Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Exploring the molecular basis of disease severity in rare disease scenarios is a challenging task provided the limitations on data availability. Causative genes have been described for Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS), a group of diverse minority neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders; yet a molecular explanation for the phenotypic severity differences remains unclear. Here, we present a workflow to explore the functional relationships between CMS causal genes and altered genes from each patient, based on multilayer network community detection analysis of complementary biomedical information provided by relevant data sources, namely protein-protein interactions, pathways and metabolomics. Our results show that CMS severity can be ascribed to the personalized impairment of extracellular matrix components and postsynaptic modulators of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clustering. This work showcases how coupling multilayer network analysis with personalized -omics information provides molecular explanations to the varying severity of rare diseases; paving the way for sorting out similar cases in other rare diseases.

Free full text 


Logo of ncommsLink to Publisher's site
Nat Commun. 2024; 15: 1227.
Published online 2024 Feb 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45099-0
PMCID: PMC10902324
PMID: 38418480

Rare disease research workflow using multilayer networks elucidates the molecular determinants of severity in Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Exploring the molecular basis of disease severity in rare disease scenarios is a challenging task provided the limitations on data availability. Causative genes have been described for Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS), a group of diverse minority neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders; yet a molecular explanation for the phenotypic severity differences remains unclear. Here, we present a workflow to explore the functional relationships between CMS causal genes and altered genes from each patient, based on multilayer network community detection analysis of complementary biomedical information provided by relevant data sources, namely protein-protein interactions, pathways and metabolomics. Our results show that CMS severity can be ascribed to the personalized impairment of extracellular matrix components and postsynaptic modulators of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clustering. This work showcases how coupling multilayer network analysis with personalized -omics information provides molecular explanations to the varying severity of rare diseases; paving the way for sorting out similar cases in other rare diseases.

Subject terms: Molecular medicine, Data integration, Prognostic markers

Introduction

Understanding phenotypic severity is crucial for prediction of disease outcomes, as well as for administration of personalized treatments. Different severity levels among patients presenting the same medical condition could be explained by characteristic relationships between diverse molecular entities (i.e. gene products, metabolites, etc) in each individual. In this setting, multi-omics data integration is becoming a promising tool for research, as it has the potential to gain complex insights of the molecular determinants underlying disease heterogeneity. However, even in a scenario where the level of biomedical detail available to study is steadily growing1, the analysis of the molecular determinants of disease severity is not typically addressed in rare disease research literature2, despite its obvious relevance at the medical and clinical level. Rare diseases represent a challenging setting for the application of precision medicine because, by definition, they affect a small number of patients, and therefore the data available for study is considerably limited in comparison to other conditions. Accordingly, leveraging the wealth of biomedical knowledge of diverse nature coming from publicly available databases has the potential to address data limitations in rare diseases3,4. In this sense, multilayer networks can offer a holistic representation of biomedical data resources5,6, which may allow exploration of the biology related to a given disease independently of cohort sizes and their available omics data.

Here, in order to evaluate and demonstrate the potential of multilayer networks as means of assessing severity in rare disease scenarios, we provide an illustrative case where we develop a framework for analyzing a patient cohort affected by Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS), a group of inherited rare disorders of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Fatigable weakness is a common hallmark of these syndromes, that affects approximately 1 patient in 150,000 people worldwide. The inheritance of CMS is autosomal recessive in the majority of patients. CMS can be considered a relevant use case because, while patients share similar clinical and genetic features7, phenotypic severity of CMS varies greatly, with patients experiencing a range of muscle weakness and movement impairment. While over 30 genes are known to be monogenic causes of different forms of CMS (Table 1), these genes do not fully explain the ample range of observed severities, which has been suggested to be determined by additional factors involved in neuromuscular function. Examples of CMS-related genes are AGRN, LRP4 and MUSK encoding for proteins that mediate communication between the nerve ending and the muscle, which is crucial for formation and maintenance of the NMJ (Fig. 1).

Table 1

Location, phenotype, inheritance and genes involved in CMS (adapted from https://omim.org/phenotypicSeries/PS601462 and http://www.musclegenetable.fr)

LocationPhenotypeInheritanceGene
2q31.1CMS1A, slow-channelADCHRNA1
2q31.1CMS1B, fast-channelAR, AD
17p13.1CMS2A, slow-channelADCHRNB1
17p13.1CMS2C, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiencyAR
2q37.1CMS3 A, slow-channelADCHRND
2q37.1CMS3 B, fast-channelAR
2q37.1CMS3 C, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiencyAR
17p13.2CMS4 A, slow-channelAR, ADCHRNE
17p13.2CMS4 B, fast-channelAR
17p13.2CMS4 C, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiencyAR
3p25.1CMS5ARCOLQ
10q11.23CMS6, presynapticARCHAT
1q32.1CMS7, presynapticADSYT2
1p36.33CMS8, with pre- and postsynaptic defectsARAGRN
9q31.3CMS9, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiencyARMUSK
4p16.3CMS10ARDOK7
11p11.2CMS11, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiencyARRAPSN
2p13.3CMS12, with tubular aggregatesARGFPT1
11q23.3CMS13, with tubular aggregatesARDPAGT1
9q22.33CMS14, with tubular aggregatesARALG2
1p21.3CMS15, without tubular aggregatesARALG14
17q23.3CMS16ARSCN4A
11p11.2CMS17ARLRP4
20p12.2CMS18ADSNAP25
10q22.1CMS19ARCOL13A1
2q12.3CMS20, presynapticARSLC5A7
10q11.23CMS21, presynapticARSLC18A3
2p21CMS22ARPREPL
22q11.21CMS23, presynapticARSLC25A1
15q23CMS24, presynapticARMYO9A
12p13.31CMS25, presynapticARVAMP1
3p21.31CMS, related to GMPPBARGMPBB
20q13.33CMS, presynapticARLAMA5
3p21.31CMS, with nephrotic syndromeARLAMB2
8q24.3CMS, with plectin defectARPLEC
12q24.13CMS, related to RPH3AARRPH3A
9p13.3CMS, presynaptic, related to MUNC13-1ARUNC13B
2q37.1Escobar syndromeARCHRNG

AR autosomal recessive, AD autosomal dominant.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41467_2024_45099_Fig1_HTML.jpg
A schematic depiction of the main molecular activities of known Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS) causal genes (Methods) taking place at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) in the presynaptic terminal (in blue), synaptic cleft (in white), and skeletal muscle fiber (in red) (for a detailed description of this system see Supplementary Information, Functions of CMS-associated genes in the neuromuscular junction).

ChAT Choline O-Acetyltransferase, LRP4 LDL Receptor Related Protein 4, AChR Acetylcholine Receptor, MuSK Muscle Associated Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, Na(V) 1.4 Nav1.4 voltage-gated sodium channel.

In particular, the AGRN-LRP4 receptor complex activates MUSK by phosphorylation, inducing clustering of the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in the postsynaptic membrane. This allows the presynaptic release of acetylcholine (ACh) to trigger muscle contraction8,9. Additional evidence of CMS severity heterogeneity emerged within the NeurOmics and RD-Connect projects10 studying a small population (about 100 individuals) that were described in the original publication as being of ‘gypsy’ ethnic origin, from Bulgaria.

All affected individuals shared the same causal homozygous mutation (a deletion within the AChR ε subunit, CHRNE c.1327delG11). However, the severity of symptoms across this cohort varies considerably regardless of age, gender and initiated therapy, suggesting the existence of additional genetic causes for the diversity of disease phenotypes. By analyzing multi-omics data, we performed an in-depth characterization of 20 CMS patients, representing the two opposite ends of the spectrum observed in the wider cohort, aiming to investigate the molecular bases of the observed differences in the individual severity of the disease. Clinically, CMS severity ranges from minor symptoms (e.g., exercise intolerance) to more severe CMS forms depending on the causal genetic impairments12,13. Severe CMS is typically presented with reduced Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), severe generalized muscle fatigue and weakness, proximal and bulbar muscle fatigue and weakness, impaired myopathic gait and hyperlordosis. Two CMS severity levels have been identified for this cohort through extensive phenotyping, namely a severe disease phenotype (8 patients) and a not-severe disease phenotype (2 intermediate and 10 mild patients) (Supplementary Dataset 1). Out of the tested demographic factors (age, sex) and clinical tests (speech, mobility, respiratory dysfunctions, among others), FVC and shoulder lifting ability show a significant association with the severity classes (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test p = 0.0128 and p = 0.0418, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 1). We sought to interrogate whether severity was determined by additional genetic variations impacting neuromuscular activity, on top of the causative CHRNE mutation. We analyzed three main types of genetic variations: single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), copy number variations (CNVs), and compound heterozygous variants (two recessive alleles located at different loci within the same gene in a given individual). The extensive analysis of the genomic information did not render any SNPs that could be considered a unique cause of disease severity by being common to all the cases. Nevertheless, a number of CNVs and compound heterozygous variants were found to appear exclusively in the different severity groups, in one or more patients. Moreover, the compound heterozygous variants of the severe group are enriched in pathways related to the extracellular matrix (ECM) receptors, which have been proposed as a target for CMS therapy14.

To investigate the functional relationship between these variants and CMS severity, we designed an analytical workflow based on multilayer networks (Fig. 2), allowing the integration of external biological knowledge to acquire deeper functional insights. A multilayer network consists of several layers of nodes and edges describing different aspects of a system15. In biomedicine, this data representation has been used to study biomolecular interactions16 and diseases6, facilitating integration and interpretation of heterogeneous sources of data. Several established tools for network analysis have been recently adapted for multilayer networks, such as random walk with restart17,18, community detection algorithms19 and node embeddings20. By crossing patient genomic data with the information provided by a multilayer network encompassing biomedical knowledge, we are able to describe the functional relationships of new genetic modifiers responsible for the different phenotypic severity levels, showcasing the potential of multilayer networks to provide support on the analysis of rare disease patients.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41467_2024_45099_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Analytical workflow designed to address the severity of a cohort of patients affected by Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes (CMS).

A multi-scale functional analysis approach, based on multilayer networks, was used to identify the functional relationships between genetic alterations obtained from omics data (Whole Genome Sequencing, WGS; RNA-sequencing, RNAseq) with known CMS causal genes. In green, compound heterozygous variants; in yellow, copy number variants (CNVs); in purple, known CMS causal genes. Modules of CMS linked genes are detected using graph community detection at a resolution range (γ) (Methods) where the most prominent changes in community structure occur. Modules that emerged from this analysis were characterized at single individual level.

Results

Variants do not segregate with patient severity

We first searched for variants able to segregate the disease phenotypes (severe and not-severe) by analyzing a large panel of mutational events (mutations in isoforms, splicing sites, small and long noncoding genes, promoters, transcription start site (TSS), predicted pathogenic mutations, loss of function mutations, among others). We could not find one single mutation or combinations of mutations that were able to completely segregate the two groups (Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. S1) although partial segregation can be observed (Suppl. Dataset 2). As already described for monogenic diseases21 and cancer22, we hypothesized that distinct weak disease-promoting effects may represent patient-specific causes to CMS severity, which bring damage to sets of genes that are functionally related. To find these effects, we sought to search for variants with the potential to alter gene functions, such as CNVs and compound heterozygous variants, which have been previously reported to be key to CMS12,2325.

Compound heterozygous variants are functionally related

In order to explore the hypothesis that disease severity in this cohort may be due to variants in patient-specific critical elements, we sought to identify potentially damaging compound heterozygous variants and CNVs. We analyzed the gene lists associated with these mutations to search for evidence of alterations in relevant pathways for the severe (n = 8) and not-severe cases (n = 12). We first performed a functional enrichment analysis (Methods) of the genes with CNVs found in the two groups. The set of affected genes in the severe group is composed of 26 unique genes (10 private to the severe group), while the not-severe group presented 86 unique genes (Supplementary Dataset 3). None of these gene sets showed any functional enrichment. Moreover, none of these genes had been described as causal for CMS, and none carried compound heterozygous variants (Supplementary Fig. 2). As for compound heterozygous variants, the set of affected genes in the severe group is composed of 112 unique genes (89 private to the severe group), while the not-severe group resulted in 152 unique genes (Supplementary Dataset 3). We found that the severe group shows significant enrichment in genes belonging to extracellular matrix (ECM) pathways, in particular ECM receptor interactions (KEGG hsa04512, p adjusted = 0.002337) and ECM proteoglycans (Reactome R-HSA-30001787, p adjusted = 0.001237), which are the top-hit pathways when the 89 genes appearing only in the severe group are considered. Both these pathways share common genes, namely TNXB, LAMA2, TNC, and AGRN. The role of extracellular matrix proteins for the formation and maintenance of the NMJ has recently drawn attention to the study of CMS26,27. In particular, within the genes linked with ECM pathways, AGRN and LAMA2 stand out for their implication in CMS and other rare neuromuscular diseases2830. ECM-related pathways are not enriched in the not-severe set of genes (KEGG hsa04512, p adjusted = 0.6170). Moreover, top-hit pathways of the not-severe set of genes are not explicitly related to ECM and not consistent between Reactome and KEGG (Reactome Susceptibility to colorectal cancer R-HSA-5083636, p adjusted = 4.131e−7, genes MUC3A/5B/12/16/17/19; KEGG Huntington’s disease hsa05016, p adjusted = 0.07103, genes REST, CREB3L4, CLTCL1, DNAH2/8/10/11). These findings support our hypothesis that the severe patients might present disruptions in NMJ functionally related genes that, combined with CHRNE causative alteration, may be responsible for the worsening of symptoms.

CMS-specific monolayer and multilayer community detection

As disease-related genes tend to be interconnected31, we sought to analyze the relationships among the CMS linked genes (i.e. known CMS causal genes, and severe and not-severe compound heterozygous variants and CNVs; Methods) using network community clustering analysis. We employed the Louvain algorithm (Methods) to find groups of interrelated genes in three monolayer networks that represent biological knowledge contained in databases, separately: the Reactome database32, the Recon3D Virtual Metabolic Human database33, and from the Integrated Interaction Database (IID)34 (Supplementary Fig. 3). The first network consists of 10,618 nodes (genes) and 875,436 edges, representing shared pathways between genes. The second network consists of 1863 nodes (genes) and 902,188 edges, representing shared reaction metabolites between genes. The third network consists of 18,018 nodes (genes) and 947,606 edges, representing aggregated protein-protein interactions from all tissues (Methods: Monolayer community detection). The last two networks, represent the ‘metabolome’ and the ‘interactome’ data, respectively. Measurement of network overlap and community similarity (Methods) revealed high specificity of their edges, as well as that the same CMS linked genes did not form the same communities across the different networks (Supplementary Fig. 4).

These results show that, although disease-related genes are prone to form well-defined communities in distinct networks35,36, different facets of biological information reflect diverse participation modalities of such genes into communities. In order to deliver an integrated analysis of such heterogeneous information, we further consider them as a multilayer network5 (Methods: Monolayer community detection and Multilayer community detection).

Large-scale multilayer community detection of disease associated genes

We first sought to test the hypothesis that disease-related genes tend to be part of the same communities also in a multilayer network setting. We used the curated gene-disease associations database DisGeNET37, showing that disease-associated genes are significantly found to be members of the same multilayer communities (Wilcoxon test p < 0.001 in a range of resolution parameters described in the Methods). We pre-processed DisGeNET database by filtering out diseases and disease groups with only one associated gene (6352 diseases), and those whose number of associated genes was more than 1.5 * interquartile range (IQR) of the gene associated per disease distribution (823 diseases with more than 33 associated genes) (Supplementary Fig. 5A, B). This procedure prevents a possible analytical bias due to the higher amounts of genes annotated to specific disease groups (e.g. entry C4020899, Autosomal recessive predisposition, annotates 1445 genes). We then retrieved the communities of each associated gene, excluding 428 genes not present in our multilayer network and the diseases left with only one associated gene. The final analysis comprised a total of 5892 diseases with an average number of 7.38 genes per disease.

For each disease, we counted the number of times that disease-associated genes are found in the same multilayer communities, and compared the distribution of such frequencies with that of balanced random associations (1000 randomizations). Results show that disease-associated genes are significantly found in the same multilayer communities across the resolution interval (Suppl. Figure 5C).

Modules within the CMS multilayer communities

We define a module as a group of CMS linked genes that are systematically found to be part of the same multilayer community while increasing the multilayer network community resolution parameter (Methods; Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. S2; Figs. 3 and and44).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41467_2024_45099_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Identification of the largest module containing genes that are found in the same community in a range of modularity resolution (Methods).

In each module, genes are connected if they are found in the same multilayer communities at n values of the resolution parameter γ within the range under consideration (γ [set membership] (0,4]). The arrows indicate the systematic increase of n. At n = 8, the module contains genes that are always found in the same community in the entire range of resolution (see Supplementary Information, Multilayer community detection analysis). The largest module containing the CMS linked gene set (highlighted in red), which includes known CMS causal genes, severe-specific heterozygous compound variants and CNVs, is shown. Source data are provided in the Github repository of the project (see Data Availability section).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41467_2024_45099_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Largest multilayer network modules containing known CMS causal genes.

The largest modules, containing known CMS causal genes, within the multilayer communities of CMS linked genes specific to the not-severe (A) and severe (B) groups are reported. In green, compound heterozygous variants; in yellow, CNVs; in purple, known CMS causal genes. Being a CMS causal gene bearing compound heterozygous variants, AGRN is depicted using both green and purple. Source Cytoscape session is provided in the Github repository of the project (see Data Availability section).

Within each of these communities, we identified smaller modules of CMS linked genes that are specific to the severe and not-severe groups. We tested the significance of obtaining these exact genes in the severe and not-severe largest modules upon severity class label shuffling among all individuals (1000 randomizations). We found that 13 (p adjusted = 0.022) and 14 (p adjusted = 0.027) are the minimum number of genes composing the modules that are not expected to be found at random in the severe and not-severe largest components, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 6).

In the two groups, the significantly largest module that contains known CMS causal genes is composed of 15 genes (Fig. 4). 6 out of these 15 are previously described CMS causal genes (Methods), namely the ECM heparan sulfate proteoglycan agrin (AGRN); the cytoskeleton component plectin (PLEC), causative of myasthenic disease38; the agrin receptor LRP4, key for AChR clustering at NMJ39 and causative of CMS by compound heterozygous variants40; the ECM components LAMA5 and LAMB2 laminins, and COL13A1 collagen. Considering all nodes (not only CMS linked), the number of nodes in the module is 482. All the other genes of the two modules are involved in a varied spectrum of muscular dysfunctions, discussed in the following sections. As the location of the causal gene products determine the most common classification of the disease (i.e. presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic CMS)27, we determined class and localization of the members of the found modules (Table 2).

Table 2

Localization and functions of proteins encoded by the genes found in the largest modules of the multilayer communities of severe and not-severe groups

Activity localizationClassCMS causal genePhenotype groupFunctionSynaptic localization
(Manual curation)
Localization (UniProt)
Not-severeSevere
ECM (ECM)ProteoglycansAGRNAGRNCell hydration and growth factor trapping

Pre- and postsynaptic

(PMID:

29462312)

Synaptic basal lamina/ECM
HSPG2

Basement membrane

(PMID:30453502)

Basement membrane/ECM
VCAN

ECM

(PMID:29211034)

ECM
COL15A1

Basement membrane

(PMID:26937007)

ECM
CollagensCOL13A1Structural support

Basement membrane

(PMID:

30768864)

Post-synaptic cell membrane
COL6A5

Basement membrane

(PMID:23869615)

Extracellular matrix
LamininsLAMA5Web-like structures

Pre-synaptic

(PMID:28544784)

Basement membrane/ECM
LAMB2

Basement membrane

(PMID:27614294)

Basement membrane/ECM/Synaptic cleft
LAMB4

Myenteric plexus basement membrane

(PMID:

28595269)

Basement membrane/ECM
LAMA2

Pre-synaptic

(PMID:9396756)

Basement membrane/ECM
USH2A

Neuronal projection of stereocilia

(PMID:19023448)

Stereocilia membrane/Secreted

(Extracellular region)

FibulinsHMCN1Scaffolding

Glomerular Extracellular matrix

(PMID:

29488390)

Basement membrane/ECM
TenascinsTNCAnti-adhesion

Basement membrane

(PMID:

29466693)

ECM/Perisynaptic ECM (Ensembl)
TNXB

Basement membrane

(PMID:

23768946)

ECM
LOXL3Collagen assembly

Basement membrane

(PMID:26954549)

Secreted

(extracellular region)

ADAMTS9Proteoglycan cleavage

Secreted to ECM

(PMID:30626608)

ECM
ADAM28

ECM

(PMID:24613731)

Cell membrane/Secreted

(extracellular region)

NeuropeptidesCHGBRegulatory peptides precursor

Pre- and postsynaptic

(PMID:7526287)

Secreted

(extracellular region)

OthersITIH5Hyaluronic acid binding

ECM

(PMID:27143355)

Secreted

(extracellular region)

Cell surfaceReceptorsMSR1Proteoglycan and collagen binding

Macrophage surface Scavenger Receptor

(PMID:12488451)

Plasma membrane
MCAM

Plasma membrane

(PMID:28923978)

Plasma membrane
LRP4Laminin binding

Post-synaptic

(PMID:25319686)

Post-synaptic cell membrane
CytoplasmCytoskeletonPLECStructural support

Post-synaptic

(PMID:20624679)

Post-synaptic cytoskeleton

Synaptic localization was retrieved from manual curation and Uniprot database (Methods).

Laminins, well-known CMS glycoproteins, are affected in both severe (LAMA2, USH2A) and not-severe (LAMB4) groups, and are bound by specific receptors that are damaged in the not-severe group (MCAM)41. Collagens, known CMS-related factors, are associated with the not-severe group (COL6A5), and bound by specific receptors that are damaged in the not-severe group (MSR1)42.

However, overall collagen biosynthesis is affected in both severe and not-severe groups. Indeed, metalloproteinases, damaged in the not-severe group, are responsible for the proteolytic processing of lysyl oxidases (LOXL3), which are implicated in collagen biosynthesis43 and damaged in the severe group. Alterations in proteoglycans (AGRN, HSPG2, VCAN, COL15A1)44, tenascins (TNC, TNXB)45,46, and chromogranins (CHGB)47 are specific of the severe group. We observed no genes associated with proteoglycan damage in the not-severe group, suggesting a direct involvement of ECM in CMS severity.

Personalized analysis of the severe cases

We sought to analyze the 15 genes of the largest module of the severe group in each one of the 8 patients, hereafter referred to using the WGS sample labels (Supplementary Dataset 1). At the topological level, all incident interactions existing between the genes of the severe module (Fig. 4B) are related to the protein-protein interaction and pathway layers (Fig. 5). Overall, these genes have a varied range of expression levels in tissues of interest (Supplementary Fig. 7), for instance in skeletal muscle HSPG2, LAMA2, PLEC and LAMB2 show medium expression levels (9 to 107 TPM) while the others show low expression levels (0.6 to 9 TPM) (Methods). Patient 2, a 15 years old male, presents compound heterozygous variants in tenascin C (TNC), mediating acute ECM response in muscle damage45,48, and CNVs (specifically, a partial heterozygous copy number loss) in usherin (USH2A), which have been associated with hearing and vision loss49. Patient 16, a 25 years old female, presents compound variants in tenascin XB (TNXB), which is mutated in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a disease that has already been reported to have phenotypic overlap with muscle weakness5053 and whose compound heterozygous variants have been reported for a primary myopathy case54,55; and versican (VCAN), which has been suggested to modify tenascin C expression56 and is upregulated in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models57,58. Patient 13, a 26 years old male, presents compound mutations in laminin α2 chain (LAMA2), a previously reported gene related to various muscle disorders5961 whose mutations cause reduction of neuromuscular junction folds62, and collagen type XV α chain (COL15A1), which is involved in guiding motor axon development63 and functionally linked to a skeletal muscle myopathy64,65. Patient 12, a 49 years old female, presents compound mutations in chromogranin B4 (CHGB), potentially associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis early onset66,67. Patient 18, a 51 years old man, presents compound mutations in agrin (AGRN), a CMS causal gene that mediates AChR clustering in the skeletal fiber membrane68,69. Patient 20, a 57 years old male, presents compound mutations in lysyl oxidase-like 3 (LOXL3), involved in myofiber extracellular matrix development by improving integrin signaling through fibronectin oxidation and interaction with laminins70, and perlecan (HSPG2)71, a protein present on skeletal muscle basal lamina72,73, whose deficiency leads to muscular hypertrophy74, that is also mutated in Schwartz-Jampel syndrome75, Dyssegmental dysplasia Silverman-Handmaker type (DDSH)76 and fibrosis77, such as Patient 19, a 62 years old female. Furthermore, based on the estimated familial relatedness (Methods) and personal communication (February 2018, Teodora Chamova), patients 19 and 20 are siblings (Supplementary Dataset 4).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41467_2024_45099_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Incident interactions between the genes identified in the severe-specific module in the multilayer network.

LOXL3 is not depicted as it has incident interactions with genes in the module that are not CMS linked. USH2A is not present in the pathways layer, thus it is only depicted in the protein-protein interaction layer.

Functional consequences of variants in the severe-specific module

Studying the functional impact of the compound heterozygous variants in the severe-specific genes of the module, we observed that in 6 of the 8 patients at least one of the variants is predicted to be deleterious by the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP)78 (Methods; Supplementary Dataset 5). For example, as for Patient 18, who presents 3 different variants in AGRN gene, only rs200607541 is predicted to be deleterious by VEP’s Condel (score = 0.756), SIFT (score = 0.02), and PolyPhen (score = 0.925). In particular, the variant (C > T transition) presents an allele frequency (AF) of 4.56E−03 (gnomAD exomes)79 and affects a region encoding a position related to a EGF-like domain (SMART:SM00181) and a Follistatin-N-terminal like domain (SMART:SM00274). Both of these domains are part of the Kazal domain superfamily which is specially found in the extracellular part of agrins (PFAM: CL0005)80,81. On the other hand, Patient 16 presents a total of 38 TNXB transcripts affected by three gene variants (rs201510617, rs144415985, rs367685759) that are all predicted to be deleterious by the three scoring systems, have allele frequencies of 3.17E−02, 4.83E−02 and 5.90E−03, respectively; and in overall, are affecting two conserved domains. The first consists of a fibrinogen related domain that is present in most types of tenascins (SMART:SM00186), while the second is a fibronectin type 3 domain (SMART:SM00060) that is found in various animal protein families such as muscle proteins and extracellular-matrix molecules82. Two of the severe patients (Patients 12 and 19) present severe-only specific compound heterozygous variants that are not predicted to be deleterious. However, one variant in the CHGB gene (rs742710, AF = 1.07E−01), present in patient 12, has been previously reported to be potentially causative for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis early onset66,67. This gene has also been strongly suggested in literature as a possible marker for onset prediction in multiple sclerosis83, and other related neural diseases like Parkinson’s84 and Alzheimer’s disease85. As for Patient 19, the variant rs146309392 (AF = 8.40E−04) in the gene HSPG2 has been previously referred to be causal of Dyssegmental dysplasia as a compound heterozygous mutation76. This variant, as pointed out before, is shared with sibling patient 20. One severe individual (Patient 3), a 37 years old female, does not carry compound heterozygous variants included in this module but others at a lower resolution parameter value (Supplementary Fig. 8; Supplementary Dataset 6). Interestingly, most of the genes carrying severe-specific deleterious compound heterozygous variants in this patient (CDH3, FAAP100, FCGBP, GFY, RPTN) are not related to processes at the NMJ level8690. Nevertheless, three of these variants occur in genes potentially involved in NMJ functionality. In particular, variants rs111709242 (AF = 2.64E−03) and rs77975665 (AF = 3.03E−02) affect gene PPFIBP2, which encodes a member of the liprin family (liprin-β) that has been described to control synapse formation and postsynaptic element development91,92. Furthermore, the variant rs111709242 is predicted to be deleterious by the SIFT algorithm (see Supplementary Dataset 6). Interestingly, PPFIBP2 appears in modules at lower resolution parameter values associated with known CMS causal genes (e.g. DOK7, RPSN, RPH3A, VAMP1, UNC13B) (Supplementary Fig. 8). In addition, variant rs151154986 (AF = 2.18E−02) affects the acyl-CoA thioesterase ACOT2, which generate CoA and free fatty acids from acyl-CoA esters in peroxisomes93. While ACOT2 is not retained across the entire resolution range explored, community detection at the individual layer level (i.e. Louvain community detection for each network) revealed relationships with causal CMS genes at all layers (Supplementary Fig. 3). Namely, ACOT2 shares community membership with ALG14, DPAGT1, GFPT1, GMPPB and SLC25A1A at the protein-protein interaction layer; with CHAT and SLC5A7 at the pathways layer; and with GMPBB, SLC25A1 and CHAT at the metabolomic layer. A role for CoA levels in skeletal muscle for this enzyme class has been previously described94. Moreover, this patient presents high relatedness with three not-severe patients (Patients 8, 9, and 10) who in turn display a very high relatedness among them (Supplementary Dataset 4).

Potential pharmacological implications

Finding a personalized genetic diagnosis might help select the appropriate medication for each patient. For instance, fluoxetine and quinine are used for treating the slow-channel syndrome, an autosomal dominant type of CMS caused by mutations affecting the ligand binding or pore domains of AChR, but this treatment should be avoided in patients with fast-channel CMS95. Within our cohort, 13 (7 mild, 2 moderate and 4 severe) out of 20 individuals from our CMS cohort are receiving a pharmacological treatment consisting of pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis and CMS96. This treatment slows down acetylcholine hydrolysis, elevating acetylcholine levels at the NMJ, which eventually extends the synaptic process duration when the AChR are mutated. Although the severity could potentially be related to how well a patient responds to the treatment with the AchE inhibitors, we could not find a clear correlation between severity and pyridostigmine treatment (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test p adjusted = 0.356; Supplementary Fig. 1). In Addition to the causal mutation in CHRNE, our results indicate that severity is related to AChR clustering at the Agrin-Plectin-LRP4-Laminins axis level, suggesting the potential benefit of pharmaceutical intervention enhancing the downstream process of AChR clustering. For example, beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonists like ephedrine and salbutamol have been documented as capable of enhancing AChR clustering97 and proved to be successful in the treatment for severe AChR deficiency syndromes98,99. Furthermore, the addition of salbutamol in pyridostigmine treatments has been described as being able to ameliorate the secondary effects of pyridostigmine in the postsynaptic structure100.

Discussion

In this work, we have developed a framework for the analysis of disease severity in scenarios heavily impacted by sample size. Presenting limited numbers of cases is one of the main obstacles for the application of precision medicine methods in rare disease research, as it critically affects the level of expected statistical power, a common hallmark in the analysis of minority conditions101. This fact hampers exploring the molecular relationships that define the inherently heterogeneous levels of disease severity observed in rare disease populations, making it an atypically addressed biomedical problem2. Our approach, based on the application of multilayer networks, enable the user to account for the many interdependencies that are not properly captured by a single source of information, effectively combining the available patient genomic information with general biomedical knowledge from relevant databases representing different aspects of molecular biology. The application to a relevant clinical case, where we tested the hypothesis that the severity of CMS may determined by patient-specific alterations that impact NMJ functionality, provided evidence on how the methodology is able to recover the molecular relationships between the candidate patient-specific genomic variants, the observed causal AChR mutation and previously described CMS causal genes (Table 1).

Our in-depth functional analysis focused on a cohort of 20 CMS patients, from a narrow, geographically isolated and ethnically homogenous population, who share the same causative mutation in the AChR ε subunit (CHRNE) but show different levels of severity. The isolation and endogamy that characterize the population from which these patients come from might have favored the accumulation of damaging variants102,103, giving rise to the emergence of compound effects on relevant genes for CMS. This observation has previously been made in similar syndromes104,105 and in a number of other neuromuscular diseases106,107. Compound heterozygosity is known to happen in CMS108,109. The initial analysis of compound heterozygous variants revealed a significant enrichment of functional categories that are specific to the severe cases, namely ECM functions. This suggests the existence of functional relationships between major actors of the NMJ that are affected by severity-associated damaging mutations. Such interactors include already known CMS causal genes (e.g. AGRN, LRP4, PLEC) as well as genes known to interact with them. While severity-specific compound heterozygous variants and CNVs are observed, demographic factors (e.g. sex, age), pharmacological treatment, and personalized omics data (e.g. variant calling, differential gene expression, allele specific expression, splicing isoforms) do not segregate with patient severity.

Therefore, this motivated the development of our multilayer network community analysis to investigate the relationship between known CMS causal genes and severity-associated variants (compound heterozygous variants and CNVs), integrating pathways, metabolic reactions, and protein-protein interactions. Recently, we used a multilayer network as a means to perform dimensionality reduction tasks for patient stratification in medulloblastoma, a childhood brain tumor110. Here, we started by analyzing DisGeNET data in order to verify that disease-associated genes tend to belong to the same multilayer communities. We then identified stable and significantly large gene modules within our CMS cohort’s multilayer communities and mapped the corresponding damaging mutations back to the single patients, providing a personalized mechanistic explanation of severity differences. Given the difficulties of cohort recruitment for rare diseases, this approach could be used to investigate forms of CMS and other phenotypically variable rare diseases caused by a common mutation.

Overall, our approach revealed major relationships at the protein-protein and pathway layers. The personalized analysis of these mutations further suggests that CMS severity can be ascribed to the damage of specific molecular functions of the NMJ which involve genes belonging to distinct classes and localizations, namely ECM components (proteoglycans, tenascins, chromogranins) and postsynaptic modulators of AChR clustering (LRP4, PLEC) (Table 2). Alterations of other genes related to ECM components, such as laminins and collagen, are observed but are not specific to the severity levels.

Although at first the use of metabolomic knowledge in the multilayer network did not seem to provide highly relevant information for the cohort, it provided relevant insights for the personalized analysis of Patient 3, whose mutations presented functional relationships in all layers with other CMS causal genes outside of the presented severe-specific module (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Finding a personalized genetic diagnosis for phenotypic severity might help select the appropriate medication for each patient. Within our cohort, 13 out of 20 individuals from our CMS cohort are receiving a pharmacological treatment consisting of pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis and CMS96. Although the severity could potentially be related to how well a patient responds to the standard treatment with the AchE inhibitors, we could not find a clear correlation between severity and pyridostigmine treatment (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test p adjusted = 0.356; Supplementary Fig. 1). Our results indicate that severity is related to AChR clustering at the Agrin-Plectin-LRP4-Laminins axis level, suggesting the potential benefit of pharmaceutical intervention enhancing the downstream process of AChR clustering. Strikingly, beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonists like ephedrine and salbutamol have been documented as capable of enhancing AChR clustering97 and proved to be successful in the treatment for severe AChR deficiency syndromes98100,111, but a strong molecular explanation for the observed favorable effects was still missing. This study provides possible molecular explanations for the reported successful use of such treatments by relating CMS phenotypic severity with formation of AChR clusters at the motor neuron membrane. Several of the genes identified in this analysis do not have previous associations with the NMJ, such as the Usher syndrome and Retinitis pigmentosa associated gene; USH2a, identified as a copy number loss in patient 2. Previous studies have commented on USH2A presence on the basement membranes of perineurium nerve fibers112,113, however, further studies in a mammalian model and/or using zebrafish mutants rather than transient knockdown will be required to determine the presence of USH2a at the NMJ, and whether loss of USH2a alone can impact NMJ signaling or whether co-occurrence with CHRNE CMS is required. In this regard, we report evidence of USH2A presence at the tibialis anterior muscle (Supplementary Fig. 9A) and the soleus muscle (Supplementary Fig. 9B) (Methods) in 10-week-old C57BL/6J (Jax) male mice. Additional functional work is also required to ascertain the importance of other potential modifiers identified in this study. Particularly, a prospective analysis on the potential NMJ involvement of the unique variants detected for the non-severe group could be of special interest for the study of CMS, potentially discerning their functional relationship to causal CMS genes.

Our work represents a thorough study of a narrow population showing a differential accumulation of damaging mutations in patients with CMS who have varying phenotypic severities, building on the initial impact of CHRNE mutations on the NMJ. It is important to remark that CMS is of particular interest among rare diseases, since drugs that influence neuromuscular transmission can produce clear improvements in the affected patients114. In this sense, identifying meaningful molecular relationships between gene variants allow us to gain insight into the disease mechanisms through a biomedical multilayer network framework, paving the way for a whole new set of computational approximations for rare disease research.

Methods

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics committee of Sofia Medical University (protocol 4/15-April-2013). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants in the study, including more than two indirect identifiers. The study abides by the Declaration of Helsinki; no compensation was given to the participants. All animal experiments were approved by the University of Ottawa animal care and veterinary service department (protocol #3089) and complied with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the Animals for Research Act. Reporting of animal sex, age and strain details comply with the ARRIVE guidelines.

WGS and RNA-seq

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) data have been obtained from blood using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-free library preparation kit. Sample sequencing was performed with the HiSeqX sequencing platform (HiseqX v1 or v2 SBS kit, 2 × 150 cycles), with an average mean depth coverage ≥30X. Samples have been analyzed using the RD-Connect pipeline: BWA-mem for alignment; Picard for duplicate marking and GATK 3.6.0 for variant calling. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data have been obtained from fibroblasts, using Illumina TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit v2, sequencing with an average of 60 M reads per sample (paired-end 2 × 125 cycles). Data has been processed with the following pipeline115: STAR 2.35a for alignment, RSEM 1.3.0 for quantification, and GATK 3.6.0 for variant calling. All analyses have been performed using the human genome GRCh37d5 as reference.

Copy number variations

Copy Number Variations (CNVs) have been extracted using ClinCNV (https://github.com/imgag/ClinCNV) by employing a set of Eastern European samples as a background control group. Out of the 569 autosomal CNVs we selected as potential candidates the CNVs of the following types that overlapped with protein-coding genes: 1) whole gene gains or losses, and 2) partial losses (deletions overlapping with exons but not with the whole gene). The list of potential candidates included 55 CNVs that created a total of 82 whole gene gains or losses and 28 partial losses.

Compound heterozygous variants

Compound heterozygous variants have been obtained by phasing the WGS variant calls with the RNA-seq aligned BAM files using phASER116. At first, variants are imputed using Sanger Imputation Service with EAGLE2 pre-phasing step117. PhASER is then applied to extend phased regions to gene-wide haplotypes. By accurately reflecting the muscle transcriptome, fibroblasts have been previously proved to be excellent and minimally invasive diagnostic tools for rare neuromuscular diseases118. We then annotated variants with eDiVA tool (www.ediva.crg.es)119, and removed all mutations with Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD)120 that show allele frequency >3% globally, all variants outside exonic and splicing regions using Ensembl annotation, all synonymous mutations, and all variants with read depth (coverage) smaller than 8. Afterwards we selected all genes with at least two hits on different alleles as affected by damaging compound heterozygous variants. Each sample has been processed individually throughout the whole process.

Monolayer community detection

We performed a network community detection analysis using the Louvain clustering algorithm121 implemented in R package igraph (https://igraph.org/) with default parameters. We carried out the analysis using three (monolayer) networks, obtained from Reactome database32, from the Recon3D Virtual Metabolic Human database33 (both downloaded in May 2018), and from the Integrated Interaction Database (IID)34 (downloaded in October 2018). Additional information on network connectivity metrics (e.g. node centrality distributions and specific centrality information for severe-specific module genes) is conveniently provided as a Jupyter Notebook, accessible at the following link: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/blob/master/Scripts/Multilayer_Network_Information_and_Connectivity_Patterns.ipynb.

All gene identifiers of each network were converted to NCBI Entrez gene identifiers using R packages AnnotationDbi v1.44.0 and org.Hs.eg.db v3.7.0 (http://bioconductor.org/). After detecting the community structure from each layer independently, we retrieved the community membership of the genes of interest, henceforth called CMS linked genes, i.e. known CMS causal genes, and severe and not-severe compound heterozygous variants and CNVs. We then defined a community similarity measure as Jaccard Index, i.e. the number of shared genes of interest between the communities divided by the sum of the total number of genes of each community.

Multilayer community detection

We constructed a multilayer gene network composed of the three monolayer networks described in the previous section (Reactome, Virtual Metabolic Human and Integrated Interaction Database). Each of these three networks represents one layer of the multilayer network and, in general, three facets of fundamental molecular processes in the cell (Suppl. Figure 10). The multilayer community detection analysis was performed using MolTi software19, which adapts the Louvain clustering algorithm with modularity maximization to multilayer networks. The algorithm is parametrized by the resolution (γ): the higher the value of γ, the smaller the size of the detected multilayer communities. By varying the resolution parameter γ it is possible to uncover the modular structure of network communities122.

By exploring a wide range of resolution parameter values, we identified γ = 4 (727 communities, each one composed of 26.46 genes on average) as an extreme value before both size and number of the detected multilayer communities stabilize (Supplementary Fig. 11). The most dramatic changes in number and composition of detected communities are observed in the resolution parameter interval γ [set membership] (0,4]. We, therefore, used this parameter interval to test the hypothesis that disease-related genes consistently appear in the same multilayer communities, as well as to identify modules containing CMS linked genes within them. In this analysis, we define a module as a group of CMS linked genes that are systematically found to be part of the same multilayer community while increasing the resolution parameter (see Supplementary Information, Multilayer community detection analysis).

Additional analyses

We retrieved known CMS causal genes from the GeneTable of Neuromuscular Disorders (http://www.musclegenetable.fr, version November 2018)123. Segregation analysis of WGS data has been performed using Rbbt124. DisGeNET database37 was downloaded in November 2018. The association between CMS severity, demographic factors and clinical tests was assessed with a two-tailed Fisher’s test using R statistical environment (www.R-project.org). Networks were rendered with Cytoscape125. We used VCFtools126 to compute familial relatedness Ω among patients, scaled to -log2(2Ω). We used Enrichr127 for the functional enrichment analysis of the gene lists under study. We used Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP)78 to assess the impact of the compound heterozygous variants in the genes of the severe-specific largest module. Expression levels in tissues of interest (GTEx and Illumina Body Map) were retrieved from EBI Expression Atlas (www.ebi.ac.uk/) by filtering with the following keywords: ‘nerve’, ‘muscle cell’, ‘fibroblast’ and ‘nervous system’ (0.5 TPM default cutoff). We used Expression Atlas expression level categories: low (0.5 to 10 TPM), medium (11 to 1000 TPM), and high (more than 1000 TPM). Synaptic localization was retrieved from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/).

Western Blot and Immunostaining of USH2A on mouse neuromuscular junctions

For Western Blotting 40 mg of protein was run on a 10% gel and transferred to a membrane using the BioRad Trans Turbo semi-dry transfer machine. The membrane was blocked in milk for 1 h and Usherin (FabGennix, USH2A-112AP, 1:2000) was added (5% BSA in TBST) overnight. Secondary antibodies were diluted 1:1000 in milk.

Labeling of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) was performed on soleus muscle in 10-week-old C57BL/6 J (Jax) male mice. Muscles were washed in ice-cold PBS (2 × 10 min) and then separated out into small bundles under a stereo-microscope. They were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 2% PFA, washed 2 × 1 h with ice-cold PBS, and treated with Analar Ethanol and Methanol both at −20 °C (10 min each). Tissues were then incubated with blocking/permeabilization solution (5% horse serum, 5% BSA, 2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 4 h (room temp (RT)) with gentle agitation.

Muscle bundles were incubated with antibodies, diluted in blocking buffer without triton, against Usherin-FITC (Rb polyclonal, FabGennix USH.101-FITC,1:100) overnight (4 °C) with agitation and then for a further 2 h (RT) the following morning. Muscles were then washed in blocking buffer 4 × 1 h (RT) and incubated with Alexa 594-Conjugated α-Bungarotoxin (ThermoFisherScientific, B13423, 1:250), for 4 h (RT). Samples were washed 4 × 1 h in PBS and then mounted using Vectashield hardset mounting medium. Images were captured using Olympus FV1000c scanning confocal microscope using FV1000 application software (FV10-ASW) software at x63 oil immersion objective.

Animals were housed under 12 h light/dark cycles and had ad libitum access to standard chow (Teklad Global 18% protein Rodent Diet) and water.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review file(5.7M, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the donors and families, Daniel Rico (Newcastle University) for his contribution in early stages of the project, Anaïs Baudot (Aix Marseille Université and Barcelona Supercomputing Center) for her careful revision of the manuscript, Miguel Vázquez (Barcelona Supercomputing Center) for advising about Rbbt analysis, Jon Sánchez-Valle (Barcelona Supercomputing Center) and Núria Olvera (Barcelona Supercomputing Center and IDIBAPS) for the insightful discussions. The authors also acknowledge the corresponding funding institutions: The NeurOmics and RD-Connect projects have been funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreements no 2012-305121 and 2012-305444. I.N.C. was supported by a grant for pre-doctoral contracts for the training of doctors (Project ID: SEV-2015-0493-18-2) (Grant ID: PRE2018-083662) from the Spanish Ministry for Science, Innovation and Universities, and the EU project EVENFLOW under Horizon Europe agreement No. 101070430. E.O. was supported by an AFM-Téléthon postdoctoral fellowship for the duration of this work. H.L. receives support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Foundation Grant FDN-167281), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Muscular Dystrophy Canada (Network Catalyst Grant for NMD4C), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI-JELF 38412), and the Canada Research Chairs program (Canada Research Chair in Neuromuscular Genomics and Health, 950-232279). V.G. was a research fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. D.C. was supported by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Program, H2020-SC1-DTH-2018- 1, iPC - individualizedPaediatricCure (ref. 826121).

Author contributions

T.C., I.T. and V.G. collected and processed the biopsies; H.L. and R.T. coordinated data sharing; A.T., P.A.C.T., S.B. and S.C. coordinated and performed the omics data analysis with Y.A., S.L., M.R. and M.B.; E.O. and S.S. performed the experimental validations; D.C. and A.V. coordinated the multilayer network analysis performed by I.N.C. All authors contributed to the writing and revising of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

WGS metadata and variant data, and patient phenotypic descriptions have been deposited in the RD-Connect GPAP: https://platform.rd-connect.eu/#/. This data is available under controlled access for registered users of the GPAP. Details on access to GPAP can be found in: https://platform.rd-connect.eu/userregistration. Biobank sample accession identifiers are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The raw RNA-Seq dataset analyzed in this study is not publicly available due to sensible content (patient molecular data on a rare disease). Minimal, pre-processed RNA-Seq data for reproducibility is provided within the github repository of the project: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/tree/master/data/fibroblast_expression. Given the sensitive nature of this data, accessibility should be requested to Hanns Lochmüller (Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; Ottawa, Canada) at hlochmuller@toh.ca. A reasonable timeframe for a response could be within two weeks of sending the request. All source data and code files for reproducing all the Figures are provided within the github repository of the project: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS. Information on the source data can be accessed from: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/blob/master/Source_Information_README. We specifically provide the Cytoscape Session file (‘cys’) containing all the plots used to produce Figs. 3 and and4,4, as well as Supplementary Figs. 3, 6, and 8 in this link: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/blob/master/Cytoscape_Session/CMS_Session.cys. Specific input Source Data files for creating the Cytoscape Session used to build Figs. 3, ,4A,4A, B, 6 and 8 can be accessed from the following link as csv files: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/tree/master/Cytoscape_Session. Additionally, the Cytoscape Session provides an extra plot with the incident interactions considered to render Fig. 5. Supplementary Fig. 1 source data is provided as Supplementary Table 1. Input Data for reproducing Supplementary Fig. 2 can be accessed from: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/tree/master/data/InputGenes. Input for plotting Supplementary Figure 11 as well as information on the files is available at: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS/tree/master/data/MolTi/Community_Analysis.

Code availability

All generetad code and the Cytoscape session rendering Figs. 3 and and4,4, as well as Supplementary Figs. 3, 6 and 9 are available for reproducibility purposes at: https://github.com/ikernunezca/CMS. The analysis of multilayer communities can also be performed using CmmD110 (https://github.com/ikernunezca/CmmD) with parameters: resolution_start: 0, resolution_end: 4, interval: 0.5 and the CMS linked genes as nodelist. Code can also be referenced using Zenodo128.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-45099-0.

References

1. Karczewski KJ, Snyder MP. Integrative omics for health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;19:299–310. 10.1038/nrg.2018.4. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Boycott KM, Vanstone MR, Bulman DE, MacKenzie AE. Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: discovery to translation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:681–691. 10.1038/nrg3555. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Buphamalai P, Kokotovic T, Nagy V, Menche J. Network analysis reveals rare disease signatures across multiple levels of biological organization. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6306. 10.1038/s41467-021-26674-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Mitani AA, Haneuse S. Small Data Challenges of Studying Rare Diseases. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e201965. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1965. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Gosak M, et al. Network science of biological systems at different scales: A review. Phys. Life Rev. 2018;24:118–135. 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.003. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Halu A, De Domenico M, Arenas A, Sharma A. The multiplex network of human diseases. Npj Syst. Biol. Appl. 2019;5:1–12. 10.1038/s41540-019-0092-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Finsterer J. Congenital myasthenic syndromes. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019;14:57. 10.1186/s13023-019-1025-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Burden SJ, Yumoto N, Zhang W. The Role of MuSK in Synapse Formation and Neuromuscular Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013;5:a009167. 10.1101/cshperspect.a009167. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Li L, Xiong W-C, Mei L. Neuromuscular Junction Formation, Aging, and Disorders. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2018;80:159–188. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034255. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Lochmüller H, et al. RD-Connect, NeurOmics and EURenOmics: collaborative European initiative for rare diseases. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;26:778–785. 10.1038/s41431-018-0115-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Abicht A, et al. A common mutation (ε1267delG) in congenital myasthenic patients of Gypsy ethnic origin. Neurology. 1999;53:1564–1564. 10.1212/WNL.53.7.1564. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Abicht, A., Müller, J. S. & Lochmüller, H. Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Overview. In GeneReviews® (eds. Adam, M. P. et al.) (University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle WA, 1993).
13. Della Marina A, et al. Long Term Follow-Up on Pediatric Cases With Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes—A Retrospective Single Centre Cohort Study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020;14:560860. 10.3389/fnhum.2020.560860. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Ito M, Ohno K. Protein-anchoring therapy to target extracellular matrix proteins to their physiological destinations. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:628–636. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.014. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Kivelä M, et al. Multilayer networks. J. Complex Netw. 2014;2:203–271. 10.1093/comnet/cnu016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Zitnik M, Leskovec J. Predicting multicellular function through multi-layer tissue networks. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:i190–i198. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx252. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Edler D, Bohlin L, Rosvall M. Mapping Higher-Order Network Flows in Memory and Multilayer Networks with Infomap. Algorithms. 2017;10:112. 10.3390/a10040112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Valdeolivas A, et al. Random walk with restart on multiplex and heterogeneous biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:497–505. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty637. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Didier G, Brun C, Baudot A. Identifying communities from multiplex biological networks. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1525. 10.7717/peerj.1525. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Pio-Lopez L, Valdeolivas A, Tichit L, Remy É, Baudot A. MultiVERSE: a multiplex and multiplex-heterogeneous network embedding approach. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:8794. 10.1038/s41598-021-87987-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Kousi M, Katsanis N. Genetic Modifiers and Oligogenic Inheritance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015;5:a017145. 10.1101/cshperspect.a017145. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Castro-Giner F, Ratcliffe P, Tomlinson I. The mini-driver model of polygenic cancer evolution. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:680–685. 10.1038/nrc3999. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Bevilacqua JA, et al. Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome due to DOK7 mutations in a family from Chile. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2017;27:6832. 10.4081/ejtm.2017.6832. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Richard P, et al. Possible founder effect of rapsyn N88K mutation and identification of novel rapsyn mutations in congenital myasthenic syndromes. J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:e81. 10.1136/jmg.40.6.e81. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Yang K, et al. CHRNE compound heterozygous mutations in congenital myasthenic syndrome: A case report. Medicine. 2018;97:e0347. 10.1097/MD.0000000000010347. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Beeson D. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: recent advances. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2016;29:565. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000370. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Rodríguez Cruz PM, Palace J, Beeson D. The Neuromuscular Junction and Wide Heterogeneity of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1677. 10.3390/ijms19061677. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Bertini E, D’Amico A, Gualandi F, Petrini S. Congenital Muscular Dystrophies: A Brief Review. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2011;18:277–288. 10.1016/j.spen.2011.10.010. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Bönnemann CG, et al. Diagnostic approach to the congenital muscular dystrophies. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2014;24:289–311. 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.12.011. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Nicole S, et al. Agrin mutations lead to a congenital myasthenic syndrome with distal muscle weakness and atrophy. Brain. 2014;137:2429–2443. 10.1093/brain/awu160. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Menche J, et al. Uncovering disease-disease relationships through the incomplete interactome. Science. 2015;347:1257601. 10.1126/science.1257601. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Fabregat A, et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D649–D655. 10.1093/nar/gkx1132. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Brunk E, et al. Recon3D enables a three-dimensional view of gene variation in human metabolism. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:272–281. 10.1038/nbt.4072. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Kotlyar M, Pastrello C, Malik Z, Jurisica I. IID 2018 update: context-specific physical protein–protein interactions in human, model organisms and domesticated species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D581–D589. 10.1093/nar/gky1037. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Cantini L, Medico E, Fortunato S, Caselle M. Detection of gene communities in multi-networks reveals cancer drivers. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17386. 10.1038/srep17386. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Goh K-I, et al. The human disease network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:8685–8690. 10.1073/pnas.0701361104. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Piñero J, et al. DisGeNET: a comprehensive platform integrating information on human disease-associated genes and variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D833–D839. 10.1093/nar/gkw943. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Forrest K, et al. Congenital muscular dystrophy, myasthenic symptoms and epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) associated with mutations in the PLEC1 gene encoding plectin. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2010;20:709–711. 10.1016/j.nmd.2010.06.003. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Barik A, et al. LRP4 Is Critical for Neuromuscular Junction Maintenance. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:13892–13905. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1733-14.2014. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Ohkawara B, et al. LRP4 third β-propeller domain mutations cause novel congenital myasthenia by compromising agrin-mediated MuSK signaling in a position-specific manner. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23:1856–1868. 10.1093/hmg/ddt578. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Dagur PK, McCoy JP. Endothelial-binding, proinflammatory T cells identified by MCAM (CD146) expression: Characterization and role in human autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015;14:415––4422. 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.003. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Di Martino A, et al. Collagen VI in the Musculoskeletal System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:5095. 10.3390/ijms24065095. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Panchenko MV, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Trubetskoy OV, Gacheru SN, Kagan HM. Metalloproteinase activity secreted by fibrogenic cells in the processing of prolysyl oxidase. Potential role of procollagen C-proteinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:7113–7119. 10.1074/jbc.271.12.7113. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycan form and function: A comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015;42:11–55. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.02.003. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Flück M, et al. Mechano-regulated Tenascin-C orchestrates muscle repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2008;105:13662–13667. 10.1073/pnas.0805365105. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. van Dijk, F. S., Ghali, N., Demirdas, S. & Baker, D. TNXB-Related Classical-Like Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. In GeneReviews® (eds. Adam, M. P. et al.) (University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle WA, 1993). [Abstract]
47. Andreose JS, Sala C, Fumagalli G. Immunolocalisation of chromogranin B, secretogranin II, calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P at developing and adult neuromuscular synapses. Neurosci. Lett. 1994;174:177–180. 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90015-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Sorensen JR, Skousen C, Holland A, Williams K, Hyldahl RD. Acute extracellular matrix, inflammatory and MAPK response to lengthening contractions in elderly human skeletal muscle. Exp. Gerontol. 2018;106:28–38. 10.1016/j.exger.2018.02.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Austin-Tse CA, et al. Analysis of intragenic USH2A copy number variation unveils broad spectrum of unique and recurrent variants. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2018;61:621–626. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.04.006. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Kirschner J, et al. Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy: Connective tissue abnormalities in the skin support overlap with Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2005;132A:296–301. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30443. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Matsumoto K-I, Aoki H. The Roles of Tenascins in Cardiovascular, Inflammatory, and Heritable Connective Tissue Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:609752. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609752. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Okuda-Ashitaka E, Matsumoto K-I. Tenascin-X as a causal gene for classical-like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Front. Genet. 2023;14:1107787. 10.3389/fgene.2023.1107787. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Voermans NC, Engelen BG. Differential diagnosis of muscular hypotonia in infants: The kyphoscoliotic type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS VI) Neuromuscul. Disord. 2008;18:906–907. 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.05.016. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Pénisson-Besnier I, et al. Compound heterozygous mutations of the TNXB gene cause primary myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2013;23:664–669. 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.04.009. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Voermans NC, Gerrits K, Engelen BGvan, Haan Ade. Compound heterozygous mutations of the TNXB gene cause primary myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2014;24:88–89. 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.10.007. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Keller KE, Sun YY, Vranka JA, Hayashi L, Acott TS. Inhibition of Hyaluronan Synthesis Reduces Versican and Fibronectin Levels in Trabecular Meshwork Cells. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e48523. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048523. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. McRae N, et al. Glucocorticoids Improve Myogenic Differentiation In Vitro by Suppressing the Synthesis of Versican, a Transitional Matrix Protein Overexpressed in Dystrophic Skeletal Muscles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2629. 10.3390/ijms18122629. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. McRae NL, et al. Genetic reduction of the extracellular matrix protein versican attenuates inflammatory cell infiltration and improves contractile function in dystrophic mdx diaphragm muscles. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:11080. 10.1038/s41598-020-67464-x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. AMIN M, et al. Rare variant in LAMA2 gene causing congenital muscular dystrophy in a Sudanese family. A case report. Acta Myol. 2019;38:21–24. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. Dimova I, Kremensky I. LAMA2 Congenital Muscle Dystrophy: A Novel Pathogenic Mutation in Bulgarian Patient. Case Rep. Genet. 2018;2018:e3028145. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
61. Løkken N, Born AP, Duno M, Vissing J. LAMA2-related myopathy: Frequency among congenital and limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:547–553. 10.1002/mus.24588. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Rogers RS, Nishimune H. The role of laminins in the organization and function of neuromuscular junctions. Matrix Biol. 2017;57–58:86–105. 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.08.008. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Guillon E, Bretaud S, Ruggiero F. Slow Muscle Precursors Lay Down a Collagen XV Matrix Fingerprint to Guide Motor Axon Navigation. J. Neurosci. 2016;36:2663–2676. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2847-15.2016. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Eklund L, et al. Lack of type XV collagen causes a skeletal myopathy and cardiovascular defects in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2001;98:1194–1199. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1194. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Muona A, Eklund L, Väisänen T, Pihlajaniemi T. Developmentally regulated expression of type XV collagen correlates with abnormalities in Col15a1−/− mice. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:89–102. 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00187-1. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Gros-Louis F, et al. Chromogranin B P413L variant as risk factor and modifier of disease onset for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2009;106:21777–21782. 10.1073/pnas.0902174106. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Pampalakis G, et al. New molecular diagnostic trends and biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum. Mutat. 2019;40:361–373. 10.1002/humu.23697. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Huzé C, et al. Identification of an Agrin Mutation that Causes Congenital Myasthenia and Affects Synapse Function. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;85:155–167. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.06.015. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Jacquier A, et al. Severe congenital myasthenic syndromes caused by agrin mutations affecting secretion by motoneurons. Acta Neuropathol. 2022;144:707–731. 10.1007/s00401-022-02475-8. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Kraft-Sheleg O, et al. Localized LoxL3-Dependent Fibronectin Oxidation Regulates Myofiber Stretch and Integrin-Mediated Adhesion. Dev. Cell. 2016;36:550–561. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Zoeller JJ, McQuillan A, Whitelock J, Ho S-Y, Iozzo RV. A central function for perlecan in skeletal muscle and cardiovascular development. J. Cell Biol. 2008;181:381–394. 10.1083/jcb.200708022. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Carmen L, et al. Role of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Glycobiology. 2019;29:110–123. 10.1093/glycob/cwy058. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Larraín J, Alvarez J, Hassell JR, Brandan E. Expression of Perlecan, a Proteoglycan That Binds Myogenic Inhibitory Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor, Is Down Regulated during Skeletal Muscle Differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 1997;234:405–412. 10.1006/excr.1997.3648. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Xu Z, et al. Perlecan deficiency causes muscle hypertrophy, a decrease in myostatin expression, and changes in muscle fiber composition. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:461–470. 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.06.001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Stum M, et al. Spectrum of HSPG2 (Perlecan) mutations in patients with Schwartz-Jampel syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2006;27:1082–1091. 10.1002/humu.20388. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Arikawa-Hirasawa E, et al. Dyssegmental dysplasia, Silverman-Handmaker type, is caused by functional null mutations of the perlecan gene. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:431–434. 10.1038/86941. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Lord MS, et al. The multifaceted roles of perlecan in fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:150–166. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. McLaren W, et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122. 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Karczewski KJ, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–443. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Laskowski M, Kato I. Protein Inhibitors of Proteinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1980;49:593–626. 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.003113. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Porten E, et al. The Process-inducing Activity of Transmembrane Agrin Requires Follistatin-like Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:3114–3125. 10.1074/jbc.M109.039420. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Bork P, Doolittle RF. Proposed acquisition of an animal protein domain by bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:8990–8994. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8990. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Mo M, Hoang HT, Schmidt S, Clark RB, Ehrlich BE. The role of chromogranin B in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013;56:102–114. 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.04.003. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Nilsson A, et al. Striatal Alterations of Secretogranin-1, Somatostatin, Prodynorphin, and Cholecystokinin Peptides in an Experimental Mouse Model of Parkinson Disease * S. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2009;8:1094–1104. 10.1074/mcp.M800454-MCP200. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
85. Chen Y, et al. Changes of Protein Phosphorylation Are Associated with Synaptic Functions during the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019;10:3986–3996. 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00190. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Hull S, et al. Characterization of CDH3-Related Congenital Hypotrichosis With Juvenile Macular Dystrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:992–1000. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2089. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. Johansson MEV, Thomsson KA, Hansson GC. Proteomic Analyses of the Two Mucus Layers of the Colon Barrier Reveal That Their Main Component, the Muc2 Mucin, Is Strongly Bound to the Fcgbp Protein. J. Proteome Res. 2009;8:3549–3557. 10.1021/pr9002504. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Kaneko-Goto T, et al. Goofy Coordinates the Acuity of Olfactory Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:12987–12996. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4948-12.2013. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Ramanagoudr-Bhojappa R, et al. Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of 19 Fanconi anemia pathway genes in zebrafish revealed their roles in growth, sexual development and fertility. PLOS Genet. 2018;14:e1007821. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007821. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. Swuec P, et al. The FA Core Complex Contains a Homo-dimeric Catalytic Module for the Symmetric Mono-ubiquitination of FANCI-FANCD2. Cell Rep. 2017;18:611–623. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.013. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Astigarraga S, Hofmeyer K, Farajian R, Treisman JE. Three Drosophila liprins interact to control synapse formation. J. Neurosci. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2010;30:15358–15368. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1862-10.2010. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Bernadzki KM, et al. Liprin-α−1 is a novel component of the murine neuromuscular junction and is involved in the organization of the postsynaptic machinery. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9116. 10.1038/s41598-017-09590-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Grevengoed TJ, Klett EL, Coleman RA. Acyl-CoA Metabolism and Partitioning. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2014;34:1–30. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105541. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Li LO, et al. Compartmentalized Acyl-CoA Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle Regulates Systemic Glucose Homeostasis. Diabetes. 2015;64:23–35. 10.2337/db13-1070. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
95. Engel AG, Shen X-M, Selcen D, Sine SM. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:420–434. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70201-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Lee M, Beeson D, Palace J. Therapeutic strategies for congenital myasthenic syndromes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018;1412:129–136. 10.1111/nyas.13538. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
97. Clausen L, Cossins J, Beeson D. Beta−2 Adrenergic Receptor Agonists Enhance AChR Clustering in C2C12 Myotubes: Implications for Therapy of Myasthenic Disorders. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2018;5:231–240. 10.3233/JND-170293. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Cruz PMR, et al. Salbutamol and ephedrine in the treatment of severe AChR deficiency syndromes. Neurology. 2015;85:1043–1047. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001952. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Garg D, Goyal V. Positive response to inhaled salbutamol in congenital myasthenic syndrome due to CHRNE mutation. Muscle Nerve. 2022;66:E1–E2. 10.1002/mus.27563. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Vanhaesebrouck AE, et al. β2-Adrenergic receptor agonists ameliorate the adverse effect of long-term pyridostigmine on neuromuscular junction structure. Brain. 2019;142:3713–3727. 10.1093/brain/awz322. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
101. Whicher D, Philbin S, Aronson N. An overview of the impact of rare disease characteristics on research methodology. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018;13:14. 10.1186/s13023-017-0755-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Fareed M, Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2017;44:99–107. 10.1080/03014460.2016.1265148. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Petukhova L, et al. The Effect of Inbreeding on the Distribution of Compound Heterozygotes: A Lesson from Lipase H Mutations in Autosomal Recessive Woolly Hair/Hypotrichosis. Hum. Hered. 2009;68:117–130. 10.1159/000212504. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Müller JS, et al. A newly identified chromosomal microdeletion of the rapsyn gene causes a congenital myasthenic syndrome. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2004;14:744–749. 10.1016/j.nmd.2004.06.010. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Ohno K, Sadeh M, Blatt I, Brengman JM, Engel AG. E-box mutations in the RAPSN promoter region in eight cases with congenital myasthenic syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003;12:739–748. 10.1093/hmg/ddg089. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Wang D-N, et al. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2I: two Chinese families and a review in Asian patients. Int. J. Neurosci. 2018;128:199–207. 10.1080/00207454.2017.1380640. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Zhong J, et al. Novel compound heterozygous PLEC mutations lead to early-onset limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2Q. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;15:2760–2764. 10.3892/mmr.2017.6309. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Hantaï D, Nicole S, Eymard B. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: an update. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013;26:561. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328364dc0f. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
109. Thompson R, et al. Increasing phenotypic annotation improves the diagnostic rate of exome sequencing in a rare neuromuscular disorder. Hum. Mutat. 2019;40:1797–1812. 10.1002/humu.23792. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
110. Núñez-Carpintero I, Petrizzelli M, Zinovyev A, Cirillo D, Valencia A. The multilayer community structure of medulloblastoma. iScience. 2021;24:102365. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102365. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
111. Sadeh M, Shen X-M, Engel AG. Beneficial effect of albuterol in congenital myasthenic syndrome with epsilon-subunit mutations. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:289–291. 10.1002/mus.22153. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
112. Pearsall N, et al. Usherin expression is highly conserved in mouse and human tissues. Hear. Res. 2002;174:55–63. 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00635-4. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
113. Schwaller F, et al. USH2A is a Meissner’s corpuscle protein necessary for normal vibration sensing in mice and humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24:74–81. 10.1038/s41593-020-00751-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
114. Engel AG. The therapy of congenital myasthenic syndromes. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:252–257. 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.01.001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
115. Laurie S, et al. From Wet-Lab to Variations: Concordance and Speed of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing. Hum. Mutat. 2016;37:1263–1271. 10.1002/humu.23114. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
116. Castel SE, Mohammadi P, Chung WK, Shen Y, Lappalainen T. Rare variant phasing and haplotypic expression from RNA sequencing with phASER. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12817. 10.1038/ncomms12817. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
117. Durbin R. Efficient haplotype matching and storage using the positional Burrows–Wheeler transform (PBWT) Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1266–1272. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu014. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
118. Gonorazky HD, et al. Expanding the Boundaries of RNA Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Rare Mendelian Disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019;104:466–483. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.012. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
119. Bosio M, et al. eDiVA—Classification and prioritization of pathogenic variants for clinical diagnostics. Hum. Mutat. 2019;40:865–878. 10.1002/humu.23772. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
120. Lek M, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–291. 10.1038/nature19057. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
121. Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008;2008:P10008. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
122. Fortunato S, Barthélemy M. Resolution limit in community detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2007;104:36–41. 10.1073/pnas.0605965104. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
123. Bonne G, Rivier F, Hamroun D. The 2018 version of the gene table of monogenic neuromuscular disorders (nuclear genome) Neuromuscul. Disord. 2017;27:1152–1183. 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.10.005. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
124. Vázquez, M., Nogales, R., Carmona, P., Pascual, A. & Pavón, J. Rbbt: A Framework for Fast Bioinformatics Development with Ruby. In Advances in Bioinformatics (eds. Rocha, M. P., Riverola, F. F., Shatkay, H. & Corchado, J. M.) 201–208 (Springer, 2010). 10.1007/978-3-642-13214-8_26.
125. Saito R, et al. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:1069–1076. 10.1038/nmeth.2212. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
126. Danecek P, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–2158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
127. Chen EY, et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinforma. 2013;14:128. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-128. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
128. Núñez-Carpintero, I. ikernunezca/CMS: December 11th 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10352689 (2023).

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/160151367
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/160151367

Article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (1)

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) (1)