Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.
Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please
turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.
This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your
personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing
to this as outlined in our
privacy notice and cookie policy.
This article is a preprint. It may not have been peer reviewed.
A preprint is a complete scientific manuscript that an author uploads
on a public server for free viewing. Initially it is posted without
peer review, but may acquire feedback or reviews as a preprint, and
may eventually be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The posting of
preprints on public servers allows almost immediate dissemination and
scientific feedback early in the 'publication' process.
Share this article
Share with emailShare with twitterShare with linkedinShare with facebook
Abstract
Sex differences exist in the integrative response to exercise, however, these are typically researched during constant-load exercise. Interval exercise involves high-intensity efforts interspersed with recovery periods to repeatedly stress physiological systems, and it is currently unknown whether the response to this form of exercise differs between sexes. Ten males and ten females (age: 25±3 years) completed two experimental visits. First, an incremental treadmill exercise test was performed to obtain submaximal (lactate threshold) and maximal ( O 2peak ) data. Thereafter, visit two involved 4 × 3-min running intervals at 90% of the final incremental test velocity (v O 2peak ), with 90 secs rest between intervals. Before exercise and after each interval, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), quadriceps potentiated twitch (Q tw.pot ), and voluntary activation (VA) were recorded. The rates of oxygen uptake ( O 2 ), carbon dioxide production ( CO 2 ) and ventilation ( E ) were continuously recorded throughout. There was no sex difference in relative O 2peak (males: 47.2±6.0 vs. females: 44.4±5.8 ml.kg - 1. min -1 , p=0.292). When expressed relative to peak values, there were no sex differences in the O 2 or CO 2 response to the interval task (p≥0.781). Females had greater E , E / O 2 , and E / CO 2 values during the first two intervals (p≤0.046). There were no sex differences in the reductions in MVC, Q tw.pot , and VA during the interval task (p≥0.150), however females had lesser reductions in Q tw.pot values post-exercise (−24±9 vs. −15±8%, p=0.044). Sex differences exist in the physiological response to interval exercise. Compared to males, females experienced greater hyperpnoea during the initial stages, and had lesser decreases in contractile function post-exercise.