Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

ILCOR pediatric life support recommendations translation to constituent council guidelines: An emphasis on similarities and differences.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
      Authors
    • Shepard LN 1
    (1 author)
  • 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
      Authors
    • Nadkarni VM 2
    (1 author)
  • 3. Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
      Authors
    • Ng KC 3
    • Ong GY 3
    (2 authors)
  • 4. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
      Authors
    • Scholefield BR 4
    (1 author)

ORCIDs linked to this article

Resuscitation, 21 May 2024, 201:110247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110247 PMID: 38777078 

Abstract 

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) performs rigorous scientific evidence evaluation and publishes Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations. These evidence-based recommendations are incorporated by ILCOR constituent resuscitation councils to inform regional guidelines, and further translated into training approaches and materials and implemented by laypersons and healthcare providers in- and out-of-hospital. There is variation in council guidelines as a result of the weak strength of evidence and interpretation. In this manuscript, we highlight ten important similarities and differences in regional council pediatric resuscitation guidelines, and further emphasize three differences that identify key knowledge gaps and opportunity for "natural experiments."

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110247

Citations & impact 

This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/166935470
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/166935470

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.