Abstract
Free full text
The terminology issue for myeloid-derived suppressor cells
To the Editor
The recent study by Yang R et al. (1) described antigen specific immune suppression by Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells, which was mediated by the expression of CD80. This report continued series of recent papers published in Cancer Research, which provided strong evidence in support of critical role of these cells in tumor progression (1-6). Recent years have witnessed increasing interest in immunosuppressive cells of myeloid origin. During the last 18 months alone, more than 50 papers have appeared in peer-reviewed journals on this subject. Accumulation of these cells has been reported under pathological conditions including bacterial and parasitic infections, acute and chronic inflammation, and traumatic stress. However, most of the attention has been focused on the role of these cells in cancer. Immunosuppressive myeloid cells accumulate in large numbers in tumor-bearing mice, in practically all tested experimental models, as well as in patients with breast, lung, prostate, kidney, head and neck and other types of cancer. These cells are produced in response to a variety of tumor-derived cytokines and are a heterogeneous mixture of myeloid cells at different stages of differentiation. The precise nature of the suppressor cell population (i.e. precursors of granulocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells or early myeloid progenitors) depends on the hosts' tumor and tumor-derived factors. Despite this heterogeneity, immunosuppressive myeloid cells share some common characteristics: lack or reduced expression of markers of mature myeloid cells, expression of both Gr-1 and CD11b molecules in mice, inability to differentiate into mature myeloid cells in the presence of tumor-derived factors, high levels of reactive oxygen species, and activation of arginase I and other molecules. Most importantly, these cells possess a high potential to suppress immune responses in vitro and in vivo. Immunosuppressive myeloid cells are now considered by many a critical mechanism of tumor escape, as well as an important immunosuppressive factor for other pathological conditions.
Because these cells play a key role in regulation of immunity we feel it necessary to address one issue that causes confusion in this field. These cells lack a clear, unified name. In the literature, these cells have been called “immature myeloid cells” or “myeloid suppressor cells”. Although both of these names reflect the cells' biology, neither term is entirely accurate. The name “immature myeloid cells” implies that these cells are normal myeloid precursors. However, this may not be the case. Recent studies have demonstrated clear differences in the biology of normal immature myeloid cells and the cells that accumulate in tumor-bearing hosts. In addition, this term does not reflect the most important feature of these cells: their ability to suppress immune responses. The name “myeloid suppressor cells” (MSC) implies that these cells include populations of mature myeloid cells, such as macrophages or dendritic cells, capable of displaying some immunosuppressive features under certain circumstances. However, this name is also not accurate, being too generic and potentially misleading since these cells are not mature myeloid cells. In addition, the abbreviation “MSC” is commonly used for the characterization of mesenchymal stem cells. We believe that the lack of an accurate name for these cells creates confusion and hampers attempts to develop a cohesive picture of the mechanisms of immune suppression in cancer and other pathological conditions.
Therefore, we suggest that these cells be called “myeloid-derived suppressor cells” (MDSC). We believe this term more closely reflects the origin and function of these cells and hope that it will stimulate further scientific discussions and progress not only in immunology but also in cancer biology where undoubtedly the same or similar cell populations play a major functional role.
References
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3037
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/67/1/425/2567961/425.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3037
Article citations
Cardiopulmonary bypass and VA-ECMO induced immune dysfunction: common features and differences, a narrative review.
Crit Care, 28(1):300, 10 Sep 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39256830 | PMCID: PMC11389086
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Current Knowledge and Perspectives of Immunotherapies for Neuroblastoma.
Cancers (Basel), 16(16):2865, 17 Aug 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39199637 | PMCID: PMC11353182
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Innate immune cells in tumor microenvironment: A new frontier in cancer immunotherapy.
iScience, 27(9):110750, 17 Aug 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39280627 | PMCID: PMC11399700
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
The significant role of amino acid metabolic reprogramming in cancer.
Cell Commun Signal, 22(1):380, 29 Jul 2024
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 39069612 | PMCID: PMC11285422
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Myeloid‑derived suppressor cells: Key immunosuppressive regulators and therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer (Review).
Int J Oncol, 65(3):85, 26 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39054950 | PMCID: PMC11299769
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (447) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
NCI NIH HHS (5)
Grant ID: R01 CA100062
Grant ID: R01 CA084488-09
Grant ID: R01 CA100062-04
Grant ID: R01 CA127483
Grant ID: R01 CA084488