Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Morbidity and mortality have declined only modestly in patients with clinical acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), despite extensive research into the pathophysiology. Current treatment remains primarily supportive with lung-protective ventilation and a fluid conservative strategy. Pharmacologic therapies that reduce the severity of lung injury in preclinical models have not yet been translated to effective clinical treatment options. Consequently, further research in translational therapies is needed. Cell-based therapy with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is one attractive new therapeutic approach. MSCs have the capacity to secrete multiple paracrine factors that can regulate endothelial and epithelial permeability, decrease inflammation, enhance tissue repair, and inhibit bacterial growth. This review will focus on recent studies, which support the potential therapeutic use of MSCs in ALI/ARDS, with an emphasis on the role of paracrine soluble factors.

Free full text 


Logo of nihpaLink to Publisher's site
Stem Cells. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3293251
NIHMSID: NIHMS354793
PMID: 21506195

Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Acute Lung Injury: Role of Paracrine Soluble Factors

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality have declined only modestly in patients with clinical acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), despite extensive research into the pathophysiology. Current treatment remains primarily supportive with lung-protective ventilation and a fluid conservative strategy. Pharmacologic therapies that reduce the severity of lung injury in preclinical models have not yet been translated to effective clinical treatment options. Consequently, further research in trans-lational therapies is needed. Cell-based therapy with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is one attractive new therapeutic approach. MSCs have the capacity to secrete multiple paracrine factors that can regulate endothelial and epithelial permeability, decrease inflammation, enhance tissue repair, and inhibit bacterial growth. This review will focus on recent studies, which support the potential therapeutic use of MSCs in ALI/ARDS, with an emphasis on the role of paracrine soluble factors.

Keywords: Acute lung injury, Angiopoietin-1, Keratinocyte growth factor, LL-37, Mesenchymal stem cells, Pulmonary edema

Introduction

Adult stem cells are tissue specific cells that have retained the ability to differentiate into a distinct variety of cell lineages and have self-renewal capability. Although adult stem cells do not possess the full plasticity of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), they offer practical advantages including ease of isolation and propagation. More significantly, they have a limited risk of tumor formation and are not associated with the ethical controversy that surrounds ESC research. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are one class of adult stem cells that have generated a significant amount of interest as a potential therapy for lung disease. MSCs were first discovered in 1968 by Friedenstein et al. [1], who found bone marrow stromal cells that were adherent, clonogenic, and fibroblastic in appearance. MSCs, also called multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, can now be isolated from a variety of human tissues including the bone marrow, adipose tissue, and placenta. Bone marrow-derived MSCs reside near the sinusoids and function as support cells for hematopoietic stem cells. Although MSCs comprise less than 0.1% of all bone marrow cells, they can be isolated from whole bone marrow aspirates by their ability to adhere to plastic and form colonies. Although no unique MSC surface markers have been identified, the International Society of Cellular Therapy defined MSCs in 2006 by three criteria: (1) MSCs must be adherent to plastic under standard tissue culture conditions; (2) MSCs must express certain cell surface markers such as CD73, CD90, and CD105, but must not express other markers including CD45, CD34, CD14, or CD11b; and (3) MSCs must have the capacity to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages including osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chrondoblasts under in vitro conditions [2].

The current enthusiasm surrounding the potential use of MSCs for therapeutic purposes is based on their low immunogenicity, their immunomodulatory properties, and their ability to secrete endothelial and epithelial growth factors and, more recently, antimicrobial peptides (Table 1). Allogeneic MSCs are able to evade clearance by the host immune system through a variety of mechanisms including low expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and II proteins as well as lack of the T-cell costimulatory molecules, CD80 and CD86, a characteristic of MSCs often referred to as being “immunoprivileged” [13]. MHC II molecules are designed to enable T4-lymphocytes to recognize epitopes of exogenous antigens and discriminate self from nonself. This property makes MSCs attractive for cell-based therapy because they can be administered to patients without human leukocyte antigen matching. However, recent studies have shown that MSCs can express higher levels of the MHC class II proteins than originally thought [1416]. In addition, Nauta et al. [17] demonstrated that infusion of allogeneic MSCs elicited a host response and led to graft rejection. It has now become apparent that the original belief that MSCs have low immunogenicity due to a lack of MHC II antigen is not entirely correct. However, the concern over the potential immunogenicity of MSCs must be interpreted in light of how MSCs affect both the innate and adaptive immune systems, often suppressing T and B lymphocyte activations (see below). Although these are different issues and seem to have opposing functions, they clearly affect each other’s behavior in vivo and must be studied further.

Table 1

Mesenchymal stem cell paracrine soluble factors: Potential role in acute lung injury

Soluble factorsaFunctional effects
Keratinocyte growth factorAlveolar fluid transport [3]
Lung protein permeability [4]
Angiopoietin-1Lung epithelial and endothelial
 permeability [57]
Interleukin-1 receptor
 antagonist
Anti-inflammatory [8]
Interleukin-10Anti-inflammatory [9, 10]
Prostaglandin E2Anti-inflammatory [9]
LL-37Antimicrobial [9, 11, 12]
aSecretion of some soluble factors may depend on cell-cell contact or the alveolar milieu itself, such as interleukin-10 or prostaglandin E2.

Mscs in Preclinical Ali Models

Previous studies suggested that bone marrow-derived MSCs may have therapeutic applications in several clinical disorders including myocardial infarction [1821], diabetes [22], sepsis [9, 11], hepatic failure [23], and acute renal failure [24]. Bone marrow-derived MSCs have been investigated in several in vivo models of lung disease [5, 810, 2530]. In a mouse model of bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis, syngeneic MSCs improved survival and lung inflammation when given intravenously [25, 27]. In a follow-up study, Ortiz et al. [8] found that a subpopulation of mouse MSC produced interleu-kin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) that was capable of attenuating the severity of bleomycin-induced lung injury. To determine the effect of MSCs on lung injury from endotoxin, several groups studied the therapeutic effect of MSCs following intraperitoneal [28] or intratracheal Escherichia coli endotoxin [5, 30] in mice. Xu et al. [28] found that intravenous administration of syngeneic MSCs following intraperitoneal lipopolysac-charide (LPS) prevented endotoxin-induced pulmonary inflammation, injury, and edema as well as the influx of neutrophils into the injured alveoli. In addition, Xu et al. [30] and Mei et al. [5] also discovered that transfection of mouse MSCs with and without human angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) both reduced the severity of E. coli endotoxin-induced lung injury. In all these studies, the therapeutic effect could not be accounted for by the level of lung MSC engraftment, suggesting the importance of paracrine soluble factors or direct interaction with host cells.

One major limitation to these studies was that MSCs were not used as a treatment modality; the cells were given concurrent with the injury or before the injury. Recently, we reported that intrabronchial instillation of syngeneic MSCs 4 hours after endotoxin delivery to the lung improved survival and reduced the extent of pulmonary edema formation in E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury (ALI) in mice [10]. To further define the therapeutic potential of MSCs, we developed two human models of ALI: an ex vivo human lung preparation perfused with human blood and injured by E. coli endotoxin and primary cultures of human alveolar epithelial type II cells grown in a Transwell plate with an air-liquid interface injured by an inflammatory insult. In the ex vivo perfused human lung, the intrabronchial instillation of human MSCs 1 hour after endotoxin-induced lung injury restored alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) or the ability to resolve pulmonary edema fluid in part by the secretion of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) [3]. In primary cultures of human alveolar type II cells, human MSCs grown without cell contact in a Transwell plate restored the increase in epithelial permeability to protein caused by exposure to inflammatory cytokines in part by the secretion of Ang-1 [6]. In addition, new preliminary data from a meeting suggest that MSCs may enhance repair to the injured alveolar epithelium in a LPS-induced lung injury model in rats by the mitochondrial transfer of material from one cell to the other [31]. In summary, these studies supported the theme that MSC paracrine factors with or without direct interaction with injured lung cells were a key mechanism by which MSCs promoted repair in the injured tissue beds.

Mechanism: Engraftment

Much of the initial interest in adult stem cell therapy originated from the multipotent nature of the bone marrow-derived cells. Krause et al. [32] found that a single bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cell could give rise to cells of multiple different organs including the lung. She reported up to 20% engraftment of bone marrow-derived cells in the lung, including epithelial cells, from a single hematopoietic precursor. This report stimulated additional investigations into the possibility that bone marrow-derived MSCs might be able to regenerate the lung epithelium and/or endothelium as well. However, these results were questioned by multiple groups, who observed only engraftment of leukocyte lineages [33] or low engraftment rates in lung injury models with observed rates of <1% [25, 27, 34, 35]. Despite initial interest in their multipotent properties, engraftment in the lung now does not appear to play the major beneficial role. The beneficial effect of MSCs appears to derive more from their capacity to home to injured tissue beds, interact with injured host cells, and secrete paracrine soluble factors that modulate immune responses as well as alter the responses of endothelium or epithelium to injury through the release of growth factors and antimicrobial peptides [3, 6, 8, 9, 12].

However, the role of stem cell engraftment in repair following lung injury requires further research. Sueblinvong et al. [36] found that human umbilical cord MSCs when cultured in vitro with specialized growth medium expressed Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP), surfactant protein-C (SP-C), and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), important functional markers of lung alveolar epithelial cells. After systemic administration to immunotolerant, nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice, rare cells were localized in the lung airway epithelium that expressed cytokeratin and human CFTR. Wong et al. [37, 38] found a subpopulation of adherent human and murine bone marrow cells that expressed CCSP as well, and when cultured ex vivo with an air-liquid interface, these CCSP+ cells expressed alveolar type I and II markers such as pro-SP-C, CFTR, and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). CCSP+ cells preferentially homed to naphthalene-damaged airways when delivered transtracheally or intravenously. Although further research is needed, these publications highlight the potential of in vitro modification of MSCs, which may increase lung engraftment and/or regeneration in vivo.

Several groups have also identified adult stem cells within the lung, some with the features of MSCs. Kim et al. [39] identified CCSP+ SP-C+ Sca-1 CD34 cells at the bronchoalveolar ductal junction in mice,+which were + capable of differentiating into Clara cells or alveolar type I or II in response to lung injury. In addition, fibroblast-like cells have been found in the lungs of premature human infants as well as the lungs of human allograft following lung transplantation, which have characteristics of MSCs [40, 41]. Jarvinen et al. [41] demonstrated that these lung resident MSCs from human lung allografts, similar to bone marrow-derived MSCs, suppressed T-cell activation in vitro, primarily through the secretion of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Although promising, the roles of these lung resident stem cells during ALI will need to be investigated further. One potential mechanism of benefit by MSC therapy in ALI may be through the support of these endogenous stem cells.

Mechanism: Immunomodulation

A major characteristic of MSCs has been the immunomodulatory properties of the cells. Multiple studies have demonstrated that MSCs possess potent immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting the activity of both innate and adaptive immune cells [4245]. This immunosuppression has been shown to be mediated by cell contact-dependent and cell contact-independent mechanisms through the release of soluble factors. The list of candidate mediators released or induced by MSCs include transforming growth factor-b, tumor necrosis factor a (TNFα)–stimulated gene/protein 6 (TSG-6) [21], PGE2, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and IL-1ra among others. In a model of sepsis following cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in mice, Nemeth et al. [9] found that bone marrow-derived mouse MSCs, activated by LPS or TNFα, secreted PGE2, which reprogrammed alveolar macrophages to secrete IL-10. The beneficial effect of MSCs on mortality and improved organ function following sepsis was eliminated by macrophage depletion or pretreatment with antibodies to IL-10 or the IL-10 receptor, suggesting an essential role for IL-10 in these experiments; IL-10 is a cytokine secreted predominantly by monocytes that downregulates the expression of T helper 1 cytokines, MHC class II antigens, and costimulatory molecules on macrophages. IL-10 has also been reported to inhibit the rolling, adhesion, and transepithelial migration of neutrophils [46] (Fig. 1).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-354793-f0001.jpg

In acute lung injury (ALI), the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) rely on both paracrine mechanism and through interaction with other cells. Multiple mechanisms have been identified through which MSC therapy may repair the alveolar epithelium and endothelium during ALI, such as (a) secretion of paracrine soluble factor, which restore alveolar fluid clearance, lung permeability, and inhibit bacterial growth, and (b) immunomodulation of innate and adaptive immune cells, which reduce alveolar inflammation. Although not fully characterized, the potential of engraftment by in vivo modified MSCs and the presence of endogenous adult stem cells with characteristics similar to MSCs may also contribute to this therapeutic effect. Abbreviations: Ang-1, angiopoietin-1; IL-10, interleukin-10; KGF, keratinocyte growth factor; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PMN, polymorphonuclear neutrophils.

In a model of ALI following intrabronchial E. coli endotoxin in mice, we [11] found that syngeneic MSCs improved survival and lung injury in association with a decrease in macrophage inflammatory protein-2 and TNFα levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and elevated levels of IL-10 in both the plasma and BAL fluids. In bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis in mice, Ortiz et al. [8] found that mouse MSCs decreased subsequent lung collagen accumulation, fibrosis, and levels of matrix metalloproteinases in part by IL-1ra secretion; IL-1ra is a cytokine that competitively competes with IL-1b for IL-1 receptor binding. IL-1b is one of the major inflammatory cytokines in pulmonary edema fluid in patients with ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [47]. These studies confirmed the anti-inflammatory effect of MSCs in multiple lung injury experiments in mice [5, 25, 27, 28, 30].

Despite the well documented anti-inflammatory effects of MSCs, recent literature described a dual role for MSCs as an immunostimulatory cell as well [16]. Several investigators have reported that MSCs can upregulate expression of MHC II when exposed to low levels of inflammation and function as antigen-presenting cells stimulating the adaptive immune system [14, 15]. Recent evidence has also shown that MSCs can secrete IL-6 and induce production of IgG by B lymphocytes in an in vitro setting [48]. In addition, MSCs can prevent neutrophil apoptosis and degranulation in culture without inhibiting their phagocytic or chemotactic capabilities [49]. Thus, MSCs have more complex effects on the immune system than their classical role as immune suppressor cells. In the future, we will have to study the complex and often opposing relationship between the potential immunogenicity of MSCs and their ability to suppress the innate and adaptive immunity to understand the significance of immunomodulation during therapy for lung injury.

Mechanism: Afc

Impaired AFC (i.e., the resolution of pulmonary edema) is common in patients with ALI/ARDS. The level of AFC impairment has significant prognostic value in determining morbidity and mortality [50, 51]. Several experimental studies have studied the mechanisms that reduce AFC in ALI, and several pathways have been implicated [52, 53]. In ALI, we and other investigators have reported that pulmonary edema fluid contained high levels of several proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1b, IL-8, TNFα, and TGFb1 [5456]. Several of these proinflammatory cytokines have been studied in experimental epithelial fluid transport experiments, particularly the effect of the inflammatory cytokines on the major sodium channel (ENaC a, b, and c) and sodium-potassium ATPase (Na-K-ATPase), and CFTR, alveolar epithelial proteins involved in fluid transport or pulmonary edema resolution.

Bone marrow-derived MSCs are known to produce several epithelial specific growth factors, specifically KGF, the seventh member of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family. We have been particularly interested in KGF because multiple investigators have reported that KGF can reduce lung injury in small animal models of pulmonary edema. Recombinant human KGF pretreatment reduced mortality following intratracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid [57, 58], bleomycin [59, 60], hyperoxia [61, 62], and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [63]. In rat lung, KGF improved alveolar fluid transport in part by upregulating aENaC gene expression [64] and Na-K-ATPase activity [65]. In the ex vivo perfused human lung, the intrabronchial instillation of human MSCs 1 hour after endotoxin-induced lung injury restored AFC in part by the secretion of KGF [3], which increased vectorial fluid transport across the alveolar epithelium in part through increased trafficking of sodium transport proteins to the cell surface [66, 67]. These studies demonstrated how MSCs may reduce pulmonary edema, a key pathological feature in ALI with prognostic significance (Fig. 1).

Mechanism: Lung Protein Permeability

The integrity of the lung microvascular endothelium is essential to prevent the influx of protein-rich fluid from the plasma as well as inflammatory cells, which may further aggravate the ability of the lung epithelium to reduce alveolar edema. Several MSC paracrine soluble factors, such as Ang-1 and KGF, are potentially important in these effects. Ang-1, a ligand for the endothelial Tie2 receptor, is a known endothelial survival [68] and vascular stabilization factor that reduces endothelial permeability and inhibits leukocyte-endothelium interactions by modifying endothelial cell adhesion molecules and cell junctions [6972]. We recently found that allogeneic human MSCs secreted a significant amount of Ang-1. Using small interfering RNA knockdown, the secretion of Ang-1 was essential to prevent the increase in epithelial protein permeability in primary cultures of human alveolar epithelial type II cells injured by an inflammatory insult [6]. The effect of MSCs secreted Ang-1 in lung permeability supported several recent studies, which demonstrated the therapeutic use of MSCs (with and without transfection with human Ang-1) in mice injured by LPS [5, 7, 30] (Fig. 1).

The potential therapeutic role of KGF is intriguing given the recent study by Murakami et al. [4] that reported that FGFs FGF2, FGF4, and FGF8, which are specific for both FGF receptors 1IIIc and 3IIIc, are responsible for the maintenance of endothelial barrier homeostasis. In models of acute permeability edema such as α-naphthylthiourea [65, 73], P. aeruginosa [63], or ventilator-induced lung injury [74], KGF reduced lung edema and BAL protein levels. Another epithelial specific growth factor secreted by MSCs is hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Previously, HGF was found to stabilize integrity of pulmonary endothelial cells by the inhibition of Rho GTPase and the prevention of actin stress fiber formation and paracellular gaps among pulmonary endothelial cells injured by thrombin [75, 76]. The effect of MSC-derived growth factors on restoring or maintaining lung permeability following injury is promising and will need to be studied further.

Mechanism: Antibacterial Properties

One safety concern with MSC-based therapy, particularly in treating ALI/ARDS, is their effect on host defense against bacterial infection. Bacterial pneumonia and sepsis from a nonpulmonary cause are two of the most common etiologies of ARDS [77]. Given the preponderance of literature that describes the immunosuppressive effect of MSCs, there was a concern that this effect might diminish host defense against infections. However, recent in vivo studies have provided evidence for the beneficial effects of MSCs in the treatment of bacteria-induced sepsis. In the mouse model of sepsis (CLP), intravenous syngeneic MSCs reduced mortality, improved organ function, and decreased total bacterial counts in the blood and peritoneal fluid [9]. Survival benefits in this study were explained in part by the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs mediated by soluble paracrine factors such as IL-10 and PGE2. In another study, Gonzalez-Rey et al. [78] reported the protective effect of subcutaneous adipose tissue-derived human and mouse MSCs in mouse experimental colitis and sepsis, which also was associated with improved bacterial clearance. Intraperitoneal MSC treatment suppressed acute inflammatory autoimmune responses in mice by inhibiting the inflammatory and Th1 responses. However, the actual mechanism of enhanced bacterial clearance was not clearly identified in these studies.

Macrophages and monocytes play a central role in the production of inflammatory mediators during sepsis, and they appear to be a major cell target in the protective effect of MSCs. Recently, Mei et al. [11] reported that the improvement in bacterial clearance in syngeneic MSC-treated septic mice following CLP could be in part explained by enhanced phagocytic activity of splenic monocytes and macrophages. Also, Kim and Hematti [79] reported that human MSCs improved phagocytic activity of monocyte-derived macrophages, when cocultured in vitro. They demonstrated that coculture of human MSCs and macrophages caused an alternative state (M2) of macrophage activation, which is characterized by anti-inflammatory properties and more potent phagocytic activity. The molecular mechanism of such macrophage “reprogramming” effect of MSCs in both of these studies is unclear. Interestingly, Mei et al. did not find any effect of MSCs on phagocytic activity of macrophages in vitro coculture experiments, but clearly demonstrated enhancement of phagocytosis in CD11+ cell population isolated from mouse spleen after MSCs treatment.

It is now well-established that MSCs have Toll-like and formyl peptide-like receptors and become activated in response to different bacterial products, suggesting the possibility that MSCs may be directly involved in innate immune response [10, 80]. Recently, we found that human bone marrow-derived MSCs can inhibit bacterial growth directly, and their antimicrobial effect is mediated in part through the secretion of an antimicrobial peptide LL-37, which was upregulated upon bacterial stimulation [12]. We also demonstrated that LL-37 secretion by MSCs improved bacterial clearance in vivo in the mouse model of E. coli pneumonia, when MSCs were administered intrabronchially. These antimicrobial activities of MSCs suggest these cells may participants in host defense (Fig. 1).

Conclusion

ALI/ARDS is the most common cause of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in critically ill patients [77, 81]. Current treatment for ALI/ARDS is only supportive [82, 83], and therefore, new treatments are needed. Recently, multiple investigators have demonstrated the beneficial effects of MSCs in preclinical models of ALI in both rodents and human tissue. Given the promising initial results, there has been enthusiasm to advance MSCs and/or cell-based therapy to patients with ALI/ARDS [84]. Currently, there are over 120 clinical trials registered with clinicaltrial.gov involving the use of MSCs as therapy in patients with cardiac, renal, and autoimmune diseases. Much of current interest of MSCs have focused on soluble factors due to their ability to secrete multiple paracrine factors such as growth factors, factors regulating endothelial and epithelial permeability, anti-inflammatory cytokines, and, more recently, antimicrobial peptides that can potentially treat the major abnormalities that underlie ALI, including impaired AFC, altered lung endothelial permeability, dysregulated inflammation, and infection. However, given the recent findings of in vitro modification of these MSCs to a lung epithelial phenotype and the potential to increase lung engraftment in vivo [36, 37] and the discovery of endogenous adult lung stem cells with features of MSCs [39, 41], further mechanistic studies are needed to maximize MSCs therapeutic effect. At a minimum, issues of potency (“what defines a MSCs”) and immunogenicity versus immunomodulatory behavior of MSCs needs further work. For instance, the effect of culture conditions on both MSCs growth and phenotype is significant but still not fully appreciated [85]; not all MSCs retain their “stem” cell-like properties in culture. It may be time to revise the definition of MSCs set forth by the International Society of Cellular Therapy from 2006 [2] to compare preclinical animal studies and clinical trials for efficacy better. Regardless, future research in this field should continue and focus on elucidating the basic mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effects of MSCs. In the process, a novel and safe therapy for ALI/ARDS might eventually emerge.

Acknowledgments

We thank Diana Lim for her excellent help in preparing the figure. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI 093026 and NHLBI 5185651854 [to J.W.L.]) and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID A1053194 [to M.A.M.]). Pediatric Scientist NIH (James P Howard).

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions: J.W.L.: manuscript writing and final approval of manuscript; X.F. and J.P.H.: collection and/or assembly of data; A.K. and M.A.M.: manuscript writing.

REFERENCES

1. Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, et al. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6:230–247. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Lee JW, Fang X, Gupta N, et al. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:16357–16362. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Murakami M, Nguyen LT, Zhang ZW, et al. The FGF system has a key role in regulating vascular integrity. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3355–3366. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Mei SH, McCarter SD, Deng Y, et al. Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin 1. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e269. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Fang X, Neyrinck AP, Matthay MA, et al. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells restore epithelial protein permeability in cultured human alveolar type ii cells by secretion of angiopoietin-1. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:26211–26222. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. McCarter SD, Mei SH, Lai PF, et al. Cell-based angiopoietin-1 gene therapy for acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:1014–1026. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Ortiz LA, Dutreil M, Fattman C, et al. Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:11002–11007. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Nemeth K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PS, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin e(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med. 2009;15:42–49. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Gupta N, Su X, Popov B, et al. Intrapulmonary delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves survival and attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice. J Immunol. 2007;179:1855–1863. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Mei SH, Haitsma JJ, Dos Santos CC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 182:1047–1057. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Krasnodembskaya A, Song Y, Fang X, et al. Antibacterial effect of human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated in part from secretion of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Stem Cells. 2010;28:2229–2238. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Patel SA, Sherman L, Munoz J, et al. Immunological properties of mesenchymal stem cells and clinical implications. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2008;56:1–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Chan JL, Tang KC, Patel AP, et al. Antigen-presenting property of mesenchymal stem cells occurs during a narrow window at low levels of interferon-gamma. Blood. 2006;107:4817–4824. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Stagg J, Pommey S, Eliopoulos N, et al. Interferon-gamma-stimulated marrow stromal cells: A new type of nonhematopoietic antigen-presenting cell. Blood. 2006;107:2570–2577. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Stagg J. Immune regulation by mesenchymal stem cells: Two sides to the coin. Tissue Antigens. 2007;69:1–9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Nauta AJ, Westerhuis G, Kruisselbrink AB, et al. Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunogenic in an allogeneic host and stimulate donor graft rejection in a nonmyeloablative setting. Blood. 2006;108:2114–2120. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Li TS, Hayashi M, Ito H, et al. Regeneration of infarcted myocardium by intramyocardial implantation of ex vivo transforming growth factor-beta-preprogrammed bone marrow stem cells. Circulation. 2005;111:2438–2445. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Miyahara Y, Nagaya N, Kataoka M, et al. Monolayered mesenchymal stem cells repair scarred myocardium after myocardial infarction. Nat Med. 2006;12:459–465. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Iso Y, Spees JL, Serrano C, et al. Multipotent human stromal cells improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction in mice without long-term engraftment. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;354:700–706. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Lee RH, Pulin AA, Seo MJ, et al. Intravenous HMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:54–63. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Lee RH, Seo MJ, Reger RL, et al. Multipotent stromal cells from human marrow home to and promote repair of pancreatic islets and renal glomeruli in diabetic NOD/scid mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17438–17443. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Parekkadan B, van Poll D, Suganuma K, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules reverse fulminant hepatic failure. PLoS One. 2007;2:e941. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Togel F, Hu Z, Weiss K, et al. Administered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289:F31–F42. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Ortiz LA, Gambelli F, McBride C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8407–8411. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Yamada M, Kubo H, Kobayashi S, et al. Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells are important for lung repair after lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury. J Immunol. 2004;172:1266–1272. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
27. Rojas M, Xu J, Woods CR, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in repair of the injured lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;33:145–152. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
28. Xu J, Woods CR, Mora AL, et al. Prevention of endotoxin-induced systemic response by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293:L131–L141. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
29. Zhen G, Liu H, Gu N, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation protects against rat pulmonary emphysema. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3415–3422. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Xu J, Qu J, Cao L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-based angiopoietin-1 gene therapy for acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. J Pathol. 2008;214:472–481. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. Islam MN, Otsu K, Houser SD, et al. Mitochondrial donation by mesenchymal stromal cells rescues alveolar surfactant secretion in sepsis. FASEB J. 2010;24:612–24. [Google Scholar]
32. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, et al. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell. 2001;105:369–377. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
33. Wagers AJ, Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, et al. Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2002;297:2256–2259. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Kotton DN, Fabian AJ, Mulligan RC. Failure of bone marrow to reconstitute lung epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;33:328–334. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Loi R, Beckett T, Goncz KK, et al. Limited restoration of cystic fibrosis lung epithelium in vivo with adult bone marrow-derived cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:171–179. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Sueblinvong V, Loi R, Eisenhauer PL, et al. Derivation of lung epithelium from human cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:701–711. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Wong AP, Dutly AE, Sacher A, et al. Targeted cell replacement with bone marrow cells for airway epithelial regeneration. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293:L740–L752. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Wong AP, Keating A, Lu WY, et al. Identification of a bone marrow-derived epithelial-like population capable of repopulating injured mouse airway epithelium. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:336–348. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
39. Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, et al. Identification of bron-chioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell. 2005;121:823–835. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
40. Hennrick KT, Keeton AG, Nanua S, et al. Lung cells from neonates show a mesenchymal stem cell phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:1158–1164. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
41. Jarvinen L, Badri L, Wettlaufer S, et al. Lung resident mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human lung allografts inhibit T cell proliferation via a soluble mediator. J Immunol. 2008;181:4389–4396. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
42. Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105:1815–1822. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
43. Beyth S, Borovsky Z, Mevorach D, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells alter antigen-presenting cell maturation and induce T-cell unre-sponsiveness. Blood. 2005;105:2214–2219. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
44. Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood. 2006;107:367–372. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
45. Glennie S, Soeiro I, Dyson PJ, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induce division arrest anergy of activated T cells. Blood. 2005;105:2821–2827. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
46. Ajuebor MN, Das AM, Virag L, et al. Role of resident peritoneal macrophages and mast cells in chemokine production and neutrophil migration in acute inflammation: Evidence for an inhibitory loop involving endogenous IL-10. J Immunol. 1999;162:1685–1691. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
47. Geiser T, Atabai K, Jarreau PH, et al. Pulmonary edema fluid from patients with acute lung injury augments in vitro alveolar epithelial repair by an IL-1beta-dependent mechanism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1384–1388. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
48. Rasmusson I, Le Blanc K, Sundberg B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells stimulate antibody secretion in human B cells. Scand J Immunol. 2007;65:336–343. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
49. Raffaghello L, Bianchi G, Bertolotto M, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit neutrophil apoptosis: A model for neutrophil preservation in the bone marrow niche. Stem Cells. 2008;26:151–162. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142(6 pt 1):1250–1257. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
51. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1376–1383. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
52. Matthay MA, Folkesson HG, Clerici C. Lung epithelial fluid transport and the resolution of pulmonary edema. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:569–600. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
53. Folkesson HG, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial ion and fluid transport: Recent progress. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006;35:10–19. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
54. Pugin J, Verghese G, Widmer MC, et al. The alveolar space is the site of intense inflammatory and profibrotic reactions in the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:304–312. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
55. Olman MA, White KE, Ware LB, et al. Pulmonary edema fluid from patients with early lung injury stimulates fibroblast proliferation through IL-1 beta-induced IL-6 expression. J Immunol. 2004;172:2668–2677. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
56. Lee JW, Fang X, Dolganov G, et al. Acute lung injury edema fluid decreases net fluid transport across human alveolar epithelial type II cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24109–24119. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
57. Nemzek JA, Ebong SJ, Kim J, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor pretreatment is associated with decreased macrophage inflammatory protein-2alpha concentrations and reduced neutrophil recruitment in acid aspiration lung injury. Shock. 2002;18:501–506. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
58. Yano T, Deterding RR, Simonet WS, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor reduces lung damage due to acid instillation in rats. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;15:433–442. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
59. Sugahara K, Iyama K, Kuroda MJ, et al. Double intratracheal instillation of keratinocyte growth factor prevents bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in rats. J Pathol. 1998;186:90–98. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. Yi ES, Salgado M, Williams S, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor decreases pulmonary edema, transforming growth factor-beta andplatelet-derived growth factor-BB expression, and alveolar type II cell loss in bleomycin-induced lung injury. Inflammation. 1998;22:315–325. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
61. Barazzone C, Donati YR, Rochat AF, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor protects alveolar epithelium and endothelium from oxygen-induced injury in mice. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:1479–1487. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
62. Panos RJ, Bak PM, Simonet WS, et al. Intratracheal instillation of keratinocyte growth factor decreases hyperoxia-induced mortality in rats. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2026–2033. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
63. Viget NB, Guery BP, Ader F, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279:L1199–L1209. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
64. Wang Y, Folkesson HG, Jayr C, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport can be simultaneously upregulated by both KGF and beta-agonist therapy. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:1852–1860. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
65. Guery BP, Mason CM, Dobard EP, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor increases transalveolar sodium reabsorption in normal and injured rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:1777–1784. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
66. Dada LA, Sznajder JI. Mechanisms of pulmonary edema clearance during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: Role of the Na,K-ATPase. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(suppl 4):S248–S252. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
67. Planes C, Blot-Chabaud M, Matthay MA, et al. Hypoxia and beta 2-agonists regulate cell surface expression of the epithelial sodium channel in native alveolar epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:47318–47324. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
68. Kwak HJ, So JN, Lee SJ, et al. Angiopoietin-1 is an apoptosis survival factor for endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 1999;448:249–253. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
69. Gamble JR, Drew J, Trezise L, et al. Angiopoietin-1 is an antiperme-ability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ Res. 2000;87:603–607. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
70. Thurston G, Suri C, Smith K, et al. Leakage-resistant blood vessels in mice transgenically overexpressing angiopoietin-1. Science. 1999;286:2511–2514. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
71. Kim I, Moon SO, Park SK, et al. Angiopoietin-1 reduces VEGF-stimulated leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by reducing ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin expression. Circ Res. 2001;89:477–479. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
72. Pizurki L, Zhou Z, Glynos K, et al. Angiopoietin-1 inhibits endothelial permeability, neutrophil adherence and IL-8 production. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;139:329–336. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
73. Mason CM, Guery BP, Summer WR, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor attenuates lung leak induced by alpha-naphthylthiourea in rats. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:925–931. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
74. Welsh DA, Summer WR, Dobard EP, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor prevents ventilator-induced lung injury in an ex vivo rat model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(3 pt 1):1081–1086. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
75. Birukova AA, Alekseeva E, Mikaelyan A, et al. HGF attenuates thrombin-induced endothelial permeability by Tiam1-mediated activation of the Rac pathway and by Tiam1/Rac-dependent inhibition of the Rho pathway. FASEB J. 2007;21:2776–2786. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
76. Singleton PA, Salgia R, Moreno-Vinasco L, et al. CD44 regulates hepatocyte growth factor-mediated vascular integrity. Role of c-met, Tiam1/Rac1, dynamin 2, and cortactin. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30643–30657. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
77. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1685–1693. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
78. Gonzalez-Rey E, Anderson P, Gonzalez MA, et al. Human adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue protect against experimental colitis and sepsis. Gut. 2009;58:929–939. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
79. Kim J, Hematti P. Mesenchymal stem cell-educated macrophages: A novel type of alternatively activated macrophages. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:1445–1453. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
80. Nemeth K, Mayer B, Mezey E. Modulation of bone marrow stromal cell functions in infectious diseases by toll-like receptor ligands. J Mol Med. 2010;88:5–10. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
81. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1334–1349. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
82. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The acute respiratory distress syndrome network. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–1308. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
83. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–2575. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
84. Matthay MA, Thompson BT, Read EJ, et al. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for severe acute lung injury. Chest. 2010;138:965–972. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
85. Larson BL, Ylostalo J, Prockop DJ. Human multipotent stromal cells undergo sharp transition from division to development in culture. Stem Cells. 2008;26:193–201. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1002/stem.643

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
8
319
1

Article citations


Go to all (259) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

NHLBI NIH HHS (5)

NICHD NIH HHS (1)

National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2)

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1)

PHS HHS (2)

Pediatric Scientist NIH

    Wellcome Trust (1)