Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.
Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please
turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.
This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your
personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing
to this as outlined in our
privacy notice and cookie policy.
Share this article
Share with emailShare with twitterShare with linkedinShare with facebook
Abstract
Within a few years, autoantibodies targeting the nervous system resulted in a novel disease classification. For several of them, which we termed 'established', direct pathogenicity has been proven and now guides diagnostic pathways and early immunotherapy. For a rapidly growing number of further anti-neuronal autoantibodies, the role in disease is less clear. Increasing evidence suggests that they could contribute to disease, by playing a modulating role on brain function. We therefore suggest a three-level classification of neurological autoantibodies according to the degree of experimentally proven pathogenicity and strength of clinical association: established, emerging, explorative. This may facilitate focusing on clinical constellations in which autoantibody-mediated mechanisms have not been assumed previously, including autoimmune psychosis and dementia, cognitive impairment in cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. Based on recent data reviewed here, humoral autoimmunity may represent an additional "super-system" for brain health. The "brain antibody-ome", that is, the composition of thousands of anti-neuronal autoantibodies, may shape neuronal function not only in disease, but even in healthy aging. Towards this novel concept, extensive research will have to elucidate pathogenicity from the atomic to the clinical level, autoantibody by autoantibody. Such profiling can uncover novel biomarkers, enhance our understanding of underlying mechanisms, and identify selective therapies.