Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Wound healing is a dynamic process involving a complex interaction between many cells and mediators. Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element for cell stabilization. Mg was reported to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in angiogenesis in vitro. However, the function of Mg in wound healing is not known. We observed that the expression level of Mg in human wound tissue fluid was only 10% of that found in human blood serum. To confirm whether Mg is a suitable wound dressing material, we fabricated a Mg- or Mg-silver (Ag)-based polyethylene dressing to study its effect on wound healing. We observed that Mg and Ag were stably preserved in the constructed material and were able to be rapidly released in the moist environment. We also observed that the Mg-based dressing had good cellular compatibility without harmful extractables. Furthermore, Mg enhanced the antibacterial activity of Ag. In line with the observed increase in fibroblast migration in vitro, the Mg-Ag-based dressing improved acute and chronic wound repairs via an increase in neovascularization and basal cell proliferation. The present results show that a Mg-Ag-based coating can be manufactured as an optimal dressing for adjuvant wound therapy.

Free full text 


Logo of ijmsLink to Publisher's site
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep; 25(17): 9311.
Published online 2024 Aug 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179311
PMCID: PMC11395027
PMID: 39273259

Novel Magnesium- and Silver-Loaded Dressing Promotes Tissue Regeneration in Cutaneous Wounds

Shin-Chen Pan, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft,1 Ying-Jhen Huang, Formal analysis, Data curation,2 Chong-Han Wang, Formal analysis, Data curation,2 Chao-Kai Hsu, Conceptualization, Investigation,3 and Ming-Long Yeh, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision2,4,*
César Viseras, Academic Editor, Luana Perioli, Academic Editor, and Cinzia Pagano, Academic Editor

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Wound healing is a dynamic process involving a complex interaction between many cells and mediators. Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element for cell stabilization. Mg was reported to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in angiogenesis in vitro. However, the function of Mg in wound healing is not known. We observed that the expression level of Mg in human wound tissue fluid was only 10% of that found in human blood serum. To confirm whether Mg is a suitable wound dressing material, we fabricated a Mg- or Mg-silver (Ag)-based polyethylene dressing to study its effect on wound healing. We observed that Mg and Ag were stably preserved in the constructed material and were able to be rapidly released in the moist environment. We also observed that the Mg-based dressing had good cellular compatibility without harmful extractables. Furthermore, Mg enhanced the antibacterial activity of Ag. In line with the observed increase in fibroblast migration in vitro, the Mg-Ag-based dressing improved acute and chronic wound repairs via an increase in neovascularization and basal cell proliferation. The present results show that a Mg-Ag-based coating can be manufactured as an optimal dressing for adjuvant wound therapy.

Keywords: magnesium, silver, wound dressing, wound healing

1. Introduction

Wound healing is a dynamic process involving a complex interaction between many cells and mediators [1]. Effective wound healing reduces the risk of complications such as infections, which can lead to more severe health issues, including sepsis, amputation, or even death. Chronic wounds, if left untreated, can result in significant morbidity and complications that place a burden on healthcare systems and patients alike. It has been shown that this interaction affects several important processes in wound healing, such as re-epithelialization, neovascularization, and connective tissue deposition [2]. Most studies emphasized the functions or signaling of cells and mediators to perform regulatory events. However, the significance of trace elements in wound healing warrants further investigation. The role of zinc in wound healing has been established. High levels of zinc and its binding protein, metallothionein, are expressed in the keratinocytes at the wound border and other cell types during the early inflammatory phase of the rat wound model [3]. The application of topical zinc oxide enhanced healing in both partial-thickness and full-thickness wounds [4]. A significantly differential level of copper between normal skin and scar tissue suggested the role of trace elements in the regulation of the wound healing process [5].

Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element for cell stabilization. For example, ATP-generating reactions are Mg-dependent [6]. Other functions of Mg include the regulation of muscle activity, control of neurological function, and neurotransmitter release. It also contributes to maintaining the function of the heart, peripheral vessels, platelets, and bone formation [6]. However, the function of Mg in wound healing has not been studied. Mg is mostly found in muscle tissue, soft tissue, and bone [7]. The distribution of Mg in the skin was not addressed until now. Mg was reported to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in angiogenesis in vitro [8]. Low Mg levels enhanced the dysfunction of cultured endothelial cells via the activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1 [9]. In addition, Ag is a well-known antibacterial agent. A previous report demonstrated that silver nanowires were potential antibacterial agents against E. coli, S. aureus, MRSA, and S. saprophyticus [10]. In addition, silver nanoparticles have been shown to be effective against a broad spectrum of viruses and also possess a potent antibacterial effect [11]. Herein, we aimed to develop novel Mg- and Ag-based dressings for a dual effect of antimicrobial activity and enhanced wound healing rate. We have conducted a detailed characterization of the dressing, including immersion, microstructure, and surface wettability. The cytotoxic and antimicrobial effects of the dressing were also tested.

2. Results

2.1. Differential Expression of Mg in Human Serum and Wound Tissue

Local healing responses may lead to differences in systemic and local mediator production. To investigate whether Mg levels were different between serum and wound tissue, a total of 17 individuals were included to test the Mg levels in blood and wound tissue fluids. Of interest, we found that only 10% of the Mg expression level was observed in wound tissue fluid (0.24 ± 0.01 mg/dL), compared to expression in blood serum (2.25 ± 0.21 mg/dL, Figure 1), suggesting the potential of local Mg additives to promote wound healing.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g001.jpg

Differential expression levels of Mg in tissue fluids and blood (**** p < 0.0001).

2.2. Efficient Release Properties of Mg- and Ag-Containing Dressings

The influence of Mg in cell physiology has been well-demonstrated. Given the evidence that an ideal wound dressing should provide efficient release of the components to promote wound healing, reduce bacteria counts, and minimize tissue toxicity [12], a thorough understanding of Mg and Ag release kinetics at different time points was studied using an immersion test from 2 to 72 h. At 6 h, over 50% of the Mg ion was observed in the medium and ascended to its highest value at 72 h (2.19 mM, Figure S1, left). In addition, two different types of Mg dressings (Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100) exhibited a similar release property (Figure S1, right). Furthermore, the release of the Ag ion in the medium was 0.5 ppm at 2 h, 0.89 ppm at 6 h, 0.88 ppm at 24 h, and 0.96 ppm at 72 h. The Ag ion was observed to rapidly release into the medium at 6 h, exhibiting good antibacterial activity, reaching approximately 92% of its concentration at 72 h (Figure S1, right).

2.3. Incorporation of Mg and Ag in Wound Dressings

Polyethylene materials are widely used in wound dressings. The mesh coated with Ag and Mg ions was prepared through sputtered technology. In the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing, the Mg ions were sputtered on top of the Ag ions to keep the Mg ions on the outermost layer of the dressing. The surface morphology of the sputtered metal ions was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 250× and 500× magnification. Either Ag or Mg were welded steadily to maintain the integrity of the material in use (Figure S2A). In addition, surface elements such as Ag and Mg ions were studied with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. The data showed that the average proportion of Mg atoms was 4.7% in Mg100 dressing and 8.7% in Ag200 + Mg100 dressing, with Ag atoms at a low proportion of 0.15% in the latter (Figure S2B). The results indicated that Mg and Ag ions can be incorporated into our material by a sputtered process.

2.4. Good Surface Wettability of Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 Dressings

Wettability is one of the important abilities of sputtered technology. Traditionally, the contact angle was utilized to measure the wettability between the test liquid and the solid surface [13]. A contact angle greater than 90 degrees is needed to maintain its hydrophobic property to avoid stickiness of the dressing to the tissue wound, reduce secondary damage during dressing change, and also help to release ions. To study the surface wettability of our materials, the contact angles of different thicknesses of our dressing, such as 10, 25, 50, and 100 nm, were measured. The results showed that the contact angles of all materials were about 120 degrees. Additionally, there were no differences in the contact angle between uncoated dressing and all types of Mg dressings (Figure S3), suggesting the Mg coating did not significantly alter the hydrophobic properties of the dressing material.

2.5. Absence of Harmful Extractables from Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 Dressings

To study the toxic effects of Ag and Mg in our material, a standard cell toxicity test was used. According to the policy of ISO 10993-5 [14], we picked HUVEC and NIH-3T3 cell lines for cytotoxicity testing of our dressings. A maximal Mg release property of 2 mM was determined to prevent cell toxicity in our design. The extracts of Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings were diluted into four different conditions for the following experiment. Solutions with 10% DMSO and 10% FBS were indicated as positive and negative controls, respectively. The HUVECs displayed a higher survival rate (>70%) when cultured at different levels of Mg concentrations, ranging from 0.1 to 2 mM (Figure 2A). By contrast, cultured NIH-3T3s still displayed a higher survival rate in media with 0.5 and 1 mM Mg concentrations, which were 94.63% and 78.75%, respectively. However, the survival rate of the NIH-3T3s decreased to 64.92% in the 2 mM Mg medium (Figure 2B). Although decreasing viability of fibroblasts was observed, cell viability could be reversed to higher than 70% in the Ag-Mg combination, indicating a potentially synergistic effect of Ag and Mg in the dressing. In addition, HUVECs and NIH-3T3s exhibited a high survival rate in the medium of different concentrations of Ag and Mg in the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing (Figure 2C,D). The present study showed HUVECs were able to maintain a high viability rate at this level. Even in the presence of 0.8 ppm of Ag with Mg, cell viability still reached 82.39%, indicating the absence of harmful extractables from our Ag- and Mg-based materials.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g002.jpg

The toxic effects of Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and fibroblasts (NIH-3T3s) were used for cytotoxicity testing of dressings. The effects of different levels of Mg and Ag concentrations extracted from Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings on HUVECs and NIH-3T3s were investigated. Cell viability of HUVECs and NIH-3T3s is shown in (AD). PC—positive control; NC—negative control.

2.6. Magnesium-Enhanced Antibacterial Ability of Silver in Wound Dressing

Testing for the antimicrobial ability of wound dressings was carried out using Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [15]. According to the laboratory’s Biosafety Level (BSL) guidelines, a BSL-1 E. coli strain was chosen to test our products. The data showed that both the Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings had lower OD600 values, with the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing showing a significantly lower value (p < 0.05, n = 3) compared to the control (Figure 3A). The obtained value was also converted into the efficiency of the bacteriostatic activity. The data indicated that the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing exhibited 40% of bacteriostatic activity against E. coli (Figure 3B), suggesting that Mg amplifies the antibacterial properties of Ag.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g003.jpg

Antibacterial ability of the Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings. (A) A BSL-1 E. coli strain was chosen to test the antibacterial ability of the dressings. Both the Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings had lower OD600 values, with the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing showing a significantly lower value (* p < 0.05, n = 3). (B) The percentage of bacteriostatic activity in each group is shown. OD—optical absorbance values.

2.7. Increased Migration of Fibroblasts by Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 Dressings

Mg was found to promote fibroblast migration and accelerate wound healing in optimal conditions [16]. To study the effect of Ag and Mg on cell migration, we performed an in vitro scratch wound assay. Fibroblasts were incubated in the medium containing either Mg100 or Ag200 + Mg100 dressings for 24 h. Images of the scratch wounds at 6 and 24 h after scratching showed that fibroblast migration into the scratch wound area was accelerated in the presence of Mg (Figure 4A). At 24 h, the scratch wound was nearly closed for the medium containing Mg100 or Ag200 + Mg100, whereas the control medium had no such effect. Quantification of the percentage of scratch wound closure using image analysis confirmed a significant acceleration of fibroblast migration in the presence of Mg100 or Ag200 + Mg100 at 6 and 24 h (Figure 4B).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g004.jpg

In vitro fibroblast migration in the presence of Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings. (A) Fibroblasts were incubated in the medium containing Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings for 24 h for the cell migration assay. Images show an acceleration of fibroblast migration in the experimental groups. (B) Quantification of the percentage of scratch wound closure using image analysis is shown (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 for all time points, n = 3).

2.8. Increased Cutaneous Wound Healing in Normal and Diabetic Mice by Mg Dressings

Although Mg has been reported to promote endothelial cell functions [8], its exact role in cutaneous wound repair is unclear. We have demonstrated the promising effects of the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing in in vitro experiments. However, the specific influence of varying Ag levels on wound healing remains unclear. To explore the effects of increased Ag concentrations on wound healing, we have developed two distinct Ag dressing variants (Ag200 + Mg100 and Ag2000 + Mg100) for in vivo studies. We created four 1 cm full-thickness skin wounds on the back of SD rats. To determine the optimal concentration, three different concentrations of Mg dressings, including 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg, were developed. The results show that the three different types of Mg dressings provide similar wound-closure responses (Figure S4). Due to the reports of antimicrobial effects and possible acceleration of wound healing of Ag [17,18], the synergistic effect of Mg and Ag was examined. The punch wounds were covered with Mg100, Ag200 + Mg100 or Ag2000 + Mg100 dressings. Each dressing manifested an improvement in the wound closure from day 1 to day 7, with significant responses of Ag200 + Mg100 and Ag2000 + Mg100 at day 1 and day 3 when compared to the control (Figure 5A,B). The quantification of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections showed a faster healing rate of neo-epidermis of Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 wounds at day 9 post-wounding (Figure 5C,D). To examine if the improvement in wound healing was due to the increase in re-epithelialization, we scored the Ki67+ proliferating keratinocytes at day 9 after establishing the wound (Figure 5E). The experimental groups exhibited an increase in Ki67+ keratinocytes in the wound area, with a significant number in Mg100 dressing when compared to the control group (Figure 5F). Neovascularization is an important process of wound healing and precedes re-epithelialization. To further delineate the effect of Mg on the acceleration of in vivo vasculature, we detected and quantified blood vessels with endothelial marker CD31 immunohistochemistry in wound sections (Figure 5G). Examining sections from different wound tissues revealed that the Mg100 dressing showed a greater percentage of vasculature in the dermis (Mg100: 6.4 ± 0.7%, Ag200 + Mg100: 5.5 ± 0.5%, and Ag2000 + Mg100: 6.0 ± 0.8%). By contrast, a significantly lower percentage of CD31+ blood vessels was observed in the control group (3.5 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.05, Figure 5H). In addition, we did not observe a statistical significance in the different Ag dressing variants. Based on these observations, we conclude that Mg promotes acute wound healing, partly via increasing basal cell proliferation.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g005.jpg

In vivo acute wound healing assay of Mg dressings. (A,B) Representative images of wounds at different days post-wounding. The graph shows the comparison of percent residual wounds in each group (* p < 0.05, n = 6, scale bar = 1 cm). (C,D) Representative H&E staining images of re-epithelialization area in wounded skin on day 9 post-wounding (A in (C): yellow zone represents remaining wound on day 9; B in (C): yellow line, residual epithelial defect; black line, original epithelial defect). The quantification of neo-epidermis in H&E sections on day 9 (* p < 0.05, n = 6). (E,F) Representative images of proliferative Ki67+ keratinocytes in wound areas on day 9 post-wounding (* p < 0.05, n = 3, scale bar = 100 μm). (G,H) Representative images of neovascularization (CD31+ blood vessels) in wound areas on day 9 post-wounding (* p < 0.05, n = 5, scale bar = 100 μm).

We also tested the effects of the Ag and Mg dressings in a diabetic mouse model. After successfully inducing hyperglycemia in SD rats (>250 mg/dL blood glucose, Figure S5), four 1 cm full-thickness skin wounds were created using a biopsy punch 7 days later. The healing effects of the dressings (Mg100, Ag200 + Mg100, and Ag2000 + Mg100) on diabetic wounds were studied. The data showed a significant improvement of wound closure rate in the Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 groups from day 1 to day 5 (Figure 6A,B). The neo-epidermis of different wounds was further examined by H&E stain of day-9 wound sections. The results showed a better re-epithelialization with the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing (88.2 ± 7.9%) compared to the control (51.4 ± 7.8%, p < 0.05, Figure 6C,D). The Ki67+ keratinocytes of day-9 tissues were further investigated (Figure 6E). Despite no significant difference, a trend toward an increase in Ki67+ keratinocytes in wound sections with the Mg100 (5.8 ± 0.8 cells/200 μm) and Ag200 + Mg100 (6.8 ± 0.9 cells/200 μm) dressings was observed when compared with the control group (5.1 ± 0.6 cells/200 μm, Figure 6F). Neovascularization of wound tissues was examined and showed a significantly higher vessel density in the Ag200 + Mg100 (3.8 ± 0.4%) and Ag2000 + Mg100 (3.9 ± 0.4%) treated wound sections. Moreover, a lesser neovascularization was observed in the control group (1.8 ± 0.3%, p < 0.05, Figure 6G,H). From the acute and chronic models, we observed a positive role for Mg in the in vivo wound healing model via a possible action mechanism of increased keratinocyte proliferation and neovascularization.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-g006.jpg

In vivo diabetic wound healing assay of Mg dressings. (A,B) Representative images of wounds at different days post-wounding. The graph shows the comparison of percent residual wounds in each group (* p < 0.05, n = 6, scale bar = 1 cm). (C,D) Representative H&E staining images of re-epithelialization area in wounded skin on day 9 post-wounding (A in (C): yellow zone represents remaining wound on day 9; B in (C): yellow line, residual epithelial defect; black line, original epithelial defect). The quantification of neo-epidermis in H&E sections on day 9 (* p < 0.05, n = 6). (E,F) Representative images of proliferative Ki67+ keratinocytes in wound areas on day 9 post-wounding (n = 3, scale bar = 100 μm). (G,H) Representative images of neovascularization (CD31+ blood vessels) in wound areas on day 9 post-wounding (* p < 0.05, n = 5, scale bar = 100 μm).

3. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a Mg-Ag-based dressing improved wound healing by increasing fibroblast migration, neovascularization, and basal cell proliferation in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Materials testing showed that Mg and Ag were stably preserved in the constructed material and were able to rapidly release in moist environments. The Mg-based dressing had good cellular compatibility without harmful extractables. Furthermore, Mg enhanced the antibacterial activity of Ag. The present results show that a Mg-Ag-based coating can be manufactured as an optimal dressing for adjuvant wound therapy.

The influence of Mg in cell physiology has been well-demonstrated. Mg sulfate affected the viability and proliferation of the human gastric adenocarcinoma epithelial cell line in a dose-dependent manner from 3 to 50 mM concentrations [19]. The reduction in osteoclast activity was also reported at a high Mg concentration (>3 mM) [20]. We observed a low expression level of Mg in human wounds. The concept of elevated Mg levels in wound tissue fluids provides intriguing insights into wound healing processes. A related study emphasized that incorporating Mg into hydrogels promoted the differentiation of human skin fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, contributing to skin wound healing [21]. The findings from our study on the diverse distribution of Mg in the body offer valuable insights for developing innovative strategies to improve wound healing outcomes.

A comprehensive understanding of Mg in wound dressing is essential for optimizing its therapeutic benefits while minimizing potential adverse effects. The potential mechanism by which magnesium-based dressings enhance wound healing is the infiltration of magnesium ions from the dressing into the wound bed. However, further studies are necessary to confirm this proposed mechanism. The release kinetics and biological effects of Mg from wound dressings have not been studied. Our data indicated that the release of Mg peaked on day 3. However, the safety of Mg-containing dressings has raised concerns. Our study on the toxic effects of silver (Ag) and magnesium (Mg) in wound dressings followed a standard cell toxicity test following the ISO 10993-5 guidelines. Two different types of cell lines demonstrated high survival rates when exposed to different concentrations of Ag and Mg from the Mg-Ag-based dressings, indicating the absence of harmful extractables from Ag and Mg in the materials at the concentrations tested. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the cytotoxic effects of wound dressing components like Ag and Mg to ensure their safety and efficacy in promoting wound healing [22,23,24]. The synergistic effect of Ag and Mg on the viability of fibroblasts (NIH-3T3s) observed in our study was intriguing. Further research is warranted to investigate how Ag may enhance the effects of Mg.

The release of Mg and Ag is crucial to determining the bacteriostatic activity of the dressings. It is noteworthy that an effective concentration of silver for bactericidal activity typically ranges from 30 to 40 mg/L [17]. The maximum release potential of Mg (2 mM) and Ag (0.8 ppm) in the Ag200 + Mg100 dressing is sufficient to achieve 40% bacteriostatic activity against E. coli, which underscores the synergistic effect of Mg in augmenting the antibacterial efficacy of silver. This innovative concept suggests that the incorporation of magnesium can potentiate the antimicrobial effects of silver, offering a promising strategy for developing wound dressings with enhanced antibacterial properties and advancing the understanding of how different combinations of antimicrobial agents can work synergistically to combat microbial infections effectively. This study’s results provide valuable insights into the development of wound dressings with improved antimicrobial capabilities, paving the way for wound care management and infection control. However, further investigation is needed to compare the efficacy of Mg-Ag dressings with that of commercial Ag dressings.

Our in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated the promising role of the Mg-Ag-based dressings in enhancing wound healing. The process of wound healing involves various molecular regulators and chemoattractants that promote cell migration. Studies have shown that biosynthesized bacteria nanocellulose/silver nanocomposites can enhance wound healing by accelerating cell migration into the wound area, leading to faster closure of scratches [25]. The presence of Mg has been found to promote fibroblast migration and accelerate wound closure, highlighting its potential therapeutic benefits in enhancing the wound healing process [26]. Our results indicated that Mg might act through mechanisms that increase keratinocyte proliferation and neovascularization. Adequate levels of magnesium are essential for normal keratinocyte proliferation [27]. Magnesium supplementation can boost the expression of hyaluronan synthases, crucial enzymes involved in hyaluronic acid production, thereby improving skin hydration and aiding in wound healing [28]. Mg likely promotes keratinocyte proliferation by stimulating DNA and protein synthesis and modulating cell cycle regulators [29]. Additionally, Mg promotes neovascularization through multiple mechanisms, such as the enhancement of endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation, upregulating angiogenic genes, reducing oxidative stress, and creating a favorable wound microenvironment [30]. These properties make Mg a promising therapeutic target for improving vascularization in impaired wound healing and osseointegration, especially in the context of diabetes [30]. We developed the Mg-Ag dressing to improve wound healing through skin absorption. Research has demonstrated that magnesium can indeed be absorbed through the skin, offering a potential method for improving magnesium status in the body [31]. Although there is a lack of clinical validation for Mg-Ag dressings, a study conducted on patients with diabetic foot ulcers demonstrated that magnesium supplementation led to a significant improvement in wound healing compared to the placebo [32]. The potential effect of Mg-Ag dressings on chronic wound healing is promising. However, further research is necessary to fully understand the role of magnesium in wound healing. In summary, we have pioneered the utilization of Mg-Ag-based dressings for managing both acute and chronic wounds. Our research highlights the crucial role of magnesium in wound healing. Magnesium contributes significantly to this process by increasing keratinocyte proliferation and neovascularization. Furthermore, the Mg-Ag polyethylene material exhibits superior antibacterial properties, making it a promising candidate for the development of innovative wound dressings. Finally, the dressing’s efficiency was elucidated through in vitro and in vivo studies, which are schematically illustrated in Scheme 1.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ijms-25-09311-sch001.jpg

The schematic illustration of the effect of Mg-Ag-based dressing on wound healing. Mg-Ag-based dressing effectively promoted wound healing both in vitro and in vivo.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Samples

Concentrations of Mg in blood and wound tissue were measured in human participants. Patients were enrolled if they had acute or chronic wounds with obviously devitalized tissue. Exclusion criteria included cases not requiring wound debridement, wounds from malignant cancers, a propensity for bleeding, and pediatric patients. Wound samples were harvested from patients with acute wounds or chronic wounds under the standard wound debridement procedure. Serum for Mg quantification was collected on the same day as the wound tissues were harvested. To determine Mg concentration in wound tissue fluids, we combined the wound tissue samples in equal volumes with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA, Millipore, Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) buffer to remove unnecessary materials via centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The composition of the RIPA buffer included: 50 mM Tris-HCL at pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 (Igepal, Millipore, Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA), 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate. Mg concentrations in blood and wound fluid samples were examined using the colorimetric endpoint method with the diazonium salt xylidyl blue, using a Roche cobas c 702 machine (Basel, Switzerland). When magnesium reacts with the diazonium salt known as xylidyl blue, it forms a purple complex. This reaction causes a decrease in the absorbance of xylidyl blue, which is directly proportional to the magnesium concentration in the solution. The Mg level was expressed in mg/dL. Values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in this study, and all study procedures, including sample gathering and analysis, were approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (No. A-ER-112-173).

4.2. Mg and Ag Synthesized Materials

Magnesium-ion and silver-ion dressings were produced by KNH Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan. In brief, a non-woven polypropylene cloth was ionic sputter coated with pure Mg and/or Ag target on the sputter coater machine for 300 s at different times before scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation. In the combined Ag and Mg dressing, the silver ions were sputtered first, and then the magnesium ions were sputtered on top of it, so that the magnesium ions are on the outermost layer of the dressing. The thickness of the Mg coating was tested at 25, 50, 100, and 200 nm. The release concentration profile of the 100 nm group was the most ideal, so the following experiment used only the 100 nm as the Mg coating thickness. Two thicknesses of Ag coating, 200 and 2000 mg/m2, were fabricated in the pilot study. The groups investigated in this study were the control (polypropylene without ionic coating), Mg100 (only Mg coating at 100 nm), Ag200 + Mg100 (Ag coating at 200 mg/m2 and Mg coating at 100 nm), and Ag2000 + Mg100 (Ag coating at 2000 mg/m2 and Mg coating at 100 nm) groups.

4.3. Immersion Test

A part of the synthesized Mg100 or Ag200 + Mg100 dressing material, approximately 120 cm2 (N = 3), was immersed in 20 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) according to the ISO 10993-12:2021 standard [33] for sample preparation and reference materials. The materials were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 2, 6, 24, and 72 h, and the concentration of ions contained was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Perkin-Elmer-SCIEX, ELAN 6100 DRC II, Woodbridge, ON, Canada). The calibration, matrix matching, and instrument conditions were described as before [34]. Briefly, acetic acid was utilized as a carbon source at the optimum concentration of 10% v/v for matrix matching in the measurement of Mg and Ag. An ICP-MS multi-element standard solution served for external calibration, while rhodium was employed as an internal standard for all measurements. To prevent particle deposition in the sample introduction system, Triton X-100 (Sigma, Kawasaki-shi, Japan) was added to all solutions at a concentration of 0.1% v/v as a detergent. Calibration involved a four-point (blank and three standards) approach, executed in a straightforward linear mode.

4.4. Micrographs

The dressing underwent a sputtering process, where Ag and Mg ions were applied using a sputter coater machine for a duration of 300 s. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to examine the surface morphology of the dressing, while the energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was employed to analyze the elemental composition present on the surface of the coated dressing.

4.5. Surface Wettability

The contact angle goniometer (First Ten Angstroms, FTA-1000B, Portsmouth, VA, USA) was used to measure surface wettability. An amount of 5 µL deionized water was dropped on the surface of the dressing, and the surface wettability was measured by the contact angle meter. When the contact angle is lower, the surface is more hydrophilic. If the surface is hydrophobic, the contact angle will be greater than 90°.

4.6. Cell Culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs, P2 to P8, H-UV001, BCRC, Hsinchu, Taiwan) and mouse fibroblasts (NIH-3T3s, P3 to P5, 60008, BCRC, Taiwan) were used for the cell cytotoxicity and migration assays. HUVECs were cultured in medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1.5% heparin, 2.5% endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS), and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (AA). NIH-3T3s were cultured in medium containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin G, 100 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate, 1.25 g/mL amphotericin B, and 1% AA. Both types of cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

4.7. Cytotoxicity Assay

HUVECs and NIH-3T3s (5.0 × 103 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates and incubated overnight at 37 °C in an incubator with 5% CO2. After the cells adhered to the plate, the culture medium was replaced with six different media: one containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, serving as the positive control), another with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, serving as the negative control), and four test media with varying concentrations of Mg and Ag. These were incubated for an additional 24 h. The test media were prepared using extracts from Mg and Ag dressings. Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings were incubated with 20 mL of culture medium for 24 h to release Mg and Ag ions. After filtering, four different concentrations of Mg (0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM) and Ag (0.04, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 ppm) were diluted with 10% FBS for further experiments. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was used for the determination of the number of viable cells in cytotoxicity assays. An amount of 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent was added per well, the plates were wrapped in aluminum foil and placed in an incubator for 3 h in the dark. Cell viability was determined by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm using an ELISA reader. Cell viability can be calculated using the following formula:

(ODtest − ODblank)/(ODnegative − ODblank) × 100% = Cell viability

4.8. Antimicrobial Assay

The antimicrobial test was carried out according to ISO 10993-12:2021 and the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) specifications. The tested materials were immersed in PBS, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and then filtered to prepare a material extract. A strain of Escherichia coli (PT-FTDH5, Protech, Taipei, Taiwan) was selected for the antimicrobial assay. To prevent the risk of infection and ensure that the microbial load is within an acceptable range, the strain concentration was controlled to be below 100 CFU (colony-forming units) according to the USP (United States Pharmacopeia) specifications to ensure the safety and quality of our products. Extracts of tested materials, such as uncoated dressing, Mg100, Ag200 + Mg100, and commercial Ag dressing (Acticoat, Smith & Nephew, London, UK), were added to each tube along with the same volume of bacteria concentration and incubated for 16 h. An amount of 2 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB) was also added for bacterial growth. The experimental group was exposed to the same bacterial concentration and the corresponding extract concentration for 16 h. The optical density (OD) at the 600 nm absorption wavelength was measured using an ELISA reader to estimate the bacterial concentration in a liquid [35]. Analytical data can be obtained using the following formula:

(Experiment groups − Control group)/Control group × 100 = bacteriostatic activity (%)

4.9. Cell Migration Assay

Cell migration experiments were performed using a culture-insert (ibidi GmbH Gräfelfing, Germany). NIH-3T3s (2 × 104 cells/well) were seeded and cultured in a 37 °C incubator containing 5% CO2 until the cells’ growth was complete and without gaps. After the cells were confluent, the culture-insert could be removed to leave a 500 μm wide area in the well. The Mg100 and Ag200 + Mg100 dressings were incubated with 20 mL of culture medium for 24 h, then filtered, and 10% FBS was added to create the experimental solutions. The attached cells were fed with test solutions or control medium to observe cell migration. Following saline washes, the wound was photographed by an inverted optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at the time points of 0, 6, and 24 h.

4.10. Animals

Sprague–Dawley rats (male) were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan and were bred at the National Cheng Kung University animal center. The animal experimental protocol was carried out under the required conditions in accordance with the NCKU animal center standards and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval no: 107266). Diabetic rats were fed a high-fat diet with a 60% fat content. After 4 weeks of feeding, the rats were fasted for 3 days, anesthetized, and subjected to blood sampling from the tail vein (Roche blood glucose meter). Afterward, the rats were injected with streptozotocin 35 mg/kg through the tail vein. Measurement of plasma blood glucose in the fasting state was carried out on the second and sixth days after induction. Diabetes was successfully induced in rats when their fasting blood glucose levels exceeded 250 mg/dL.

4.11. Wound Healing Assay

The 5-week-old male SD rats were anesthetized and depilated. Four full-thickness excisional wounds were made on the dorsum of the mice on either side of the midline using a 10 mm biopsy punch. The wound edge was affixed to the underlying tissue using 4-0 nylon for four stitches to prevent skin retraction (Figure S6). Four wounds were randomly covered with uncoated polyethylene, Mg100, Ag200 + Mg100, and Ag2000 + Mg100 dressings, respectively, with the dressings replaced every other day. Each wound was digitally photographed and quantified at days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 using ImageJ software 1.48 (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), which was normalized to the original wound areas. The equation for percent wound closure is: Percent wound closure = (1 − wound area/original wound area) × 100%.

4.12. Immunohistochemistry and Histological Analysis

On day 9, the animals were sacrificed, and the wound skins were immersed in 10% formalin fixative for 3 days and then subjected to tissue fixation and waxing. The skin tissue was dehydrated and waxed, and then the tissue was embedded into a paraffin block by a paraffin tissue embedding machine. Typically, paraffin wax used in histology for embedding tissue samples has a melting point between 56 and 58 °C. After the tissue sections were cut from the paraffin block using a microtome (4–6 μm) [36], they were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Ki67, or CD31 to observe the structural state of the epithelial layer and the dermis layer of the wound healing site. H&E stain was observed through a microscope (Olympus BX 41 and Olympus E-M5II), and the sliced images taken under the objective lens 10× were edited into an entire wound section by Image Composite Editor. A range of 8 to 15 H&E staining images of each group was taken under the microscope objective 4×, the wound panoramic slice was edited by the computer software, and the wound distance and the total length of the epithelialization were measured by the computer software (Image Pro Plus version 7.1). The percentage of re-epithelialization in each group is as follows:

(Newly grown epithelial length)/(Wound length) × 100 = re-epithelialization (%)

The wound pathological sections were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using Ki67 (1:50) to analyze the changes in the number of newborn keratinocytes [37]. The keratinocytes (located in the basal layer) in the epithelialization site were observed under a microscope objective 40× as neonatal keratinocytes. In the quantitative analysis, a total of 3 staining images were taken from different locations in the wound healing area in each group. The position of the basal layer in each epithelial layer of each stain was observed, and the keratinocytes that showed a positive reaction within 200 μm were counted and quantitatively analyzed. Total blood vessel counts of wound skins were analyzed by CD31 (1:100). The number and size of blood vessels composed of vascular endothelial cells in the endothelial layer were observed under a microscope with a 20× objective. In the quantitative analysis, the stained image was measured by Image Pro Plus to measure the area occupied by each group of vascular endothelial cells and the area of the whole image, thereby converting the percentage of blood vessels in the whole image. The CD31 area was calculated by the following equation:

(area of blood vessel)/(area of each picture) × 100 = CD31 area (%)

4.13. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was computed using GraphPad Prism 5 statistical software. The absorbance values of the quantitative tests were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). Cell invasion area was calculated by Image J and the quantitative tests were expressed as mean ± SD. The wound photos were calculated using the digital image capture system software (Image Pro Plus) and expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM). The data analysis was carried out using a one-way ANOVA. The multiple comparison analysis was followed by Sidak’s post hoc test. When the p value is less than 0.05, it indicates a significant difference.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from KNH Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taiwan, and the Biomedicine Enterprise Acceleration Project by Central Taiwan Science Park, Taiwan.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25179311/s1.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by research grants from Taiwan’s National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 113-2314-B-006-002-). This research is financially funded by KNH Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taiwan, and the Biomedicine Enterprise Acceleration Project by Central Taiwan Science Park, Taiwan.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.-C.P., C.-K.H. and M.-L.Y.; Formal analysis: Y.-J.H. and C.-H.W.; Investigation: S.-C.P., C.-K.H. and M.-L.Y.; Data curation: Y.-J.H. and C.-H.W.; Supervision: M.-L.Y.; Original Draft Preparation: S.-C.P.; Writing—Review and Editing: M.-L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board at National Cheng Kung University Hospital (no. A-ER-112-173, 2023/7/13).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

1. Eming S.A., Krieg T., Davidson J.M. Inflammation in wound repair: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007;127:514–525. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700701. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Sorg H., Tilkorn D.J., Hager S., Hauser J., Mirastschijski U. Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts. Eur. Surg. Res. 2017;58:81–94. 10.1159/000454919. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Lansdown A.B., Mirastschijski U., Stubbs N., Scanlon E., Agren M.S. Zinc in wound healing: Theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:2–16. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00179.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Agren M.S., Chvapil M., Franzen L. Enhancement of re-epithelialization with topical zinc oxide in porcine partial-thickness wounds. J. Surg. Res. 1991;50:101–105. 10.1016/0022-4804(91)90230-J. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Bang R.L., Dashti H. Keloid and hypertrophic scars: Trace element alteration. Nutrition. 1995;11:527–531. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Jahnen-Dechent W., Ketteler M. Magnesium basics. Clin. Kidney J. 2012;5:i3–i14. 10.1093/ndtplus/sfr163. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Elin R.J. Assessment of magnesium status for diagnosis and therapy. Magnes. Res. 2010;23:S194–S198. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Banai S., Haggroth L., Epstein S.E., Casscells W. Influence of extracellular magnesium on capillary endothelial cell prolifera tion and migration. Circ. Res. 1990;67:645–650. 10.1161/01.RES.67.3.645. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Maier J.A., Malpuech-Brugere C., Zimowska W., Rayssiguier Y., Mazur A. Low magnesium promotes endothelial cell dys function: Implications for atherosclerosis, inflammation and thrombosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1689:13–21. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.01.002. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. De Mori A., Jones R.S., Cretella M., Cerri G., Draheim R.R., Barbu E., Tozzi G., Roldo M. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity Properties of Silver Nanowires and Their Composites with Carbon Nanotubes for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2303. 10.3390/ijms21072303. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Luceri A., Francese R., Lembo D., Ferraris M., Balagna C. Silver Nanoparticles: Review of Antiviral Properties, Mechanism of Action and Applications. Microorganisms. 2023;11:629. 10.3390/microorganisms11030629. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Holbrook R.D., Rykaczewski K., Staymates M.E. Dynamics of silver nanoparticle release from wound dressings revealed via in situ nanoscale imaging. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014;25:2481–2489. 10.1007/s10856-014-5265-6. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Benli B., Du H., Celik M.S. The anisotropic characteristics of natural fibrous sepiolite as revealed by contact angle, surface free energy, AFM and molecular dynamics simulation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012;408:22–31. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.04.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. ISO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2009. [Google Scholar]
15. Szweda P., Gorczyca G., Tylingo R. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of selected, commercially available wound dressing materials. J. Wound Care. 2018;27:320–326. 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.320. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Lin D.J., Hung F.Y., Yeh M.L., Lui T.S. Microstructure-modified biodegradable magnesium alloy for promoting cytocom patibility and wound healing in vitro. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2015;26:248. 10.1007/s10856-015-5572-6. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Warriner R., Burrell R. Infection and the chronic wound: A focus on silver. Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2005;18:2–12. 10.1097/00129334-200510001-00001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Wright J.B., Lam K., Buret A.G., Olson M.E., Burrell R.E. Early healing events in a porcine model of contaminated wounds: Effects of nanocrystalline silver on matrix metalloproteinases, cell apoptosis, and healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10:141–151. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10308.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Zhang X., Bo A., Chi B., Xia Y., Su X., Sun J. Magnesium sulfate induced toxicity in vitro in AGS gastric adenocarcinoma cells and in vivo in mouse gastric mucosa. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015;16:71–76. 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.1.71. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Maradze D., Musson D., Zheng Y., Cornish J., Lewis M., Liu Y. High magnesium corrosion rate has an effect on osteoclast and mesenchymal stem cell role during bone remodelling. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10003. 10.1038/s41598-018-28476-w. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Yang F., Xue Y., Wang F., Guo D., He Y., Zhao X., Yan F., Xu Y., Xia D., Liu Y. Sustained release of magnesium and zinc ions synergistically accelerates wound healing. Bioact. Mater. 2023;26:88–101. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.019. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Sethuram L., Thomas J., Mukherjee A., Chandrasekaran N. Effects and formulation of silver nanoscaffolds on cytotoxicity dependent ion release kinetics towards enhanced excision wound healing patterns in Wistar albino rats. RSC Adv. 2019;9:35677–35694. 10.1039/C9RA06913E. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Nesporova K., Pavlik V., Safrankova B., Vagnerova H., Odraska P., Zidek O., Cisarova N., Skoroplyas S., Kubala L., Velebný V. Effects of wound dressings containing silver on skin and immune cells. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:15216. 10.1038/s41598-020-72249-3. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Rigo C., Roman M., Munivrana I., Vindigni V., Azzena B., Barbante C., Cairns W.R. Characterization and evaluation of silver release from four different dressings used in burns care. Burns. 2012;38:1131–1142. 10.1016/j.burns.2012.06.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Moniri M., Boroumand Moghaddam A., Azizi S., Abdul Rahim R., Zuhainis S.W., Navaderi M., Mohamad R. In vitro mo lecular study of wound healing using biosynthesized bacteria nanocellulose/silver nanocomposite assisted by bioinformatics databases. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018;13:5097–5112. 10.2147/IJN.S164573. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Monsuur H.N., Boink M.A., Weijers E.M., Roffel S., Breetveld M., Gefen A., van den Broek L.J., Gibbs S. Methods to study differences in cell mobility during skin wound healing in vitro. J. Biomech. 2016;49:1381–1387. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.040. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Wolf F.I., Cittadini A. Magnesium in cell proliferation and differentiation. Front. Biosci. 1999;4:D607–D617. 10.2741/Wolf. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Marunaka K., Shu S., Kobayashi M., Goto M., Katsuta Y., Yoshino Y., Ikari A. Elevation of hyaluronan synthase by magne sium supplementation mediated through the activation of GSK3 and CREB in human keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:71. 10.3390/ijms23010071. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Littlefield N.A., Hass B.S., McGarrity L.J., Morris S.M. Effect of magnesium on the growth and cell cycle of transformed and non-transformed epithelial rat liver cells in vitro. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 1991;7:203–214. 10.1007/BF00250975. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Liu L., Wang F., Song W., Zhang D., Lin W., Yin Q., Wang Q., Li H., Yuan Q., Zhang S. Magnesium promotes vascularize tion and osseointegration in diabetic states. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2024;16:10. 10.1038/s41368-023-00271-y. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Grober U., Werner T., Vormann J., Kisters K. Myth or Reality-Transdermal Magnesium? Nutrients. 2017;9:813. 10.3390/nu9080813. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Afzali H., Jafari Kashi A.H., Momen-Heravi M., Razzaghi R., Amirani E., Bahmani F., Gilasi H.R., Asemi Z. The effects of magnesium and vitamin E co-supplementation on wound healing and metabolic status in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27:277–284. 10.1111/wrr.12701. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Materials. ISO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2021. [Google Scholar]
34. Forrer R., Gautschi K., Lutz H. Simultaneous measurement of the trace elements Al, As, B, Be, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Rb, Se, Sr, and Zn in human serum and their reference ranges by ICP-MS. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2001;80:77–93. 10.1385/BTER:80:1:77. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Hazan R., Que Y.-A., Maura D., Rahme L.G. A method for high throughput determination of viable bacteria cell counts in 96-well plates. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:259. 10.1186/1471-2180-12-259. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Masuda T., Kawaguchi J., Oikawa H., Yashima A., Suzuiki K., Sato S., Satodate R. How thick are the paraffin-embedded tissue sections routinely prepared in laboratory? A morphometric study using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Pathol. Int. 1998;48:179–183. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1998.tb03890.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Coger V., Million N., Rehbock C., Sures B., Nachev M., Barcikowski S., Wistuba N., Strauss S., Vogt P.M. Tissue Concentrations of Zinc, Iron, Copper, and Magnesium During the Phases of Full Thickness Wound Healing in a Rodent Model. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019;191:167–176. 10.1007/s12011-018-1600-y. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)