FVC, mean (SD) | 84.4 (10.5) | 86.7 (10.9) | 0.37 |
Max β agonist FEV1 response (ml), mean (SD)* | 131 (135) | 271 (326) | 0.03 |
Max β agonist FEV1 response (% change), mean (SD)** | 5.8 (7.3) | 7 (7.5) | 0.53 |
Asthma History | |||
Age of asthma onset, median [IQR] | 34 [14.5–50.5] | 5 [2–9] | <0.01 |
Years with asthma, median [IQR] | 35 [20–51] | 23 [20–27] | <0.01 |
Positive Family History of Asthma*** | 21 (60.0%) | 26 (70.3%) | 0.5 |
History of intubation | 7 (20%) | 4 (10.8%) | 0.45 |
History of hospital admission | 22 (62.9%) | 19 (51.4%) | 0.45 |
Asthma Outcomes in past 12 months | |||
Freq. ER visits/patient, mean (SD) | 1.03 (1.8) | 1.3 (2.4) | 0.63 |
Freq. Hospitalizations/patient, mean (SD) | 0.3 (0.8) | 0.1 (0.4) | 0.25 |
Freq. Urgent Care visits/patient, mean (SD) | 1.9 (2.9) | 1.2 (2.1) | 0.29 |
Freq. Patients with >1 oral/IV CS burst | 28 (80%) | 27 (75%) | 0.83 |
ACT score, mean (SD) | 15 (4.9) | 18 (4.3) | 0.01 |
Mini-AQLQ, mean (SD) | 3.8 (1.4) | 4.4 (1.3) | 0.07 |
Symptom Score, mean (SD) | 3.7 (1.5) | 4.6 (1.5) | 0.01 |
Activity Score, mean (SD) | 4.2 (1.8) | 5 (1.5) | 0.05 |
Environment Score, mean (SD) | 3.3 (1.7) | 3.6 (1.5) | 0.50 |
Emotional Score, mean (SD) | 4.2 (1.7) | 4.3 (1.7) | 0.86 |
Current Treatment | |||
ICS Dose: Low | 4 (15.4%) | 4 (16%) | 0.93 |
Medium | 11 (42.3%) | 12 (48%) | |
High | 11 (42.3%) | 9 (36%) | |
None | 9 (25.7%) | 12 (32.4%) | 0.53 |
Long-acting β-agonist | 22 (62.9%) | 12 (32.4%) | 0.02 |
Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist | 13 (37.1%) | 6 (16.2%) | 0.08 |
Data are presented in absolute numbers (percentages), means (Standard Deviation=SD) or median [Interquartile range=IQR]; ACT=Asthma Control Test; AQLQ=Asthma quality of life questionnaire; BD-bronchodilator; CS=Corticosteroids; ER=emergency room; FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; Freq.=Frequency; FVC= Forced vital capacity; ICS=inhaled corticosteroid; IV=intravenous.
Aged asthma patients had significantly worse asthma control as measured by the ACT (15.0 in the aged vs. 18.0 in the young, P =0.01). There was not a significant difference in the overall impact of asthma on the quality of life in the aged compared to the younger group (mini-AQLQ scores of 3.8 vs. 4.4, respectively, P =0.07). However, there was a statistically significant difference in aged vs younger groups in the AQLQ domains of Symptom and Activity Scores (3.7 vs. 4.6, P=0.01, and 4.2 vs. 5.0, P=0.05, respectively).
Most aged and younger patients with asthma were taking an ICS (74.3% vs. 67.6%, P =0.71). ICS dose was not significantly different between the two patient groups; most received medium to high doses.
Comparison of sputum inflammatory cell patterns between aged and younger patients with asthma
The total numbers of sputum cells were not significantly different between all 4 study groups (P=0.75; Fig 1A). The total numbers of sputum neutrophils was significantly elevated in the aged (30.5 ×104/mL) compared to the younger asthma patients (13.0 ×104/mL, P <0.01; Fig 1A). Additionally, the percentage of sputum neutrophils was significantly elevated in the aged asthma patients (23.1%) compared to younger patients (6.9%, P <0.01) and to aged-matched controls (1.9%, P <0.01; Fig 1B). However, no significance differences in the total numbers (3.0 ×104/mL vs. 7.0×104/mL, respectively, P =0.12) and percentages of sputum neutrophils (1.9% vs. 3.5%, respectively, P =0.20), were observed between aged and younger controls suggesting that these changes are specific to asthma. After adjusting for ICS adherence, ICS dose, years with asthma, atopy, race, sex, BMI and pack-years of smoking, the associations remained significant.
Similarly, the absolute number and percentage of sputum eosinophils was significantly elevated in the aged (7.0×104/mL and 3.8%, respectively) compared to younger (2.0×104/mL, P <0.01 and 1.2%, P <0.01, respectively) asthma patients and to aged controls (1.0×104/mL, P <0.01 and 0.7%, P <0.01, respectively). This increase was not secondary to aging as suggested by the non-significant difference between eosinophil numbers (P =0.69) and percentages (P =0.85) in aged and younger control subjects. Analyses adjusting for ICS adherence, ICS dose, years with asthma, atopy, race, sex, BMI and pack-years of smoking showed similar results.
Cytokine expression between older and younger patients with asthma
We measured protein expression of several cytokines, including some involved in recruitment of neutrophils (IL-8), common to “inflamm-aging” (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), Th17 cells (IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-23, IL-27, MIP-3α/CCL20) and eosinophils (IL-5, eotaxin-1; Table IV). Levels of sputum IL-5 (P=0.02), IL-6 (P <0.01), IL-8 (P =0.01), IL-10 (P =0.03), IL-17F (P =0.03), eotaxin-1 (P =0.02) and GM-CSF (P =0.04) were significantly increased in aged asthma patients suggesting an aging-impact on asthma. Although IL-27 was higher in aged vs younger asthma patients (P =0.06), the difference was not significant. To determine the effect of asthma on aging, we compared aged asthma patients to aged-matched controls, and found significantly elevated sputum protein IL-6 (P =0.01), IL-10 (P =0.02) and markers of Th17 cells (IL-17A [P =0.05], IL-23 [P =0.05], IL-27 [P =0.02], MIP-3α/CCL20 [P =0.04]) in the former. No significant differences in the levels of IL-1β (P =0.06) and IL-17F (P =0.06) were detected in aged asthma patients vs. controls. We were unable to analyze expression of IL-4 as many of the samples had concentrations which were below the levels of detection, therefore not providing sufficient numbers of samples (Fig E2). All of the samples had undetectable TGF-β.
TABLE IV
Asthma | Control | P value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cytokine (pg/ml) | Aged | Younger | Aged | Younger | Younger Asthma vs. Aged Asthm a | Aged Control vs. Aged Asthma | Younger Control vs. Aged Control | Younger Control vs. Younger Asthma |
N=28 | N=27 | N=14 | N=20 | |||||
IL-1β | 5.8 [4.1–14.8] | 4.9 [3.5–7.6] | 4.2 [3.6–4.7] | 6.8 [3.2–16] | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.48 |
IL-5 | 3.4 [3.1–4.8] | 3.1 [2.7–3.4] | 2.3 [2.1–3.4] | 3.1 [2.6–3.2] | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.48 |
IL-6 | 8.6 [4.4–16.1] | 2.7 [0.46–5.8] | 1.7 [0.53–3.1] | 6.6 [2.6–13.3] | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
IL-8 | 539 [294–1513] | 228 [140–431] | 253 [222–715] | 449 [171–733] | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.75 | 0.30 |
IL-10 | 0.50 [0.34–0.99] | 0.38 [0.15–0.49] | 0.34 [0.08–0.48] | 0.49 [0.34–0.84] | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
IL-15 | 1.2 [0.9–3.6] | 1.1 [0.76–1.2] | 1.03 [0.97–1.1] | 1.3 [1.02–2.9] | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
IL-17A | 5.6 [2.4–5.8] | 5.4 [1.01–5.7] | 1.03 [0.83–5.5] | 2.3 [2.1–5.7] | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.80 |
IL-17F | 9.4 [0.57–9.7] | 8.7 [0.45–9.4] | 0.45 [0.45–9.1] | 0.45 [0.45–9.7] | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.70 | 0.78 |
GM-CSF | 15.1 [13.4–16.2] | 13.7 [12.4–15.1] | 13.3 [12.7–14.9] | 13.3 [12.8–15.2] | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.88 | 0.70 |
IL-23 | 101 [36.8–132] | 40.7 [34.6–75.7] | 38.2 [28.2–70.5] | 109 [42.6–120] | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
IL-27 | 9.3 [6.1–11.2] | 8.1 [3–8.8] | 1.8 [0.66–7.7] | 5.3 [3.5–10.1] | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.68 |
MIP3α/CCL20 | 99.3 [17.7–243] | 29.7 [10.9–103] | 25.0 [5.4–38.7] | 69.1 [16.7–230] | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.42 |
IFN–γ | 4.9 [4.3–5.7] | 4.5 [4.1–5.3] | 4.7 [4.2–5.2] | 5.2 [4.8–6.1] | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.14 | 0.02 |
Eotaxin-1 | 2.0 [2–25] | 2.0 [2–2] | 2.0 [2–2] | 2.0 [2–2] | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
Values are expressed as medians [interquartile range]
Sputum Treg cell percentages
There was no significant difference in percent of sputum Treg cells (expressed as CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes expressing Foxp3+CD127low) between aged (10.7%) vs. younger asthma patients (7.5%) (P =0.27), aged asthma patients vs. aged-controls (14.6%) (P =0.62), and aged vs. younger control groups (16.3%) (P =0.34; Fig E1B). However, the percent Treg cells was lower in younger asthma subjects compared to age-matched controls (P =0.02), suggesting that only in younger asthma patients, the percentages of Treg cells are decreased compared to aged-matched controls. There was no statistical difference in the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Tregs, a surrogate marker of Treg function27–28, between aged and younger patients with asthma and between patients with asthma and aged-matched controls (Table EII).
Association between clinical characteristics of asthma and inflammatory markers
The mean difference in ACT scores among asthma patients with high vs. low IL-6 levels in aged subjects was −4.5 units compared to 2.4 units among younger patients (P=0.01); suggesting a differential relationship between IL-6 and asthma control according to age (Fig 2A). Similarly, aged vs. younger patients with high vs. low MIP-3α/CCL20 levels had an ACT score differences of −3.6 vs. 2.3 units (P=0.03), also suggesting an age-specific effect of this cytokine. No significant age-associated interactions between neutrophil percentage, eosinophil percentage, IL-1β, IL-5, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-23, IL-27, GM-CSF and ACT were observed (P>0.05 for all other comparisons, Fig 2A and Table EI).
The odds ratio (OR) for asthma hospitalizations (over the past 12 months) of aged patients with high neutrophil percentages was 6.7 vs. 0.1 in younger patients (P<0.01 for interaction; Fig 2B). Additionally, aged asthma subjects with high sputum IL-1β, IL-6, MIP-3α/CCL20 had increased OR for hospitalization at 7.0, 60.0, 28.0 vs. 0.4 (P=0.03), 2.5 (P=0.05), 0.7 (P=0.01) in the younger. Conversely, no significant interaction between age group and hospitalization was observed for eosinophil percent, IL-5, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-23, IL-27, GM-CSF (P>0.05 for all comparisons, Fig 2B and Table EI).
DISCUSSION
Our study investigated the relationship of aging on airway inflammation in asthma, as measured in induced sputum, and its association with clinical outcomes, including disease control. We found that aged asthma patients have a different pattern of sputum inflammation, which is characterized by increases in both neutrophils and eosinophils and elevated protein expression of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, eotaxin-1, GM-CSF and cytokines associated with Th17 cells. These identified markers have potential clinical relevance. In patients >60 years, elevated sputum IL-6 and MIP3α/CCL20 were significantly associated with decreased asthma control; and elevated sputum neutrophils, IL-1β, IL-6 and MIP3α/CCL20 correlated to an increased risk of hospitalization in the past 12 months. Our findings suggest that selective age-related inflammatory markers have relationships with clinical features of asthma. Further research of these pathways may provide new management strategies for this vulnerable group of patients.
The limited data to define airway inflammation in aged adults suggest that this group of patients tends to have increased airway neutrophils29–31. The sputum neutrophils that we found in our groups of asthma patients is slightly lower than previous reports29–32, but these differences may relate to methods of sputum collection33, ICS doses or underlying severity of asthma. Nonetheless, our groups of younger and aged patients received comparable doses of ICS, and no relationship was found between ICS and sputum neutrophils. Although previous studies provided an initial insight to features of airway inflammation in the aged, these reports did not match study populations for disease severity and intensity of treatment14–15, 34–35, did not specifically address the effect of aging on immune markers of inflammation34, or evaluate inner-city patients, a highly at-risk asthma population in the United States.
Aging is associated with several immune system changes which may affect inflammation36. Increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6), in the absence of an underlying infection or systemic inflammatory disorder, is a process referred to as “inflamm-aging”16, and is frequently observed in aged adults. In the lung, the impact of “inflamm-aging” is reflected by an elevation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophils and IL-6, even without obvious airway disease37–38; and changes proposed to be secondary to increased systemic inflammation which “spills” over into the airways39–40. These aged-related changes highlight the need to evaluate appropriate controls to differentiate age vs. asthma-related variability. Although we did not find evidence of “inflamm-aging” in our aged control population, our data offers insight into how aging may affect inflammation in asthma. A key future step will be to identify and establish mechanisms leading to these changes, how they may affect the increased morbidity in this population, and seek age-specific treatments to potentially improve outcomes.
One interpretation of the findings in our population of aged asthma patients is that the “inflamm-aging” patterns were reflected in sputum samples by increased neutrophils, IL-6, IL-8, and cytokines associated with Th17 cells. However, the lack of significant difference in neutrophils and levels of these cytokines among aged and younger controls suggests that these findings were not necessarily due to aging itself, but rather through asthma and aging. There are intricate interactions between IL-6, IL-8 and Th17 cells, which may contribute to, and explain, age-related differences in sputum neutrophils and are reflected in clinical outcomes, including diminished asthma control. For example, IL-6 differentiates naïve T-cells towards a Th17 subset (rather than Tregs), and increases the stability of committed Th17 cells41–49. Conversely, neutralization of IL-6 in T-cell co-cultures decreases Th17 cells50, and administration of anti-IL-6 to patients with rheumatoid arthritis significantly decreases peripheral Th17 cells44. IL-27 is a complex cytokine with both pro-and anti-inflammatory properties; inhibiting the development of Th17 from naïve T-cells, but with limited effect on the stability of committed Th17 cells51–52. Furthermore, IL-27 has been reported to inhibit Treg cells51–52. Th17 cells promote neutrophilia through multiple mechanisms53–54, including secretion of the neutrophil chemo-attractant, CXCL8 (IL-8)55, and are associated with asthma in younger adults that is less responsive to ICS56–57. Although we did not measure clinical responsiveness to ICS in our asthma subjects, aged patients, despite similar ICS treatments, had significantly decreased asthma control compared to younger patients, which was associated with increased IL-6 and the Th17 cytokine, MIP3α/CCL20. Furthermore aged asthma patients with elevated sputum neutrophils, IL-1β, IL-6 and MIP3α/CCL20 had a greater risk of hospitalization.
The significantly increased IL-6 in the aged asthma patients is of particular interest and potential clinical relevance. For example, elevated systemic levels of IL-6 are associated with increased frailty and higher morbidity of chronic diseases in the aged58–60. Of note, our population of aged controls did not have elevated sputum IL-6, which may be due to the fact that we measured IL-6 in the sputum and not plasma. In younger patients, variants of the IL-6 receptor61, polymorphisms of the IL-6 gene62 and elevated sputum IL-6 are associated with more severe asthma63. Moreover, whether an over-expression of IL-6 contributes to diminished corticosteroid responsiveness with aging has yet to be established.
We also found an increase in sputum eosinophils in the aged asthma patients compared to the younger asthma population, which may reflect poorer asthma control in the latter group. Although increases in eosinophils reflect disease severity, risks for exacerbations, and a T2 immune profile, our initial prejudice, and that in the literature, suggested that the dominant inflammatory cell would be the neutrophil in the aged group. However, allergen sensitized and airway challenged aged mice developed both elevated airway eosinophil and neutrophil populations64–65. A potential explanation for increased eosinophils in the aged asthma subjects, is a high frequency of allergic sensitization, elevated eotaxin and IL-5, all implying a T2 profile. In younger patients with asthma, combined elevated airway neutrophils and eosinophils often identify patients whose asthma is more difficult to control66. The persistence of sputum eosinophils in the aged asthma likely implies more severe disease, diminished responsive to ICS and a possible need for another approach, i.e. biologics, to achieve greater disease control.
The function of Treg cells in asthma is not completely understood, but has been proposed to suppress and regulate inflammation including decreasing Th17 cells43, 67. Studies conducted in younger patients with asthma have shown that compared to age-matched controls, the numbers of peripheral and airway Treg cells are decreased68–71, a concept found in our younger patients. The role of Treg cells in aged patients with asthma, however, has yet to be defined and has not been evaluated from airways samples. Most prior work suggests that Treg cells increase with aging, however the effect of aging on their function is less clear72–75. The underlying mechanisms for increased Treg cells with aging may include increased clonal expansion, in particular due to chronic viral infection (e.g., cytomegalovirus), increased IL-15 protein and receptor expression (promoting Treg development and maintenance), and decreased expression of pro-apoptotic molecules76–78. One study has specifically analyzed markers of peripheral Treg cells in aged asthma patients and reported decreased numbers compared to normal controls34. However, younger patients were not included for comparison. In our study, we noted significantly decreased sputum IL-15 in the younger patients with asthma compared to age-matched controls (Table IV), but no significant difference between aged asthma patients and controls. Although we did not find statistical differences between the Foxp3 MFI (as a marker of Treg function) of aged vs. younger patients with asthma and between patients with asthma vs. aged-matched controls, it may be that Treg suppressive activity is more accurately determined by co-culture proliferation experiments.
Our study has several strengths and limitations that are worth acknowledging. The study population was from a single institution, thus limiting the generalization of our findings. However, our center is one of the largest providers of medical care to the East Harlem, New York population, which has one of the highest rates of asthma in the United States79–80. We recruited patients from an inner-city minority population, a group with increased morbidity and mortality81–82. Previous studies of aged patients with asthma have not specifically addressed inner-city populations. Our study is also strengthened by the comparison of age-matched normal controls and younger patients with asthma, which allowed us to examine the effect of asthma on aging, aging on asthma, and the effect of aging itself. Additionally, as higher doses of ICS may increase sputum neutrophils19, we included a run-in period to accurately measure and then control our analyses for ICS dose and adherence. We excluded subjects with a smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years to remove subjects with COPD or possible asthma-COPD overlap35. Limitations to our study include a one-time sputum collection, thus, we could not evaluate the longitudinal stability of our findings. Additionally, by nature of their age, aged asthma patients had a longer duration of disease.
Our study of aged inner-city adults with asthma, suggest that both aging and asthma affect airway inflammation. Establishing the characteristics of airway inflammation in aged adults and underlying mechanisms of these processes is an important first step in the development of age-specific or personalized therapy. Current treatment of asthma applies the pathophysiology and therapeutic principles of asthma largely based on work in younger patients to aged individuals. We feel that our study helps set the stage for further investigation on the role of aging, asthma and airway inflammation in a high risk group with significant unmet treatment needs.
Supplementary Material
01
Corrected Fig E1
Corrected Fig E2
Corrected Manuscript
Corrected Online Repository
Corrected Table EI
Corrected Table EII
old
Acknowledgments
Funding: This study was funded by NIH 5R21 AI101425
We would like to thank Dr. Thomas Kraus for assistance with the Millipore cytokine analysis for this study.
Abbreviations used
ACT | Asthma control test |
Ag | Antigen |
AQLQ | Asthma quality of life questionnaire |
BALF | Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid |
BMI | Body mass index |
ICS | Inhaled corticosteroids |
IL | Interleukin |
IQR | Interquartile range |
MFI | Median fluorescence intensity |
TNF | Tumor necrosis factor |
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.015
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: http://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091674916311150/pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Asthma and hypertension: the role of airway inflammation.
Front Med (Lausanne), 11:1451625, 10 Oct 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39450103 | PMCID: PMC11499200
To investigate the function of age-related genes in different subtypes of asthma based on bioinformatics analysis.
Heliyon, 10(15):e34766, 20 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39144919 | PMCID: PMC11320208
Inflammatory markers in world trade center workers with asthma: Associations with post traumatic stress disorder.
PLoS One, 19(2):e0297616, 13 Feb 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38349898 | PMCID: PMC10863856
Phytoestrogen-Based Hormonal Replacement Therapy Could Benefit Women Suffering Late-Onset Asthma.
Int J Mol Sci, 24(20):15335, 19 Oct 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37895016 | PMCID: PMC10607548
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Aging-Related Mechanisms Contribute to Corticosteroid Insensitivity in Elderly Asthma.
Int J Mol Sci, 24(7):6347, 28 Mar 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 37047327 | PMCID: PMC10093993
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (29) article citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Smoking and airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma.
Chest, 120(6):1917-1922, 01 Dec 2001
Cited by: 190 articles | PMID: 11742922
Profiles of proinflammatory cytokines in sputum from different groups of severe asthmatic patients.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 97(3):312-320, 01 Sep 2006
Cited by: 17 articles | PMID: 17042136
Apoptotic eosinophils in sputum from asthmatic patients correlate negatively with levels of IL-5 and eotaxin.
Respir Med, 101(7):1447-1454, 26 Mar 2007
Cited by: 20 articles | PMID: 17379492
Use of induced sputum to examine airway inflammation in childhood asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 102(5):S100-1, 01 Nov 1998
Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 9819317
Review