Main text

(Cell Genomics 3, 100436.e1-e6; December 13, 2023)

In Table S2 of our originally published paper, we identified 8 loci where the most significant variant listed was incorrect due the digit underflow (i.e., the p values were so small [<1.0 × 10⁻³⁰⁰] that the software we used could not distinguish between them). As a result, these 8 loci either correctly listed the most significant variant with a p value of 0 or listed a variant that is not the most significant but with a p value of 0.

To amend this, we have revised the entries for these 8 loci with the corrected most significant variants. We also made changes to the columns “nSNPs,” “nGWASSNPs,” “nIndSigSNPs,” “IndSigSNPs,” “nLeadSNPs,” and “LeadSNPs” for 5 of the 8 loci (new unique ID for the loci: 4:9995256:A:G, 2:234671462:T:G, 17:80697458:C:T, 19:45412079:C:T, and 19:45412079:C:T) due to the change of the identified most significant variant. Table S2 has now been updated online. These changes do not affect any other materials, the interpretation of the results, or the overall conclusions of our manuscript. The authors apologies for the inconvenience caused by the errors.