Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

While cochlear implantation (CI) and electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) have a positive outcome in most cases, their effectiveness varies depending on the etiology of the hearing loss. Among the various etiologies, genetic factors are the leading cause of hearing loss and may impact CI and EAS outcomes.

Aims/objectives

To reveal the genetic background of the hearing loss in CI/EAS patients in each ethnic population, we undertook a multi-center study involving the genetic testing of hearing loss in CI/EAS patients from 10 centers.

Material and methods

Saliva samples and clinical information for the patients and their family members were obtained and next-generation sequencing analysis using a panel carrying 63 deafness genes was then performed.

Results

Genetic testing successfully identified the causative gene variants in 54.5% (48/88) of patients with pre-lingual onset hearing loss (onset under 6 years) and in 12% (12/95) of those with late-onset hearing loss (onset at 6 years or more).

Conclusions and significance

We clearly indicated that genetic factors are the most common cause of hearing loss regardless of ethnic background. Saliva-based genetic testing is a useful tool for multi-center studies seeking to clarify the genetic causes of hearing loss in CI or EAS patients between countries separated by distance.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Health and Labor Sciences Research (3)

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (4)