Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Osteoclasts are multinucleated myeloid lineage cells formed in response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) by fusion of bone marrow-derived precursors that circulate in the blood and are attracted to sites of bone resorption in response to factors, such as sphingosine-1 phosphate signaling. Major advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating osteoclast functions have been made in the past 20 years, mainly from mouse and human genetic studies. These have revealed that osteoclasts express and respond to proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Some of these cytokines activate NF-κB and nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) signaling to induce osteoclast formation and activity and also regulate communication with neighboring cells through signaling proteins, including ephrins and semaphorins. Osteoclasts also positively and negatively regulate immune responses and osteoblastic bone formation. These advances have led to development of new inhibitors of bone resorption that are in clinical use or in clinical trials; and more should follow, based on these advances. This article reviews current understanding of how bone resorption is regulated both positively and negatively in normal and pathologic states.

Free full text 


Logo of nihpaLink to Publisher's site
J Bone Miner Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3613781
NIHMSID: NIHMS443025
PMID: 23436579

Advances in osteoclast biology reveal potential new drug targets and new roles for osteoclasts

Abstract

Osteoclasts are multinucleated myeloid lineage cells formed in response to M-CSF and RANKL by fusion of bone marrow-derived precursors that circulate in the blood and are attracted to sites of bone resorption in response to factors, such as sphingosine-1 phosphate signaling. Major advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating osteoclast functions have been made in the past 20 years mainly from mouse and human genetic studies. These have revealed that osteoclasts express and respond to pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Some of these cytokine activate NF-κB and NFATc1 signaling to induce osteoclast formation and activity and also regulate communication with neighboring cells through signaling proteins, including ephrins and semaphorins. Osteoclasts also positively and negatively regulate immune responses and osteoblastic bone formation. These advances have led to development of new inhibitors of bone resorption that are in clinical use or in clinical trials; and more should follow, based on these advances. This paper reviews current understanding of how bone resorption is regulated both positively and negatively in normal and pathologic states.

Keywords: Osteoclast, bone resorption, osteoclastogenic cytokine, apoptosis, osteoblast, NF-κB, RANKL, NFATc1

Introduction

Osteoclastic bone resorption coupled with bone formation helps to maintain skeletal integrity and mineral homeostasis, but it also is responsible for localized or generalized bone loss, which can weaken the skeleton and increase the risk of fracture (1, 2). Osteoclasts (OCs) are specialized myeloid lineage cells that function most effectively as multinucleated cells. Osteoclast precursors (OCPs) arise in the bone marrow and, like other leukocytes, circulate in the blood from where they are attracted to bone remodeling units (BRUs) in response to chemokines, cytokines and other factors elaborated at sites either destined for or already undergoing resorption (3, 4).

Bone loss and fractures can be prevented by anti-resorptive drugs (5). However, atypical femoral fractures have been linked to long-term treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates, the most widely prescribed anti-resorptive drugs (6), and osteonecrosis of jaw bones has been reported in some patients given intravenous bisphosphonates (6) or Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), the major osteoclastogenic cytokine (7). These adverse events have resulted in increasing reluctance of patients with osteoporosis to take bisphosphonates long-term and point to the need for new anti-resorptive therapies designed to target osteoclasts.

Morphologic studies of human bone biopsy samples in the 1960s, 70s and 80s revealed how bone remodeling maintains skeletal integrity and is disrupted in common diseases (2). Mouse and human genetic studies since the 1980s have identified numerous signaling pathways regulating OC formation and function (1, 8) as well as some unanticipated functions of osteoclasts to regulate osteoblastic and other cells (9). These studies should lead to development of new drugs targeted specifically to these signaling pathways, which are reviewed in this Review.

(i) Regulation of osteoclast formation

(a) Cytokines and transcription factors

OCs form by cytoplasmic, but not nuclear, fusion of precursors derived from myeloid progenitor cells that give rise also to macrophages and dendritic cells (9, 10). The progenitor cells differentiate into osteoclast precursors (OCPs) in response to macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and RANKL, but expression of several transcription factors, including PU.1, and a heterodimeric complex of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and Tfe3 (11), is required earlier in myeloid progenitors to promote their differentiation (12). For example, PU.1 and MITF promote expression of c-fms (the M-CSF receptor) (12), and mice deficient in these develop osteopetrosis (13), a condition characterized by radiographically dense long bones in which trabecular bone formed during endochondral ossification is not removed due to failure of OC formation or activity.

M-CSF is an essential osteoclastogenic cytokine expressed by osteoblast lineage cells. It promotes expression of RANK on OCP cell membranes, leaving the RANK+ cells primed to respond to RANKL (14). It mediates OCP proliferation, differentiation and survival through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (Grb-2) and Akt/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling (14). M-CSF also signals through a complex comprised of phosphorylated DNAX-activating protein 12 (DAP12) and the non-receptor tyrosine kinase, Syk (14), which is also activated by co-stimulatory signaling. Thus, M-CSF has important roles in all aspects of osteoclastic bone resorption.

(b) RANKL/RANK and downstream signaling

RANKL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily of proteins and is expressed by osteoblast lineage and other cell types, including T and B lymphocytes (15). In the absence of essential molecules that signal downstream of RANK, such as NF-κB and c-Fos, increased numbers of CD11b+ OCPs accumulate (as in RANK-/- mice (16) and NF-κBp50/p52 double knockout (dKO) mice (17)) or precursors are diverted down the macrophage lineage (as in c-Fos-/- mice) (18). Thus, treatment of patients with anti-RANKL drugs could lead to accumulation of OCPs, which could differentiate into OCs after therapy is discontinued. Such a mechanism could perhaps account for the increase in serum bone resorption markers reported in some clinical trials following cessation of Denosumab (19), but the precise mechanism remains to be determined.

During endochondral ossification, growth plate chondrocytes express RANKL, RANK and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (20). 1,25,(OH)2D3, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (20-22) regulate RANKL expression by these cells to attract OCPs to growth plates and facilitate rapid removal of newly formed bone, thus preventing osteopetrosis (13). Hypertrophic chondrocytes are the major source of RANKL during endochondral ossification, not osteoblastic cells, as had been thought previously, and osteocytes in bone are the major source of RANKL during bone remodeling and in response to mechanical stress (23-25).

Unlike c-fms, RANK lacks intrinsic kinase activity to phosphorylate and activate downstream signaling molecules. Rank recruits TRAFs, particularly TRAFs 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, which function as adapter proteins to recruit protein kinases (26, 27). Of these, only TRAF 6 appears to have essential functions in osteoclastic cells (26, 27). RANK/TRAF6 signaling activates four main pathways to induce OC formation: (NF-κB; c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/activator protein-1 (AP-1); c-myc; and calcineurin/NFATc1); and two others to mediate osteoclast activation (Src and MKK6/p38/MITF) and survival (Src and ERK), (26-28), which will be discussed later. TRAF 2 positively and TRAF3 negatively regulates OC formation (see below).

NF-κB is a family of transcription factors, which includes the signaling proteins, RelA, p50, Rel B, p52 and c-Rel, that induce expression of genes involved in normal and aberrant immune responses, cell division, differentiation and movement, and carcinogenesis through canonical and non-canonical pathways (29, 30). Requirement of NF-κB in osteoclastogenesis was discovered unexpectedly when NF-κB p50/p52 dKO mice failed to thrive at weaning due to absence of tooth eruption associated with osteopetrosis because the mice did not form OCs (31, 32). The defect in OC formation in NF-κB dKO OCPs is rescued by either c-Fos or NFATc1 retroviral constructs (33), indicating that they act downstream of NF-κB.

NF-κB appears to cooperate with NFATc2 (which is not required for OC formation) to induce expression of NFATc1, with NF-κB p50 and p65 being recruited to the NFATc1 promoter within 1 hour of treatment of OCPs with RANKL, resulting in transient auto-amplification of NFATc1 expression (34). It remains to be determined what the precise role of this transient auto-amplification of NFATc1 is and which genes are activated in response to it, but it may be down-regulation of constitutively active repressors of RANK signaling (35) (see later).

In the canonical pathway, RANKL binding to RANK leads quickly to formation of a complex on the intracellular cytoplasmic portion of RANK that contains a number of proteins, including TRAF6 and TAK1 (TGFβ-activated kinase-1), which induce activation of IKKκ̃ (also called NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO)). This leads to phosphorylation and subsequent activation of IKKβ, which phosphorylates IκB, an inhibitory NF-κB family protein that holds p65 and p50 heterodimers in an inactive state in the cytoplasm. IκB consequently undergoes rapid degradation by the 26S proteasome resulting in release of p65 and p50 and their translocation to nuclei where they prevent apoptosis of OCPs, thus allowing them to continue differentiating (36, 37). Mice with deletion of IKKβ in OC lineage cells have impaired OC formation and osteopetrosis (36). Interestingly, a constitutively active IKKβ (IKKβ-SS/EE) expressed in OCPs induces their differentiation into OCs in the absence of RANK or RANKL treatment (38), further emphasizing the importance of NF-κB signaling in OC formation.

Activation of the non-canonical pathway occurs more slowly, typically within 3-4 hours of RANKL treatment through the activity of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). This leads to processing of the precursor molecule, p100, to p52, which typically signals in association with RelB. In unstimulated cells, newly synthesized NIK gets bound by TRAF3, leading to NIK proteasomal degradation (39). NF-κB activation by RANKL recruits a TRAF/cIAP E3 ligase complex to RANK leading to cIAP1/2 activation by TRAF2. This targets TRAF3 for ubiquitination and degradation allowing NIK to accumulate and activate IKKα, which phosphorylates p100 and leads to its proteasomal processing to p52 and subsequent nuclear translocation of RelB/p52 heterodimers (29, 36).

NIK, IKKα and p100 do not have a required function for basal OC formation (29, 36). However, they do appear to have regulatory roles in RANKL- or TNF-enhanced OC formation in pathologic states. For example, intra-tibial injection of murine melanoma cells caused localized osteolysis in WT, but not in NIK-/- mice (36). In contrast, TNF-transgenic (TNF-Tg) mice crossed with p100-/- mice developed earlier and more severe joint inflammation and bone erosion than TNF-Tg mice, indicating that p100 limits TNF-induced OC formation and inflammation (40). These studies suggest that strategies to inhibit NIK or increase p100 could reduce bone loss in inflammatory and metastatic bone disease. Pre-clinical studies with a peptide that inhibits NF-κB signaling by binding to NEMO reduced osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis (41). However, to date there have been no clinical studies reported with this agent.

(c) NFATc1 and Co-Stimulatory Signaling

NFAT transcription factors regulate immune responses as well as cardiovascular, muscle, and neuronal and other cell functions (42). NFATc1 is activated in OCPs by being dephosphorylated by calcineurin, a phosphatase, which is activated by calcium-calmodulin signaling (34, 43) mediated by phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ), which plays a key role by releasing calcium from stores within the cytoplasm (34, 44). NFATc1 is also activated through PLCγ by co-stimulatory signaling, which is initiated by ligand binding to immunoglobulin-like receptors, such as TREM-2 (triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells-2) and OSCAR (osteoclast-associated receptor) (34). These receptors are expressed on OCPs and they recruit adaptor molecules, such as Fc receptor common γ subunit (FcRγ) and DAP12 leading to phosphorylation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) within these adaptor proteins and activation of downstream signaling. NFATc1 is involved in all aspects of osteoclast formation and activation and seems like a prime target for anti-osteoclast therapy. Indeed the immunosuppressive agents and calcineurin/NFATc1 inhibitors, FK506 and cyclosporine-A, prevent bone loss in inflammatory arthritis because they reduce the inflammation and associated bone resorption (45). However, NFATc1 also positively regulates expression of osterix, a key osteoblastogenic transcription factor, and the net effect of these inhibitors in normal mice is bone loss (45).

The ligands for most co-stimulatory receptors remain unidentified, but OSCAR is activated in OCPs by portions of exposed collagen fibers in resorption lacunae (46). Activation of NFATc1 through RANK and OSCAR in turn induces increased OSCAR expression on OCPs in a positive feedback loop (47). Expression of OSCAR and RANKL is increased in the synovium of joints of patients with RA (48). Thus, co-stimulatory signaling likely enhances OC formation and bone resorption mediated by RANKL through this and other mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

(d) T and B Lymphocytes and Osteoimmunology

The recognition that RANKL is expressed not only by osteoblastic cells, but also by T and B cells and synoviocytes in inflammatory bone diseases and that RANK signaling is involved in immune responses, lymph node formation and B cell maturation (27, 44) spawned the new field of osteoimmunology (49). However, the contributions of T and B cells to the increased osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory bone disease are complex. For example, although T helper (Th) cells express RANKL, T regulatory cells (Tregs) inhibit OC formation through cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (50, 51) and production of IL-4 and IL-10 (35) and Th1 cells express INFγ, which inhibits OC formation. Both T cell types are present in inflamed joints of RA patients and the effects of T cells overall appear to be inhibitory (52). Th17 cells are the major subset of RANKL-expressing Th cells in inflamed synovium of RA patients (53). In inflamed synovium, they (54) and mast cells (55) express IL-17, which induces OC formation mainly by increasing RANKL expression by synovial fibroblasts (52), although one study has reported direct induction of OC formation by IL-17 from human monocytes (56). Th17 cells are also inflammatory and cause increased expression of TNF, IL-1 and IL-6 by synovial fibroblasts, which in turn increase their expression of RANKL (52). Interestingly, adoptive co-transfer of a subset of CD11b–/loLy6Chi OCPs with CD4+ T cells from arthritic mice markedly decreased the severity of arthritis in Rag2-/-recipient mice, suggesting that these sub-populations of OCPs and T cells can be anti-inflammatory (57). There are also conflicting data about B cell expression of RANKL (43, 51, 58). Further study will be required to explain how these complex positive and negative functions of immune cells lead overall to increased bone resorption in inflammatory bone disease, but they point to additional mechanisms to limit bone resorption.

T cells have been implicated also in ovariectomy (Ovx)-induced the bone loss in mice, but these findings also are somewhat controversial (15). For example, T cell-deficient nude mice appear to be protected from bone loss after Ovx in some, but not all studies (15). Estrogen inhibits differentiation of Th17 cells, but the role of IL-17 in Ovx-induced bone loss is unclear because there are conflicting findings of the effects of Ovx on bone loss in IL-17 receptor-deficient mice (15). Estrogen also increases Treg numbers; but it also regulates T cell production of TNF by inhibiting expression of IL-7, which promotes OC formation. In contrast, estrogen deficiency expands the pool of TNF-producing T cells, while transgenic mice over-expressing Tregs are protected against Ovx-induced bone loss (15, 59). Some of the discrepancies among these studies may be due to differences in the strains of mice used, in study design, or to the positive effects of one set of T cells being negated by those of another set, as appears to occur in RA.

A further twist to the role of T cells in Ovx-induced bone loss is that OCs can function as antigen presenting cells and thus can behave as immune cells to activate T cells (10). For example, they express Fc receptor common γ subunit (FcRγ), major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, CD40, and CD80 (60), just like dendritic cells (60) and express a wide range of cytokines. Therefore, OCs could participate in Ovx-induced T cell proliferation and activation along with or in place of dendritic cells. This positive role could be negated, however, because OCs can also inhibit T cell proliferation and suppress T cell production of TNF and IFNγ (61). These positive and negative effects of immune cells, cytokines, estrogen, and estrogen deficiency emphasize the fact that even in pathologic conditions there are mechanisms to limit excessive tissue destruction.

(e) RANKL/RANK mutations cause osteopetrosis in humans

Kindreds with RANKL or RANK deletion mutations have marked osteopetrosis and appear to lack palpable lymph nodes (62, 63). However, obvious immunodeficiencies have not been reported in any of them, suggesting that they may have compensatory mechanisms that maintain normal immune responses. Interestingly, mice deficient in RANK specifically in B cells have normal B cell development (64). This may be important for patients being treated with anti-RANKL drugs, like Denosumab, because these findings in mice suggest that they might not interfere with B cell maturation. To date, no significant increase in infections or other signs of impaired immune responses have been reported in patients in clinical trials of Denosumab (19).

Activating mutations in the RANK gene are responsible for a number of rare bone diseases, including familial expansile osteolysis, and expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia (65) in which there is increased localized, rather than generalized OC formation and bone resorption. This focal involvement has similarities to adult Paget's disease, many cases of which have mutations in genes encoding molecules that signal downstream of RANK (66), but it is not known why skeletal involvement is not diffuse in these diseases.

(ii) Recruitment of osteoclast precursors to remodeling sites

OCPs circulate in the blood from where they are attracted to BRUs (4). Morphologic studies have identified a thin canopy of connective tissue covering resorption sites and small vessels pass through it into BRUs, bringing cells and nutrients (67). Resorbing OCs pass the products of resorption through their cytoplasm within lysosomes into the extracellular space within BRUs and from there these products enter efferent vessels and the circulation (68).

(a) Chemokine attraction of OCPS

Stroma-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is a chemokine, which mediates leukocyte migration, and its local concentration can determine the location of cells. For example, in TNF-mediated inflammatory arthritis, TNF inhibits SDF-1 production by marrow cells leading to mobilization of OCPs from the marrow (69) and to increased numbers of them in the bloodstream (70) from where they can be attracted to inflamed joints by high SDF-1 concentrations.

OCPs are attracted to the bloodstream by sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P), a bioactive sphingolipid with numerous functions, including regulation of cell motility, proliferation and survival (71). S1P is secreted from red blood cells and platelets resulting in higher concentrations in serum than in the marrow. OCPs express S1P receptors (S1PRs) 1 and 2, signaling through which tends to have opposite effects. For example, S1PR1 signaling chemo-attracts OCPs from the marrow to the blood, while S1PR2 signaling appears to chemo-repel them back to the marrow (71). FTY720, an S1PR1, but not R2 agonist, prevented ovariectomy-induced bone resorption in mice, while more OCPs were attached to bone surfaces in S1PR1-/- mice, associated with increased OC formation and bone resorption (71).

These findings raise the possibility that low serum S1P levels or mutations in S1P receptors could be associated with increased bone resorption and osteoporosis in some patients. S1P levels are increased in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and FTY720 significantly reduced joint destruction and inflammation in mice with inflammatory arthritis (71). Collectively, these findings suggest that drugs that can promote OCP migration to the bloodstream or prevent them from leaving it could reduce bone loss in common bone diseases. However, S1P has complex roles in inflammation and cytokine expression with positive and negative regulatory functions, which may make use of agonists challenging (71).

(iii) Regulation of osteoclast activation

Inactive, quiescent bone surfaces are covered by bone lining cells, the cytoplasm of which must be retracted exposing matrix proteins such as vitronectin before bone resorption can begin (72). Lining cells communicate with osteocytes within the bone and with osteoblastic cells in the marrow through their extensive dendritic processes, which could mediate signaling that leads to the cytoplasmic retraction (73), but the mechanisms involved remain unknown. OCs form a tight sealing zone with the exposed bone surface using actin filament-rich podosomes that are surrounded by adhesion, signaling, and adaptor molecules, protein tyrosine kinases, and actin-associated molecules, such as vinculin, talin and paxillin, which are involved in multiple facets of cell movement in normal and pathologic conditions (74).

(a) Integrin- and cytokine-mediated OC attachment to matrix and activation

OCs attach to the bone surface mainly through the vitronectin receptor, αVβ3 integrin (75), in association with kindlin-3 (76), a member of a family of proteins that are recruited to integrin adhesion sites in platelets and leucocytes. Kindlin-3 activates β3 integrin during the early events in OC activation. Humans with kindlin-3 gene mutations and kindlin-3-/- mice are osteopetrotic because their OCs do not form podosomes (77).

Integrin binding to bone matrix proteins, such as osteopontin and bone sialoprotein, activates αVβ3 and recruits Src tyrosine kinase by standard outside-in signaling (78). Src phosphorylates Syk, which recruits the co-stimulatory ITAM protein, Dap12, and Slp76, and these function as an adaptor protein complex for Vav3, a guanine nucleotide exchange protein that activates the small GTPase Rho family members, Cdc42 and Rac (78). αVβ3 and c-fms interact physically, and by inside-out signaling through αVβ3 cause a structural change in αVβ3, which is required for its activation (78). Interestingly, β3 integrin -/- mice have only mild osteopetrosis, perhaps because other integrins can substitute for it in OCs (78). RANK is also physically linked to αVβ3 by Src, forming a complex, which activates Syk, Slp-76, Vav3, and Rac, and in this respect is similar to αVβ3/Src interaction (78). Because the OC is the only cell that forms a ruffled membrane to resorb bone, it is possible that components of this activation step could be targets of future anti-resorptive drugs.

(b) Osteoclast ruffled border formation and bone resorption

Inside sealing zones formed by podosomes, the OC surface area facing the bone is increased significantly by the ruffled border membrane, which is formed by accumulation of cytoplasmic lysosomal secretory vesicle fusion with the cytoplasmic membrane and requires expression of Src (79). Vesicle fusion is promoted by the small GTPase Rab7 and synaptotagmin VII, a calcium-sensing molecule, and by proteins involved in autophagy and extracellular protein secretion, including Atg5, Atg7, Atg4B, and LC3 (80, 81). Accordingly, synaptotagmin VII−/− osteoclasts have severely defective ruffled border formation (82). H+ and Cl- ions pass through the ruffled border and form HCl to dissolve the mineral component of bone, and proteolytic enzymes, particularly cathepsin K, are secreted to degrade the matrix (75). H+ ions are secreted through the V-type H+ ATP6i proton pump complex, whereas Cl- ions pass through a chloride channel encoded by ClCN7.

Src phosphorylates proteins involved in OC activation, including Syk, Pyk2, cortactin, and c-Cbl, which has ubiquitin ligase activity (83). It also mediates RANKL-induced survival signaling in vitro (84), but src-/- OCs have normal survival in vivo (79, 83), perhaps because other Src family members substitute for it. Src is over-expressed in many cancers in which it plays positive roles in proliferation, invasion and metastasis and thus is a therapeutic target in both OCs and tumor cells in metastatic bone disease (83). Small molecular inhibitors of Src have been developed, and of these saracatamib currently is being investigated in metastatic prostate cancer with some promising results as an adjuvant to standard chemotherapy (83). To date no Src inhibitors have been studied in osteoporosis clinical trials.

(c) Osteoclast precursor fusion

High OC nuclear numbers correlate with more aggressive resorption, as is seen in Paget's disease and giant cell tumor of bone. OCP fusion is regulated by dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP), Atp6v0d2, OC-STAMP, and CD9 (85). Atp6v0d2 is a subunit of V-ATPase, a component of the V-type H+ ATP6i proton pump complex, which also is involved in OCP-mediated inhibition of osteoblast precursor formation (86), one of a number of unanticipated roles for OCPs and OCs in the regulation of bone formation (9).

NFATc1 and c-Fos play major roles in OCP fusion and activation and in conjunction with MITF and PU.1 variously regulate expression of a number of genes, including, DC-STAMP, OC-STAMP, OSCAR, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, cathepsin K, V-ATPase-d2 and the calcitonin receptor (12, 87, 88). Vitamin E (α-tocopherol) also regulates OCP fusion by inducing DC-STAMP expression through activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 and MITF (89). Importantly, administration of α-tocopherol to rats at doses taken by some humans as dietary supplements increased OC numbers in the animals and reduced bone mass, suggesting that excessive Vitamin E consumption could adversely affect bone health (89).

(d) Osteoclast-rich osteopetrosis in humans due to defects in genes regulating OC functions

Most cases osteopetrosis in humans result from mutations in genes involved in matrix demineralization and dissolution. These include: T-cell immune regulator 1 (TCIRG1), which encodes the α3 subunit of the H+ ATPase involved in proton generation; carbonic anhydrase II, which catalyzes hydration of CO2 to H2CO3 to provide a source of H+; the chloride channel 7 (ClCN7), through which chloride ions pass; Pleckstrin homology domain-containing family M member 1, which encodes a vesicle-associated protein linked to small GTPase signaling; and cathepsin K (13, 90, 91). Humans with cathepsin K mutations develop an osteochondrodysplasia, called pycnodysostosis, the features of which include osteopetrosis, dwarfism and defects of the craniofacial bones. In contrast, cathepsin K-/- mice have osteopetrosis, but no other bone defects (5), suggesting a more complex role for the gene in humans and raising the possibility that cathepsin K inhibitors could have adverse effects on non-stable fracture healing, in which some features of endochondral ossification are recapitulated.

Drug candidates have been developed to inhibit the proton pump and cathepsin K in OCs, but most of these have failed because of adverse effects in clinical trials. However, odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, showed promise in phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (92, 93). It inhibits bone resorption, but does not appear to inhibit bone formation to the same extent as other anti-resorptive drugs by mechanisms that remain to be explained, but which could involve osteoclast-stimulated bone formation (94).

(v) Negative regulation of osteoclast formation

(a) Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is the major negative regulator of bone resorption (26, 27). OPG is secreted by osteoblastic and other cell types and binds to RANKL as a decoy receptor thus preventing its interaction with RANK. Most of the factors, including growth factors and cytokines, that up-regulate expression of RANKL also increase OPG expression, typically to a lesser extent, and thus the net effect is increased bone resorption (95). Other cytokines, such as, IL-4 and IL-13, which are produced by Th2 lymphocytes, enhance OPG and inhibit RANKL expression in osteoblastic cells and therefore suppress osteoclastogenesis (35). As will be seen later, there are multiple additional mechanisms whereby cytokine signaling can limit OC formation and activation.

Interestingly, some of the signaling that regulates osteoblast formation also regulates OPG expression. For example, Wnt/β-catenin canonical signaling, which is required for osteoblast formation, positively regulates OPG expression in osteoblasts (96), while Wnt 5a-induced non-canonical signaling in osteoblasts positively regulates OC formation through receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor (Ror) proteins expressed in OCPs (97). This is a potentially important target for therapeutic intervention because a soluble form of Ror2 acted as a decoy receptor of Wnt5a and prevented bone destruction in mouse models of arthritis (97). In addition, Jagged1/Notch1 signaling, which regulates MSC numbers and osteoblast differentiation, alters the OPG/RANKL expression ratio in stromal cells to inhibit OC formation (98).

These findings are consistent with a model in which immature osteoblastic cells interact with osteoclastic cells through Wnt 5a near the cutting edges of BRUs to promote OC formation, while more mature osteoblastic cells express OPG through Wnt canonical and Notch signaling to inhibit osteoclastogenesis and promote OC apoptosis through OPG near the reversal site in BRUs where osteoblastic cells can differentiate into matrix-forming osteoblasts.

Loss-of-function mutations of TNFRSF11B, the gene encoding OPG, occur in humans and account for most cases of juvenile Paget's disease (99). The mutation results in OPG deficiency and unopposed RANKL-induced bone resorption with osteoporosis, long bone and vertebral deformities during childhood; the phenotype is similar to that seen in OPG-/- mice (100).

(b) RANKL-mediated inhibition

Some inhibitory mechanisms are actually mediated by RANKL signaling itself within OCPs. For example, activation of c-Fos also induces expression by OCPs of interferon-β (INF-β), which binds to the INF-α/β receptor on OCPs leading to inhibition of OCP differentiation by post-transcriptional reduction in c-Fos protein (101). Mice deficient in INF-β or in a component of the INF-α/β receptor have severe osteopenia due to increased OC formation and activity, emphasizing how important this mechanism is (101). INF-β is used to prevent disease flares in multiple sclerosis with significant efficacy. Although some studies have reported beneficial effects on bone mineral density, patient numbers have been low, and this warrants further study.

(c) Ephrin/Eph and semaphorin/neuropilin/plexin signaling (and osteoclast regulation of osteoblasts)

Ephrins and semaphorins are widely expressed molecules that control communication between cells, including neurons and axons during nervous system development, and endothelial cells and lymphocytes during immune responses and angiogenesis (102-104). These molecules are also expressed in bone and regulate interactions between and functions of osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells (105-107). For example, RANKL-induced c-Fos/NFATc1 signaling increases expression of the ligand, ephrinB2, on the surface of OCPs. Reverse signaling through this ligand when it binds directly to the Eph4 receptor on osteoblastic cells down-regulates c-Fos and NFATc1 expression to limit OC formation; forward signaling through Eph4 stimulates osteoblast precursor differentiation by inhibiting the small GTPase, RhoA (105). Decreased ephrinA1 and EphA1 expression was identified in bones of patients with metastatic of prostate cancer (108) and giant cell tumor of bone (109) by mRNA microarray analysis implicating reduced Ephrin-Eph signaling in osteolytic bone disease.

Semaphorins (Semas) are expressed widely as secreted and membrane-associated proteins; the latter signal through plexins and the former through neuropilins (Nrps). Sema3A is secreted by osteoblasts and OCs, and its binding to Nrp1 on OCPs inhibits RANKL-induced OC formation by inhibiting ITAM and RhoA signaling (110). It also binds to Nrp1 on mesenchymal precursors to stimulate osteoblast and inhibit adipocyte differentiation through canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Accordingly, Sema3A and Nrp1-/- mice have osteoporosis with reduced bone formation. Importantly, treatment of mice with Sema3A inhibited bone resorption and increased bone formation in normal mice and enhanced bone regeneration in a mouse cortical bone defect model (110). Sema4D is membrane-bound and binds to plexin1 on target cells. It is expressed by osteoclasts and inhibits osteoblast differentiation and function by activating RhoA-ROCK, which inhibits insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling (111). Consistent with these findings, sema4D-/- and plexin1-/- mice have high bone mass due to increased bone formation (111). Sema6d is membrane-bound, and by binding to plexin-A1 on OCPs induces OC formation through Trem-2/DAP12/PLCγ-induced NFAT activation as well as podosome formation through Rac-GTP generation in OCs. Accordingly, plexin1-/- mice have marked osteopetrosis, but normal osteoblast function (107). Sema7A is expressed by osteoclasts and osteoblasts and induces monocyte production of free radicals, IL-6, and TNF, suggesting that it may play a role in inflammatory bone disease (107). It promotes OC formation and OCP fusion as well as osteoblast migration in vitro, but full understanding of its role in bone awaits generation of Sem7a-/- mice.

These studies and other studies (9) have revealed complex interactions between osteoclastic and osteoblast cells and that OCs and OCPs have important positive and negative regulatory roles in normal and pathologic bone remodeling that had not been anticipated a decade ago. Further studies will be required to determine exactly where and when these interactions take place in remodeling units to initiate and subsequently stop both resorption and formation, but they suggest that drugs could be developed to enhance or restrict some of these interactions to increase bone mass.

(d) Constitutively-expressed transcriptional repressors of RANK signaling

There are also constitutive mechanisms to inhibit basal OC formation. For example, in the absence of RANKL stimulation, Bcl6 is recruited to the NFATc1, cathepsin K, and DC-STAMP promoters to inhibit osteoclastogenesis. In contrast, RANKL induces removal of Bcl6 from these promoters and its replacement by NFATc1, to mediate osteoclastogenesis (112). Bcl6 is one of a group of constitutively-expressed transcriptional repressors in OCPs, including interferon regulatory factor-8 (IRF-8), Eos, and v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family protein B (35). Their expression is down-regulated by RANK signaling. They are also direct targets of B lymphocyte–induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp-1), deletion of which in OCs results in osteopetrosis due to up-regulation of Bcl6 and impaired osteoclastogenesis (112). In contrast, Bcl6-/- mice have increased OC formation and severe osteoporosis. Thus, RANKL/RANK activation of NFATc1 in OCPs not only promotes osteoclastogenesis directly, but it also facilitates it indirectly by repressing expression of negative regulators.

(d) Negative regulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines

TNF- and RANKL-induced translocation of NF-κB RelA/p50 complexes to nuclei induces increased expression of p100, which is efficiently processed to p52 by NIK in response to RANKL, but not to TNF (40). Thus, in conditions, such as RA in which TNF expression is increased, excess p100 protein becomes available to bind to RelB and/or RelA and in this way p100 can inhibit NF-κB signaling and limit OC formation (40). This accumulation of p100 is accompanied by an increase in TRAF3 in the cells and this in part explains why TNF only modestly increases OC formation in WT mice and does not induce OC formation when given to either RANKL-/- or RANK-/- mice (40). However, when these RANKL-/- or RANK-/- mice are also deficient in p100, TNF induces OC formation in vivo (40). TNF also limits OC formation in RA by inducing expression of IRF-8 and the Notch-induced DNA binding molecule, recombinant recognition sequence binding protein at the Jκ site (35) in OCPs and by promoting secretion by OCPS and OCs of TSG-6 (TNF-stimulated gene 6), which acts synergistically with OPG to inhibit OC activity by an autocrine mechanism (113). Although T cells express RANKL in rheumatoid joints to potentially increase bone resorption, they also secrete INFγ, which degrades TRAF6 in OCPs and in this way T cells can also limit OC formation (114).

During immune responses anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10, are elaborated to help resolve inflammation, and some of these can inhibit OC formation. For example, IL-10 inhibits expression of c-Fos, c-Jun, TREM-2 and NFATc1 in OCPs (35). IL-4 inhibits bone resorption by several mechanisms in addition to its effects on OPG expression. For example, it suppresses expression of RANK, NFATc1 and c-Fos as well as NF-κB, MAPK, and calcium signaling during osteoclastogenesis. In combination with GM-CSF, IL-4 cleaves c-fms from the surface of OCPs to suppress osteoclastogenesis (35).

During co-stimulatory signaling, ITAM-bearing proteins typically partner with proteins containing an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) (35), some of which promote and others inhibit immune responses and osteoclastogenesis. For example, Ly49Q promotes osteoclastogenesis by competing with the murine paired Ig-like receptor, PIR-B, for association with the SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) (115). In contrast, the human inhibitory immunoglobulin-like receptor, LILRB, and PIR-B recruit SHP-1 to negatively regulate osteoclastogenesis (115). An ITIM is present in the cytoplasmic tail of DC-STAMP whose surface expression declines during osteoclastogenesis. DC-STAMP is phosphorylated on its tyrosine residues and physically interacts with SHP-1 and CD16, which is an ITAM-associated protein (116) and by binding to this complex, DC-STAMP might actually limit OC formation (116). Finally, toll-like receptor signaling is activated in monocytes by microbial products at sites of inflammation leading to enhanced immune responses, but in OCPs it leads to inhibition of their differentiation by causing the cells to shed the extracellular domain of c-fms (35). These advances in understanding of how bone and immune cells interact could lead to development of new therapies to inhibit both inflammation and osteoclastogenesis, but given the complexity involved, this is likely to be challenging.

(vi) Osteoclast Apoptosis

(a) Promotion of osteoclast apoptosis

One of the earliest reports of OC apoptosis was in response to estrogen and was mediated by increased expression of TGFβ by bone marrow cells (117). Estrogen also induces OC apoptosis by increasing Fas-ligand expression in OCs (118), and estrogen receptor alpha signaling also inhibits expression of genes regulating OC activity, without affecting OCP proliferation or fusion (119). Thus, estrogen can inhibit bone resorption by limiting OC life span and activity. Interestingly, TGFβ appears also to support OC survival directly through TAK1/MEK/AKT-mediated activation of NF-κB in OCs (120). In addition to its expression by marrow stromal cells, TGFβ is also released from bone matrix during resorption and is activated by the acid environment under the ruffled border. Thus, these opposite effects of TGFβ on OC survival may reflect the site and source of its production.

Bisphosphonates also induce OC apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (121), in part by inhibiting the activity of enzymes in the mevalonate pathway (122) and promoting caspase cleavage of Mammalian Sterile 20-like (Mst) kinase 1, which is a pro-apoptotic substrate for the apoptosis effector enzyme, caspase 3 (123). However, some amino-bisphosphonates appear to inhibit bone resorption without inducing OC apoptosis (124), consistent with their differing affinities for the binding sites of target enzymes (125). Despite proven efficacy in many pathologic settings, bisphosphonates have only modest anti-resorptive activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (126, 127), which may be related to high TNF levels in their joints and blood and to glucocorticosteroid therapy. For example, TNF attenuates bisphosphonate-induced apoptosis by up-regulating Bcl- XL expression in OCPs and OCs (128), and glucocorticosteroids can inhibit OC apoptosis (129), although the mechanism remains to be determined. Denosumab (130) and raloxifene (131) induce OC apoptosis, but other anti-resorptive drugs, including calcitonin (68) and the cathepsin K inhibitors, odanacatib and ONO-5334, which are in phase 3 clinical trials, do not (94).

OCPs are recruited continuously to the cutting edges of resorption lacunae to maintain a population of relatively young resorbing OCs at this site, while older OCs undergo apoptosis predominantly in reversal sites of resorption lacunae (132) where high extracellular calcium concentrations resulting from bone resorption (133) and OPG released by osteoblastic cells can induce OC apoptosis. However, OPG can also bind to and inhibit TNF-related apoptosis-induced ligand (TRAIL), which induces OC apoptosis. OPG appears to reduce apoptosis of human OCs in vitro by inhibiting this mechanism (134), but further studies are required to determine if this mechanism has a functional role in vivo.

(b) Prevention of osteoclast apoptosis

An early effect of RANKL signaling in OCP differentiation is up-regulation of JNK signaling, which rather surprisingly was found to induce apoptosis of NF-κB p65-deficient OCPs by activating Bid and caspase 3 (37). These findings indicate that p65 plays an important role to prevent OCP apoptosis, and other studies in this paper show that p65 is not required for expression of genes that regulate osteoclastogenesis. Enhanced OC survival is an important component of bone resorption and is increased by cytokines, including M-CSF, RANKL, TNF, IL-1, and VEGF-A, which prevent OC apoptosis by up-regulating Rho family small G-protein Ras/Rac1/Erk and PI3 kinase/mTOR/S6K signaling (135). Withdrawal of these cytokines rapidly induces OC apoptosis due to reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2 (136). M-CSF prevents OC apoptosis by a number of mechanisms, including: activating MITF, which increases Bcl-2 expression (135-137); increasing the proteasomal degradation of Bim by c-Cbl, an ubiquitin ligase; and up-regulating expression of Bcl-XL(138), which inhibits cleavage of procaspase-9; and inhibiting the activity of caspases 3 and 9, which initiate apoptosis. Deletion of Bcl-XL in OCs resulted in increased OC apoptosis, but surprisingly the mice had increased, rather than decreased bone resorption. This was associated with increased c-Src activity and expression of vitronectin and fibronectin by OCs, resulting in enhanced integrin-mediated activation of the cells (139) and suggesting that Bcl-XL also inhibits OC resorptive activity. Bim is a pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member whose expression is down-regulated by IL-3 signaling through the Raf/Erk and/or PI3K/mTOR pathways. Bim-/- mice have decreased OC activity, despite increased OC survival (136). Thus, although in general, enhanced OC survival is associated with increased bone resorption and vice versa, these two activities can be uncoupled.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges grant support from the NIH (NIAMS), grant number AR43510-17 and thanks Nora Plumeri for secretarial assistance.

Footnotes

Disclosure. The author declares no conflict of interest.

Bibliography

1. Seeman E. Bone modeling and remodeling. Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression. 2009;19(3):219–33. Epub 2009/11/04. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Eriksen EF. Cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling. Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders. 2010;11(4):219–27. 10.1007/s11154-010-9153-1. Epub 2010/12/29. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Henriksen K, Bollerslev J, Everts V, Karsdal MA. Osteoclast activity and subtypes as a function of physiology and pathology--implications for future treatments of osteoporosis. Endocrine reviews. 2011;32(1):31–63. 10.1210/er.2010-0006. Epub 2010/09/21. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Muto A, Mizoguchi T, Udagawa N, Ito S, Kawahara I, Abiko Y, et al. Lineage-committed osteoclast precursors circulate in blood and settle down into bone. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2011 10.1002/jbmr.490. Epub 2011/09/08. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Boyce BF, Rosenberg E, de Papp AE, Duong le T. The osteoclast, bone remodelling and treatment of metabolic bone disease. European journal of clinical investigation. 2012;42(12):1332–41. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02717.x. Epub 2012/09/25. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. McClung M, Harris ST, Miller PD, Bauer DC, Davison KS, Dian L, et al. Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteoporosis: Benefits, Risks, and Drug Holiday. The American journal of medicine. 2012 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.06.023. Epub 2012/11/28. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813–22. 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62344-6. Epub 2011/03/01. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Karsenty G, Wagner EF. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Developmental cell. 2002;2(4):389–406. Epub 2002/04/24. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Boyce BF, Yao Z, Xing L. Osteoclasts have multiple roles in bone in addition to bone resorption. Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression. 2009;19(3):171–80. Epub 2009/11/04. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Boyce BF, Schwarz EM, Xing L. Osteoclast precursors: cytokine-stimulated immunomodulators of inflammatory bone disease. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2006;18(4):427–32. 10.1097/01.bor.0000231913.32364.32. Epub 2006/06/10. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Steingrimsson E, Tessarollo L, Pathak B, Hou L, Arnheiter H, Copeland NG, et al. Mitf and Tfe3, two members of the Mitf-Tfe family of bHLH-Zip transcription factors, have important but functionally redundant roles in osteoclast development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(7):4477–82. 10.1073/pnas.072071099. Epub 2002/04/04. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Mellis DJ, Itzstein C, Helfrich MH, Crockett JC. The skeleton: a multi-functional complex organ: the role of key signalling pathways in osteoclast differentiation and in bone resorption. The Journal of endocrinology. 2011;211(2):131–43. 10.1530/joe-11-0212. Epub 2011/09/10. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Del Fattore A, Cappariello A, Teti A. Genetics, pathogenesis and complications of osteopetrosis. Bone. 2008;42(1):19–29. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.029. Epub 2007/10/16. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. alphavbeta3 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor: partners in osteoclast biology. Immunological reviews. 2005;208:88–105. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00331.x. Epub 2005/11/30. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Pacifici R. Role of T cells in ovariectomy induced bone loss--revisited. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(2):231–9. 10.1002/jbmr.1500. Epub 2012/01/25. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Li P, Schwarz EM, O'Keefe RJ, Ma L, Boyce BF, Xing L. RANK signaling is not required for TNFalpha-mediated increase in CD11(hi) osteoclast precursors but is essential for mature osteoclast formation in TNFalpha-mediated inflammatory arthritis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(2):207–13. 10.1359/jbmr.0301233. Epub 2004/02/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Xing L, Bushnell TP, Carlson L, Tai Z, Tondravi M, Siebenlist U, et al. NF-kappaB p50 and p52 expression is not required for RANK-expressing osteoclast progenitor formation but is essential for RANK- and cytokine-mediated osteoclastogenesis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2002;17(7):1200–10. 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1200. Epub 2002/07/05. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Wang ZQ, Ovitt C, Grigoriadis AE, Mohle-Steinlein U, Ruther U, Wagner EF. Bone and haematopoietic defects in mice lacking c-fos. Nature. 1992;360(6406):741–5. 10.1038/360741a0. Epub 1992/12/24. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Miller PD. A review of the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease. 2011;3(6):271–82. 10.1177/1759720x11424220. Epub 2012/08/08. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Masuyama R, Stockmans I, Torrekens S, Van Looveren R, Maes C, Carmeliet P, et al. Vitamin D receptor in chondrocytes promotes osteoclastogenesis and regulates FGF23 production in osteoblasts. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116(12):3150–9. 10.1172/jci29463. Epub 2006/11/14. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Usui M, Xing L, Drissi H, Zuscik M, O'Keefe R, Chen D, et al. Murine and chicken chondrocytes regulate osteoclastogenesis by producing RANKL in response to BMP2. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2008;23(3):314–25. 10.1359/jbmr.071025. Epub 2007/10/31. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Wang BTD, Zhu M, Boyce BF, chen D, editors. B–Catenin Controls Osteoclast Formation through Regulation of OPG and RANKL Expression in Chrondrocytes. ASBMR 2010 Annual Meeting; p. 2010. [Google Scholar]
23. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, Kurata K, Oh-Hora M, Feng JQ, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nature medicine. 2011;17(10):1231–4. 10.1038/nm.2452. Epub 2011/09/13. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Xiong J, Onal M, Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Manolagas SC, O'Brien CA. Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nature medicine. 2011;17(10):1235–41. 10.1038/nm.2448. Epub 2011/09/13. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Tatsumi S, Ishii K, Amizuka N, Li M, Kobayashi T, Kohno K, et al. Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell metabolism. 2007;5(6):464–75. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.001. Epub 2007/06/07. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Boyce BF, Xing L. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2008;473(2):139–46. 10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.018. Epub 2008/04/09. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Wada T, Nakashima T, Hiroshi N, Penninger JM. RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12(1):17–25. 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.11.007. Epub 2005/12/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423(6937):337–42. 10.1038/nature01658. Epub 2003/05/16. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Boyce BF, Yao Z, Xing L. Functions of nuclear factor kappaB in bone. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1192:367–75. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05315.x. Epub 2010/04/16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. DiDonato JA, Mercurio F, Karin M. NF-kappaB and the link between inflammation and cancer. Immunological reviews. 2012;246(1):379–400. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01099.x. Epub 2012/03/23. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Franzoso G, Carlson L, Xing L, Poljak L, Shores EW, Brown KD, et al. Requirement for NF-kappaB in osteoclast and B-cell development. Genes & development. 1997;11(24):3482–96. Epub 1998/02/07. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
32. Iotsova V, Caamano J, Loy J, Yang Y, Lewin A, Bravo R. Osteopetrosis in mice lacking NF-kappaB1 and NF-kappaB2. Nature medicine. 1997;3(11):1285–9. Epub 1997/11/14. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
33. Yamashita T, Yao Z, Li F, Zhang Q, Badell IR, Schwarz EM, et al. NF-kappaB p50 and p52 regulate receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and tumor necrosis factor-induced osteoclast precursor differentiation by activating c-Fos and NFATc1. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(25):18245–53. 10.1074/jbc.M610701200. Epub 2007/05/09. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Takayanagi H, Kim S, Koga T, Nishina H, Isshiki M, Yoshida H, et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Developmental cell. 2002;3(6):889–901. Epub 2002/12/14. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Zhao B, Ivashkiv LB. Negative regulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by cytokines and transcriptional repressors. Arthritis research & therapy. 2011;13(4):234. 10.1186/ar3379. Epub 2011/08/25. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Novack DV. Role of NF-kappaB in the skeleton. Cell research. 2011;21(1):169–82. 10.1038/cr.2010.159. Epub 2010/11/17. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Vaira S, Alhawagri M, Anwisye I, Kitaura H, Faccio R, Novack DV. RelA/p65 promotes osteoclast differentiation by blocking a RANKL-induced apoptotic JNK pathway in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(6):2088–97. 10.1172/jci33392. Epub 2008/05/10. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Otero JE, Dai S, Alhawagri MA, Darwech I, Abu-Amer Y. IKKbeta activation is sufficient for RANK-independent osteoclast differentiation and osteolysis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;25(6):1282–94. 10.1002/jbmr.4. Epub 2010/03/05. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Hacker H, Tseng PH, Karin M. Expanding TRAF function: TRAF3 as a tri-faced immune regulator. Nature reviews Immunology. 2011;11(7):457–68. 10.1038/nri2998. Epub 2011/06/11. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Yao Z, Xing L, Boyce BF. NF-kappaB p100 limits TNF-induced bone resorption in mice by a TRAF3-dependent mechanism. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2009;119(10):3024–34. 10.1172/jci38716. Epub 2009/09/23. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Jimi E, Aoki K, Saito H, D'Acquisto F, May MJ, Nakamura I, et al. Selective inhibition of NF-kappa B blocks osteoclastogenesis and prevents inflammatory bone destruction in vivo. Nature medicine. 2004;10(6):617–24. 10.1038/nm1054. Epub 2004/05/25. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Hogan PG, Chen L, Nardone J, Rao A. Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT. Genes & development. 2003;17(18):2205–32. 10.1101/gad.1102703. Epub 2003/09/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems. Nature reviews Immunology. 2007;7(4):292–304. 10.1038/nri2062. Epub 2007/03/24. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Takayanagi H. New insights into osteoclastogenic signaling mechanisms. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM. 2012;23(11):582–90. 10.1016/j.tem.2012.05.005. Epub 2012/06/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Koga T, Matsui Y, Asagiri M, Kodama T, de Crombrugghe B, Nakashima K, et al. NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation. Nature medicine. 2005;11(8):880–5. 10.1038/nm1270. Epub 2005/07/26. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Barrow AD, Raynal N, Andersen TL, Slatter DA, Bihan D, Pugh N, et al. OSCAR is a collagen receptor that costimulates osteoclastogenesis in DAP12-deficient humans and mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121(9):3505–16. 10.1172/jci45913. Epub 2011/08/16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Asagiri M, Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 2007;40(2):251–64. 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023. Epub 2006/11/14. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Crotti TN, Dharmapatni AA, Alias E, Zannettino AC, Smith MD, Haynes DR. The immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) -related factors are increased in synovial tissue and vasculature of rheumatoid arthritic joints. Arthritis research & therapy. 2012;14(6):R245. 10.1186/ar4088. Epub 2012/11/14. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Rho J, Takami M, Choi Y. Osteoimmunology: interactions of the immune and skeletal systems. Molecules and cells. 2004;17(1):1–9. Epub 2004/04/02. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Zaiss MM, Axmann R, Zwerina J, Polzer K, Guckel E, Skapenko A, et al. Treg cells suppress osteoclast formation: a new link between the immune system and bone. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2007;56(12):4104–12. 10.1002/art.23138. Epub 2007/12/01. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Okamoto K, Takayanagi H. Regulation of bone by the adaptive immune system in arthritis. Arthritis research & therapy. 2011;13(3):219. 10.1186/ar3323. Epub 2011/06/04. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Takayanagi H. New developments in osteoimmunology. Nature reviews Rheumatology. 2012;8(11):684–9. 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.167. Epub 2012/10/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Sato K, Suematsu A, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi A, Morishita Y, Kadono Y, et al. Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2006;203(12):2673–82. 10.1084/jem.20061775. Epub 2006/11/08. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Kotake S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Matsuzaki K, Itoh K, Ishiyama S, et al. IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1999;103(9):1345–52. 10.1172/jci5703. Epub 1999/05/04. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Hueber AJ, Asquith DL, Miller AM, Reilly J, Kerr S, Leipe J, et al. Mast cells express IL-17A in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 2010;184(7):3336–40. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903566. Epub 2010/03/05. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Adamopoulos IE, Chao CC, Geissler R, Laface D, Blumenschein W, Iwakura Y, et al. Interleukin-17A upregulates receptor activator of NF-kappaB on osteoclast precursors. Arthritis research & therapy. 2010;12(1):R29. 10.1186/ar2936. Epub 2010/02/20. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Charles JF, Hsu LY, Niemi EC, Weiss A, Aliprantis AO, Nakamura MC. Inflammatory arthritis increases mouse osteoclast precursors with myeloid suppressor function. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2012;122(12):4592–605. 10.1172/jci60920. Epub 2012/11/02. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Schett G, David JP. The multiple faces of autoimmune-mediated bone loss. Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2010;6(12):698–706. 10.1038/nrendo.2010.190. Epub 2010/11/04. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Pacifici R. The immune system and bone. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2010;503(1):41–53. 10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.027. Epub 2010/07/06. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Li H, Hong S, Qian J, Zheng Y, Yang J, Yi Q. Cross talk between the bone and immune systems: osteoclasts function as antigen-presenting cells and activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Blood. 2010;116(2):210–7. 10.1182/blood-2009-11-255026. Epub 2010/03/23. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Grassi F, Manferdini C, Cattini L, Piacentini A, Gabusi E, Facchini A, et al. T cell suppression by osteoclasts in vitro. Journal of cellular physiology. 2011;226(4):982–90. 10.1002/jcp.22411. Epub 2010/09/22. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Sobacchi C, Frattini A, Guerrini MM, Abinun M, Pangrazio A, Susani L, et al. Osteoclast-poor human osteopetrosis due to mutations in the gene encoding RANKL. Nature genetics. 2007;39(8):960–2. 10.1038/ng2076. Epub 2007/07/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Guerrini MM, Sobacchi C, Cassani B, Abinun M, Kilic SS, Pangrazio A, et al. Human osteoclast-poor osteopetrosis with hypogammaglobulinemia due to TNFRSF11A (RANK) mutations. American journal of human genetics. 2008;83(1):64–76. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.06.015. Epub 2008/07/09. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Perlot T, Penninger JM. Development and function of murine B cells lacking RANK. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 2012;188(3):1201–5. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102063. Epub 2012/01/06. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Crockett JC, Mellis DJ, Scott DI, Helfrich MH. New knowledge on critical osteoclast formation and activation pathways from study of rare genetic diseases of osteoclasts: focus on the RANK/RANKL axis. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2011;22(1):1–20. 10.1007/s00198-010-1272-8. Epub 2010/05/12. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Cundy T, Reid IR. Paget's disease of bone. Clinical biochemistry. 2012;45(1-2):43–8. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.09.026. Epub 2011/10/26. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Andersen TL, Sondergaard TE, Skorzynska KE, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Plesner TL, Hauge EM, et al. A physical mechanism for coupling bone resorption and formation in adult human bone. The American journal of pathology. 2009;174(1):239–47. 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080627. Epub 2008/12/20. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Vaananen K. Mechanism of osteoclast mediated bone resorption--rationale for the design of new therapeutics. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2005;57(7):959–71. 10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.018. Epub 2005/05/07. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Zhang Q, Guo R, Schwarz EM, Boyce BF, Xing L. TNF inhibits production of stromal cell-derived factor 1 by bone stromal cells and increases osteoclast precursor mobilization from bone marrow to peripheral blood. Arthritis research & therapy. 2008;10(2):R37. 10.1186/ar2391. Epub 2008/03/29. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Li P, Schwarz EM, O'Keefe RJ, Ma L, Looney RJ, Ritchlin CT, et al. Systemic tumor necrosis factor alpha mediates an increase in peripheral CD11bhigh osteoclast precursors in tumor necrosis factor alpha-transgenic mice. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2004;50(1):265–76. 10.1002/art.11419. Epub 2004/01/20. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Kikuta J, Iwai K, Saeki Y, Ishii M. S1P-targeted therapy for elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients with osteoporosis. Rheumatology international. 2011;31(7):967–9. 10.1007/s00296-010-1634-8. Epub 2010/11/30. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Chambers TJ, Fuller K. How are osteoclasts induced to resorb bone? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011;1240:1–6. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06249.x. Epub 2011/12/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Bonewald LF. The amazing osteocyte. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2011;26(2):229–38. 10.1002/jbmr.320. Epub 2011/01/22. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Saltel F, Chabadel A, Bonnelye E, Jurdic P. Actin cytoskeletal organisation in osteoclasts: a model to decipher transmigration and matrix degradation. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008;87(8-9):459–68. Epub 2008/02/26. S0171-9335(08)00009-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.001. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
75. Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2003;4(8):638–49. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
76. Schmidt S, Nakchbandi I, Ruppert R, Kawelke N, Hess MW, Pfaller K, et al. Kindlin-3-mediated signaling from multiple integrin classes is required for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The Journal of cell biology. 2011;192(5):883–97. 10.1083/jcb.201007141. Epub 2011/03/02. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Malinin NL, Zhang L, Choi J, Ciocea A, Razorenova O, Ma YQ, et al. A point mutation in KINDLIN3 ablates activation of three integrin subfamilies in humans. Nature medicine. 2009;15(3):313–8. Epub 2009/02/24. nm.1917 [pii] 10.1038/nm.1917. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
78. Teitelbaum SL. The osteoclast and its unique cytoskeleton. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011;1240:14–7. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06283.x. Epub 2011/12/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Boyce BF, Yoneda T, Lowe C, Soriano P, Mundy GR. Requirement of pp60c-src expression for osteoclasts to form ruffled borders and resorb bone in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1992;90(4):1622–7. 10.1172/jci116032. Epub 1992/10/01. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. DeSelm CJ, Miller BC, Zou W, Beatty WL, van Meel E, Takahata Y, et al. Autophagy proteins regulate the secretory component of osteoclastic bone resorption. Developmental cell. 2011;21(5):966–74. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016. Epub 2011/11/08. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Hocking LJ, Whitehouse C, Helfrich MH. Autophagy: a new player in skeletal maintenance? Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(7):1439–47. 10.1002/jbmr.1668. Epub 2012/06/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Zhao H, Ito Y, Chappel J, Andrews NW, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Synaptotagmin VII regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoclast and osteoblast secretion. Developmental cell. 2008;14(6):914–25. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.022. Epub 2008/06/10. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Boyce B, Xing L. Src inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic bone disease: rationale and clinical data. Clin Investig (Lond) 2011;1(12):1695–706. 10.4155/cli.11.150. Epub 2012/03/03. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Wong BR, Besser D, Kim N, Arron JR, Vologodskaia M, Hanafusa H, et al. TRANCE, a TNF family member, activates Akt/PKB through a signaling complex involving TRAF6 and c-Src. Molecular cell. 1999;4(6):1041–9. Epub 2000/01/15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
85. Yagi M, Miyamoto T, Sawatani Y, Iwamoto K, Hosogane N, Fujita N, et al. DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2005;202(3):345–51. 10.1084/jem.20050645. Epub 2005/08/03. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Lee SH, Rho J, Jeong D, Sul JY, Kim T, Kim N, et al. v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation. Nat Med. 2006;12(12):1403–9. 10.1038/nm1514. Epub 2006/11/28. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. Sharma SM, Bronisz A, Hu R, Patel K, Mansky KC, Sif S, et al. MITF and PU.1 recruit p38 MAPK and NFATc1 to target genes during osteoclast differentiation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(21):15921–9. 10.1074/jbc.M609723200. Epub 2007/04/04. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Fujita N, Suzuki T, Iwasaki R, Morita K, et al. Induction of DC-STAMP by alternative activation and downstream signaling mechanisms. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22(7):992–1001. 10.1359/jbmr.070401. Epub 2007/04/04. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Fujita K, Iwasaki M, Ochi H, Fukuda T, Ma C, Miyamoto T, et al. Vitamin E decreases bone mass by stimulating osteoclast fusion. Nature medicine. 2012;18(4):589–94. 10.1038/nm.2659. Epub 2012/03/06. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. Van Wesenbeeck L, Odgren PR, Coxon FP, Frattini A, Moens P, Perdu B, et al. Involvement of PLEKHM1 in osteoclastic vesicular transport and osteopetrosis in incisors absent rats and humans. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117(4):919–30. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
91. Tolar J, Teitelbaum SL, Orchard PJ. Osteopetrosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2004;351(27):2839–49. 10.1056/NEJMra040952. Epub 2004/12/31. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Stoch SA, Zajic S, Stone JA, Miller DL, van Bortel L, Lasseter KC, et al. Odanacatib, a Selective Cathepsin K inhibitor to Treat Osteoporosis: Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics - Results from Single Oral Dose Studies in Healthy Volunteers. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2012 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04471.x. Epub 2012/09/28. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Williams SC. Potential first-in-class osteoporosis drug speeds through trials. Nature medicine. 2012;18(8):1158. 10.1038/nm0812-1158. Epub 2012/08/08. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Boonen S, Rosenberg E, Claessens F, Vanderschueren D, Papapoulos S. Inhibition of cathepsin K for treatment of osteoporosis. Current osteoporosis reports. 2012;10(1):73–9. 10.1007/s11914-011-0085-9. Epub 2012/01/10. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
95. Kearns AE, Khosla S, Kostenuik PJ. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease. Endocrine reviews. 2008;29(2):155–92. 10.1210/er.2007-0014. Epub 2007/12/07. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Hill TP, Spater D, Taketo MM, Birchmeier W, Hartmann C. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Developmental cell. 2005;8(5):727–38. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
97. Maeda K, Kobayashi Y, Udagawa N, Uehara S, Ishihara A, Mizoguchi T, et al. Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis. Nat Med. 2012;18(3):405–12. 10.1038/nm.2653. Epub 2012/02/22. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Bai S, Kopan R, Zou W, Hilton MJ, Ong CT, Long F, et al. NOTCH1 regulates osteoclastogenesis directly in osteoclast precursors and indirectly via osteoblast lineage cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(10):6509–18. 10.1074/jbc.M707000200. Epub 2007/12/25. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Whyte MP, Obrecht SE, Finnegan PM, Jones JL, Podgornik MN, McAlister WH, et al. Osteoprotegerin deficiency and juvenile Paget's disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2002;347(3):175–84. 10.1056/NEJMoa013096. Epub 2002/07/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, Morony S, Tarpley J, Capparelli C, et al. osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes & development. 1998;12(9):1260–8. Epub 1998/06/06. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
101. Takayanagi H, Kim S, Matsuo K, Suzuki H, Suzuki T, Sato K, et al. RANKL maintains bone homeostasis through c-Fos-dependent induction of interferon-beta. Nature. 2002;416(6882):744–9. 10.1038/416744a. Epub 2002/04/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Davy A, Soriano P. Ephrin signaling in vivo: look both ways. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2005;232(1):1–10. 10.1002/dvdy.20200. Epub 2004/12/08. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Tran TS, Kolodkin AL, Bharadwaj R. Semaphorin regulation of cellular morphology. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2007;23:263–92. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093554. Epub 2007/06/02. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Suzuki K, Kumanogoh A, Kikutani H. Semaphorins and their receptors in immune cell interactions. Nature immunology. 2008;9(1):17–23. 10.1038/ni1553. Epub 2007/12/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Zhao C, Irie N, Takada Y, Shimoda K, Miyamoto T, Nishiwaki T, et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell metabolism. 2006;4(2):111–21. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012. Epub 2006/08/08. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Matsuo K, Otaki N. Bone cell interactions through Eph/ephrin: bone modeling, remodeling and associated diseases. Cell adhesion & migration. 2012;6(2):148–56. 10.4161/cam.20888. Epub 2012/06/05. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Kang S, Kumanogoh A. Semaphorins in bone development, homeostasis, and disease. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2012 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.09.008. Epub 2012/10/02. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Morrissey C, True LD, Roudier MP, Coleman IM, Hawley S, Nelson PS, et al. Differential expression of angiogenesis associated genes in prostate cancer bone, liver and lymph node metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25(4):377–88. 10.1007/s10585-007-9116-4. Epub 2007/11/01. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
109. Guenther R, Krenn V, Morawietz L, Dankof A, Melcher I, Schaser KD, et al. Giant cell tumors of the bone: molecular profiling and expression analysis of Ephrin A1 receptor, Claudin 7, CD52, FGFR3 and AMFR. Pathology, research and practice. 2005;201(10):649–63. Epub 2005/12/06. S0344-0338(05)00145-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.prp.2005.07.005. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
110. Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Taniguchi M, Kodama T, Kumanogoh A, Takayanagi H. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature. 2012;485(7396):69–74. 10.1038/nature11000. Epub 2012/04/24. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
111. Negishi-Koga T, Shinohara M, Komatsu N, Bito H, Kodama T, Friedel RH, et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nature medicine. 2011;17(11):1473–80. 10.1038/nm.2489. Epub 2011/10/25. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
112. Miyauchi Y, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto H, Sakamoto A, Iwasaki R, Hoshi H, et al. The Blimp1-Bcl6 axis is critical to regulate osteoclast differentiation and bone homeostasis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2010;207(4):751–62. Epub 2010/04/07. jem.20091957 [pii] 10.1084/jem.20091957. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
113. Mahoney DJ, Swales C, Athanasou NA, Bombardieri M, Pitzalis C, Kliskey K, et al. TSG-6 inhibits osteoclast activity via an autocrine mechanism and is functionally synergistic with osteoprotegerin. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2011;63(4):1034–43. 10.1002/art.30201. Epub 2010/12/17. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
114. Takayanagi H, Ogasawara K, Hida S, Chiba T, Murata S, Sato K, et al. T-cell-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma. Nature. 2000;408(6812):600–5. 10.1038/35046102. Epub 2000/12/16. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
115. Mori Y, Tsuji S, Inui M, Sakamoto Y, Endo S, Ito Y, et al. Inhibitory immunoglobulin-like receptors LILRB and PIR-B negatively regulate osteoclast development. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 2008;181(7):4742–51. Epub 2008/09/20. 181/7/4742 [pii] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
116. Chiu YH, Mensah KA, Schwarz EM, Ju Y, Takahata M, Feng C, et al. Regulation of human osteoclast development by dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP) Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2011 10.1002/jbmr.531. Epub 2011/10/12. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
117. Hughes DE, Dai A, Tiffee JC, Li HH, Mundy GR, Boyce BF. Estrogen promotes apoptosis of murine osteoclasts mediated by TGF-beta. Nature medicine. 1996;2(10):1132–6. Epub 1996/10/01. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
118. Nakamura T, Imai Y, Matsumoto T, Sato S, Takeuchi K, Igarashi K, et al. Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell. 2007;130(5):811–23. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025. Epub 2007/09/07. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
119. Imai Y, Youn MY, Kondoh S, Nakamura T, Kouzmenko A, Matsumoto T, et al. Estrogens maintain bone mass by regulating expression of genes controlling function and life span in mature osteoclasts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1173(1):E31–9. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04954.x. Epub 2009/09/16. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
120. Cicek M, Vrabel A, Sturchio C, Pederson L, Hawse JR, Subramaniam M, et al. TGF-beta inducible early gene 1 regulates osteoclast differentiation and survival by mediating the NFATc1, AKT, and MEK/ERK signaling pathways. PloS one. 2011;6(3):e17522. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017522. Epub 2011/03/23. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
121. Hughes DE, Wright KR, Uy HL, Sasaki A, Yoneda T, Roodman GD, et al. Bisphosphonates promote apoptosis in murine osteoclasts in vitro and in vivo. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1995;10(10):1478–87. 10.1002/jbmr.5650101008. Epub 1995/10/01. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
122. Rogers MJ, Crockett JC, Coxon FP, Monkkonen J. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates. Bone. 2011;49(1):34–41. 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.008. Epub 2010/11/30. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
123. Reszka AA, Halasy-Nagy JM, Masarachia PJ, Rodan GA. Bisphosphonates act directly on the osteoclast to induce caspase cleavage of mst1 kinase during apoptosis. A link between inhibition of the mevalonate pathway and regulation of an apoptosis-promoting kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274(49):34967–73. Epub 1999/11/27. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
124. Matsumoto T, Nagase Y, Iwasawa M, Yasui T, Masuda H, Kadono Y, et al. Distinguishing the proapoptotic and antiresorptive functions of risedronate in murine osteoclasts: Role of the akt pathway and the ERK/Bim axis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2011;63(12):3908–17. 10.1002/art.30646. Epub 2011/09/08. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
125. Russell RG. Bisphosphonates: the first 40 years. Bone. 2011;49(1):2–19. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.022. Epub 2011/05/11. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
126. Lodder MC, Van Pelt PA, Lems WF, Kostense PJ, Koks CH, Dijkmans BA. Effects of high dose IV pamidronate on disease activity and bone metabolism in patients with active RA: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Journal of rheumatology. 2003;30(9):2080–1. Epub 2003/09/11. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
127. Valleala H, Laasonen L, Koivula MK, Mandelin J, Friman C, Risteli J, et al. Two year randomized controlled trial of etidronate in rheumatoid arthritis: changes in serum aminoterminal telopeptides correlate with radiographic progression of disease. The Journal of rheumatology. 2003;30(3):468–73. Epub 2003/03/01. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
128. Zhang Q, Badell IR, Schwarz EM, Boulukos KE, Yao Z, Boyce BF, et al. Tumor necrosis factor prevents alendronate-induced osteoclast apoptosis in vivo by stimulating Bcl-xL expression through Ets-2. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2005;52(9):2708–18. 10.1002/art.21236. Epub 2005/09/06. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
129. Jia D, O'Brien CA, Stewart SA, Manolagas SC, Weinstein RS. Glucocorticoids act directly on osteoclasts to increase their life span and reduce bone density. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5592–9. Epub 2006/08/29. en.2006-0459 [pii] 10.1210/en.2006-0459. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
130. Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Bell A, Brown V. Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. International journal of clinical practice. 2012;66(12):1139–46. 10.1111/ijcp.12022. Epub 2012/09/13. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
131. Krum SA, Miranda-Carboni GA, Hauschka PV, Carroll JS, Lane TF, Freedman LP, et al. Estrogen protects bone by inducing Fas ligand in osteoblasts to regulate osteoclast survival. The EMBO journal. 2008;27(3):535–45. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601984. Epub 2008/01/26. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
132. Parfitt AM, Mundy GR, Roodman GD, Hughes DE, Boyce BF. A new model for the regulation of bone resorption, with particular reference to the effects of bisphosphonates. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1996;11(2):150–9. 10.1002/jbmr.5650110203. Epub 1996/02/01. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
133. Lorget F, Kamel S, Mentaverri R, Wattel A, Naassila M, Maamer M, et al. High extracellular calcium concentrations directly stimulate osteoclast apoptosis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2000;268(3):899–903. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2229. Epub 2000/02/19. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
134. Chamoux E, Houde N, L'Eriger K, Roux S. Osteoprotegerin decreases human osteoclast apoptosis by inhibiting the TRAIL pathway. Journal of cellular physiology. 2008;216(2):536–42. 10.1002/jcp.21430. Epub 2008/03/14. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
135. Tanaka S, Miyazaki T, Fukuda A, Akiyama T, Kadono Y, Wakeyama H, et al. Molecular mechanism of the life and death of the osteoclast. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006;1068:180–6. 10.1196/annals.1346.020. Epub 2006/07/13. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
136. Tanaka S, Wakeyama H, Akiyama T, Takahashi K, Amano H, Nakayama KI, et al. Regulation of osteoclast apoptosis by Bcl-2 family protein Bim and Caspase-3. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2010;658:111–6. 10.1007/978-1-4419-1050-9_12. Epub 2009/12/02. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
137. Akiyama T, Bouillet P, Miyazaki T, Kadono Y, Chikuda H, Chung UI, et al. Regulation of osteoclast apoptosis by ubiquitylation of proapoptotic BH3-only Bcl-2 family member Bim. The EMBO journal. 2003;22(24):6653–64. 10.1093/emboj/cdg635. Epub 2003/12/06. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
138. Woo KM, Kim HM, Ko JS. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes the survival of osteoclast precursors by up-regulating Bcl-X(L) Experimental & molecular medicine. 2002;34(5):340–6. Epub 2003/01/15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
139. Iwasawa M, Miyazaki T, Nagase Y, Akiyama T, Kadono Y, Nakamura M, et al. The antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL negatively regulates the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2009;119(10):3149–59. 10.1172/JCI39819 39819 [pii]. Epub 2009/09/18. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/1311531
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/1311531

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1002/jbmr.1885

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
157
0

Article citations


Go to all (79) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


    Funding 


    Funders who supported this work.

    NIAMS NIH HHS (2)