Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.
Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please
turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.
This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your
personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing
to this as outlined in our
privacy notice and cookie policy.
1.
Living with Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; and Summer Foundation, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Authors
Cubis L
1
D'Cruz K
1
Topping M
1
Winkler D
1
Douglas J
1
(5 authors)
2.
Living with Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; and School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; and School of Information and Communication Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Authors
McDonald S
2
(1 author)
3.
Living with Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Authors
Dean P
3
Ramme R
3
(2 authors)
4.
Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, Caulfield South, Vic, Australia.
Brain Impairment : a Multidisciplinary Journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment,
01 Aug 2024, 25:IB23102 https://doi.org/10.1071/ib23102PMID: 39094010
Share this article
Share with emailShare with twitterShare with linkedinShare with facebook
Abstract
Background People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have unique housing and support needs that are essential for maintaining independence at home; however, there is limited research to guide the design of community living options for this population. The aim of this study was to examine housing and support needs and preferences of people with MS with the intention to inform the planning of a co-designed intervention based on the study's findings. Methods Using the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework, quantitative (n =79) and qualitative (n =6) data from people with MS were extracted and integrated from projects completed by the research team that explored the housing and support needs and preferences of people with disability. Results were synthesised and presented to a reference group for validation, contextualisation, and adaptation to the Australian context. Results High physical support needs were common across participants. People most commonly required home modifications to improve accessibility, such as ramps, equipment such as heating and cooling, and assistive technology. Many people required more than 8 hours per day of paid support. Moving into individualised housing facilitated independence and community reintegration. People reported gaps between what they wanted from support workers and what they received, citing individual and systemic barriers. Conclusion People with MS have support needs that require proactive and responsive funding arrangements, housing design and support provision. In line with KTA principles, findings will inform the planning of a co-designed intervention that involves people with lived experience of MS and other stakeholders to influence policy and improve home and living outcomes for this population.