Abstract
Study question
Does oxygen concentration during 3-day embryo culture affect obstetric and neonatal outcomes?Summary answer
Oxygen concentration during 3-day embryo culture does not seem to affect the obstetric and neonatal outcomes measured.What is known already
Atmospheric oxygen appears to be harmful during extended embryo culture. Embryo culture conditions might therefore be a potential risk factor for subsequent fetal development and the health of future children. No data are available concerning the obstetrics and neonatal outcomes after Day 3 transfer of embryos cultured under reduced and atmospheric oxygen tensions.Study design, size, duration
A secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial assessing clinical pregnancy outcomes was carried out. This analysis included 1125 consecutive oocyte donation cycles utilizing ICSI or IVF and Day 3 embryo transfers between November 2009 and April 2012. The whole cohort of donated oocytes from patients who agreed to participate in the study were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to a reduced O2 tension group (6% O2) or an air-exposed group (20% O2) based on a computer-generated randomization list. Fresh and vitrified oocytes were used for oocyte donation. Only those pregnancies with a live birth at or beyond 24 weeks of gestation were included.Participants/materials, setting, methods
Day 3 embryos were cultured in an atmosphere of 5.5% CO2, 6% O2, 88.5% N2 versus a dual gas system in air.Main results and the role of chance
From the eligible 1125 cycles, 564 were allocated to the 6% O2 group and 561 cycles to the 20% O2 group. However, 50 and 62 cycles did not reach embryo transfer in the 6% and 20% O2 groups, respectively. No differences were found between 6% O2 and atmospheric O2 tension in the number of livebirths per embryo transfer (mean ± SD, 0.5 ± 0.7 versus 0.5 ± 0.7), pregnancy complications or neonatal outcomes. Both groups (6% and atmospheric O2) had similar single and twin delivery rates (40.8% versus 38.1% and 10.7% versus 12.3%, respectively). Preterm delivery rates and very preterm delivery rates (10.80% versus 13.24% and 1.25% versus 2.94%, respectively), birthweight (3229 ± 561 g versus 3154 ± 731 g), low birthweight (2.92% versus 2.45%), birth height (50.18 ± 2.41 cm versus 49.7 ± 3.59 cm), head circumference (34.16 ± 1.87 cm versus 33.09 ± 1.85 cm) and 1 min Apgar scores (8.96 ± 0.87 versus 8.89 ± 0.96) were also similar between 6% and atmospheric O2 groups, respectively.Limitations, reasons for caution
The number of liveborns finally analyzed is still small and not all obstetric and neonatal variables could be evaluated. Furthermore, a small proportion of the obstetric and neonatal data was obtained through a questionnaire filled out by the patients themselves. One reason for the lack of effect of oxygen concentration on pregnancy outcome could be the absence of trophectoderm cells at cleavage stage, which may make Day 3 embryos less susceptible to hypoxic conditions.Wider implications of the findings
Nowadays many IVF laboratories use a more physiological oxygen concentration for embryo culture. However, the benefits of using low oxygen concentration on both laboratory and clinical outcomes during embryo culture are still under debate. Furthermore, long-term studies investigating the effect of using atmospheric O2 are also needed. Gathering these type of clinical data is indeed, quite relevant from the safety perspective. The present data show that, at least in egg donation cycles undergoing Day 3 embryo transfers, culturing embryos under atmospheric oxygen concentration seems not to affect perinatal outcomes.Study funding/competing interest(s)
The present project was supported by the R + D program of the Regional Valencian Government, Spain (IMPIVA IMDTF/2011/214). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the content of this manuscript.Trial registration number
NCT01532193.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa152
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/35/9/2017/33867211/deaa152.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/100212974
Article citations
Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Assist Reprod Genet, 41(3):563-580, 22 Jan 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38246922
Review
Oxidative Stress in Pregnancy.
Biomolecules, 13(12):1768, 09 Dec 2023
Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 38136639 | PMCID: PMC10741771
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Oxygen concentration from days 1 to 3 after insemination affects the embryo culture quality, cumulative live birth rate, and perinatal outcomes.
J Assist Reprod Genet, 40(11):2609-2618, 20 Sep 2023
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 37728792 | PMCID: PMC10643741
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
Clinical Trials
- (1 citation) ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT01532193
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Hum Reprod, 35(4):785-795, 01 Apr 2020
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 32240287
Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.
Hum Reprod Open, 2020(1):hoz036, 22 Jan 2020
Cited by: 24 articles | PMID: 31989044 | PMCID: PMC6975868
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Hum Reprod, 32(3):556-567, 01 Mar 2017
Cited by: 54 articles | PMID: 28130435
Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod, 31(11):2561-2569, 07 Oct 2016
Cited by: 24 articles | PMID: 27907898
Review
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
R + D program of the Regional Valencian Government, Spain (1)
Grant ID: IMDTF/2011/214
0 publications