Abstract

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a public health problem associated with significant mortality and morbidity worldwide.¹ Although the major factors contributing to CVD risk are well established, other determinants remain uncertain and require further evaluation to facilitate the development of various prevention strategies.² Some occupational factors are expected to play a role in the development of CVDs; among them, is the disruption of circadian rhythm, which occurs during night shift work.³

Circadian rhythm disruption (through changes in sleep/wake cycle) are known to be associated with an increase in psychosocial stress and a change in eating habits (i.e., eating an overly rich diet at night).^4,5 These effects were associated with changes in autonomic nervous system balance, with the sympathetic nervous system being the predominant division in the muscular and thoracic compartment and parasympathetic division being predominant in the intra-abdominal compartment.⁶ As a consequence of these changes, individuals may experience an increase in body weight (obesity), abnormally high blood pressure, high blood glucose, and impaired lipogenesis.⁶ Thus, it has been suggested that night shift working pattern might be associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and CVDs.^4,7-13

A link between shift work and CVDs has been suggested, but cannot be firmly asserted. In one meta-analysis, epidemiological evidence suggested an association between sleep loss due to shift work and coronary heart diseases (CHDs).¹⁴ Shift workers (males and females) had a 40% higher risk of developing ischemic heart diseases compared to day workers.¹⁴ On the other hand, a recent systematic review, which was based on 16 studies published between 1972 and 2008, did not define any certainty between shift work and CVDs.¹⁵ This equivocal evidence can be attributed to the various definitions used in identifying night shift workers.¹⁶

Night shift workers may also be at increased risk for the development of MetS.³ MetS is a cluster of clinical and metabolic abnormalities that may sharply increase the risk of subsequent CHDs.¹⁷ A study of more than 27 000 participants from the Västerbotten intervention program in the north of Sweden, found a significant association between night shift work and MetS.³ In this study, high triglyceride (TG) levels, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and obesity were found to cluster more among night shift workers compared to daytime workers.³

Due to this epidemiological profile of the effect of night shifts on CVDs and MetS risk, it is important to conduct studies to evaluate the association between night shift work and the development of CVDs and MetS. Shedding light on this to the night shift workers population could improve their overall CVD risk management by allowing them to adopt appropriate interventions (e.g., diet, physical activity, and meditation).

We previously published a study on the impact of night shift working on the level of selected lipids parameters and found that night shift workers had higher TG levels and lower HDL-C levels.¹⁸ In the same study, we used lipid parameters to calculate an index that represents insulin resistance, which was found to be significantly higher among night shift workers compared to daytime workers.¹⁹ Based on the effect of night shift working on employees’ lipid parameters, the same cohort was used in this study to examine the impact of night shift work on increasing the risk of CVDs.

We used three screening methods to assess the risk of CVDs. The first method was to calculate the atherogenic index of the plasma (AIP).¹⁹ The second method was to predict the 30-year risk for CHD based on the Framingham Heart Study,²⁰ and the third method was to assess the presence of MetS and its components using the criteria of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI).²¹ To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the association between night shift work and both Framingham score (30-year risk) and AIP as predictors of cardiovascular risk.

Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee at the Jordan University Hospital. Recruitment of subjects was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Helsinki Declaration.²² Informed verbal consent was obtained from each participant.

This study was part of a large cross-sectional study conducted to evaluate the negative consequences of working night shifts on employees’ health.^18,23,24 The study sample represents a cohort of hospital employees (males and females) from all hospital departments. From this cohort, 140 apparently healthy adults (aged 20–59 years without any established CVDs at baseline evaluation), with permanent employment for at least three years were recruited. Participants were classified into two groups: daytime working group with subjects working from 7.00 am to 4.00 pm and night shift working group with subjects working from 4.00 pm to 7.00 am. The night shift working group should have at least four night shifts per month for the last three years. Exclusion criteria included pregnant female workers, part-time workers, or if daytime workers had any night shift work during their previous working schedule.

Data collection took place between June and December 2014. For each recruited patient, sociodemographic data such as age, gender, smoking status, occupation, and marital status were obtained. At baseline, all participants underwent medical evaluation including weight, height, blood pressure, and waist circumference measurements. For fasting blood glucose (FBG), HDL-C, TG measurements, and fasting blood samples were obtained from all participants. Detailed information about data collection and blood sample measurement has been published previously.¹⁹

AIP has been used as a significant predictor of atherosclerosis.²⁵ It can be calculated from standard lipid profile and provides more predictive value for CVD beyond lipid profile. AIP is based on the TG to HDL-C ratio and is calculated according to the following formula: AIP = Log [TGs]/[HDL].²⁵

Framingham score is a tool for estimating 30-year risk of cardiovascular events among healthy individuals. The thirty-year risk for CVD was estimated based on a simple calculation that uses standard risk factors (i.e., gender, age, blood pressure and antihypertensive treatment, smoking, diabetes, and body mass index) without the need for any laboratory values.²¹

The diagnosis of MetS was based on the AHA/NHLBI criteria, which defines MetS as the presence of at least three of the following five conditions: FBG³ 100 mg/dL or on drug treatment for elevated glucose; blood pressure³ 130/85 mmHg or on antihypertensive drug treatment in a patient with a history of hypertension; TGs ³ 150 mg/dL or on drug treatment for elevated TGs; HDL-C < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women or on drug treatment for reduced HDL-C; or waist circumference³ 102 cm in men or³ 88 cm in women.²¹

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample; the quantitative variables were described using mean and standard deviation (SD); qualitative variables were described using frequency and percentages. Group differences were explored using independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Non-parametric tests were used for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared analysis. If the expected frequency fell below five, Fisher’s exact test was employed. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). For all statistical analysis, a p-value of < 0.050 was considered statistically significant. All tests were two-tailed.

There were differences in sociodemographic characteristics between the two studied groups (night shift and daytime groups) in terms of age and gender. These differences were controlled for when evaluating the difference between the two working groups. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate the differences in AIP and Framingham scores between the two groups; while hierarchical multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the difference in MetS prevalence. Finally, simple linear regression and simple logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the influence of the duration of night shift working and the number of night shifts per month on the three cardiovascular predictors among night shift workers.

Results

Demographic and working characteristics of the study cohort are represented in Table 1. The daytime group were older and had a higher proportion of females compared to the night shift group.

By conducting ANCOVA (with age and gender being the main covariates), night shift work was independently associated with increased AIP (log TG/HDL-C) compared to daytime work (0.36 vs. 0.21 respectively, F-value= 5.1, df =1, p = 0.024) [Figure 1].

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Mean value and standard error of the mean of atherogenic index of plasma (log triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol among Jordanian employees working day or night shifts. Comparison was performed using one-way analysis of covariance (after adjusting for age and gender) (F-value = 5.1, df = 1, p = 0.024).

In the evaluation of the 30-year risk for CVDs among the study groups, although not significant, night shift workers showed higher Framingham score compared to daytime workers (17.5 vs. 13.2, respectively, F-value = 2.5, df = 1, p = 0.115) [Figure 2].

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Mean value and standard error of the mean of Framingham risk for cardiovascular diseases (30 years risk) among Jordanian employees working day or night shifts. Comparison was performed using one-way analysis of covariance (after adjusting for age and gender effect) (F-value = 2.5, df = 1, p = 0.115).

MetS components were assessed for all participants [Table 2]. The average number of MetS components in the whole sample was 1.2, with no significant difference found between the two groups (p = 0.764). There was no significant difference between the two groups for all the anthropometric parameters except for HDL-C and TG.

When evaluating the prevalence of MetS among both working groups [Figure 3], night shift workers showed a non-significant higher percentage of MetS compared to daytime workers after adjusting for age and gender confounding effect (15.9% vs. 10.3% respectively, p = 0.484).

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Prevalence of MetS among Jordanian employees according to their working groups. Comparison was performed using hierarchical multiple logistic regression after adjusting for age and gender (p = 0.484).

Finally, the duration of night shifts and the number of night shifts per months significantly increased the 30-year Framingham risk among night shift workers (p = 0.000 and 0.012, respectively). The presence of MetS and AIP were not affected by the duration and the number of night shifts per month [Table 3].

Discussion

This study is an extension of our previous study, which evaluated the impact of night shift working on employees’ lipid parameters and insulin resistance index.¹⁸ Based on the fact that abnormal lipid parameters are associated with increased risk of CVDs,²⁶ this cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the impact of night shift work on the risk of cardiovascular events among the same cohort of workers using three different predictors of CVDs including (AIP, 30-year Framingham risk score, and MetS). Although other studies have evaluated the relationship between night shift work and MetS,^3,13,27-30 no study to date has assessed the association between night shift work and both AIP and the 30-year Framingham risk scoring, which have been reported to be among the best predictors of CVD.^19,20,25

AIP has the advantage of being easily calculated from individuals’ routine fasting lipid profile.^25,31 Although several other atherogenic indices have been associated with increased risk of CVDs such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL-C ratio, TG/HDL-C ratio and total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C ratio. We used AIP in this study because it has been found to be a better marker for predicting cardiovascular risk compared to the classical conventional indices³² since it can reflect the composition of blood lipoproteins.^25,33

Remarkably, in this study, night shift workers had higher AIP (after adjusting for age and gender) compared to daytime workers. This is the first study to evaluate the influence of shift working on AIP. A previous study evaluated the influence of shift work on different atherogenic indices including TG/HDL ratio, TC/HDL ratio, and LDL-C/HDL ratio.³⁴ All indices were elevated in night shift workers compared to daytime workers.³⁵

In this study, Framingham risk score was used as a tool to predict the 30-year cardiovascular risk. Despite being a valuable predictor of CHD risk, it is only applied to individuals without previously diagnosed heart disease and has low accuracy in some ethnic subgroups.³⁵ The validity of using this scoring system among the Middle Eastern population has been studied and approved previously.³⁶

The relationship between the 10-year Framingham risk scoring and night shift work have been investigated in some recent studies,^37-39 but this is the first study to evaluate the 30-year CVD risk. The 30-year Framingham risk scoring system estimates the risk of developing CVDs in the next 30 years.²⁰ The fact that participants mean age in this study was 33 years led to the decision to use the 30-year risk to get a long-term prediction of risk.

Although we found no significant difference in Framingham 30-year risk score between the two groups, night shift workers showed a relatively higher risk score compared to daytime workers. Among the night shift workers, 30-year Framingham risk was positively associated with an increased duration of night shift work and the number of night shifts per month. Compared to previous studies that have evaluated the 10-year risk, one study reported a higher 10-year risk score in night shift workers,³⁹ while others reported no significant difference among night shift workers compared to daytime workers.^37,38 The advantage of the simple equation used in this study is the lack of need for laboratory values; it is only based on standard risk factors. This means CHD risk assessment can be easily implemented in primary care settings.

Although numerous researchers have suggested an association between night shift work and MetS,^3,13,27-30 we did not find this association significant. However, a higher percentage of night shift workers developed MetS compared to daytime workers. A possible justification for the lack of a significant relationship is the relatively small sample size, which may affect the power of the study.

According to the results obtained in this study, most anthropometric components of MetS were higher among night shift workers compared to daytime workers, with hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C level being the only components showing a significant association with night shift work. The effect of night shift work on those two lipid parameters was discussed in more detail in a previous study.¹⁸

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular events.⁴⁰ The relationship between night shift work and blood pressure was not statistically significant in this study. This finding was consistent with two previous reports by the same research team, which found no significant relationship between systolic/diastolic blood pressure and working schedule.^3,41 Higher blood pressure in night shift workers were reported in the literature,^14,27 as well as lower blood pressure.²⁸ These inconsistencies in the association between night shift work and blood pressure might be explained by the different techniques used to measure blood pressure and the different times these readings were taken without taking into account circadian variation in blood pressure readings.⁴²

The mean FBG was found to be similar in both night shift and daytime workers. Previous studies have also confirmed this finding,^3,39,41 while another study found hyperglycemia to be more common in night shift workers than daytime workers.²⁷ Interestingly, one study found that FBG was significantly lower in night shift workers.³⁸ We found no significant difference in waist circumference between the two groups. This result is in agreement with that of a cross-sectional study in Southern France.³⁸ Other studies showed that abdominal obesity was more common in night shift workers than in daytime workers among both males and females.^3,28,41

Variation in eating habits between night shift and daytime workers may explain part of the observed association with FBG and abdominal obesity in these previous studies.^3,28,41 Night shift workers were reported to consume more food during the night and more smaller meals throughout the day compared with daytime workers. This may contribute to desynchronization of the rhythmicity of glucose and TG, which consequently, may result in more hyperglycemia and abdominal fat deposits.⁴³ We did not assess the dietary habits of the two working group, so it is difficult to explain the insignificant variations in FBG and abdominal obesity between them.

It is important to mention that this study has some methodological limitations. First, the study was limited by its cross-sectional design, which does not infer a causal relationship between increased cardiovascular risk and shift work. Second, the relatively small recruited sample size may reduce the power of the study to identify significant differences between the groups. The reason behind this limited sample size is the strict inclusion criteria for subject recruitment and the fasting requirements to obtain blood samples, which proved to be challenging to employees. Third, in this study, no data about dietary habits of the recruited participants was collected, which may confound the results obtained in this study.

Conclusion

This is the first study to assess the association between night shift work and AIP as well as the 30-year Framingham risk score as a predictor of CVDs. Night shift work was associated with an increase in AIP score compared to daytime work. The duration of night shift working and the number of night shifts per month significantly increased the 30-year Framingham risk among night shift workers. These findings suggest an association between night shift work and the risk of CVDs and atherosclerosis. Therefore, it is warranted to monitor shift workers clinical parameters and lifestyle habits. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of longitudinal exposure to night shift work on CVD risk and the development of MetS, and how lifestyle intervention can ameliorate CVD progression.

Disclosure

References