Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling is a potent technique for the discernment of subtle molecular interactions and subcellular localization, furnishing contextual insights into the protein of interest within cells. Although ascorbate peroxidase2 (APEX2) has proven effective in this approach when overexpressed, its compatibility with endogenous proteins remains untested. We improved this technique for studying native protein-protein interactions in live Drosophila ovary tissue. Through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, APEX2 was fused with the endogenous dysfusion gene. By pre-treating the tissue with Triton X-100 to enhance biotin-phenol penetration, we successfully identified multiple proteins interacting with the native Dysfusion proteins that reside on the inner nuclear membrane. Our protocol offers a comprehensive workflow for delineating the interactome networks of ovarian components in Drosophila, aiding future studies on endogenous protein-protein interactions in various tissues of other animals. Key features • Elucidating Protein-protein interactions provides deeper insights into the regulation of gene expression in molecular network and complex signaling pathways, advancing protein engineering and drug design. • This protocol utilizes CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in technology to tag endogenous proteins with the APEX2 to label nearby proteins within a 20 nm radius in Drosophila melanogaster. • We optimize APEX2-proximity labeling by using Triton X-100 pre-treatment to enhance biotin-phenol penetration into Drosophila ovaries, enabling endogenous proteins enrichment under native conditions.

Free full text 


Logo of bioprotLink to Publisher's site
Bio Protoc. 2024 Oct 20; 14(20): e5090.
Published online 2024 Oct 20. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.5090
PMCID: PMC11540050
PMID: 39512889

Detecting Native Protein–Protein Interactions by APEX2 Proximity Labeling in Drosophila Tissues

Abstract

Enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling is a potent technique for the discernment of subtle molecular interactions and subcellular localization, furnishing contextual insights into the protein of interest within cells. Although ascorbate peroxidase2 (APEX2) has proven effective in this approach when overexpressed, its compatibility with endogenous proteins remains untested. We improved this technique for studying native protein–protein interactions in live Drosophila ovary tissue. Through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, APEX2 was fused with the endogenous dysfusion gene. By pre-treating the tissue with Triton X-100 to enhance biotin-phenol penetration, we successfully identified multiple proteins interacting with the native Dysfusion proteins that reside on the inner nuclear membrane. Our protocol offers a comprehensive workflow for delineating the interactome networks of ovarian components in Drosophila, aiding future studies on endogenous protein–protein interactions in various tissues of other animals.

Key features

• Elucidating Protein-protein interactions provides deeper insights into the regulation of gene expression in molecular network and complex signaling pathways, advancing protein engineering and drug design.

• This protocol utilizes CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in technology to tag endogenous proteins with the APEX2 to label nearby proteins within a 20 nm radius in Drosophila melanogaster.

• We optimize APEX2-proximity labeling by using Triton X-100 pre-treatment to enhance biotin-phenol penetration into Drosophila ovaries, enabling endogenous proteins enrichment under native conditions.

Keywords: Proximity labeling, APEX2, Drosophila, Oogenesis, Pull-down assay, CRISPR/Cas9

Graphical overview

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is BioProtoc-14-20-5090-ga001.jpg

Workflow of proximity labeling with APEX2 tagging endogenous proteins in Drosophila ovary

Background

Proximity labeling is a powerful technique applied to mark adjacent proteins, providing valuable insights into the spatial arrangement of a given protein of interest within cells [1]. This approach excels over conventional assays because it can detect subtle or temporary protein–protein interactions (PPI) and pinpoint the precise localization within intact cellular compartments. Ascorbate peroxidase2 (APEX2) is engineered to enhance proximity labeling techniques for uncovering intricate subcellular proteomes in vivo [2]. By utilizing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), APEX2 catalyzes biotin-phenol (BP) into biotin-phenoxyl radical, a highly reactive and short-lived species (lasting less than 1 ms), which quickly forms covalent bonds with nearby proteins within a 20 nm radius [3]. The resulting biotinylated proteins can be purified with streptavidin beads and then subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for identification [3]. Although APEX2 has shown efficacy in cell culture systems and Drosophila tissues when overexpressed, the compatibility with endogenous proteins tagged with this enzyme has not been tested [2–6]. While ectopic expression facilitates research on PPI, it may hinder embryonic development or lead to misinterpretation due to aberrant cellular behavior; a preferable method for unveiling PPI is to purify proteins expressed under native conditions.

In this protocol, we improved APEX2-based proximity labeling in live Drosophila ovary tissue to study PPI in the natural state. By using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, we generated a transgenic fly line that carries the APEX2 gene inserted at the N-terminal of endogenous dysfusion (dysf) locus. To enhance protein biotinylation catalyzed by APEX2, fly ovary tissues were pre-treated with Triton X-100 to facilitate the penetration of BP into tissues. After a sequence of protein enrichment and LC-MS/MS analysis, we identified numerous proteins that were labeled by APEX2-tagged Dysf proteins [7].

Altogether, our protocol provides a proximity-labeling workflow for mapping the interactome networks of Drosophila ovary. The level of detail in this protocol shall empower future researchers to explore endogenous PPI in living tissues of other multicellular organisms.

Materials and reagents

Biological materials

  1. Drosophila melanogaster

Reagents

  1. Schneider's Drosophila medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 21720024)

  2. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: A5670701)

  3. 100× Penicillin-Streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 15070063)

  4. Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (streptavidin-HRP) (Life Technologies, catalog number: S-911)

  5. cOmpleteTM, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Merck, catalog number: 4693132001)

  6. (3aS,4S,6aR)-hexahydro-N-[2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-oxo-1H-thieno[3,4-d]imidazole-4-pentanamide (Biotin-phenol, BP) (Iris Biotech, catalog number: LS-3500)

  7. PierceTM Streptavidin magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 88816)

  8. Trolox (Merck, catalog number: Al-238813)

  9. Sodium azide (Merck, catalog number: S2002)

  10. Sodium L-ascorbate (Merck, catalog number: A4034)

  11. Hydrogen peroxide solution (H2O2) (Merck, catalog number: 31642)

  12. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Merck, catalog number: P3813)

  13. Bio-Rad protein assay dye reagent concentrate (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 5000006)

  14. Tris base (cyrusbioscience, catalog number: 101-77-86-1)

  15. Glycine (cyrusbioscience, catalog number: 101-56-40-6)

  16. NaCl (cyrusbioscience, catalog number: 101-7647-14-5)

  17. SDS (cyrusbioscience, catalog number: 101-151-21-3)

  18. Triton X-100 (JT Baker®, X198-07)

  19. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Bioman, catalog number: ALB001)

  20. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck, catalog number: D2650)

Solutions

  1. 10× PBS stock

  2. 1 M Tris-HCL pH 8.0

  3. 5 M NaCl

  4. 10% SDS

  5. Dissection medium (see Recipes)

  6. 500 mM Biotin-phenol (see Recipes)

  7. 100 mM H2O2 (see Recipes)

  8. 1 M Sodium ascorbate (see Recipes)

  9. 500 mM Trolox (see Recipes)

  10. 1 M Sodium azide (see Recipes)

  11. Quencher solution (see Recipes)

  12. 25× Protease inhibitor cocktail (see Recipes)

  13. 20% Triton X-100 (see Recipes)

  14. RIPA lysis buffer (see Recipes)

  15. 0.3% PBST (see Recipes)

Recipes

  1. Dissection medium

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Schneider's Drosophila medium500 mM445 mL
    FBS10%50 mL
    100× Penicillin-Streptomycin5 mL
    Totaln/a500 mL

  2. 500 mM Biotin-phenol

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Biotin-phenol500 mM100 mg
    DMSOn/aUp to 550 μL
    Totaln/a550 μL

    1. The stock needs to be shaken by vortexing.

    2. Aliquot the stock solution into small volumes and store at -80 °C to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.

  3. 100 mM H2O2

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    30% H2O2(10M)100 mM10 μL
    10× PBS100 μL
    H2On/a890 μL
    Totaln/a1 mL

    Do not store this stock.

  4. 1 M Sodium ascorbate

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Sodium ascorbate1 M0.59 g
    H2On/aUp to 5 mL
    Total (optional)n/a5 mL

  5. 500 mM Trolox

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Trolox500 mM12.5145 mg
    DMSOn/aUp to 100 μL
    Total (optional)n/a100 μL

    Do not store this stock.

  6. 1 M Sodium azide

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Sodium azide1 M0.65 g
    H2On/aUp to 10 mL
    Total (optional)n/a10 mL

    Aliquots can be stored at -20 °C or below for several months.

  7. Quencher solution

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    500 mM Trolox5 mM10 μL
    1 M Sodium azide10 mM10 μL
    1 M Sodium ascorbate10 mM10 μL

    10× PBS

    H2O

    n/a

    100 μL

    870 μL

    Total (optional)n/a1 mL

    1. Make this solution immediately before it is to be used to quench the biotinylation reaction.

    2. Do not store this solution.

  8. 25× Protease inhibitor cocktail

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    cOmpleteTM, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail25×1 tablet
    H2On/aUp to 2 mL
    Total (optional)n/a2 mL

  9. 20% Triton X-100

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    Triton X-10020%10 mL
    H2On/a40 mL
    Total (optional)n/a50 mL

  10. RIPA lysis buffer

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    1 M Tris-HCL pH 8.050 mM2.5 mL
    5 M NaCl150 mM1.5 mL
    10% SDS0.1%0.5 mL
    20% Triton X-1001%2.5 mL
    25× Protease inhibitor cocktail2 mL
    H2On/a41 mL
    Total (optional)n/a50 mL

  11. 0.3% PBST

    ReagentFinal concentrationQuantity or Volume
    20% Triton X-1000.3%0.75 mL
    10× PBS5 mL
    H2On/a44.25 mL
    Total (optional)n/a50 mL

Equipment

  1. Standard equipment for fly incubation

  2. Micro refrigerated centrifuge (Kubota, model: 3740)

  3. Magnetic stand (G-Biosciences, catalog number: 786-888)

  4. Multi-mixer overhead mixer shaker Mischer Rotator (NanoEnTek, model: SLRM-3)

  5. Ultrasonic processor (ChromTech, model: UP-500)

  6. xMarkTM microplate absorbance spectrophotometer (BIO-RAD, catalog number: 1681150)

  7. Mini Trans-Blot electrophoretic transfer cell (BIO-RAD, catalog number: 1703930)

  8. Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra Cell (BIO-RAD, catalog number: 1658001)

Software and datasets

  1. NCBIprot (20180429)

Procedure

  1. Transgenic fly generation

    1. The N-APEX2-dysf knock-in fly was produced by WellGenetics Company (Taiwan) using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing through the following steps.

      1. Guide RNA construction: The pDCC6 vector was digested with BbsI and ligated with the annealed guide RNA (ACGTGGCCTAGACAAGGTGACGG). This was followed by transformation, colony PCR selection, and sequencing.

      2. Donor plasmid construction: The APEX2 and 3XFlag sequences were amplified and cloned into the pUC57-Kan (Cassette RFP) vector using a sequence- and ligation-independent method (named Cassette APEX2-3XFlag-RFP). The two homology arms (upstream and downstream) of dysf were amplified from genomic DNA and then cloned into Cassette APEX2-3XFlag-RFP.

      3. Microinjection: The constructs (donor plasmid and CRISPR/Cas9 vector plasmid) were injected into embryos according to standard procedures.

      4. Selection and verification: Transgenic offspring were identified by genomic PCR and sequencing, and then crossed with balancer flies to establish a stable line. These steps are illustrated in Figure 1.

        An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is BioProtoc-14-20-5090-g001.jpg
        Workflow of generating the dysfJW allele using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.

        A. APEX2, Piggy Bac terminal repeat, 3XFlag, homology arms, DsRed2, and 3XP3-hsp70 promoter were cloned into the pUC57-Kan plasmid as a donor plasmid. B. The guide RNA was cloned into the CRISPR/Cas9 vector plasmid (pDCC6). C. Both plasmids were co-injected into a Drosophila embryo following the standard protocol.

    2. As a result of homology-dependent repair, the fragment of APEX2-3XFlag-PBacDsRed was inserted into the 5' end of dysf coding region after embryo microinjection, resulting in a new null allele, dysfJW . In order to generate an APEX2 knock-in tag in the dysf locus, dysfJW was crossed with BL8285 (w1118; CyO, P{Tub-PBac\T}2/wgSp-1; l(3)**/TM6B, Tb1 ) to excise the PBacDsRed fragment. After precise excision, one GTTAAA sequence was left as a linker peptide to bridge 3XFlag and dysf, as illustrated in Figure 2.

      An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is BioProtoc-14-20-5090-g002.jpg
      Generation of APEX2-3XFlag knock-in at the dysf locus.

      The APEX2-3XFlag-PBacDsRed fragment was inserted into the 5' end of the dysf coding region, creating dysfJW . To generate an APEX2 knock-in tag, dysfJW flies were crossed with BL8285 to excise the PBacDsRed fragment.

  2. APEX2 reaction in Drosophila ovary

    1. Fatten 60 N-APEX2-dysf genotype female flies, from 3 to 5 days old, with wet yeast for 14–16 h at 29 °C. Subsequently, carefully dissect their ovaries with fine-tip forceps in dissection medium [8].

      Note: Quickly and gently tear the ovary, ensuring the process is brief to minimize tissue damage.

    2. After dissection, pre-treat ovaries with 1 mL of 0.3% PBST for 15 min and then wash with 1 mL of 1× PBS once.

      Note: Freshly prepare 0.3% PBST to enhance the penetration of biotin-phenol.

    3. After pre-treatment, incubate all ovaries in 200 μL of dissection medium supplemented with 500 μM BP for 15 min at 25 °C.

      Critical: Prewarm the medium to 25 °C to facilitate the dissolution of BP. Ensure that the solution fully dissolves in the dissection medium.

    4. Prepare a premix by combining 10 μL of freshly prepared 100 mM H2O2 with 790 μL of dissection medium. Then, add this premix into the samples from step B3, achieving a final concentration of 1 mM H2O2, and incubate at room temperature for 1–2 min.

      1. For the negative control group, we recommend using fruit fly ovaries without APEX2 or ovaries untreated with BP or H2O2.

      2. The biotinylation time varies depending on the expression level of the APEX2-tagged target protein and cell types, typically ranging from 30 s to 2 min [4,5,7].

    5. Rinse the ovaries three times, each for 1 min, with 1 mL of fresh quencher solution. Subsequently, carefully remove as much supernatant as possible.

      Pause point: The ovaries can be stored at -80 °C for several months.

  3. Ovary sample lysis

    1. Homogenize ovary samples using a plastic pestle with 600 μL of RIPA lysis buffer and then sonicate for 10 cycles at 30% amplitude. Each cycle comprises 5 s of sonication followed by a 5 s rest on ice between pulses.

    2. Centrifuge the lysate at 15,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Transfer the supernatant to a new tube and ensure to maintain the lysate on ice throughout the entire process.

    3. Quantify the protein content in each clarified whole-cell lysate using the Bio-Rad Protein assay dye reagent concentrate. If needed, dilute the clarified lysate beforehand to ensure that the concentrations fall within the linear range of the assay. Take 50 μL aliquots of streptavidin magnetic beads and wash them twice with 1 mL of RIPA lysis buffer.

  4. Streptavidin-based enrichment

    1. For each sample, take 50 μL aliquots of streptavidin magnetic beads. Subsequently, incubate 550 μL of each lysate sample with 50 μL of streptavidin magnetic beads for 3 h at 4 °C on a rotator set at 10 rpm. To facilitate rotation, an additional 500 μL of RIPA buffer is added to each sample.

    2. Pellet the beads using a magnetic rack and wash each bead sample five times with 500 μL of RIPA lysis buffer per wash to eliminate nonspecific binders. Keep the wash buffers on ice throughout the procedure.

  5. Western blot analysis

    1. To conduct the western blot analysis, start by preparing and boiling the samples in 1× protein loading buffer. Then, cool them on ice and briefly spin to minimize condensation.

    2. Next, load and run the samples on an 8% (w/v) SDS gel, typically loading 15% of the streptavidin-based enrichment for analysis.

    3. After gel electrophoresis, transfer the samples to a PVDF membrane using standard equipment and protocols.

    4. Once transferred, block the membrane with 5% (w/v) BSA in 1× TBST for 2 h at room temperature.

    5. Subsequently, gently rock the membrane in 10 mL of 0.3 μg/mL streptavidin-HRP in 1× TBST at room temperature for 2 h. Then, wash the membrane with 1× TBST four times for 5 min each before proceeding to membrane development.

    6. If the streptavidin affinity pulldown is effective, it should result in the depletion of biotinylated proteins in the flowthrough fraction, while simultaneously enriching them in the bound fraction, as illustrated in Figure 3.

      An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is BioProtoc-14-20-5090-g003.jpg
      Streptavidin-based enrichment of biotin-tagged proteins.

      Western blot probed with streptavidin-HRP reveals proteins labeled by APEX2 in the co-treatment of biotin-phenol and H2O2 (right panel). Figure from Wu et al. [7]

  6. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

    1. Perform electrophoresis on the remaining samples from step E2 using an 8% Tris-glycine mini gel.

    2. Apply Coomassie Blue staining to visualize proteins (Figure 4) and then carefully excise the stained bands from the gel using a new razor blade.

      An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is BioProtoc-14-20-5090-g004.jpg
      Coomassie blue staining for streptavidin-based enrichment.

      SDS-PAGE was stained with Coomassie blue to show biotinylated proteins. Color bars indicate sample fractions that were subjected to proteomic analysis. Figure from Wu et al. [7]

    3. Submit the excised samples to a reputable spectrometry facility for in-gel tryptic digestion of proteins followed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis, adhering to their established protocols.

    4. Analyze the data generated by mass spectrometry from the samples.

Validation of protocol

This protocol has been employed and validated in the following research article:

  • Wu et al. [7]. Spatiotemporal gating of Stat nuclear influx by Drosophila Npas4 in collective cell migration. Sci Adv. (Figures 6A and S5).

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C.) grants to A.C.-C.J., MOST 110-2311-B-006-005 and MOST 107-2311-B-006-002-MY3, and to Y.C.-C., MOST 110-2311-B-110-004-MY3. This work was also supported by NSTC (National Science and Technology Council, R.O.C.) grant 113-2311-B-110-003 to Y.C.-C.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Bosch J. A., Chen C. and Perrimon N.(2020). Proximity‐dependent labeling methods for proteomic profiling in living cells: An update. WIREs Dev Biol. 10(1): e392. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.392 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Hung V., Udeshi N. D., Lam S. S., Loh K. H., Cox K. J., Pedram K., Carr S. A. and Ting A. Y.(2016). Spatially resolved proteomic mapping in living cells with the engineered peroxidase APEX2. Nat Protoc. 11(3): 456 475 475. 10.1038/nprot.2016.018 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Rhee H. W., Zou P., Udeshi N. D., Martell J. D., Mootha V. K., Carr S. A. and Ting A. Y.(2013). Proteomic Mapping of Mitochondria in Living Cells via Spatially Restricted Enzymatic Tagging. Science(1979). 339(6125): 1328 1331 1331. 10.1126/science.1230593 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Chen C. L., Hu Y., Udeshi N. D., Lau T. Y., Wirtz-Peitz F., He L., Ting A. Y., Carr S. A. and Perrimon N.(2015). Proteomic mapping in live Drosophila tissues using an engineered ascorbate peroxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112(39): 12093 12098 12098. 10.1073/pnas.1515623112 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Mannix K. M., Starble R. M., Kaufman R. S. and Cooley L.(2019). Proximity labeling reveals novel interactomes in live Drosophila tissue. Development 146(14): e176644. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.176644 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Chakraborty A., Lin W. C., Lin Y. T., Huang K. J., Wang P. Y., Chang I. F., Wang H. I., Ma K. T., Wang C. Y., Huang X. R., et al. .(2020). SNAP29 mediates the assembly of histidine-induced CTP synthase filaments in proximity to the cytokeratin network. J Cell Sci. 133(9): e240200. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.240200 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Wu J. W., Wang C. W., Chen R. Y., Hung L. Y., Tsai Y. C., Chan Y. T., Chang Y. C. and Jang A. C.(2022). Spatiotemporal gating of Stat nuclear influx by Drosophila Npas4 in collective cell migration. Sci Adv. 8(29): eabm2411. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm2411 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Prasad M., Jang A. C., Starz-Gaiano M., Melani M. and Montell D. J.(2007). A protocol for culturing Drosophila melanogaster stage 9 egg chambers for live imaging. Nat Protoc. 2(10): 2467 2473 2473. 10.1038/nprot.2007.363 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bio-protocol are provided here courtesy of Bio-protocol, LLC